Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BARSURAM DHARMA KADAKE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request.

Summary

Petitioners Barsuram Dharma Kadake and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO. The petition was represented by Ms. Deepa Punde on behalf of Mr. Sachin Punde. The State was represented by Mr. A. I. Patel and Ms. P. M. J. Deshpande, while CIDCO was represented by Mr. Nitin V. Gangal. During the hearing, the petitioners instructed their counsel to withdraw the writ petition. The court recorded the written instructions and, after due consideration, disposed of the petition as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be entertained or allowed to be withdrawn

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

        Digitally
        signed by                                                               901. WP.978.2021 .DOC
        ANANT
ANANT   KRISHNA
KRISHNA NAIK
NAIK    Date:               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
        2026.02.20
        14:59:20                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
        +0530

                                     WRIT PETITION NO.978 OF 2021

               Barsuram Dharma Kadake and Ors.                     ....Petitioners
                      V/s.
               The State of Maharashtra and Ors.                   ...Respondents
                                                  _______
               Ms. Deepa Punde h/f Mr. Sachin Punde for Petitioners.
               Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w Smt. P. M. J. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent-
               State.
               Mr. Nitin V. Gangal for Respondent No.3 – CIDCO.

                                                   _______

                                          CORAM:      MANISH PITALE &
                                                      SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

                                          DATE:       20th FEBRUARY 2026

               P.C.

               1.      Learned Counsel for the Petitioners on instructions seeks permission

               to withdraw the Writ Petition. Written instructions given to the learned

               Counsel for the Petitioners have been tendered. The same are taken on

               record.


               2.      The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.


               3.      Pending Applications, in any, also stands disposed of.



                     (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                 (MANISH PITALE, J.)




               Akn                                     1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.