Bombay High Court
CHANDRAKALA RAMCHANDRA SHELKEversusTHE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Sau. Chandrakala, filed Writ Petition No. 8959 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Divisional Commissioner and others. The petition remained pending for over thirteen years before the matter was heard on 6 August 2026. The learned Additional Government Pleader, on behalf of the State, submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court agreed, holding that a writ petition cannot be entertained after such a prolonged delay. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as infructuous, with no relief granted to the petitioner.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition pending for an extended period can be entertained or is rendered infructuous by limitation.
Subjects
- limitation
- writ petition
- delay
- jurisdiction
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34715
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.8959 OF 2013
Sau. Chandrakala w/o Ramchandra Shelke … PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Divisional Commissioner,
Aurangabad & ors .… RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. B.V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for State
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 6th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
Learned A.G.P., on instructions, submits that, by
passage of time, the petition is rendered infructuous. As such, the
petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…