Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DNYANDEO RAMBHAU MOKATE AND OTHERSversusVIJAY CHANDRABHAN MOKATE

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the writ petitions are infructuous due to the parties' settlement and therefore disposed of them.

Summary

The petitioners, Dnyandeo Ramabhau Mokate and others, filed writ petitions (Nos. 8368 and 8369 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Vijay Chandrabhanu Mokate. The petitioners sought relief, but during the proceedings the parties reached an amicable settlement. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court of this settlement. The court observed that, in view of the settlement, there was no longer any matter for adjudication. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petitions as infructuous and ordered that any pending civil applications, if any, also stand disposed.

Subjects

  • settlement
  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • civil procedure
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:8855
                                                1                          39 WP 8368-2017 & 40.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 39 WRIT PETITION NO. 8368 OF 2017

                              DNYANDEO RAMBHAU MOKATE AND OTHERS
                                             VERSUS
                                   VIJAY CHANDRABHAN MOKATE

                                                AND
                                 40 WRIT PETITION NO. 8369 OF 2017

                                    DNYANDEO RAMBHAU MOKATE
                                              VERSUS
                                    VIJAY CHANDRABHAN MOKATE

                                                …
             Ms. Sakshi S. Dushing h/f. Mr. Rahul R. Karpe – Advocate for Petitioner
                                                …

                                      CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE          : 27.02.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has

             been amicably settled between the parties.


             2.       In view the settlement, nothing survives for consideration in the

             present petitions and the same stand disposed of as infructuous.


             3.       Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.




                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE
             Pooja Kale/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.