Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

D. S. KULKARNI DEVELOPERS LIMITED THROUGH MANOJ KUMAR AGARWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd filed a writ petition (No. 893 of 2020) in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that after 28 February 2020, neither the petitioner nor its counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The record showed a clear lack of interest by the petitioner in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges observed that the petitioner was not prosecuting the petition. The court therefore dismissed the writ petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to take any steps after 28 February 2020

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • Bombay High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                  DTG                                                              111-Wp-893-2020.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 893 OF 2020

                  D. S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd.                                 … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                  The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                … Respondents
                                         _______________________________________

                  None for Petitioner.

                  Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                    _______________________________________

                                                  CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE  : 31st July 2026

                  P.C. :

                  1)                  None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                  2)                  Record indicates that, after 28th February 2020, neither the

                  Petitioner nor its Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

                  once.

                  2.1)                It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                  Petition.

                  3)                  Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
            TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR                                                                                      1/1
            Date: 2026.08.06
            18:37:23 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.