Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANOHAR DHONDU KARNUKversusSENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE and ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or take steps to pursue the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Manohar Dhondu Karnuk, filed a writ petition on 24 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026. The court noted that since filing, neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to circulate or pursue the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • petition
  • non-prosecution
  • court procedure
  • dismissal
  • failure to appear

Judgment

                         sbw                                                     235-wp-976-2018.doc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.976 OF 2018

                    Manohar Dhondu Karnuk                                   … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                    Senior Inspector of Police & Ors.                       … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioner.
                    Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE :     18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                    24th February, 2018, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any

                    steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                       1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:06
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.