Bombay High Court
THE SECRETARY SHIVSHANKAR SEVABHAVI SANSTHA JAMTHI BK AND ANOTHERversusVIRENDRA PRABHAKAR BHISE AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Since the appeal was disposed and no operative order survived, the writ petition was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioners, The Secretary Shivshankar Sevabhavi Sanstha Jamthi BK and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the School Tribunal that had condoned a delay. The Tribunal's order was appealed as Appeal No. 33 of 2019, which was subsequently disposed of on 12 April 2022. The petitioners argued that the matter still required judicial scrutiny. The Court observed that the appeal had been fully decided and no operative order remained for consideration. Consequently, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, remains for the petitioners after the disposal of Appeal No. 33 of 2019?
Subjects
- writ petition
- appeal disposal
- condonation of delay
- school tribunal
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:497
1 of 1 1016-WP.9838.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1016 WRIT PETITION NO. 9838 OF 2021
THE SECRETARY SHIVSHANKAR SEVABHAVI SANSTHA JAMTHI BK
AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
VIRENDRA PRABHAKAR BHISE AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Ramchandra J. Nirmal, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for Respondent-State.
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2026
P.C.:-
1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.
2. Learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that the
proceeding arises out of the order passed by the learned School
Tribunal, whereby the delay was condoned. Subsequently, the appeal
was registered as Appeal No. 33 of 2019 and the same has also been
disposed of on 12.04.2022.
3. In view thereof, nothing survives for consideration in this
petition. Hence, the petition is disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Tauseef
Checking your session…