Bombay High Court
RAM RAJARAM YADHAV DIED LRS BHAIROBA RAM YADAV AND OTHERSversusSHAHAJI KONDIBA YADAV
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Since the regular civil appeals 358 and 359 of 2012 have been disposed, the writ petitions stand infructuous.
Summary
Petitioner Sopan Rajaram Yadav, through his GPA, filed writ petitions against Shahaji Kondiba Yadav. Both parties' counsel informed the court that the regular civil appeals (Nos. 358 and 359 of 2012) related to the dispute had already been disposed of. The court held that, with the disposal of those appeals, no substantive issue remained for the writ petitions. Consequently, the petitions were declared infructuous. Any pending civil applications, if existent, were also ordered disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether any relief can be granted in the writ petitions when the underlying civil appeals have been fully disposed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil appeal disposal
- jurisdiction
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9950
1 29 WP 9523-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
29 WRIT PETITION NO. 9523 OF 2017
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9524 OF 2017
SOPAN RAJARAM YADAV THROUGH HIS GPA VISHNU SOPAN YADAV
VERSUS
SHAHAJI KONDIBA YADAV
…
Mr. M.P. Tripathi and Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil – Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. M.P. Kale – Advocate for Respondent
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 09.03.2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned Counsel appearing for both sides submit that, during the
pendency of the present petitions, Regular Civil Appeal Nos. 358 and 359
of 2012 have already been disposed of and, therefore, nothing survives
for consideration in the present petitions.
2. In view thereof, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous.
3. Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…