Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRIRANG BHIKU BABAR DECD. THR. LHRS MRS. YAMUNA SHRIRANG BABAR AND ORSversusKASHINATH BHIKU BABAR DECD.THR. LHRS DATTATRAY KASHINATH BABAR AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Registry is directed to verify the receipt of the papers and proceedings and to call for them if they have not been received.

Summary

The petitioners filed an urgent praecipe stating that the necessary papers and proceedings from the Principal Seat at Bombay had not been received, preventing them from filing an application to bring in the legal heirs of a respondent. The Court examined the request and directed the Registry to verify the status of the documents and to call for them if they had not been received. No substantive legal issues were debated beyond the procedural request. The Court ordered the Registry to take the specified action and disposed of the praecipe. The order was signed by Justice M. M. Sathaye on 9 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Registry should be directed to verify and call for the missing papers and proceedings from the Principal Seat at Bombay.

Subjects

  • procedural law
  • writ petition
  • praecipe
  • registry direction
  • urgent application

Judgment

                                                                                     Pr-1-Bombay-WP-8495-2023.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 8495 OF 2023

                      Shrirang Bhiku Babar & Ors.                                    … Petitioners
                                                    Versus
                      Kashinath Bhiku Babar And Ors.                           … Respondents
                                                   ***
                      Mr. Ramchandra J. Kapre i/by Adv. Tejas Kapre for the Petitioners.
                      None for the Respondents.
                                                   ***
                                                                  CORAM       :   M. M. SATHAYE, J.
                                                                  DATE        :   9th March, 2026.

                      P. C. :

                      1.        Urgent praecipe is moved by learned Counsel for the Petitioners,
                      stating that the papers and proceedings are not yet received from Principal
                      Seat at Bombay and therefore the Petitioner is unable to file Application for
                      bringing legal heirs of one of the Respondents.
                      2.        Registry is directed to verify and call papers and proceedings, if not
                      received.
                      3.        Praecipe is disposed of in the above terms.


                                                                              [ M. M. SATHAYE, J. ]




TALLE
SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Digitally signed by
TALLE SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Date: 2026.03.09
17:01:08 +0530
                      Shubham                                 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.