Bombay High Court
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH LTD. AND ANOTHERversusGAJIYODDIN HANIFODDIN SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The writ petitions are dismissed as moot because no relief remains to be granted.
Summary
The Chairman of Ambad Tq. Sahakari Kharedi Vikri Sangh Ltd. and another filed three writ petitions (Nos. 9523, 9746, 9747 of 2013) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of various respondents. During the pendency, a subsequent development occurred that rendered the relief sought by the petitioners unavailable or unnecessary. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that, in view of this development, nothing survived in the petitions. The Court accepted this submission and disposed of all three writ petitions as moot. No substantive merits were addressed, and the petitions were dismissed without further order.
Issues considered
- Mootness of the writ petitions after subsequent development
Subjects
- writ petition
- mootness
- disposal
- High Court
- Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34197
58,59&60
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
58 WRIT PETITION NO. 9523 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
NANASAHEB SAHEBRAO GHOGARE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. D. Patil
…
AND
…
59 WRIT PETITION NO. 9746 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
GAJANAN LASHINATH KASEKAR AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Ms. Chaitali Chaudhari Kutti
…
AND
…
60 WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2013
CHAIRMAN, AMBAD TQ. SAHAKARI KHAREDI VIKRI SANGH
LTD. AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
GAJIYODDIN HANIFODDIN SIDDIQI AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. Kulkarni
Shripad S.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. V. M. Jaware
...
58,59&60
-2-
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 06.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. D. A. Karnik, learned counsel for the Petitioners
submits that in view of the subsequent development nothing
survives in the Petitions.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…