Bombay High Court

BALAJI PANDURANG BAMNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: KISHORE C SANT AJIT B KADETHANKAR

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

Balaji Pandurang Bamne filed Writ Petition No. 8933 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Pankaj S. Kokane and Mr. S. T. Veer. The State was represented by Mrs. D. S. Jape (AGP) and other respondents by Mr. Nitin S. Kadam. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that there were no remaining matters to be decided in the petition. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was infructuous and disposed of it accordingly.

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
disposal
High Court
Aurangabad

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23227-DB



                                                    (1)                     926 WP 8933 OF 2015


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                926 WRIT PETITION NO. 8933 OF 2015

                                    BALAJI PANDURANG BAMNE
                                               VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                   ...
           Mr. Pankaj S. Kokane h/f. Mr. S. T. Veer, Advocate for the Petitioner
           Mrs. D. S. Jape, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State
           Mr. Nitin S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4
                                                  …

                                             CORAM        : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                            AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
                                             DATE         : 12.06.2026

           PER COURT :-

           .              Learned advocate for the petitioner informs that by now, nothing
           remains to be decided in the petition.

           2.             Considering the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as
           infructuous.




           ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )                         ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
           PRW

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…