Bombay High Court
GAJRAJ SINGH VISHNU SINGHversusSHRI. G. P. DEVKAR AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Because the petitioners were acquitted in the criminal case, the writ petitions seeking to restrain the departmental enquiry were held infructuous and were disposed.
Summary
The petitioners filed writ petitions in 2013 seeking a court order to restrain the Railway Protection Force from conducting departmental enquiries against them while a criminal trial under Section 3(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act was pending. The criminal case (Court Case No. 50 of 2012) was tried before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court, Bhusawal, which ultimately acquitted the petitioners. The respondents submitted the acquittal order, arguing that the writ relief was no longer necessary. The High Court observed that, in view of the acquittal, the petitions became infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petitions and any related interim applications.
Issues considered
- The writ petition can restrain a departmental enquiry while a criminal trial is pending
- The effect of an acquittal in the criminal proceeding on the continuance of a writ petition seeking to stay the departmental enquiry
Legislation cited
- Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act — s. 3(a)
Subjects
- writ petition
- departmental enquiry
- acquittal
- Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act
- infructuous
- disposal
Judgment
48-WP-9206-2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9206 OF 2013
Ratiram Dhaniram Kushwaha …..Petitioner
Vs.
Shri. G. P. Devkar And Ors …..Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2237 OF 2022
Assistant Security Commissioner,
Railway Protection Force, Central Railway,
Solapur …..Applicant
Vs.
R. R. Kushwaha s/o
Shri. Dhaniram kushwaha and Anr …..Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.9160 OF 2013
Gajraj Singh Vishnu Singh …..Petitioner
Vs.
Shri. G. P. Devkar And Ors …..Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2236 OF 2022
Assistant Security Commissioner,
Railway Protection Force, Central Railway,
Solapur …..Applicant
Vs.
Gajraj Singh Vishnu Singh & Anr …..Respondents
Mr. Vijay Killedar, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Ratiram D.Kushwaha, Petitioner present in person.
CORAM: MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,
RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
DATED: 8th APRIL 2026
P.C.:-
1. The Petitions are of the year 2013. Petitioner No.1 in Writ
Suresh 1/2
48-WP-9206-2013.doc
Petition No. 9206 of 2013 is present.
2. The prayers made in these Petitions are to restrain the
Respondents from proceeding with the departmental enquiry till the
final hearing and disposal of the criminal case pending trial before
the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court, Bhusawal, bearing
Court Case No. 50 of 2012 under Section 3(a) of the Railway
Property (Unlawful Possession) Act.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents has placed
on record the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class
acquitting both the Petitioners in both matters.
4. In view of the acquittal of the Petitioners, the Petitions have
become infructuous. Hence, the Petitions stand disposed of.
5. Interim Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
Suresh 2/2
Checking your session…