Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RUPESH JITAN SINGH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 5 ORS

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was disposed as infructuous.

Summary

Petitioners Rupesh Jitan Singh and another filed Writ Petition No. 996 of 2019 against the State of Maharashtra and five other respondents seeking certain reliefs. The respondents argued that, owing to the lapse of time, the reliefs sought had become infructuous. The court examined whether the cause of action still survived and whether the petition could be entertained. No specific factual details or reliefs were recorded in the judgment. The court held that the petition was indeed infructuous and consequently disposed of it without granting any relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether the reliefs claimed in the writ petition have become infructuous due to the passage of time
  • Whether the cause of action for the petition still survives

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous relief
  • passage of time
  • cause of action
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                                                                       8. WP 996 of 2019.doc




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 996 OF 2019

                       Rupesh Jitan Singh and Anr.                              ...Petitioners

                                  Vs.

                       The State of Maharashtra
                       and 5 Ors.                                               ...Respondents
                                                           *****
                       None for the Petitioner
                       Ms. Ruchi Vijay Patil - for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4-SRA
                       Smt. Nazia Sheikh – AGP for Respondent No. 1-State
                       Mr. Devesh Shah a/w Ishaan Choudhary i/by IC Legal – For
                       Respondent No. 6
                                                         *****
                                         CORAM :            M. S. KARNIK AND
                                                            S. M. MODAK, JJ.

                                           DATE      :        08th MAY 2026

                       P. C. :-

                       1.      Learned counsel for Respondent says that with passage of time,

                       the reliefs claimed in this petition has become infructuous. None for

          Digitally
          signed by
          LATA SUNIL
                       the Petitioner. If the Petitioner satisfies that the cause survives, liberty
LATA     PANJWANI
SUNIL
PANJWANI Date:
         2026.05.08
          17:02:59
          +0530



                       to apply restoration.

                       2.      Petition is disposed as infructuous.


                        (S. M. MODAK, J.)                                (M. S. KARNIK, J.)


                       Seema                                                                           1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.