Bombay High Court
SUNITA VILAS GAONKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition is not maintainable and is therefore dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Sunita Vilas Gaonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 22 August 2018. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The Supreme Court decision clarified the criteria for maintainability of such writ petitions. Applying that precedent, the Court held that the present petition was not maintainable. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the matter was disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the lodging of a criminal case?
Subjects
- Article 226
- writ petition
- maintainability
- criminal law
- Supreme Court precedent
Judgment
DTG 134-Wp.948.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 948 OF 2019
Sunita Vilas Gaonkar … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
_______________________________________
Ms. Sonali R. Chavan i/b Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar for Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
. In view of recent Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.,
reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798 , present Petition under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India for lodgment of crime, on the basis of complaint
dated 22nd August 2018, filed by the Petitioner is not maintainable and is
accordingly disposed off.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…