Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

HAFIZ MOHAMMAD NIZAMUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hafiz Mohammad Nizamuddin, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Security Code seeking the dismissal of criminal proceedings (State Vs. Mohd. Siddiq & others) pending under IPC Section 120B and the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Conversion of Religion Act. He alleged that …

ANAND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Anand Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 417, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He argued that the FIR was lodged after a four‑year delay and was a retaliatory measure against a prior case in Tripura. …

SMT NISHA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Nisha Yadav filed an application for cancellation of bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State’s brief holder, Sri …

VISHNU KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. filed by Vishnu Kumar and two others, who were accused in a suicide‑abetment case (Crime No. 592 of 2026). The applicants claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged after an unreasonable …

MOHD. SAJID AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd. Sajid and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3/4 of …

SHUBHASH CHANDRA AND 4 OTHERSversusROSHAN LAL AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Mainpuri to decide a 2015 injunction suit expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautions …

JANOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Jano applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 295 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a sharp-edged weapon and a fatal injury to the victim Gulzar. The FIR, lodged on 25.07.2026, does not specify the exact date and time of the incident, and there is inconsistency regarding the …

SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suraj, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 85 of 2026 under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The FIR alleged that Suraj had enticed the daughter of the first informant, but the victim’s statements under …

X-MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, a 17‑year‑old minor, was charged under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 16‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage. The FIR was lodged on 28‑06‑2026, two weeks after the alleged …

UMA SHANKAR RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Uma Shankar Rawat filed a writ petition seeking the transfer of a Fair Price Shop licence that had been issued to his uncle. The petitioner argued that the High Court should direct the concerned authority to effect the transfer. Counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be …

SHITALA PRASAD GUPT AND 15 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sixteen petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds in the Uttar Pradesh education service, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to recognize their substantive appointment date as 10 March 2005 and to award the corresponding pay scale and arrears, instead of the …

AARIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aarif, who feared arrest in a case arising from the Bareilly riots. Aarif was not named in the FIR, and his alleged involvement was based only on statements of co‑accused. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated and …

PANKAJ GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pankaj Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11 September 2026 under Section 74 of the B.N.S., 2023, and requested that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State …

PRAMOD PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered the bail application of Pramod Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2)(m) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the victim's age was incorrectly recorded, and the …

VASEEM AHAMAD AND 220 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, 221 Shiksha Mitras employed in primary schools of Uttar Pradesh, challenged a Government Order and notification dated September 2026 that instituted a Special Teacher Eligibility Test (Special TET) for in‑service teachers but expressly excluded them. They alleged that the exclusion …

GULAM MOHD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Gulam Mohd. applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in connection with offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 504 and 353. The Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences do not attract imprisonment exceeding seven years, a charge‑sheet has already been filed and there is no …

STATE OF UP AND ANOTHERversusJABIR ALI

The petitioner, Jabir Ali, claimed retrenchment and initiated an industrial dispute (Industrial Case No. 47 of 2006). The Labour Court awarded his reinstatement with full back wages, later modified by the High Court to 50% back wages in Writ Petition No. 22591 of 2008. He was reinstated in March …

MUNNA ALIAS SHIVAASHRAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Munna alias Shivaashray Yadav was arrested in connection with case crime No. 708 of 2026 under IPC sections 3(5), 115(2), 333 and 140(1). He contended that he had transferred Rs 12,00,000 to the victim, Manoj Kumar Pandey, for securing a railway job for his daughter, that the victim later returned …

BRIJ KISHOR AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT. GEETA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ under Article 227 directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Kanpur Dehat to expedite Civil Suit No. 336 of 2013. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautioned constitutional courts …

RAM LALANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.395 (Chakroad) in Village Bhojpurava, Prayagraj. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar …

SMT RAJVATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Rajvati under Section 482 CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging her participation in an assault on police officers during a public disturbance. The applicant, a woman with no prior criminal record, claimed she was falsely …

ANIL KUMAR TRIPATHI AND 7 OTHERSversusKHUSHIRAM VAISHYA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of a restoration application filed in Suit No. 198 of 2018, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The petition alleged that the suit was pending restoration and requested the High Court to intervene. The Court, noting that no …

SUNIL KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Yadav under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged fraud in property sale deeds. The applicant claimed he was a marginal witness falsely implicated, with no criminal antecedents, while the prosecution alleged he …

GUDDU BIYARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Guddu Biyar in a criminal case (Crime No.127 of 2026) involving IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 309(4), 317(2) and 109. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR contains general and omnibus allegations and that both …

ANIL SINGHversusSUNIL SINGH

Anil Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Prayagraj to decide his suit (No 470 of 2019) and the related 6‑C injunction application within a fixed time. The High Court held that the first prayer could not be granted because …

HEMANT KUMAR SHARMAversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Hemant Kumar Sharma, filed a contempt application seeking to punish the respondents for allegedly disobeying and routing a judgment dated 4 December 2014 in the case of Smt Razeena Bano & others v. State of U.P. The applicant later moved the court to withdraw the contempt petition, …

JUNAID @ KALAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Junaid @ Kala applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 290 of 2026) involving alleged indiscriminate firing at a family function, resulting in minor injuries to three persons. The prosecution argued that the accused had previously been granted bail with conditions, possessed a pistol …

CHAMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Chaman, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No. 120 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 308(5), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) and 126 of the B.N.S., 2023. He claimed false implication, arguing that the …

SAKLAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saklain in a criminal case (Crime No. 684 of 2025) under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR was lodged more than four months after the alleged incident and that no obscene …

VINOD YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Vinod Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 9‑August‑2026 under Sections 329(3), 221 and 132 of the B.N.S. 2023 and a direction that he not be arrested. He also prayed that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in …

NISHANT TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nishant Tomar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 13 …

KAVITA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners claimed they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …

INDRA KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Indra Kumar Jain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded the investigation and filed a charge sheet on 12 September 2026. The petitioner, through counsel, did not contest this fact but expressed a desire …

SATYAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Satyam Singh was arrested for alleged assault on a fellow student, resulting in multiple injuries to both parties. The FIR was lodged by the victim's brother, while no FIR was filed against the applicant. The applicant sought bail, arguing the incident was a sudden quarrel, he has no …

SRI MANMOHAN GUPTAversusSRI BALAJI ACTION MEDICAL INSTITUTE AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sri Manmohan Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) to decide Appeal No. A/1304/2023, which was filed against an order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, on merits and …

RAVI KUMAR GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravi Kumar Giri, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 4 July 2026 and the accompanying order dated 25 August 2026 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Case No. 373 of …

FURKANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Furkan, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 258 of 2026). He later sought to withdraw this application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court. The State had no objection to the withdrawal. The High …

SHAMIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shamim applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 352 of 2026) originally charged under Section 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court had already dismissed his earlier bail application for that offence, and a charge‑sheet had subsequently been filed. In the meantime, Shamim was also …

LAVISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought leave to have the writ petition dismissed as infructuous. The State, as respondent, did not contest this request. The Court granted the leave and dismissed the petition as infructuous. No substantive factual or legal issues were examined. The order was pronounced on October 1, …

NISHAversusAKHILESH BIND AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nisha, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of an execution case (No. 15 of 2024) arising from a decree in her favour dated 22‑11‑2023. The petition relied on recent Supreme Court pronouncements in Periyammal v. Rajamani (2025) and Rahul S. Shah v. Jindendra Kumar …

ANCHAL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect their life. The court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision (Akanksha v. …

MEER HASAN MIDDA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s. 482 in a case alleging assault, dowry‑related violence and offences under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The FIR was lodged 41 days after the alleged incident and the applicants 1 and 2 are the …

MEENA SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Meena Sharma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, their counsel, Anurak Upadhyay, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as …

ANNI BEGUMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Anni Begum was arrested in connection with Crime No. 803 of 2025, alleged to have fraudulently obtained pension benefits of Rs. 24,000, which have already been recovered by the Government. She has been in custody since 3 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record, while her co‑accused have already …

SUDHA SHARMA ALIAS SUDHA THAKUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Sudha Sharma alias Sudha Thakur and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Anurag Upadhyay, moved the court for leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …

MANJU KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Manju Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, and the Union of India. The officer issued a notice on 07.07.2026, to which the petitioner responded on 05.09.2026. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, directed the Regional …

PAVAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Pavan Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he is charged under IPC sections 376, 342, 506 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He had previously been granted regular bail, appeared regularly in court, and the trial court had ordered his surrender after a revision application. The applicant …

ARUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Arun Singh, who was not named in the FIR or charge sheet in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 342, 506 of the IPC and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. The applicant was summoned …

ABHISHEK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Abhishek Singh applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 342, 506 IPC and Sections 16/17 of the POCSO Act. He was not named in the FIR nor charge‑sheeted; the FIR named his cousin Pawan Singh as the primary accused. The victim’s statement recorded in court …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vijay Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 591 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim on 2 August 2026 for assault. The applicant argued that the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed, the injuries were minor, and a civil dispute existed between …

MOHD. SALEEM @ PAPPU SHAH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 07.08.2026 that alleged offences under various sections of the IPC, the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Scheduled Castes/Tribes Act. They made an innocuous prayer that the police, before making any arrests, should follow the Supreme Court …

SHAHAZAD AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 8 September 2026 registered under sections of the B.N.S. Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, and asked that they not be arrested. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the Supreme …

DEVI DAYAL SINGH YADAV @ DEVI DAYALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devi Dayal Singh Yadav in Crime No. 414 of 2026, where the FIR named co‑accused Alok Patel for using unfair means in a UP Subordinate Services Selection Commission examination. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rested …

JITENDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jitendra Sharma under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 111(3), 318(4), 61(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(3) of the IPC. Sharma claimed he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and pledged …

SMT. TAHREEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affirmed that their …

LALITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Lalit, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. in Crime No. 201 of 2026, alleging false implication in a road‑side accident that resulted in death on 26 July 2026. He argued that the FIR was lodged after an unexplained delay, that there is no evidence …

AFTAB ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aftab Alam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 16 September 2026 registered under Sections 76 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, before any arrest, the …

NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Nadeem filed a bail application in a case involving alleged looting of Rs.1.20 crore, a pistol, cartridges and cash, claiming he was not named in the FIR and that the recovered items were falsely linked to him. The prosecution could not produce any independent witness or corroborative …

M/S NK TRADERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Nk Traders filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 28‑03‑2026 issued by the State under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for the FY 2019‑20. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file …

AMANULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Amanullah Khan, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 446 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application. The court noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of …

MOHD. SALMAN ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd. Salman Ansari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to release his pending June 2023 salary of approximately Rs. 90,000‑100,000, along with interest at 18% on the General Provident Fund and gratuity amounts that had been …

HARNARAYAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Harnarayan and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 9 September 2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3), 352 and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023, and to obtain a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioners also prayed that, …

SUDAMA DEVIversusJOHAN

The petitioner, Sudama Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 18, Azamgarh, to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in Civil Suit No. 285 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the matter …

SHANTI DEVIversusOM PRAKASH THAKUR AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shanti Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) East, Ballia to decide a temporary injunction application (6-C) filed on 19.01.2026 in Original Suit No. 73 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending …

VINOD KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) AND 5 OTHERSversusSRI OMI DAGAUR AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Fast Track Court, Agra, to decide an 8‑C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 574 of 2022. The High Court found that keeping the petition pending would …

NEELU SOFATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neelu Sofat, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar to execute a recovery certificate dated 28‑01‑2021 issued under Section 40(1) of the Uttar Pradesh RERA Act. The petitioner alleged that despite the certificate, the …

POOJA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Neeraj Singh filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that his wife, Pooja Devi, was being illegally detained by her father, Hari Om, after she left their matrimonial home. The petition claimed the minor child Anmol was also in the father's custody. The State, represented by the A.G.A., …

MEERA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Meera Chauhan and another filed a writ petition seeking a decision on their representations dated 23-07-2026 and 24-07-2026 for regularisation of their service. The standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the representations had already been made and that the court …

TEJ PRATAP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Tej Pratap Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide a computerized case (Hariram v. Sri Ram, No. T201605310203568 of 2007) pending under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950. The …

MANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manish, accused under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, was lodged in jail on 31‑Aug‑2026 while trial is pending. He claimed false implication and highlighted that he has thirteen other cases, all of which are on bail. The State …

ANURAG DHAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Anurak Dhama filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑05‑2026 issued by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, and …

SMT SUNITA PANDEYversusDR UPASANA RANI VERMA

Smt. Sunita Pandey filed a contempt application alleging that Dr. Upasana Rani Verma failed to comply with the order dated 25‑05‑2026 in Writ A No. 8049/2026, which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no compliance had …

NARENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Narendra Kumar, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 14 September 2026 that moved him from the District Institute of Education and Training in Kanpur Nagar to the District Inspector of Schools in Farrukhabad. He argued that the transfer would impede his ability to …

SAROJA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusBOARD OF REVENUE U.P. AT ALLAHABAD AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Saroja Yadav and another, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Board of Revenue to decide Revision No.1061 of 2026 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a time frame set by the court. They alleged that the revision filed by respondent No.5 was …

ABHISHEK SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of District Mainpuri to decide Original Suit No. 463 of 2022. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which cautioned …

MUKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Mukesh Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus and prohibition to stop the Commissioner, Aligarh from proceeding with a land exchange alleged to be fraudulent and not in compliance with statutory procedures. The petitioner claimed that the exchange of a public utility …

RITU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ritu Devi, filed a writ petition seeking the inclusion of her name in the family register maintained under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj system. The High Court observed that the appropriate remedy is to file an application under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of …

SMT SARITA PANDEYversusBRIJESH KUMAR AGNIHOTRI AND 12 OTHERS

Smt Sarita Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of Misc. Case No. 190/74/18, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner requested the High Court to intervene and order the lower court to decide the matter promptly. The Court noted that …

YOGESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to protect their peaceful possession of a property, and also moved an application (6-C) for a temporary injunction, which the trial court allowed on 20‑04‑2024. The State appealed the interim order, and the appellate court upheld it, …

TILAK JAUHARIversusBHONDAL (SINCE DECEASED) AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kaushambi to expedite Original Suit No. 440 of 2015. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which limits constitutional courts from …

RAJVIR SINGHversusCANARA BANK, HEAD OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajvir Singh filed a writ petition (Writ-A No. 16158 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of Canara Bank and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Rahul Jain, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh …

SOVIN @ DEVESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court, after hearing counsel, directed that the petitioners may approach the concerned court within four weeks to apply for regular bail under several sections of the B.N.S. Act, and that their bail …

BRIJESH KUMAR TRIPATHI @ UMESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Brijesh Kumar Tripathi, filed a bail application under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, while the trial was pending. He claimed false implication and highlighted his prior criminal history, noting that he had been in …

MUKESH KUMARversusPREMPAL AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Chhata, Mathura to decide Original Suit No. 180 of 2007 for cancellation of a sale deed and permanent injunction within a stipulated period. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court precedent (High Court …

PRADEEP KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Pradeep Kumar Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a 9 July 2026 order from a 2018 Session Trial that had framed charges against him under IPC sections 302 and 34 for a 2017 crime. The case was pending before a …

GULAM JILANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Gulam Jilani, accused in NDPS case No. 37 of 2018, had previously been granted bail on 19‑04‑2018 but was unable to appear for trial because he was incarcerated in Gwalior jail for another case from 22‑09‑2021 to 22‑02‑2023. After his release he surrendered on 21‑08‑2026 and his earlier bail …

GEETAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former Assistant Teacher, retired on 31 March 2022 and alleges that salary arrears for the period 1 January 2022 to 31 March 2022 remain unpaid. She filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer (respondent No.2) to release the arrears and …

ANIKET AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 28.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 110 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the …

AJAY PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Ajay Pratap Singh, applied for bail in a case under Sections 109 of the IPC and Sections 3, 25(1‑B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police encounter on 13‑03‑2026 where a country‑made pistol was recovered. The applicant argued that the recovery was made without any independent …

PAYAL RAGHUVANSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Ghaziabad (Respondent No.3) to enforce a recovery certificate dated 26 March 2024 against a defaulting developer. They alleged that despite the certificate being issued by Respondent No.2, no action had …

MUKESH KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar Verma, challenged a recovery certificate dated 26 May 2026 issued by the Tehsildar of Gabhana, Aligarh. He contended that letters dated 11 November 2024 and 12 December 2024, sent by the Branch Manager of Aryavrat Bank to the Authorized Officer of the Zila Udyog …

RAZA ZAKIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Raza Zaki, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to decide Marriage Petition No. 694 of 2025 concerning restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner alleged that he was married to Alisha Haider under …

DURGESH PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Durgesh Paswan was arrested in connection with a case under the BNSS Act, 2023 (sections 87, 64(2)(m), 137(2)) and the POCSO Act (sections 5L/6) alleging that he enticed the daughter of the first informant. The victim, however, gave statements under sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS Act stating that …

SHANKAR LALversusRAMSAKHI AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shankar Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Kaushambi to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 261 of 2025. The High Court, after examining the petition at the admission …

MUMTAZ AHMADversusISRAR AHMAD AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Mumtaz Ahmad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaushambi, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 748 of 2024. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending served no …

LALARAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants Lalaram and Vijay filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 117(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties claimed injuries, with five persons on the informant’s side and four on the …

MANDIPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant issued on 16 January 2026 before a charge sheet was filed in a gang‑rape case. The court heard arguments from counsel for both parties. During the hearing, the …

SHIKHA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shikha Sharma filed an application for cancellation of bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The learned judge noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief holder, …

SHIKHA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shikha Sharma filed a bail cancellation application (No. 451 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mayuri Mehrotra, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and dismissed …

DILSHADversusSRI BRIJESH KUMAR, TEHSILDAR SORAON, TEHSIL SORAON

The applicant, Dilshad, filed a contempt application (Civil) No. 6898 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the underlying writ petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the applicant requested that the contempt …

RAMKANT SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramkant Saxena filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an order dated 23 June 2025 passed by the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board. The respondent, the Board, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Rule 5 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic …

AVANISH KUMAR RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Avanish Kumar Rai filed a writ petition under the Right to Information Act, 2005, seeking information that had already been provided in an order dated 27 July 2026 in his second appeal. The petitioner alleged that a respondent had been appointed on forged documents, but an inquiry found the …

LALJIversusSMT SARITA DEVI

The petitioner, Lalji, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge to decide his original suit (No. 612 of 2020) expeditiously. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which held that …

AARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Aarif, who was arrested in Crime No. 282 of 2026 under Sections 64(1), 74, 77 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Aarif had a consensual relationship with a major‑age girl, recorded an obscene video, and used it to …

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHUKLAversusRAKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Shukla, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (South), Kanpur Nagar to decide MACP No. 27 of 2023 expeditiously. The petitioner argued that the claim had been pending since 2023 without progress. The Court noted that no …

SMT MIFRAH FATIMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal FIR (Case Crime No. 218 of 2026) had already been lodged under sections 87, 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The …

RAMAADHAR YADAVversusSHRI VIVEK MISHRA, IN-CHARGE EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Ramaadhar Yadav filed a contempt application against Shri Vivek Mishra, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 18‑05‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 7456 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed because the opposite party had not complied with the writ order despite …

CHANDAN AND ANOTHERversusFAIJAUL HASAN

The petitioners Chandan and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mau, to decide a Section 6‑C‑2 temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 1418 of 2009. The High Court examined the petition and found that no …

BANARSI PATELversusSTATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Banarsi Patel filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to free his land of all encumbrances. The Court held that the relief sought amounts to an injunction arising from a pure civil dispute involving factual questions. Accordingly, the Court …

JAY PRATAP RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Jay Pratap Ram filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to remove encroachments on Gaon Sabha land (Gata no.278). The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh …

KANCHAN PRADEEP VISHWAKARMA AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Kanchan Pradeep Vishwakarma and another sought the release of the full claim amount awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that a similar issue had been finally decided on 10 September 2026 in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 Ors. v. Union of …

SMT. MOHINI KUSHWAH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Mohini Kushwah and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents informed the Court that a criminal case (Case Crime No. 612 of 2026) under Section 87 …

SMT RANA BEGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Smt Rana Begam filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 08‑09‑2026 by respondent No. 6 that rejected her claim for pension. The petition argued that the order was illegal. The Court observed that the District Basic Education Officer, who passed the order, does not have jurisdiction to …

SHOBHA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSANDEEP VIDHURI

The petitioners Shobha Chauhan and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Buddha Nagar to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Suit No. 956 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the petition …

MAHENDRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner sought release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that the issue of release had already attained finality by its earlier judgment in Ram Naresh Singh and 5 Ors. Vs. Union of India dated 10 September 2026. Accordingly, the present writ …

HOTI LALversusSRI BRIJESH KUMAR, COLLECTOR, COLLECTRATE COMPOUND

Hoti Lal filed a contempt application alleging that Sri Brijesh Kumar, Collector, failed to comply with the order dated 19‑05‑2026 in Writ C No. 19486/2026 which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no action had been …

PRINCE SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Prince Singh, accused under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered at Chopan police station, was detained since 26‑08‑2026 despite being on bail in a separate solitary case. He contended that the police had falsely …

AJAY KUMARversusMEWA LAL

Ajay Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Bansi, to decide a pending 7C(2) temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 256 of 2024. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at the …

RAKESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rakesh Singh in a rape case (CrPC 482) where the FIR alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and frivolous, and there was no medical …

M/S SS ASSOCIATESversusSRI SHAMBHU KUMAR

The applicant, M/S Ss Associates, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Shambhu Kumar, failed to comply with an order dated 06-10-2025 issued in Writ C No. 32030/2025 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court examined the claim that the order had been …

NURUL HASAN AND ANOTHERversusSHIVASHARANAPPA GN.

Nurul Hasan and another filed a contempt application against Shivasharanappa Gn., alleging that the opposite party had failed to comply with an order dated 06.05.2026 in Writ C No.16393/2026 which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful …

ELIAS AHMEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

Elias Ahmed applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0140 of 2026) filed under Section 87 BNS after being arrested on 14 April 2026. He contended that the FIR, lodged by the victim’s uncle, was false and that the victim’s statement under Section 180 BNSS showed she voluntarily left her uncle’s …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The juvenile applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in BNSS No. 10363 of 2026. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application in Crime No. 138 of 2026. The …

HANSRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hansraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a Recovery Certificate dated 07/09/2026 for a home loan, claiming the loan had been fully repaid, and requested mandamus to cancel the certificate and halt any coercive recovery measures. The court noted that the petitioner had …

RAMESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant, a former Assistant Clerk, was suspended in 1996 and served a charge‑sheet but was not provided the relevant documents despite repeated requests. An enquiry report was filed on 28‑Feb‑1997 without any oral inquiry or evidence, leading to a penalty of reversion to basic pay with loss of …

VIDYA AND 6 OTHERSversusSINGARI AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Kushinagar to decide their case (No. 466/2024) under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 within a fixed time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

JANKI KUSHWAHAversusVIJAY PRAKASH SINGH KUSHWAHA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Janki Kushwaha, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 10, Allahabad, to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C) dated 29‑04‑2023 in Case No. 397 of 2023. The High Court observed that keeping the …

MUNNA YADAV @ MUNNA LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case alleging offences under Sections 132, 352, 324(5) of the BNSS and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not …

PRADIP GAUDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pradip Gaud, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 561/2024 at Kotwali Hata, Kushinagar. The applicant argued that no direct evidence or dying declaration exists against him, and therefore he should be …

KARIMUDDIN @ PHERUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Karimuddin, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking the suspension of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending trial (State vs Karimuddin, NDPS case No 52A/2001). The applicant’s counsel argued that the warrant was issued because the accused …

SURENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Surendra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 04‑07‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Baradari, Bareilly, which had rejected his request to release a seized Pulsar motorcycle (UP25EE7473) and 528 g of opium. He alleged …

SHRI CHAND SINGHversusMR AVINASH PANDEY

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 20‑02‑2026 in Writ A No. 2550/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to issue a …

SHRI PALversusSHRI SHAILENDRA ASTHANA, GENERAL MANAGER

The applicant, Shri Pal, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Shri Shailendra Asthana, General Manager, failed to comply with the order dated 12 May 2026 in Writ A No. 7075/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that the opposite party had been …

JAGDISH PRASAD TRIPATHIversusAMIT PAL SHARMA AND 10 OTHERS

The applicant, Jagdish Prasad Tripathi, filed a contempt application seeking to enforce an order dated 12 March 2025 and to punish the respondents for alleged willful disobedience. He subsequently moved the court to withdraw the contempt application, citing an inherent technical defect and …

RAM DHANI PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ram Dhani Prasad was appointed as Officiating Principal of an educational institution on 01‑04‑2025 following a Committee resolution, but the required financial approval from the District Inspector of Schools was not granted despite submission of all documents. The petitioner relied on a recent …

GAUTAM KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gautam Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 336 of 2026 under Sections 65(1), 137(2) of the BNS Act and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that the sister of the first informant disappeared, but the victim’s statements under …

YESH YADAV @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Yesh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 08.08.2026 under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and a mandamus restraining his arrest. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down by the …

ASHER BHASKERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Asher Bhasker filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 23.07.2019 under Section 294 IPC and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. He also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273. …

SHYAMLAL PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on Plot No.424, recorded as forest land in Jaunpur district. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the petitioner had not approached the appropriate forest …

M/S PRAKASH PHARMACYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Prakash Pharmacy appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, rejecting its complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. The complaint alleged that the accused purchased medicines and, when demanded for the outstanding amount, used derogatory words and assaulted the complainant. The court …

FOOLA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Foola Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482, alleging that he might be arrested in a case (Cr.No.230 of 2020) involving IPC offences 147, 148, 149, 308, 323, 325, 504 and 506. The learned Additional Government Advocate objected that the offences do not attract imprisonment …

NIRMALA AND ANOTHERversusRAJ BAHADUR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Nirmala and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 14, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) filed in civil case No. 866 of 2026. …

ISRARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 35200 of 2026 filed by Israr, accused under Sections 70(2) and 137(2) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged kidnapping, attempted forced marriage and rape of a minor. The prosecution’s case relied on the victim’s …

HUSAN TARA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners argued that they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended …

MOHD LUQMAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Luqman and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 14‑01‑2026 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate/Fast Track Court‑II, Amroha, in a dowry‑related criminal …

M/S SAT GURU KRIPA AGENCYversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, M/s Sat Guru Kripa Agency, filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte order dated 11.11.2025 that cancelled its registration under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …

SHAKSHAR SINGH PUNDHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Shakshar Singh Pundhir filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed against him. The petitioner sought relief to file an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition could be disposed of by …

SMT SUSHMA SINGH AND 75 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 76 government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to grant them the first salary increment effective 1 January 2017, subsequent annual increments, and the payment of arrears with interest, relying on the CCS Revised Pay Rules, …

YASH PUNDHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Yash Pundhir filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed against him under the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner sought liberty to file an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, submitted that …

NEETU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neetu Singh, was appointed as a Shiksha Mitra but alleges that her honorarium, payable from 23 March 2026, has not been released despite a representation to the District Basic Education Officer, Farrukhabad. She filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the officer to pay …

GANESH RAJBHAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ganesh Rajbhar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 26‑06‑2026 and a direction that the police not arrest them under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 118(1) of the B.N.S. The petitioners also prayed that, before any arrest, the police …

DURVIJAY YADAVversusPANKAJ KUMAR SHAHI

The applicant, Durvijay Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Pankaj Kumar Shahi, failed to comply with an order dated 24 April 2026 issued in PIL No. 420 of 2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had …

AMIT KUMAR AHIRWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar Ahirwar, who was arrested under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and had been in jail since 13 August 2026. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Salman, applied for bail in a case under Sections 288 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act for allegedly possessing fire‑cracker material. He claimed false implication, lack of an independent witness to the arrest and recovery, and highlighted his cooperation …

VARSHA GARGversusTHE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Varsha Garg filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 31.05.2026 that moved her from District Hapur to Kannauj after ten months of service. She sought a certiorari to quash the transfer and also raised a pending representation/application before the authority. The State's …

ANOOP PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

Anoop Pal applied for bail in Crime No. 674 of 2026, charged under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act, alleging false implication in an FIR dated 21.07.2026 concerning a hotel altercation that resulted in minor injuries. The applicant argued that no weapon was identified, witness …

SMT. SHILPI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shilpi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, …

JASWANT SINGH (BORROWER)versusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Jaswant Singh, a borrower, filed a writ petition challenging an order that was appealable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The High Court examined whether the petition was maintainable given the existence of an alternative remedy. The Court held that the petitioner could pursue the …

ANUPAM SAMANTversusBHAGYASHREE SARWEY

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑2, Meerut, to decide a pending restitution of conjugal rights case (Section 9, Hindu Marriage Act) within the time fixed by the court. The petition argued that the case had …

SHEELU AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of candidates for the Trained Graduate Teacher (Sanskrit) post, challenged the final answer key dated 28 July 2026, specifically Question No. 96, seeking its quashment and a mandamus directing the authorities to treat option C as correct and revise their marks and selection …

MARKANDEY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Markandey Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide his application dated 4 July 2024 for the transfer of an arms licence originally issued to his deceased father. The application remained pending without a decision. The High Court noted the …

SHIRSTHI RAJPUT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shirsthi Rajput and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, …

THAKURI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSHRIRAM AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Azamgarh to dispose of suit No. 733/2021 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …

RAM NAWAL DECEASED AND 3 OTHERSversusSHADHU SHARAN AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Sant Kabir Nagar to decide a temporary injunction application (Form 6-C) dated 06.07.2025 in Original Suit No. 362 of 2015. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending …

ALOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Alok Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashal of an FIR dated 22‑07‑2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petition also requested that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any …

SMT. NISHA DEVI AND 3 OTHERSversusDEVICHAND AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shamli, to decide a temporary injunction application (6‑C) dated 22‑08‑2024 filed in Original Suit No. 200 of 2024. The High Court, noting that no useful purpose would be served by …

ONKAR NATH AND 2 OTHERSversusSRI PAWAN KUMAR GANGWAR

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 28‑10‑2025 issued in Writ C No. 27764/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court examined the claim and found a prima facie case of willful disobedience but …

M/S NIRANJAN SALES AND 2 OTHERSversusMS M. ARUNMOZHI

M/s Niranjan Sales and two others filed a contempt application seeking to summon Ms M. Arunmozhi and punish her for allegedly willfully disobeying an order dated 13 July 2026 in Writ‑C No.26309 of 2026. The applicants argued that without such relief they would suffer irreparable loss and injury. The …

MUKUND TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mukund Tomar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., to consider his candidature for district allotment based on his quality point marks and his position (Serial No. 512) in the published select list. The petitioner argued that his application was …

MAYA DEVI WIDOWversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Maya Devi, a widow, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and related authorities to pay all post‑retirement dues of her deceased father‑in‑law, a Class IV employee of Nagar Palika Parishad Hathras, including gratuity, provident fund, earned leave and group …

SMT. KAILASHI DEVIversusSHRI YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND 22 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Kailashi Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Court No. 3, Gorakhpur to decide a pending Section 7‑C temporary injunction application in Civil Suit No. 931 of 2016. The High Court observed that keeping …

VIRENDRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner sought the release of the entire claim amount awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that a similar issue had already been decided in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 Ors. v. Union of India), where the claim amount was ordered to be released. The …

SMT. TARANNUM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was consensual …

PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHERversusMAHENDER SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Pratap Singh and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mainpuri, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 1254 of 2023. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending …

M/S BHARAT ENTERPRISESversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

M/s Bharat Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 29‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2018‑19. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …

SHOBHAWATI AND ANOTHERversusMOHD AMAAN AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a 20 April 2018 order that directed the respondents to hand over vacant possession of allotted land. The applicant claimed that although possession was initially handed over in 2018, the respondents demolished the boundary wall …

SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of two orders dated 10.08.2026 and 22.08.2026 and a mandamus directing the respondents to allow him to continue as a Rojgar Sewak in Gram Panchayat Battupur with due honorarium. He argued that his mother’s election as Gram …

VIJAYKANT YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vijaykant Yadav and another, who have been absconding for 14 years, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 in connection with offences under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 (ss.3,5A,8) and the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act, 1960 (s.11). The learned Additional …

KAMLESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Kamlesh applied for bail in a criminal case involving sections of the IPC and CrPC, alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim alleging assault. He argued that the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed, the injuries were minor, and a civil dispute existed between …

MUNNI DEVI @ MEERA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Munni Devi @ Meera and Chandrashekhar Vishwakarma in a case under Section 108 BNS alleging abetment of suicide. The applicants contended they were falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged after a 20‑day delay, and there was …

ASHISH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Yadav, who is charged under Section 80(2) of the CrPC, Section 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No. 160 of 2025. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s key witnesses – the deceased’s …

NAIM AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Naim Ahmad, a collection executive of Hero Finance Corporation Ltd., was arrested in connection with FIR No. 185 of 2026 under Section 316(5) and has been in jail since 19 August 2026. He filed a bail application, asserting innocence, lack of any complaint from the alleged aggrieved …

VARTHANA FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

Varthana Finance Private Ltd filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute a Section 14 order of the SARFAESI Act dated 10‑11‑2025 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court decision in C. Bright v. District …

MUNNILAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur, to decide MACP No.447 of 2019 (Munnilal & others v. Udairaj & others) which had been pending since 2019. The petition argued that continued delay served no useful purpose and that the …

RAKESH DIXITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesh Dixit, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to grant him service benefits and pensionary benefits on the post of Lab Assistant, based on a pay grade of Rs. 4,600 approved on 19 September 2014 and a Government Order dated 5 …

GULFAN @ GULPHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gulfan Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery actions of a cooperative bank. Both parties agreed that the petition should be decided in accordance with the earlier order in Bajanth v. State of U.P. (RIT‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The court considered the …

RAHUL KUMARversusSMT ANSHIKA

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.1, Ghaziabad, to decide his divorce case (filed under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955) within a stipulated period, alleging undue delay since …

RAM ASREYversusSANJAY GAUTAM AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Kanpur Nagar to decide an original civil suit (No. 2554/2013) within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautioned …

SHAMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shama and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and consent, and claimed they had applied for …

RAJINDER PAL SINGHversusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajinder Pal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No.4 of 2022 (NHAI vs. Rajinder Pal Singh) within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that an application under Section 34 of …

SUKHVINDAR SINGHversusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sukhvindar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No. 7 of 2023 (NHAI v. Sukhvindar Singh) within a fixed period as mandated by Section 34(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The …

MUKESH KUMAR SAHUversusANTIM KUMAR JAIN AND 9 OTHERS

Mukesh Kumar Sahu filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lalitpur, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Civil Suit No. 120 of 2024. The High Court, after examining the petition at the …

SMT. PANCHALI @ PANCHO (CORPUS) AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition claiming that his wife, Smt. Panchali, and their two‑year‑old daughter were being unlawfully detained by him. The petitioner alleged that the wife had left the matrimonial home and that no action was taken after a police complaint. The …