Bombay High Court
SMT. APARNA PURUSHOTTAM PATILversusGODAWARI EDUCATION SOCIETY, THROUGH CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petitions were dismissed for want of prosecution, and the related civil applications were also dismissed.
Summary
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions and civil applications before the Bombay High Court but failed to prosecute them, apparently due to the passage of time and loss of interest. The Court observed that the petitioners had not taken any steps to move the proceedings forward. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petitions for want of prosecution. As a result, the associated civil applications were also dismissed as nothing survived them. No substantive merits of the petitions were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when a petitioner fails to prosecute a writ petition and associated civil applications?
Subjects
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
223 WP 3590-12.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9530 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 884 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9530 OF 2012
Anil Gopinath Dhavale ...Petitioner
Versus
Godawari Education Society & Ors. ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9531 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 885 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9531 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9532 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 886 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9532 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9533 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9533 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9534 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 888 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9534 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9535 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 889 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9535 OF 2012
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 9536 OF 2012
WITH
Page 1 of 2
Laxmi
223 WP 3590-12.DOC
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 890 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9536 OF 2012
_______
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. A. I. Patel. Addl.G.P. a/w A. A. Purav & D. S. Deshmukh, AGP for
Respondent-State.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
AARTI SATHE, JJ.
DATE: 25 JUNE 2026
P.C.
None for the Petitioners. It appears that due to passage of time, the
Petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, dismissed for want
of prosecution.
2. In view of dismissal of the Petitions, nothing survives in the above Civil
Applications and the same also stand dismissed.
(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Laxmi
Checking your session…