Bombay High Court
ARVIND UDDHAV DESHPANDEversusSHIRISH GOVINDRAO DESHPANDE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had been decided.
Summary
Arvind Uddhav Deshpande filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15 July 2013 passed by the 4th Civil Judge, Junior Division, Osmanabad in Regular Civil Suit No. 583/2012. While the writ petition was pending, the underlying civil suit was finally decided by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad on 19 July 2021. The High Court observed that the decision of the civil suit rendered the relief sought in the writ petition moot. Consequently, the court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate in the petition. The petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the substantive civil suit it challenges has been finally decided?
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil suit
- infructuous
- jurisdiction
- dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24891
8439.2014WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 WRIT PETITION NO. 8439 OF 2014
ARVIND UDDHAV DESHPANDE
VERSUS
SHIRISH GOVINDRAO DESHPANDE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ashtekar R.K.
Advocate for Respondent nos.1, 4 and 5 : Mr. V.V. Ingale
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.06.2026
P.C. :
1] By way of this petition, the petitioner has
challenged the order below Exhibit-5 dated 15.07.2013
passed by 4th Civil Judge, Junior Division, Osmanabad in
Regular Civil Suit No.583/2012.
2] During the pendency of this petition, Regular Civil
Suit No.583/2012 is decided by the learned 3 rd Joint Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad by judgment and decree
dated 19.07.2021.
3] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…