Bombay High Court
SILVERSTONE LOGISTICS REP BY ITS PARTNERS AND 2 ORSversusGOA METALLICS THR ITS PROPRIETOR AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed of
Holding
The High Court disposed the petition by directing the District Judge to decide the preliminary objections within four weeks.
Summary
The petitioners Silverstone Logistics and partners filed a writ petition challenging a July 14, 2026 order of the District Judge‑1, North Goa, which stayed proceedings in Commercial Matter No.64/2026/B before the Commercial Court at Merces. They alleged that the order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing. The petitioners also contended that the appeal itself was not maintainable under Section 37(3) read with Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The High Court directed the District Judge to consider and decide the petitioners’ application raising these preliminary objections within four weeks from the date of the order. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the order staying the commercial proceedings was passed without notice and hearing
- Whether the appeal is maintainable under Section 37(3) and Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Legislation cited
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 37(3), 5
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Maintainability of Appeal
- Stay Order
- Due Process
- Notice
- Hearing
- Commercial Court
- Preliminary Objections
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:1642
6 WP 922 2026
Jose
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.922 OF 2026
SILVERSTONE LOGISTICS REP BY ITS
PARTNERS AND 2 ORS ... PETITIONERS
Versus
GOA METALLICS THR ITS PROPRIETOR
AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS
Mr Vledson Braganza with Mr Vilas Pavithran, Advocates for
the Petitioners.
CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED :- 18th August, 2026
P.C.:
1. The present petition raises challenge to order dated 14th July,
2026 passed in Commercial Appeal No. 3/2026 pending before the
District Judge-1, North Goa at Merces, whereby learned District
Judge stayed the proceedings in CMA No.64/2026/B that is
pending before Commercial Court at Merces.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that
impugned order is passed without notice or opportunity of hearing
to the Petitioner. The Petitioner has already filed an application
objecting to maintainability of the proceeding in appeal before the
District Judge. He has specifically raised objection that in view of
Page 1 of 2
18th August, 2026
6 WP 922 2026
Section 37(3) read with Section 5 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996, the appeal itself is not maintainable.
3. In light of aforesaid factual background, the present petition
can be disposed of by issuing directions to learned District Judge to
consider and decide the Petitioner's application raising preliminary
objections expeditiously and in any case within a period of four
weeks from today.
4. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
Signed by: JOSE FRANCISCO
DSOUZA
Page 2 of 2
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 18/08/2026 14:11:46 18th August, 2026
Checking your session…