Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHAITANYA MAROTIRAO SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed the Education Officer to decide the appointment proposal within eight weeks from the date of the order.

Summary

The petitioner, Chaitanya Marotirao Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded, to decide a proposal dated 27‑04‑2021 for his appointment as Assistant Teacher on a no‑grant basis effective 26‑04‑2021 and to grant permanent approval from 26‑04‑2023. The respondents’ Additional Government Pleader waived service of notice and, on instruction from respondent No.3, undertook that the proposal would be decided within eight weeks from the date of the hearing. The Court treated this undertaking as a binding commitment. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition by directing the Education Officer to decide the proposal within eight weeks of the order. The direction aims to compel timely administrative action on the appointment.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue a mandatory direction to an education officer to decide an appointment proposal within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • appointment
  • assistant teacher
  • no‑grant basis
  • permanent approval
  • writ petition
  • direction
  • administrative delay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:3637-DB

                                                                            944-WP-843-26.odt
                                                 {1}

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                 944 WRIT PETITION NO. 843 OF 2026
                                      Chaitanya Marotirao Shinde
                                               VERSUS
                       The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
                                               ......
            Mr. V.S. Panpatte, Advocate for Petitioner
            Mr. R.S. Wani, AGP for Respondents No.1 to 3
                                               ......

                                              CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
                                                      HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                               DATE    : 28 JANUARY, 2026

            PER COURT :-

            1.          Present petition has been filed for direction to respondent No.3-
            Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded to decide the
            proposal dated 27.04.2021 for grant of approval to the appointment of
            the petitioner as Assistant Teacher on no grant basis w.e.f. 26.04.2021
            and to grant permanent approval from 26.04.2023 in regular pay scale.

            2.          Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents No.1 to 3
            and upon instructions from respondent No.3, makes a statement that
            the said proposal would be decided within a period of eight (8) weeks
            from today. The said statement is taken as undertaking.

            3.          We dispose of the writ petition by directing respondent No.3 to
            decide the said proposal dated 27.04.2021 within a period of eight (8)
            weeks from today.



            [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                       [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
                          JUDGE                                      JUDGE
            S P Rane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.