Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAKRI TALUKA EDUCATION SOCIETY SAKRI THROUGH SECRETARY G R BHOSALEversusSAYJABAI RAMCHANDRA BHIL AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as moot because the underlying civil suit remains pending.

Summary

The Sakri Taluka Education Society, through its secretary, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23 February 2017 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sakri in Regular Civil Suit No.44 of 2016. The petitioner sought relief against that order, alleging it was erroneous. The Court observed that the civil suit is still pending and is slated for arguments, and therefore there is no operative relief to be granted by the writ petition. Consequently, the Court held that nothing survives in the petition and it was disposed of. The trial court was directed to decide the civil suit on its merits without being influenced by the dismissal of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an order of a civil court can be entertained when the substantive suit is still pending for arguments

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • civil suit
  • jurisdiction
  • mootness
  • disposal
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:4601
             Dilwale                                       1              61-WP-8782 OF 2017.odt




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  61 WRIT PETITION NO. 8782 OF 2017

                Sakri Taluka Education Society Sakri Through Secretary G R Bhosale
                                               VERSUS
                               Sayjabai Ramchandra Bhil And Others
                                                  ...
             Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Swanand Lathkar h/f Mr. Shah Subodh P.
             Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Ms. Sneha P. Patil h/f Mr. Pravin S.
             Patil
                                                  ...
                                   CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE          : 02.02.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.        Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

             2.        By the present proceedings, the petitioner challenges the order

             dated 23.02.2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division,

             Sakri below Exhibit-36 in Regular Civil Suit No.44 of 2016.

             3.        The learned counsel for both sides submit that the suit is now kept

             for arguments.

             4.        In view of the above, nothing survives in the writ petition and the

             same stands disposed of.

             5.        The Trial Court shall decide the suit on its own merits, in

             accordance with law, without being influenced by the order of disposal of

             the present petition.

                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.