Bombay High Court
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH LTD. AND ANOTHERversusNANASAHEB SAHEBRAO GHOGARE AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The writ petitions were dismissed as moot because no relief remained to be granted.
Summary
The Chairman of Ambad Tq. Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. and another filed three writ petitions (Nos. 9523, 9746, 9747 of 2013) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of various respondents. The petitions were filed under the court's writ jurisdiction seeking appropriate relief. During the pendency of the matters, a subsequent development occurred that rendered the relief sought by the petitioners no longer necessary or available. The petitioners, through counsel, acknowledged that nothing survived in the petitions in view of this development. Consequently, Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh disposed of all three writ petitions as moot.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of writ petitions when a subsequent development makes the relief sought moot?
Subjects
- writ petition
- mootness
- High Court
- disposal
- cooperative society
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34195
58,59&60
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
58 WRIT PETITION NO. 9523 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
NANASAHEB SAHEBRAO GHOGARE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. D. Patil
…
AND
…
59 WRIT PETITION NO. 9746 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
GAJANAN LASHINATH KASEKAR AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Ms. Chaitali Chaudhari Kutti
…
AND
…
60 WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
GAJIYODDIN HANIFODDIN SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. V. M. Jaware
...
58,59&60
-2-
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 06.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. D. A. Karnik, learned counsel for the Petitioners
submits that in view of the subsequent development nothing
survives in the Petitions.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…