Bombay High Court
PIYUSH PANKAJ AGARWALversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
- Bench
- SANDESH D PATIL
Holding
The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition and ordered it to be disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Piyush Pankaj Agarwal, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 995 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Mr. Aarya Ambulkar (on behalf of Mr. Gaurav Nankar), filed a praecipe seeking the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether it could grant leave to withdraw at this stage of the proceedings. Relying on its inherent jurisdiction to allow withdrawal of a petition where no prejudice is caused, the Court granted the leave sought. Consequently, the petition was withdrawn and disposed of without any order as to costs.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be granted leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition at this stage?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- high court discretion
- no costs
Judgment
8-WP-995-2024 (CR).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 995 OF 2024
Piyush Pankaj Agarwal ] Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents
.....
Mr. Aarya Ambulkar i/b Mr. Gaurav Nankar Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. P.P. Deokar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State.
.....
CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
Digitally
DATED: 22nd JUNE 2026.
signed by
SHAILAJA
SHAILAJA SHRIKANT
P. C. :
SHRIKANT HALKUDE
HALKUDE Date:
2026.06.23
10:51:41
+0530 1. Mr. Ambulkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on
instructions, has tendered a praecipe seeking leave of this Court to
withdraw the petition.
2. Leave as prayed for is granted. The petition is permitted to be
withdrawn.
3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
[SANDESH D. PATIL, J.]
Shailaja 1
Checking your session…