Bombay High Court
SHRIPAD APPSAHEB BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Shripad Appsaheb Bhosale filed a writ petition (No. 828 of 2015) against the State of Maharashtra. An earlier petition dated 4 December 2023 had been dismissed for non‑prosecution and later restored by the court. On the present date, the petitioner failed to appear before the bench and indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The Court observed the petitioner's non‑appearance and reiterated that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and lack of interest
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissed
- court procedure
- absence of petitioner
Judgment
Jyoti 217-WP-828-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 828 OF 2015
Shripad Appsaheb Bhosale .. Petitioner
v/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI &
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2024.
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner.
JYOTI 2) Record indicates that, on earlier occasion i.e. on 4th December
RAJESH
MANE 2023, Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and was restored by an
Digitally signed
by JYOTI
RAJESH MANE
Date:
Order dated 28th February 2024, passed in Interim Application
2024.04.25
10:13:07 +0530
No.4780/2023 .
2.1) Today also none appears for Petitioner, when called out for
hearing.
2.2) It appears that, Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…