Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JAYSHREE MAROTI HAKEversusSHANTABAI DNYANOBA HAKE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed.

Summary

Jayshree Maroti Hake filed a writ petition (No. 8567 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shantabai Dnyanoba Hake and others. The petition remained pending for an extended period, spanning over a decade. Respondent No.1, through counsel Mr. Shailendra S. Gangakhedkar, argued that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in continuing the proceedings given the delay. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, effectively terminating the suit.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • delay
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:25701



                                                                 905 WP8567.2015
                                              -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             905 WRIT PETITION NO. 8567 OF 2015

                                JAYSHREE MAROTI HAKE
                                        VERSUS
                       SHANTABAI DNYANOBA HAKE AND OTHERS
                                             ...
              Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Shailendra S Gangakhedkar
                                             ...

                                          CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 02.07.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Mr. Shailendra S. Gangakhedkar, learned counsel for

              Respondent No.1 submits that by passage of time Petition is

              rendered infructuous.


              2.           Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as

              infructuous.




                                                    (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.