Bombay High Court
SHIVRAJ VISHWANATH KARADKHELE AND ANOTHERversusRAVINDRA RAJARAM BELAMBE AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order, but counsel submitted that the underlying regular civil suit (No. 288/2013) had already been decided by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur on 10 April 2018. The court considered whether the writ petition remained maintainable in light of the decided suit. Finding that the substantive dispute had been finally resolved, the court held that the writ petition had become infructuous. Consequently, there was nothing left to adjudicate in the petition. The court therefore disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the regular civil suit concerning the same matter has been decided
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit
- jurisdiction
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24888
8702.2014WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 WRIT PETITION NO. 8702 OF 2014
SHIVRAJ VISHWANATH KARADKHELE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
RAVINDRA RAJARAM BELAMBE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. V.M. Kagne
Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Mr. S.B. Kendre h/f Mr. R.P.
Adgaonkar
Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. Hanmant V. Patil
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.06.2026
P.C. :
1] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petition has become infructuous as Regular Civil Suit
No.288/2013 itself is decided by 2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Latur by judgment and order dated 10.04.2018.
2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…