Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHANKARRAO SAMBHAJIRAO KHARATE AND OTHERSversusTHE PARBHANI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the dispute no longer existed.

Summary

Shankarrao Sambhajirao Kharate and several other petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 8766 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of The Parbhani District Central Co‑Operative Bank Ltd. The petition sought relief against the bank, but no specific relief or grounds are detailed in the judgment. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Salunke V. D., later informed the Court that the matter had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found that there was no longer any live controversy requiring adjudication. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive legal questions. The order was pronounced by Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre on 18 March 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • bank

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:11966
              Dilwale                                        1                     33-WP-8766-16.odt




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   33 WRIT PETITION NO. 8766 OF 2016

                           Shankarrao Sambhajirao Kharate And Others
                                               VERSUS
                 The Parbhani District Central Co Operative Bank Ltd Through Its
                                         Authorized Person
                                                  ...
             Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Salunke V. D.
                                                  ...


                                        CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                        DATE          : 18.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.         Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the petition has

             become infructuous.

             2.         In view thereof, petition is disposed of as infructuous.




                                                           [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                     JUDGE


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.