Bombay High Court
JILANI VALI SAYYEDversusTHE MANAGER M/S B G CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY LTD AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Summary
Jilani Vali Sayyed filed Writ Petition No. 818 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the manager of M/s B G Construction Technology Ltd. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on multiple occasions, including on 23 February 2026 and 4 March 2026. The petition had been pending for admission since 2017 without any prosecution. The Court, noting the petitioner’s non‑appearance, ordered the petition to be placed under the ‘For Dismissal’ caption in the urgent orders category. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition in default for want of prosecution and also disposed of any pending civil applications, if any.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition pending since 2017 should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear before the Court
Subjects
- default dismissal
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- non‑appearance
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9915
1 2 WP 818-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 WRIT PETITION NO. 818 OF 2017
JILANI VALI SAYYED
VERSUS
THE MANAGER M/S B G CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY LTD AND
ANOTHER
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 04.03.2026
PER COURT :
1. None appears for the petitioner.
2. On 23.02.2026, the following order was passed :
“1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. This petition is pending since 2017 for admission. The
matter be placed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ in the
urgent orders category on 04.03.2026.”
3. Today also, none appears for the petitioner.
4. In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands dismissed in default for
want of prosecution.
5. Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…