Bombay High Court
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH LTD. AND ANOTHERversusGAJANAN LASHINATH KASEKAR AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The court disposed of the writ petitions as the petitioners, through their counsel, submitted that no cause of action remained in view of subsequent developments.
Summary
Three writ petitions (Nos. 9523, 9746 and 9747 of 2013) were filed by the Chairman of Ambad TQ. Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. and another party against various respondents. The petitioners sought relief through the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that a subsequent development had occurred which rendered the petitions moot. No further arguments or evidence were presented. Consequently, the court accepted the submission and disposed of all three writ petitions.
Subjects
- writ petition
- disposal
- subsequent development
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34196
58,59&60
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
58 WRIT PETITION NO. 9523 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
NANASAHEB SAHEBRAO GHOGARE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. D. Patil
…
AND
…
59 WRIT PETITION NO. 9746 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
GAJANAN LASHINATH KASEKAR AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Ms. Chaitali Chaudhari Kutti
…
AND
…
60 WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
GAJIYODDIN HANIFODDIN SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. V. M. Jaware
...
58,59&60
-2-
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 06.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. D. A. Karnik, learned counsel for the Petitioners
submits that in view of the subsequent development nothing
survives in the Petitions.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…