Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH LTD. AND ANOTHERversusGAJANAN LASHINATH KASEKAR AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court disposed of the writ petitions as the petitioners, through their counsel, submitted that no cause of action remained in view of subsequent developments.

Summary

Three writ petitions (Nos. 9523, 9746 and 9747 of 2013) were filed by the Chairman of Ambad TQ. Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. and another party against various respondents. The petitioners sought relief through the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that a subsequent development had occurred which rendered the petitions moot. No further arguments or evidence were presented. Consequently, the court accepted the submission and disposed of all three writ petitions.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • subsequent development
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34196



                                                                      58,59&60
                                            -1-

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           58 WRIT PETITION NO. 9523 OF 2013
               CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
                                    LTD. AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                    NANASAHEB SAHEBRAO GHOGARE AND ANOTHER
                                             ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
              Shripad S.
              AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. D. Patil
                                             …
                                            AND
                                             …

                           59 WRIT PETITION NO. 9746 OF 2013
               CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
                                    LTD. AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                     GAJANAN LASHINATH KASEKAR AND ANOTHER
                                             ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
              Shripad S.
              AGP for Respondent/State: Ms. Chaitali Chaudhari Kutti
                                             …
                                            AND
                                             …

                           60 WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2013
               CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
                                    LTD. AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                    GAJIYODDIN HANIFODDIN SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER
                                             ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
              Shripad S.
              AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. V. M. Jaware
                                             ...
                                                          58,59&60
                                -2-

                             CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                               Date : 06.08.2026

PER COURT :-

1.         Mr. D. A. Karnik, learned counsel for the Petitioners

submits that in view of the subsequent development nothing

survives in the Petitions.


2.         Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.




                                      (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.