Bombay High Court
NITIN @ SAMBHAJI SAGAJI HAGAWANEversusSOU. SUVARNA RAJENDRA KARANJAWANE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The petition is infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
Summary
The petitioner, Nitin @ Sambhaji Sagaji Hagawane, filed a writ petition challenging a dispute concerning the Gram Panchayat for the year 2013. The dispute pertained to actions taken during the tenure of that Gram Panchayat. The court observed that the tenure of the Gram Panchayat had already expired. Consequently, the petition could not be entertained as the subject matter was no longer live. The court therefore held the petition to be infructuous and dismissed it. No substantive merits of the dispute were examined. The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition challenging a dispute relating to a Gram Panchayat can be entertained after the tenure of the Gram Panchayat has ended
Subjects
- Gram Panchayat
- writ petition
- infructuous
- Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
48-WP-8536-13.doc
Sayali
SAYALI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
DEEPAK
UPASANI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
SAYALI DEEPAK
UPASANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8536 OF 2013
Date: 2026.02.12
19:09:59 +0530
Nitin @ Sambhaji Sagaji Hagawane … Petitioner
V/s.
Sou. Suvarna Rajendra Karanjawane
and Others … Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for State- Respondent No. 12.
Mr. Shubham M. Payyade i/b Mr. Sandeep S.
Salunkhe, for Respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2026
P.C.:
1. The Petition arises out of dispute in relation to Gram
Panchayat in the year 2013. The period of Gram Panchayat is
over. Hence, the petition is rendered infructuous. The writ
petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…