Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PAWAN KHANDU PATAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. CO OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was held to be infructuous and was therefore dismissed.

Summary

Petitioner Pawan Khandu Patare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and proceeded to dispose of the petition on the ground of infructuity. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without any order on the reliefs sought.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition becomes infructuous during its pendency?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                           sns                                                 54-wp-872-2024.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.872 OF 2024

                      Pawan Khandu Patare                                 … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                     … Respondents



                      Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. G.P. a/w. Adv. M.S. Bane, AGP, for the Respondent-
                      State.


                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :    24th March 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              Mr. Ghadigaonkar, learned Advocate for the Petitioner on

                      instructions submitted that, as of today the Petition has become infructuous.

                      2)              Disposed off as infructuous.



                                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




         Digitally
         signed by
                                                                                                    1/1
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.03.26
         15:19:35
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.