Bombay High Court
TRAMBAK RAGHO PATIL LRS PANDIT AND OTHERSversusDAULAT RAGHO PATIL LRS PARVATABAI AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 8802 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners, Mr. M. M. Bhokarikar, applied for liberty to withdraw the petition in order to pursue an alternative remedy. The Court considered whether a petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request and whether any procedural consequences, such as condonation of delay, should be taken into account. The Court granted the liberty to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, and directed that the time spent on the petition be considered for any future condonation of delay applications. It further noted that all contentions of the parties remain open for consideration in any subsequent proceedings, and the petition was consequently disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner and what procedural implications arise from such withdrawal
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34991
45 WP No.8802.2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8802 OF 2015
TRAMBAK RAGHO PATIL LRS PANDIT AND OTHERS
VERSUS
DAULAT RAGHO PATIL LRS PARVATABAI AND OTHERS
***
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. M. M. Bhokarikar
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. L. V. Sangeet
***
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 11th August, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. Bhokarikar, the learned counsel for the petitioners,
seeks liberty to withdraw this petition to avail the appropriate
remedy available under the law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
3. The concerned authority may take into account the
time spent in prosecuting the present petition while considering
application for condonation of delay.
4. Needless to state that all the contentions of litigating
sides are kept open.
45 WP No.8802.2015
-2-
5. With the aforesaid liberty and directions, the writ
petition is disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…