Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVRAJ VISHWANATH KARADKHELE AND ANOTHERversusRAVINDRA RAJARAM BELAMBE AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is infructuous and is disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order, but counsel submitted that the underlying regular civil suit (No. 288/2013) had already been decided by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur on 10 April 2018. The court considered whether the writ petition remained maintainable in light of the decided suit. Finding that the substantive dispute had been finally resolved, the court held that the writ petition had become infructuous. Consequently, there was nothing left to adjudicate in the petition. The court therefore disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the regular civil suit concerning the same matter has been decided

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • civil suit
  • jurisdiction
  • petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24888

                                                                            8702.2014WP

                                                    1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               921 WRIT PETITION NO. 8702 OF 2014
                       SHIVRAJ VISHWANATH KARADKHELE AND ANOTHER
                                                VERSUS
                          RAVINDRA RAJARAM BELAMBE AND ANOTHER
                                                     ...
                              Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. V.M. Kagne
                        Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Mr. S.B. Kendre h/f Mr. R.P.
                                               Adgaonkar
                           Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. Hanmant V. Patil
                                               ...
                                         CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.

                                         DATE      :    25.06.2026

                 P.C. :


                 1]            Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
                 the petition has become infructuous as Regular Civil Suit
                 No.288/2013 itself is decided by 2 nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior
                 Division, Latur by judgment and order dated 10.04.2018.
                 2]            In view of the same, nothing survives in the
                 petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.




                                                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
                                                          JUDGE

                 SGA


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.