Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicant, Deependra Prakash Tiwari, filed a civil contempt application alleging that the opposite party, District Magistrate Kritika Jyotsana, had failed to comply with a Writ Court order. The opposite party, through Additional Chief Standing Counsel Shri Sunil Bajpai, produced a written …
The petitioner Anil Kumar filed a writ petition (C No. 1001495 of 2004) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the Board of Revenue Lucknow and two other respondents. The petition was listed before Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh, J. No counsel appeared for either side. The …
Prof. Ashish Wakhlu filed a contempt application alleging that the Vice‑Chancellor and members of the Executive Council of King George’s Medical University (KGMU) violated interim orders dated 20‑12‑2018 and 05‑12‑2019 by suspending and dismissing him. The High Court examined whether the respondents …
Ram Prasad filed a first appeal against order No. 316 of 2017 passed by the lower court. The appellant's counsel, Udai Bahn Pandey, did not appear before the High Court and no request for adjournment was made. The respondents, Bechan Lal and another, were represented by Shobh Nath Pandey. The court …
Suresh Kumar Mishra filed a civil contempt application against Ashish Tiwari, Senior Superintendent, Adarsh Karagaar, Lucknow. The applicant’s counsel, Ashok Kumar and Chandra Prakash, were not present in court and no request for adjournment was made. The bench noted the absence of counsel and the …
The Special Judge convicted four accused of dacoity and possession of arms under Sections 399 and 402 IPC based on a police raid where weapons were recovered and an alleged exchange of fire. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution evidence, noting the absence of medical reports, empty …
The appellant Jivanand Upadhyay filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the VI Additional Sessions Judge, Mirzapur, dated 25 May 1984. No counsel appeared for the appellant, while the State counsel was present. An office report dated 30 September 2026 confirmed that the appellant had died. …
Ajab Singh filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. While the appeal was pending, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bulandshahr reported that the appellant had died. The court received the report on 25 August 2025 and, on 1 October 2026, held that the death of the sole appellant …
The appellant, Mangal Khan, filed a criminal appeal (No. 2125 of 1987) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction. During the pendency of the appeal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Shahjahanpur reported on 27 August 2026 that the appellant had died. The court considered whether the …
The appellants Ramjor Singh and Ramesh Singh were convicted by a Special Judge for robbery under Section 392 IPC based on the testimony of the informant and three other witnesses. On appeal, the High Court examined the credibility of the witnesses, noting delays in filing the FIR, the absence of key …
The appellant Desh Pal was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC for raping a 10‑11‑year‑old girl, Jasodha, after luring her into his rickshaw and taking her to an abandoned building where the assault occurred. The prosecution relied on the victim’s testimony, an independent eyewitness (Ram …
The revisionist Faruq Khan appealed the Family Court's order directing him to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his wife and Rs 1,000 to his son under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that, as a labourer and small farmer with an uncertain income of about Rs 4,000‑5,000 per month, the …
The revisionists, Jagat Singh and another, filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel Arshad Ullah informed the court that the revisionists no longer wished to pursue the revision. The court considered whether a revision can continue when the parties have …
Manorama Kushwaha, the wife of co‑accused Ashok Kumar Kushwaha, was named in an FIR alleging cheating and misappropriation of Rs 8.5 lakh arising from a disputed land sale. The FIR, filed under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act, led to a charge‑sheet and a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the case were …
The applicant, Mustkeem, filed a bail cancellation application (Criminal Misc. Bail Cancellation Application No. 77 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 17997 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable …
The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation challenged a Labour Court award that declared the dismissal of conductor Vinod Kumar illegal and ordered his reinstatement with back wages. The Court examined whether the departmental inquiry into alleged ticket‑less passengers was conducted fairly …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision (No. 1641 of 2012) seeking to withdraw the petition and obtain permission to file an appeal before the appropriate court. The revisionist's counsel submitted a withdrawal application requesting that the revision be dismissed as withdrawn. The court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents when the matter was listed for hearing. The court noted the absence of any party or counsel. Consequently, …
The petitioners, a wife and her minor son, filed a criminal revision under Section 127 CrPC challenging a Family Court order that enhanced their maintenance to Rs.5,000 and Rs.4,000 respectively. They argued that the court failed to consider the husband’s salary of over Rs.55,000 per month and did …
The petitioners, a group of 23 candidates, filed a writ petition seeking to avail the benefit of a Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, SLP (C) No.18516 of 2019) that directed the state to consider candidates who scored higher than the lowest appointed assistant …
The petitioner, Mohammad Salamat, filed Writ‑A No. 14567 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined this submission and found that there was no longer any cause of action to be …
Damodar Yadav filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14039 of 2022) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and five other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing after a mention by the petitioner's counsel, Virendra Singh. When the matter was taken up, no party, …
The petitioners, a group of candidates for Assistant Teacher (Science and Mathematics) posts, sought to invoke a Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, SLP (C) No.18516 of 2019) that directed the state to consider candidates who scored higher than the appointed …
The appellant Kuldeep appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) dated 23.02.2026, seeking bail and setting aside the conviction under multiple IPC and SC/ST Act provisions. The FIR alleged that the victim's son was attacked by unknown persons, with the appellant’s name appearing …
The husband (revisionist) filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the CrPC seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 25‑01‑2017 that required him to pay Rs.2,000 per month to his wife and Rs.1,000 each to their three children. He alleged that the wife had left the matrimonial home …
The applicants, Rajendra and three others, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the applicants, Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the application …
Ajay Kumar filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to modify the payment of arrears ordered by the Family Court, which required him to pay a lump sum of Rs. 1,64,000. He did not contest the merits of the maintenance order, only requested that the arrears be paid in …
The accused-applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the Special Judge on 17.11.2016, and the …
The petitioner, Smt. Ayushi, filed Criminal Revision No. 3228 of 2018 against the State of U.P. and another party. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the parties had reached a compromise outside of court and sought to withdraw the revision. The court considered whether a criminal …
The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licensee, had his license cancelled by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate on the ground of alleged irregularities in the distribution of essential commodities, based largely on statements of card‑holders. The petitioner appealed, arguing that the inquiry was unfair, that …
The juvenile revisionist filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside the order of the Juvenile Judge and the Juvenile Justice Board dated 27.02.2025 and 25.08.2025, which had convicted the juvenile under sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The revisionist's counsel later moved that the …
The applicants, Mukul Tyagi and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2534 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants …
Petitioner Birender Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to avail the benefit of a recent Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, 2025) concerning the recruitment of Assistant Teachers, which directed the state to consider candidates who scored higher than the appointed …
The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licensee, had her licence cancelled after a series of inspections that alleged irregularities in the distribution of food grains, including shortfalls in stock and complaints by ration card‑holders. The first inspection led to a suspension order, which the …
The petitioners, a group of 21 candidates, sought to avail the benefit of a Supreme Court judgment (State of Uttar Pradesh v. Neeraj Kumar Pandey, SLP (C) No.18516 of 2019) which directed the state to consider all candidates who scored higher than the lowest‑scoring appointed assistant teacher, …
Arvind Kumar Maurya filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel or party appeared to argue the case. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, under procedural rules, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive …
Hariom filed a writ petition challenging the Board of Revenue's order rejecting his application to transfer Appeal No. 1248 of 2020, which was pending before the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Saharanpur Division. The High Court stayed the appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue …
The petitioner, Dr. Suresh Chandra Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. On the date of hearing, no counsel or party appeared to press the petition. The court noted the lack of prosecution and, pursuant to procedural rules, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No …
The petitioner, appointed as an Assistant Teacher in 1973 by the school’s Management and approved by the education officer in 1974, was later excluded from salary payments after the school came under the grant‑in‑aid scheme in 1991. The exclusion was based on the claim that she lacked the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun, accused of gang rape under Sections 137(2), 61(2), 70(1) and 127(3) of the CrPC. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 were contradictory and that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
The applicant Banti filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13978 of 2026 seeking release on bail in Crime No. 401 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 64 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute outside …
The applicants, Ahashan and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashfaq @ Muse, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2), 62 of the BNS Act and Sections 5M/6, 18 of the POCSO Act for allegedly sexually harassing a seven‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false …
The High Court considered the second bail application filed by Ram Milan under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 in a dowry death case (Crime No. 241 of 2024) involving the alleged drowning of his wife, Renu Devi. The applicant argued that the death was a suicide, that he was not present at the …
The petitioner, Priyanka, filed a writ petition seeking appointment as Head Master of a privately managed aided junior high school, relying on a provisional selection list dated 24‑12‑2025 and her participation in document verification. The State authorities later omitted her name from the final …
The petitioner, Awadhesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to grant him the 2nd and 3rd Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.) along with interest and arrears. He had already submitted a representation/application for the same, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 23‑04‑2026 and to quash the charge sheet dated 07‑04‑2026 in Sessions Case No. 720 of 2026, which arose from a FIR containing offences under various sections of the BNSS and the POCSO …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 3259 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable …
The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others filed a special appeal against a single judge's order granting aid to certain educational institutions, but the appeal was filed 499 days after the limitation period expired. The appellants sought condonation of delay, citing extensive inter‑departmental …
The applicant filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 139 of 2025) under Section 103(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, seeking release during the trial. The counsel for the applicant argued that the bail application had become infructuous …
Petitioner Chandravir filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 09-10-2024 and a mandamus to restrain his arrest. He submitted that the police investigation had concluded, exonerating him, and the police report had been forwarded to the court. The State, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Pinki, the daughter of a deceased, who had been in custody since February 24, 2026 in connection with Crime No. 146 of 2026. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated and that the key prosecution witness, examined as P.W.-1, had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Rekha Devi, the wife of a deceased, who had been in custody since 24 February 2026 for a case under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that the prosecution’s key witness, examined as …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Neetu, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S. alleging abetment of suicide. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, noting the absence of any obscene material, a dying declaration, or any …
Petitioner Uma Shanker Dubey, through counsel Prem Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 10210 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court but later expressed a desire not to pursue the petition. The respondent State of U.P. and others, represented by counsel C.S.C., Haushila Prasad Mishra, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 190 of 2025) where he alleged false implication. The applicant argued that he was not arrested at the scene, the informant’s statement under Section 180 was not an eye‑witness account, and no witness …
Spml Infrastructure Limited filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against Construction and Design Services and another party, seeking direction from the High Court. The petition was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Piyush Agrawal. Learned counsel for the High Court informed that …
Spml Infrastructure Limited filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court against Allahabad Municipal Corporation and another respondent. The petition sought relief pending a decision by the lower court. Counsel for the High Court informed that the lower court had fixed a date …
The petitioner, through a public interest litigation, sought a writ directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to enforce an order under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which ordered eviction of encroachers from certain plots in Village Talhedi Buzurg. Although the …
Ankush Dhobi was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, accused of enticing the daughter of the first informant. The victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she left the house of …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tabis‑Ur‑Rehman, who was implicated in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged transfer of Rs 49 lakh through a Binance crypto payment link. The prosecution relied on WhatsApp chats linking the applicant with co‑accused Gaurav and Asad …
Sharda Gupta (72) and Mohan Gupta (65), senior citizens with no criminal record, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging their involvement in an assault that caused injuries to six persons, including a grievous fracture. The FIR named them, but the investigating officer’s report and video …
The petitioners, Umesh Bind and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. After hearing, they sought to withdraw the application and instead approach the regular bail court, requesting temporary protection from coercive action. The learned Additional Government …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Fateh Mohammad, who was implicated in a case involving kidnapping, dacoity and alleged rape under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the victim’s …
The applicant Anchal Rastogi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case No. 1336 of 2018 (State v. Sachin Rastogi et al.) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court noted that the applicant had …
The applicant, Munesh @ Manish Agrawal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel, Rahul Shukla, moved the court to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and dismissed the application as …
Shah Faishal filed a contempt petition against the Commissioner of Police alleging failure to comply with an order issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano & Another v. State of U.P. and others). The petitioner produced an FIR dated 30 September 2026 to support the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 9522 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he was never …
The applicant, Ashwani Kharwar, sought bail in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 552 of 2024) filed under Sections 85 and 80 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that his wife died by suicide and that no specific dowry demand …
The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Gupta, alleged that the respondents stopped paying his salary in March 2026 despite a 12 July 2017 order directing regular payment following a writ petition for regularisation of his services. The High Court examined whether this non‑payment constituted contempt of the …
Ram Dular Yadav was charged under Sections 304 and 323 of the IPC for assaulting a deceased person. The first bail application was rejected, but the applicant argued that no specific role was assigned to him, the co‑accused had already been released on bail, all witnesses had been examined, and he …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a delay‑condonation application filed in Revision No. 2228 of 2026, which challenges an order of the Additional Commissioner under Section 38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The revision was filed belatedly …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6218 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was never arrested and that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Ajay Yadav, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The applicant claimed false …
The petitioners, Smt Momin and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel Syed Riyaz Askari and Advocate Mohammad Hassam, prayed for leave to not press the petition. The respondents, represented …
Manvendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20‑09‑2021 (Case Crime No. 434 of 2021) and a mandamus to restrain his arrest under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B. The State, through its Additional Government Advocate, informed …
The petitioners, Gopal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that both petitioners had already been arrested and they no …
Ashish Singh Minor filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek permission to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional Government Advocate …
Sagar Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20501 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet against the petitioner had been filed on 13 …
Petitioners Smt. Riya and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The Court considered the …
Muneer Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and no longer …
Arvind Saroj and three others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20144 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they do not wish to pursue the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Rajendra, who is charged with offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5753 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 420, 408 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was never arrested and that the …
The petitioner, Aman Mahajan, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his application for a compassionate appointment by the District Basic Education Officer, Aligarh. The rejection was based on the claim that his mother, Anita Gupta, was already in government service, a claim the …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to order an inquiry into alleged irregularities by a Village Pradhan, based on a representation dated 5 January 2026. The Court examined the representation and found it to contain only vague, general …
The petitioner, a self‑described agriculturist with only a 9th‑standard education, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking directions for the construction of water tanks in villages and a fair inquiry against a contractor. The court examined the petitioner's credentials and questioned his ability …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash the FIR dated 05‑07‑2026 in Crime No. 200, filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 74, 91 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and also sought a mandamus directing the …
Petitioners Alok and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During proceedings, the Additional Government Advocate highlighted that additional sections had been added to the petition. The petitioners did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep Kushwaha, who is charged under Sections 65(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 for allegedly sexually assaulting a child aged …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7096 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(2) of the same Act. The applicant argued that he was never …
The applicants, Vinod Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Misc. Case No. 493 of 2026 and an order dated 8 June 2026 that directed an investigation under Section 175(3) of the same Act. …
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application seeking to set aside bail granted to the second accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 172 of 2025). No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 1‑1‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 47 of 2022 (Section 323 IPC) before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh. They contended that …
The applicant, Aditya Bhartiya, sought bail in a murder case (Section‑103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, equivalent to IPC s.302) after the charge was framed on 27‑01‑2026. This was his second bail application; the first was rejected because CCTV footage placed him with the deceased and a scarf used in the …
The applicant Suman, the sister‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under sections 85, 80(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No. 127 of 2026. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material showing she …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings relating to several IPC offences, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act, on the ground that they had amicably settled with …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Azad, who was charged with offences under Sections 64(1), 352, 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor aged about 17 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Keshavram @ Kriparam Prajapati in a POCSO case where the FIR alleged he enticed a girl, purportedly over 17 years old, away from her family. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement indicated a consensual relationship, no …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Munawwer, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing the victim's statement that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sanjay Yadav, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the same Act and Sections 5(II) and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl away and …
The petitioner, Sumit Rastogi, who operates a truck (registration U.P.-14/ET-8623) in the National Capital Region, sought re‑registration after the 10‑year permit expired, arguing that vehicles may operate until they reach 15 years of age. He filed a representation dated 1 August 2026 with the …
The applicant, Harikishan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 72 of 2026) involving IPC offences. The applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application, requesting …
Shailesh Yadav applied for bail in a case (Crim. No. 227 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 64, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 127(4) of the IPC, including rape and confinement of a 31‑year‑old married woman. The applicant contended that the victim was a consenting party, that the medico‑legal …
Veer Pal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20536 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner had already been arrested by the police and no longer wished to pursue the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was already concluded and a final report had been submitted in favor of the petitioners. The petitioners, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aryan Kumar, who was arrested in a case alleging rape and false promise of marriage under IPC sections 69, 115(2) and 351(3). The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting adult, the medical report did not support a rape …
Nakul was arrested in a case alleging sexual harassment and threat to throw acid at a 19‑year‑old woman, under IPC sections 74, 75(2), 79, 115(2) and 351(3). The victim’s statement indicated a consensual relationship in 2022 and she refused a medical examination, while the applicant claimed he was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunny Kumar, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor. The applicant argued that the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNS Act were …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Kaushal, who is accused of raping a minor under Sections 65(1), 123(1), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the medico‑legal report did not support the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Kshitij Rastongi, who is charged with offences under IPC sections 65(1), 64(2)(F), 64(2)(M), 357(2) and under the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 459/2026) pending under the POCSO Act. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was made out and the prosecution was malicious, citing lack of independent …
Yadveer Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on plots 340 and 341 (recorded as Rasta and Pond) in Nagla Khagi village, Auraiya district. The respondents' standing counsel raised a …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 18-12-2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.19146 of 2025. The court examined the claim and found a prima facie case for contempt but chose not to issue a notice at this …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Riyaz Mohammad, accused under sections 333, 69 and 79 of the B.N.S. for alleged rape and related offences. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory victim statements under sections 180 and 183, lack of video …
The applicant, Ashraf, sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Crime No.527 of 2026) alleging assault on his cousin Aamir during a dispute in Saudi Arabia. The prosecution argued that the victim sustained nine injuries, including three lacerated wounds to the head, indicating an intent to kill. …
Rohit Enterprises filed a contempt application against Mr. Atul Kumar Tyagi, Executive Engineer, Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (Rural). The applicant's counsel, Mukesh Kumar, informed the court that the order of the writ court had been complied with by making the required payment on 19 September 2026. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajjeet @ Ramji Rajbhar, who was charged with rape of a minor girl (aged 13 years 5 months) under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, there was no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wali Maqsood Rabbani, who was allegedly implicated in a rape case under the POCSO Act after a seven‑day delay in filing the FIR and without being named in the victim's statement. The applicant argued false implication, lack of criminal history, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Ashraf @ Asraf Hameed in a case involving alleged rape and other offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged after a seven‑day delay, he was not named in the FIR or the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Kumar, accused under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory victim …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sandeep, who was arrested in a POCSO rape case involving a 16‑year‑old girl who allegedly consented and became pregnant. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged after a nine‑month delay, that the victim’s age was not medically …
Smt. Vimla Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 34945 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed by the Collector. The petition sought relief against the Collector's decision, alleging that it was illegal or arbitrary. The Court examined the petitioner's claim and found it …
The applicant, Shahbaz (represented by Ms. Maya Devi), filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought to have the application dismissed as withdrawn. The State, represented by its learned …
Indra Pal Singh filed a contempt application against Dr. Netesh Kumar Bhodeley alleging willful disobedience of a judgment and order dated 08‑10‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15206 of 2025. The applicant claimed the order was served but not complied with. The court observed that a prima …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Junnur Khan, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M of the BNS Act and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing to contradictory statements by the …
The applicant, Taiyab, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No.69 of 2018) filed under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, fearing arrest. The applicant sought interim protection to appear before the Sessions Court and …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 05‑02‑2026 in Writ‑C No.46189 of 2025. The court examined whether the failure to comply amounted to contempt and whether notice was required before proceeding. It found a …
The petitioner, Anuj Yadav, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari and Tehsildar of Jaunpur to remove alleged unauthorized encroachments on Plot No. 1065 (0.061 hectare) recorded as Jalmagan Bhumi/Nali Khata. The petition also requested that the …
Lakhan Singh was arrested in a case alleging rape of a seven‑year‑old girl under Sections 333, 65(2), 62 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(m) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim and the first informant turned hostile before the trial court and refused a medico‑legal examination, leaving no …
The accused Angad Yadav and Kripashankar Yadav applied for bail in a case involving alleged assault and a gunshot injury under several IPC sections. They claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and that the injuries to the informant were simple, with the gunshot injury attributed …
Smt. Anita Gupta filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The respondents contended that a statutory remedy exists under Rule‑5 of the U.P. Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973, allowing an appeal to the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj. The …
The petitioner, Smt. Sandhya Chaudhary, filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to demolish an alleged illegal construction by respondent No.5 at a village in Basti district. The record revealed that both parties are co‑tenants and neighbours, and the dispute arose from an …
The accused, Kush, applied for a second bail in a criminal case (Crime No.239 of 2025) alleging he did not cause the grievous injuries alleged in the FIR. The FIR and medical reports detail severe injuries to the victim, Neha, including bone‑deep lacerations, fractures, and intracranial hemorrhages, …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 32033 of 2026 filed by Maju @ Majid in Crime No. 347 of 2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 329(3), 351(3) and 61(2) BNS. The applicant pleaded that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed Writ Petition No. 4418 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of U.P. and eight other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Manish Prajapati, informed the court that the petitioner no …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for Mumtaj @ Arif Khan, who was named in an FIR under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act for allegedly transporting sixty heads of cattle for slaughter. The applicant …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aman Pratap under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 195 of 2025. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and only a general role was ascribed to him in the …
The applicant, Shuyab @ Shoaib Ahmad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a criminal case (Crime No. 94 of 2026). He later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajan under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 137 of 2026 alleging assault under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 109 and 126(2). The applicant argued that the FIR named six accused without specifying …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Shailendra Rajput, who was charged under IPC Section 137(2), BNS Section 64(1), and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting …
The applicant, Akash Singh, sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged vehicle damage, extortion, assault, and theft of a gold chain. He claimed the FIR was false, arising from a dispute with a friend who demanded Rs.12 lakh for repairs. The State opposed bail, arguing the offences were …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Balvant Kushwaha under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged fraud in the execution of two sale deeds. The applicant argued that he was not the vendee and that the second deed was forged, asserting no criminal …
The applicant, Smt. Shakuntla Kumari, filed a contempt application alleging that Shri Rishi Raj, Vice Chairman of Prayagraj Development Authority, and others willfully defied the High Court's order dated 11 November 2025 in Writ‑C No. 39005/2025, which directed the authority to pay compensation …
The applicant, Fakaroo, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication. The applicant argued that he is already on bail in the sole …
The petitioners challenged a Government Order dated 2 September 2026 and a related memorandum that authorised a Special Teacher Eligibility Test (Special TET) for in‑service teachers in Uttar Pradesh. They alleged that the order was ultra vires, diluted the standards prescribed by the National …
The petitioners filed a writ seeking to quash an order dated 2 September 2026 and a subsequent notification dated 3 September 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission, which barred Shiksha Mitras from applying for the Special Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvindpal Singh, who was arrested in a case (Crime No. 215 of 2024) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that he had approved a bank loan after a legal scrutiny report …
Vyas @ Ved Vyas Mishra filed a contempt application alleging that Amit Kumar, Executive Engineer, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 6 February 2026 in Writ‑A No.1783 of 2026, which required the respondent to decide a retirement‑benefits representation within three months. The applicant …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 4422 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the pending civil suit Rev/383/2016, which has been adjourned since 2016. They alleged that the case was being delayed without justification and invoked Section 333 …
The applicant, Virendra Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking suspension of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending criminal case State Vs. Kapilmun Pandey et al. (Session No. 4603/2010). The applicant’s counsel argued that the …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by Nihal Mishra seeking the release of Bhumika, a 19‑year‑old woman, from the custody of her parents. The court examined the corpus, who affirmed that she voluntarily married the petitioner and wishes to reside with him. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Pratya Singh, who was charged under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly causing firearm injury to the son of an informant. The applicant argued that the FIR did not specifically assign him a role, that the …
Ram Raheesh filed a bail cancellation application (No. 420 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Radhey Shyam Yadav, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel, G.A., was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and, …
An application for contempt was filed alleging that the respondents willfully defied the order dated 06‑11‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 16450 of 2025, which directed the Chief Medical Officer to consider the petitioner’s claim for appointment and decide within two months. The applicant later produced …
The High Court heard a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Sonali Yadav, an adult woman, who claimed she was being kept in her parents' custody against her wishes after voluntarily marrying Akash Rai in 2020 and having a child in 2024. The petition sought her release to reside with her husband. The …
The petitioner, Fool Chandra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, K.C. Mishra, requested leave to not press the petition, effectively seeking to withdraw it. The Court granted the leave sought by the petitioner. …
The appellant Rahul was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions for alleged rape and caste‑related abuse following a broken marriage promise. The victim, a 20‑year‑old woman, had given contradictory statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, and …
The petitioners, a married woman and her live‑in partner, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from alleged threats by private respondents. They claimed that without such protection their life and liberty were in danger. The State argued that the married petitioner’s cohabitation without …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant, who had already been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC/84 of the …
The High Court examined a habeas corpus petition filed by Rubi Parveen, who was produced before the court after a direction to the State. The corpus, a 21‑year‑old woman, testified that she voluntarily married Imran on 18 June 2026 against her parents' wishes and is residing with him in her …
The physical record of Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22206 of 2026 was misplaced, and a digitized copy was placed before the Court. The petitioners, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition without pressing it on merits, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate …
Manoj Kumar Pandey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the proceedings arising from a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, including a non‑bailable warrant issued against him. The applicant expressed willingness to …
The applicant, Ram Raheesh, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 428 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 714 of 2025) where he was alleged to be involved in an assault on 4 November 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Singh and Surajpal Singh, who are the brother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide following a domestic dispute. They were charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioner, Ankit Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in a statutory inquiry initiated against him under Section 95(1)(g) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act. The complaint led to a preliminary inquiry, after which a proper inquiry was ordered, but the inquiry remains incomplete. The …
Sanjay Kumar filed a contempt application against Indradev Singh alleging willful non‑compliance of an order dated 01‑04‑2026 passed in Writ A No. 4546/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing a notice, …
The petitioners, Smt. Saroj and her husband, sought custody of their two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old daughter Mishti, claiming that the adoption deed executed with Ayesha Singh was unregistered and therefore invalid. The respondents, Ayesha Singh and her husband Deepak, contended that the child's welfare, …
Bhaiyan Lal filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents willfully defied an order dated 11 March 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi, in Misc. Application No. 05 of 2026. The court was presented with instructions that included a copy of FIR No. 0302 dated 28 …
The accused Vijay Lal Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 61(2) of the CrPC concerning an alleged enticement of a 14‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated that she left home voluntarily, lived in a forest area for ten days, and …
Bablu Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS No. 39505 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant, through counsel Pramod Kumar, sought to withdraw the application. The State, represented by A.G.A., opposed the withdrawal. The Court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Kumar, who is accused in a case under IPC sections 304(2), 317(2) and 317(4) arising from a FIR lodged after a delay. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false recovery, and asserted that the FIR was filed without a plausible …
Alokik Sharma filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate, alleging willful defiance of the order dated 17‑06‑2021 passed in Writ‑C No. 6822 of 2021 (Alokik Sharma v. State of U.P. and 3 others). The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the order had not been …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement, and the opposite …
The appellant filed an application under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to withdraw the pending appeal against M/s Sudha Realters Pvt Ltd. and others. The court examined the affidavit supporting the withdrawal request. Finding the reasons satisfactory, the court …
The petitioner, Suresh Chandra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to release his retirement benefits, including pension and gratuity, and to decide a pending application dated 23.05.2026. The petitioner alleged that payments were due following …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was mentioned in a co‑accused’s statement as having deposited money into the account of Sunrise Traders, a firm alleged to have trafficked a codeine‑based cough syrup. The applicant faced …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay Yadav, who was alleged to be involved in the illegal transport of codeine‑based cough syrup concealed in a DCM vehicle. The FIR named the DCM owner and driver, but not Yadav, who merely provided a transport service. The applicant argued …
The applicant, Vijay Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Both parties' counsel agreed to allow the applicant to seek regular bail. The court directed that the applicant must appear before the concerned court within four weeks to apply for …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. by Mausim, who was in custody for offences under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial had commenced and three prosecution witnesses—Wajid, Nazuk Jahan, …
The petitioner, Rajan Kumar, filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to provide drainage facilities and repair an encroached old nala in Village Berkhera Chauhan to prevent disease. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner …
Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 26‑01‑2026 under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, and requested that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits of the petition but …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the Deputy Inspector General of Police willfully defied the High Court's order dated 30 April 2026, which directed the authorities to count his training period for calculating service and grant an additional increment. The Court …
The petitioner challenged an assessment notice issued by the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division‑I, Jalaun, claiming that a reply filed on 30 July 2026 had not been acted upon. The petitioner sought judicial intervention to compel the respondent to decide on the reply. The …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, challenged Order of Recovery No.43 dated 30 July 2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Pindra, Varanasi. The recovery certificate was issued on the basis of an earlier order of the 3rd Additional Session Judge, Valsad at Vapi, in Criminal Revision No.444 of 2021. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Akaram Shah, who was arrested in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 61, 318, 319, 336, 338, 351 and 352. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no money was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Kaif, who was arrested under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 500 bottles of codeine‑based cough syrup. The applicant argued that the quantity per bottle was not specified, making the total amount fall …
The petitioners, including Madhubala and 182 others, sought to quash an order dated 2 September 2026 and a subsequent notification dated 3 September 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission that barred Shiksha Mitras from applying for the Special Teacher Eligibility …
Ramesh Chandra filed a contempt application against Santosh Kumar alleging willful defiance of an order dated 07‑01‑2025 passed by the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 42309 of 2028. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not …
The petitioners, Hina Parveen and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty, alleging threats from private respondents due to their live‑in relationship. The respondents contended that petitioner No. 2 is already married and is cohabiting …
The petitioners, B-Pacs Society Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that essential facts required for the petition could not be pleaded. …
A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Mohd Yaseen against the respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Santosh Kumar Tiwari, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw. Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the petition as …
Ajay Yadav was arrested in connection with a case involving the illegal sale and transportation of codeine‑based cough syrup and was charged under several IPC sections and the NDPS Act. The FIR did not name him, but co‑accused statements and CCTV footage showing a Rs 20 lakh deposit to a trader were …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Yadav, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 378 of 2025) involving alleged illegal sale and transportation of codeine‑based cough syrup under several IPC and NDPS provisions. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR …
The petitioner Rakesh Kumar filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. Both parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in line with the coordination bench order in Bajhang v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026, dated 22‑07‑2026). The court noted …
Raman Kumar filed a criminal revision (No. 5989 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh. At the admission stage, counsel for the revisionist, Shweta Nishad, informed the court that the revisionist no longer wished to pursue the matter and sought …
