Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAHUL UTTAM GALANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition was filed on 14 February 2020 by Rahul Uttam Galande seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and take steps to pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure
  • petitioner's default

Judgment

                   DTG                                                                118-Wp-963-2020.doc



                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                WRIT PETITION NO. 963 OF 2020

                   Rahul Uttam Galande                                              … Petitioner
                                V/s.
                   The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                  … Respondents
                                           _______________________________________

                   None for Petitioner.

                   Mr. Shrikant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                    _______________________________________

                                                    CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                    DATE  : 31st July 2026

                   P.C. :

                   1)                  None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                   2)                  Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                   14th February 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                   steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                   2.1)                It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                   Petition.

                   3)                  Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                       ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
               Digitally signed by
               DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR     Date: 2026.08.06
               18:39:54 +0530
                                                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.