Bombay High Court
SOU. VIJAYA NAVNATH PANSAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a no‑confidence motion passed in 2013. The petition was filed after a considerable delay. The Court observed that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the petition could not be entertained on its merits. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition filed after a long delay is maintainable or becomes infructuous
Subjects
- no confidence motion
- writ petition
- infructuous
- delay
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
46-WP-8185-13.doc
Sayali
SAYALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
DEEPAK
UPASANI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
SAYALI DEEPAK
UPASANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8185 OF 2013
Date: 2026.02.12
19:10:00 +0530
Sou. Vijaya Navnath Pansare … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents
Mr. Shubham M. Paggudi i/b Mr. Sandeep S.
Salunkhe, for Petitioner.
Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP for State.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2026
P.C.:
1. The petition arises out of no confidence motion for the year
2013. Due to passage of time, the petition is rendered
infructuous. The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…