Bombay High Court
MADAN VYANKATESH DAMALEversusSANGEETA PANDURANG SARPATIL
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and is therefore disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Madan Vyankatesh Damale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a signed instruction indicating that the execution proceeding related to the dispute had already been disposed of. Consequently, the petitioner argued that the writ petition had become infructuous. The Court examined whether a writ petition could continue when the underlying execution proceeding was concluded. Finding that there was no remaining issue to be adjudicated, the Court held the petition to be infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the underlying execution proceeding has been disposed of?
Subjects
- writ petition
- execution proceeding
- infructuous
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
9-wp-94-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
varsha
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2017
Madan Vyankatesh Damale … Petitioner
vs.
Sangeeta Pandurang Sarpatil … Respondent
Ms. Kanchan Phatak i/b. Mr. Nitin Deshpande for the Petitioner
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 12th JUNE 2026
ORDER:
Digitally
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits
signed by
VARSHA
VARSHA VIJAY
VIJAY RAJGURU
RAJGURU Date:
2026.06.15
12:07:36
that the execution proceeding has been disposed of rendering this
+0530
petition infructuous.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 1 of 1
Checking your session…