Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Baghpat to decide a pending temporary injunction (8-C2) application in Case No. 315 of 2025. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at the admission …
Petitioner Ajai Sharma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to Respondent No.2 to decide his application for early hearing of an appeal filed on 27.08.2026. The petition argued that the application required expeditious consideration. The Court observed that the petitioner had already filed the …
Lal Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0290 of 2023) where he is charged under Sections 401 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that the allegations against him are false, that he was not present at the scene, and that his name appears only in a co‑accused’s confessional …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Geeta in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 110 and 117(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed the FIR was false and stemmed from a petty dispute, emphasizing her clean criminal record and willingness to …
Azim Ansari applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal No. 46 of 2025) alleging he hacked a bank account and siphoned Rs.42.5 lakh, with a recovered car linked to the proceeds. The FIR was lodged on 8‑Dec‑2025 and the accused has been in custody since 13‑Sep‑2026. The prosecution argued the …
Naushad, the accused, was detained on 22 May 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a cyber‑crime case pending trial. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail, claiming false implication and noting that he is …
The accused Azam and Smt. Amna applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging false implication and that the seized 18 kg of meat was left on their doorstep by co‑accused without any independent witness. The State opposed the bail. The High Court noted that …
The petitioner, Veer Singh, a farmer, challenged an order dated 25 June 2026 issued by the Chairperson of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, alleging that it was not appealable. The revenue raised a preliminary objection that the order was indeed appealable and that the petitioner must first exhaust …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Dilshad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 35120 of 2026, seeking release in a case under Sections 310(2) and 61(2) of the IPC and CrPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that co‑accused …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Atrauli, Aligarh, to decide a Section 6-C2 temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 72 of 2025. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending would serve no …
The applicant, Shabana Parveen, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to approach the concerned court for regular bail and that his interests be protected in the interim. The opposing counsel …
The applicant, Aleem Shamsi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to approach the concerned court for regular bail and be protected from any coercive action for a short period. The opposing …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2026) involving alleged inducement of a minor under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of the CrPC and Sections 51/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements indicated a …
The petitioners, Mohd Afjal and another, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the entire claim amount awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The claim had already attained finality by a prior judgment of this Court dated 10 September 2026 in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 …
The petitioners, Ram Tirath and another, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the entire claim amount awarded to them by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The respondents, Union of India and another, opposed the relief. The Court observed that the same issue had already been finally decided in …
The petitioners, Geetanjali Kumari and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Firoz @ Ajmeri, who is accused in Crime No. 7 of 2026 under Sections 305(A), 317(2) and 331(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 21 January …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hathrus, to decide a temporary injunction (7C2) application pending in Original Suit No. 142 of 2026. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus under Article 227 directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Gunnaur to decide Suit No.10 of 2025 within a time frame fixed by the High Court. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …
Petitioners Smt Adeeba Parveen and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel and the private respondent's …
Ram Prasad, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under sections 80(2), 85, 91 of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations were vague, there was no material showing dowry harassment, and that a co‑accused had already been …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Yadavati, a 69‑year‑old woman, under Section 482 CrPC in connection with FIR No.209 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 109, 351(3), 333 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant was alleged to have used …
Ayush Mahato, a driver, was arrested on 12 September 2026 under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Punishment for Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 109(1) of the BNS Act for allegedly transporting three live cattle for slaughter. The applicant contended that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal case (FIR) under Section 87 BNS had already been lodged (Case Crime No. 121 of 2026) with the police. The petitioners did not …
The petitioner, Viplav Prakash Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant a revised salary matrix, increments, and selection pay scale based on a final selection list dated 23.08.2016. The petition also requested the court to issue any other …
Hardeep Singh and six others filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 15‑09‑2026 and to stay their arrest under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed …
Rekha Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad, Hathras to pay the pending dues of her deceased father, including earned leave, gratuity, dearness allowance, provident fund and bonus, and also to decide on various pending representations. …
Sobha Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Kaushambi, to decide her divorce petition (Case No. 207 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging undue delay since 2025. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Aligarh to expedite original suit No. 861/2024. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …
Mohammad Danish filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 32, Azamgarh, to decide a temporary injunction application (7‑C2) pending in Original Suit No. 572 of 2022. The petition was presented before the Allahabad High …
The petitioners, three government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a directive for the State of Uttar Pradesh to pay their salaries and arrears as per Government Orders dated June and December 2014, and also to compel the District Basic Education Officer to decide a representation filed on …
The petition was filed by Smt. Kusma Devi seeking a direction to the Gram Nyayadhikari of Madhogarh, Jalaun, to decide a temporary injunction application (7‑C2) dated 24‑01‑2023 filed in Suit No. 19 of 2023. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose, …
The petitioner, Ajay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hapur to dispose of Civil Suit No. 204 of 2024 within a short, court‑specified period. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Bareilly, to decide a pending 6-C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 492 of 2026. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful …
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, a senior lecturer appointed as Officiating Principal of a college, challenged the respondents' order dated 08.03.2025 which denied him the salary of a Principal. He argued that, under the precedent set in Veeresh Chandra Mishra v. State of U.P., an officiating …
Petitioner Seema Kumari sought transfer from District Commissionerate, Agra to District Mathura on compassionate grounds and also asked the court to direct the respondent to decide her pending representation dated 04.08.2026. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus …
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Maurya, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to transfer him from Kushinagar district to a Varanasi zone (Jaunpur, Gazipur or Chandauli) on compassionate grounds due to his mother's medical emergency, and also to compel the second respondent to …
The petitioners, Hari Singh and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petitioners possessed an efficacious alternative remedy in the form of an appeal under the applicable law. …
Subash Upadhyay filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a provisional order dated 14‑08‑2026 in FIR No. 125 of 2024 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, which led to criminal case 65485/2026 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
The applicant, Raj Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. issued while he was already on bail. He contended that the warrant was issued without any …
The petitioners, 38 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them salary and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that the order entitled them to such remuneration and that the respondents had …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Maurya, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide his 2016 suit within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
Petitioner Preeti filed a writ petition challenging the selection of a licensee for a fair price shop, alleging various irregularities. The High Court heard arguments from both parties. The Court noted that the petitioner must demonstrate a lis to the proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Rahish Pal, a revenue officer (Lekhpal), who feared arrest in a case (Crime No.237 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The petitioners, Muskan and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage …
The petitioner, Dadan Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a pending application (Misc. Application No. 487 of 2023) filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC, which sought enforcement of a temporary injunction granted in the original suit. The petitioner alleged …
The petitioner, Rahul Mittal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Bulandshahr to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) in Suit No. 24 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner, Dr. Awanish Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to consider his representation dated 30 March 2026 for promotion in the PMHS Cadre and entitlement to First and Second Special Assured Career Progression benefits, based on his seniority …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.111 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 318(4) of the BNS and Sections 60, 63 and 72 of the Uttar Pradesh Excise Act. The State opposed the application, arguing …
The petitioners, Khushi Upadhyay and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affidavits confirming a voluntary …
Shyam Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mathura, to decide a temporary injunction (6-C) application pending in Civil Suit No. 1629 of 2025. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, disposed of it at the …
Satendra Nath and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which was pending in the original suit. The petition sought only a direction to the lower court to decide the application promptly. The High …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gautam, who was implicated in a theft of electric wire case (Criminal No. 135 of 2026) under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) BNS. The applicant claimed innocence, stating his name appeared only in a co‑accused's confession and …
The petitioner, Sughar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application filed in the original suit (No. 1993 of 2025) in favor of the respondents. The petitioner had objected to the injunction on 26 September 2025, and the writ petition …
The petitioner, a workman, obtained a labour award on 7 October 2013 (published 31 May 2014) in Adjudication Case No. 23 of 2013, which has become final up to the Supreme Court. He filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious execution of that award, alleging that the Assistant Labour Commissioner …
The petitioner, Harish Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to accept his managerial contribution for grant of General Provident Fund, pay salary arrears of Rs. 3,66,773 from 5 Oct 1987 to July 1993, and settle pensionary dues, as well as …
Petitioners Bhagwan Sharan Shau and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the IPC and a mandamus restraining their arrest. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the …
Sangram Singh, a workman, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious execution of a labour award dated 09‑09‑2013, which had become final up to the Supreme Court. The award was published on 31‑05‑2014 in Adjudication Case No. 14 of 2013. The petitioner had moved an execution application before …
The petitioner, a workman, obtained a labour award dated 14‑11‑2013 in Adjudication Case No. 53 of 2012, which has become final up to the Supreme Court. He filed an application before the Assistant Labour Commissioner for execution of the award, but no final decision has been rendered despite notice …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Gyanpur to remove alleged illegal encroachments on three plots of land in Village Kaliyapur, Bhadohi. The petition relied on IGRS complaints showing that civil suits concerning the plots were …
The petitioner, a workman, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious execution of a labour award dated 12‑11‑2013, which had become final after Supreme Court confirmation. The award was to be executed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner, but no final decision had been rendered despite a notice …
The petitioner, a workman, sought a writ for the expeditious execution of a labour award dated 13‑11‑2013, which had become final up to the Supreme Court. The award was published on 01‑05‑2014 in Adjudication Case No. 13 of 2013, and the petitioner had filed an execution application before the …
The petitioner, Suman Lata, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Registrar (Respondent No.2) to reconsider her request for extension of work on a contract service basis and to decide a representation filed on 31-08-2026 within the stipulated time. The respondent's counsel indicated …
The petitioner, Phoolmati Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application (7C2) filed in the original suit No. 613 of 2025, along with her objection (Paper No. 25C2). The court noted that the petition had no substantive merit beyond the …
The applicants, Smt. Bhagwati and five others, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. They later sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to re‑file a fresh petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents …
The accused Sulekha applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 600 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR dated 05.08.2026. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code indicated that she voluntarily went with the accused and no sexual act was …
Radheshyam filed a contempt application alleging that Pramod‑II failed to comply with the order dated 23‑03‑2026 in Writ C No. 3565/2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted a prima facie case of willful disobedience but declined to issue a notice at this stage. …
Shivam Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation to consider his claim for a compassionate appointment arising from his father's death in service in 2003, contending that the widow had invoked the mechanism then and the claim remained …
The petitioners, Sahatu (deceased) and five others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the second respondent, a Gaon Sabha, to decide Case No. 730 of 2014 under Section 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950. The petitioners alleged …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a stay order dated 04‑02‑2026 that restrained demolition of structures on land covered by Criminal Revision No. 599 of 2026. The stay order related to Arazi No. 993 under Section 152 of the BNSS, 2023, while the applicants …
The petitioners, Nagendra Singh and another, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Special Judge (EC Act) in Banda to decide SCC No. 20/2024 within a stipulated period, alleging irreparable loss due to the pending matter. The petitioners argued that the delay was causing them …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pramila, who feared arrest in a case (Crime No. 197 of 2026) involving alleged assault under IPC sections 351(3), 352, 109 and 115(2). The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, noting that the FIR did not mention injuries to …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 46 of 2026) arising under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual …
The petitioners, Dev Kumar and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 110. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the offences did not attract imprisonment …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pankaj @ Prashant in a criminal case (Crime No. 135 of 2026) under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that the applicant had enticed the daughter of the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Neelesh Kumar and two others who were arrested under Section 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated and pointed to their existing …
The petitioners Suhani Gautam and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, alleging that a criminal case was pending. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, through the Additional Chief Standing Counsel, informed the Court that an FIR had already …
Haricharan Yadav applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, alleging that he and co‑accused were caught with three cattle for slaughter. The police recovered the cattle and arrested the accused on …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rinku Pal, who was charged under Sections 137(1), 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for alleged rape of a minor. The prosecution alleged that the accused lured the …
The Committee of Management of Gyan Prakash Inter College filed a contempt application alleging that Sri Dinesh Singh willfully defied the order dated 11‑05‑2026 issued in Writ‑C No.41018 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied …
The accused Mohd. Gufran and Mohd. Sufian applied for bail in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. They claimed false implication, noting that one has a prior conviction while the other has no criminal record, and …
The accused Bhura applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 104 of 2026) alleging matrimonial atrocities, forced miscarriage, and assault. He claimed false implication, stating that the FIR was lodged by the victim's father and that there is no definitive medical evidence linking him to the …
The applicant Jitendra Singh filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 378 of 2020) instituted under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that he was part of an organized gang and a …
The petitioners, a group of 79 employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay arrears of salary fixed after the first and second Assured Career Progression (ACP) and to decide pending representations regarding those arrears. The petition also requested the court to …
The petitioner, Smt. Shiksha Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Banda, to decide her mutual‑consent divorce petition (No. 370 of 2026) filed under Section 13‑B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The parties had been …
The applicant, M/s Santosh Pal, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sri Amrit Abhijat, willfully disobeyed a judgment and order dated 19‑05‑2026 in Writ‑C No. 19526 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had …
The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a timely decision on his representation for a disability pension. The respondent, the State of U.P. and the Basic Education Officer, argued that a fresh representation could be filed and decided according to law. The Court, without delving …
Raj Kumari filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Court examined whether the claim could be released after the earlier judgment in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 (Ram Naresh Singh & 5 Ors. v. Union of India) had …
The petitioner Laxman Rai filed a writ petition challenging the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court noted that the issue of release of the claim had already attained finality in its earlier judgment dated 10 September 2026 in Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC, which was pending in the original suit decreed ex-parte. The High Court, noting that no substantive hearing was required, disposed of the writ petition …
The petitioners, Dashrath and four others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing arguments, counsel for the petitioners prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The petition was not opposed by the respondent's counsel. The Court dismissed the writ petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 22‑08‑2025, issued under section 40 of the Act, and to recover Rs.14,39,562.33 plus interest from the promoter. The petitioner alleged that despite …
The petitioner, Smt. Sandhya Prajapati, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kannauj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) in Suit No. 308 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (S/D) of Maharajganj to decide Original Suit No. 200 of 2006 within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which restricts constitutional courts …
Petitioner Princika Agrawal filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bijnor, to decide her Section 25 Hindu Marriage Act application (Case No. 642 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the case was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 8166 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached an out‑of‑court …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove an illegal encroachment of Nahar Ki Patri from land belonging to respondent No.10 in Jamunipur village, Prayagraj district. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy …
Kapil Kumar Prajapati applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 134 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNSS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that he had enticed the daughter of the first informant, but the victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of …
Harsh Chauhan, accused under several provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, filed a bail application while already in custody since August 30, 2024. He contended that the police had falsely implicated him and highlighted his extensive criminal history. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kumar in a criminal case (Crime No. 405 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The FIR alleged that the applicant had enticed the daughter of the first …
M/s R.R. Traders, an auction purchaser of a mortgaged property, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Allahabad, to decide a pending stay‑vacation application (I.A. No.4938/2026) in S.A. No. 662 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the delay in the …
Nar Singh filed a contempt application alleging that Akanksha Gautam had failed to comply with the order dated 27 April 2026 in Writ B No. 1810/2026, which required her to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no action was taken. The court examined …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Guddu Khan under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, with the only material linking him being a police informer's …
The applicant, Vipin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 603 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS Act. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory …
The petitioner, Suresh Thakur, sought a compassionate appointment after his father, a police barber who died in harness, was granted a post of Cook in the Police Department under the Dying in Harness Rules. The petitioner argued that he is a barber, lacks cooking skills, and a barber vacancy exists, …
The petitioner, Ram Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to pass an order on his replies dated 03‑04‑2025 and 21‑04‑2026 seeking cancellation of a charge sheet dated 19‑03‑2025. The petitioner alleged that the authorities had not yet considered his …
Mahendra and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18‑09‑2026 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They sought a certiorari to quash the FIR and a mandamus directing the police …
Shiv Prasad filed a bail cancellation application (No. 470 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Nitish Shakya, did not appear to press the application. The State's counsel was present. The court noted the absence of any representative for the applicant and dismissed the …
The accused, Prabhushekhar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 133 of 2026) involving alleged firing of a licensed gun during a property dispute in Etah, Uttar Pradesh. The FIR alleged that he opened fire after a dispute over a plot of land, but the counsel argued that the matter was …
The applicant Amit Tripathi filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking discharge of the criminal case State vs. Amit (Criminal Writ No. 71/2025) pending before the Additional District Judge, Allahabad. He contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge of the criminal case State vs. Pankaj Kumar Rawat pending before the District Court, alleging that no offence was made out and that the prosecution was malicious. The applicant argued lack of …
The petitioner, Prachi Rathore (alias Siya Rathore), filed a bail cancellation application (No. 487 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the matter. The learned judge noted the absence of …
Smt. Dukhanti Devi filed a bail cancellation application (No. 483 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel did not appear to press the application, and no representative was present on her behalf. The State, represented by its brief holder, was present. The Court observed …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Patel, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 504 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the matter. Consequently, the court noted the absence of prosecution. The …
Sohan Singh filed an application for cancellation of his bail before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and the court noted the absence of any representation. The learned judge observed that the application could not be proceeded with …
Smt Nastaeem Parveen filed a bail cancellation application (No. 502 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. The applicant's counsel, Tarun Kedar Nath Singh and Umesh Singh, did not appear to press the application. The court noted the absence of any …
Zeenat Quraishi filed a bail cancellation application (No. 499 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of representation and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The State's brief …
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. The court noted the absence of prosecution and dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vivek …
Smt. Kusumlata filed a bail cancellation application (No. 511 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Ugrasen Kumar Pandey, failed to appear to press the application. No other representative appeared on behalf of the applicant. The court noted the absence of prosecution …
The applicant filed a criminal complaint alleging that his father, Satyaveer Singh, was murdered in a conspiracy involving Sohanveer, Arjun Singh and others, and that the police had failed to act despite a DSP report identifying the accused. The Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dhananjay Singh, who is charged with offences including assault and causing death under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2) and 103(1) BNS. The incident involved the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Khadak Singh, who is charged with assault offences including sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2) and 103(1) BNS, resulting in the death of Chandrika Singh. The …
Ram Saware Pathak, a resident of Nevada Bhavapur in Ayodhya district, claimed that a Khadanja (drainage) constructed under the MNREGA scheme in 2014‑15 on his land was destroyed by Devdhar Tiwari and his sons. He complained to the District Magistrate and Sub‑Divisional Officer in May 2024 but …
The applicant, Rajeev Seth, filed a civil contempt application (No. 4333 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. The matter was listed for hearing on the revised list. Neither the applicant’s counsel, Anilesh Tewari, nor any representative appeared, and no request for adjournment …
Hanuman Prasad filed Criminal Appeal No. 2038 of 1984 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The appellant failed to appear at the hearing, and the respondent's counsel was present. The court received a death verification report confirming that the sole appellant had died. The …
The appellants Rais Pal and Sadhu Ram were convicted for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on the consistent ocular testimony of three eyewitnesses, including an injured witness, and medical evidence that corroborated the …
The applicant, Pankak Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 857 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 281, 125(1), 125(b) and 106(1) of the B.N.S. A compromise between the parties had been reached and subsequently verified by the …
The appellant, Ramdatt Yadav, was charged under the Indian Penal Code for assault and under Section 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly insulting a Scheduled Caste victim inside a room. The appellant argued that the FIR was lodged after …
Amar Singh filed a criminal appeal (No. 150 of 1988) against the State. While the appeal was pending, the sole appellant, Amar Singh, died, as confirmed by a death verification report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad. The learned A.G.A. filed a compliance affidavit, which was taken on …
The applicant Bhupendra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3691 of 2019) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed but the applicant did not appear, while the Attorney General for the State was present. The court observed that …
The petitioners Pramod and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3706 of 2019) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State’s counsel was present. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 859 of 2023, which arose from a complaint under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. A compromise between the parties had been reached and subsequently …
United India Insurance Company appealed an award made by the Commissioner under the Employees' Compensation Act in favor of Surya Lal, a tanker driver who claimed 60% disability after a road accident. The claimant relied solely on a disability certificate and did not produce evidence of his income …
The Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology and Sciences filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Labour Court, U.P., Varanasi and 28 other respondents. The petition sought relief from the actions of the Labour Court, though the specific relief sought is not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed on 30 September 2026 by Mohd. Naushad, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC arising from a 2009 loan fraud involving a property already mortgaged. The applicant argued that the loan of Rs. 4.5 lakh was …
The appellant Smt. Roopwati filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The counsel for the respondents informed the court that at the time of taking cognizance, neither a charge‑sheet nor a final report had been filed, and the investigation against one accused, …
Lakhraniya Devi filed a writ petition challenging a 7 May 2018 order that denied arrears of salary and retirement benefits to her late husband, a primary school teacher who retired in 2000 and died in 2004. The petitioner argued that the husband’s appointment on 15 April 1964 was lawful, as …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 7027 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter remained pending for several years, and when the case was listed, none of the parties appeared, although the learned Additional …
The accused Ajay Shahi, Munna Kushwaha and Rajendra Rai were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge in 2013 for offences under IPC sections 323, 34, 452, 504 and 506 based on the testimony of the complainant and his relatives. The appellants filed a criminal revision alleging that the FIR was …
The petitioners Kailash and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared for either side, though the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that …
The applicants, accused of assault and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from a land dispute, obtained anticipatory bail from the Additional Sessions Judge, but the bail was limited to 30 days despite the charge‑sheet already being filed. The applicants contended that such a …
Ramawadh @ Sheru Rajbhar applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3152 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 186 of 2020 under Sections 392 and 411 of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced later in an informant's statement recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC, …
The revisionist Smt. Sunita Chaudhary filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's order dated 15 May 2017 that summoned the opposite parties under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code. The revision sought to set aside that order. However, the opposite parties had …
The petitioner, Sultan Ahmad Khan, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a 2015 order of the Civil Judge and a 2021 order of the Additional District Judge that had rejected his interim injunction application and its appeal. The petition was listed as infructuous and no counsel …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents. The court noted the lack of any party presence and classified the petition as infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed …
Chameli Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by self‑immolation, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material showing cruelty or dowry demand …
The applicant Subhash Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summoning order dated 14 May 2025 in Criminal Case No. 451 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant argued that …
The revisionist, Mohammad Kamil, challenged a Gram Nyayalay order directing him to pay Rs 3,500 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed he had no permanent income, that his wife was living away of her own volition, and that the trial court …
The petitioner, Jagdish Prasad Sharma, filed Writ Petition No. 9859 of 2018 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The Court noted that the case fell …
The petitioners Alisher Khan and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR No. 0009 of 2026 (registered on 20.01.2026 under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 105 and 89) and a mandamus directing the second respondent not to arrest them. The learned Additional …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 8602 of 2022) in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition remained pending since 2022 and the petitioners failed to appear for hearing despite notices and a directive to mark the cause of …
Petitioner Shyam Lal filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The parties later settled the dispute, with the respondent agreeing to pay Rs.21,000 to the petitioner. The draft of the settlement amount was handed over to the petitioner's counsel on 28 September 2026. Upon receipt of the …
The petitioners, Tulsi Smarak Samiti, challenged the Commissioner’s order dated 13‑11‑2025 which set aside the Assistant Registrar’s cancellation of Registration No. 226/2001‑2002 and directed the District Magistrate to manage the Rajapur property. The core dispute concerned whether the subsequent …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Narendra Sharma, who was charged under Sections 105, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. for the death of an informant. The applicant claimed false implication, noting the FIR was lodged belatedly, lacked a date and time of the incident, and …
The applicant, a police inspector, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet and criminal proceedings arising from an FIR alleging rape, assault, blackmail and offences under the IT Act. The victim alleged that the applicant deceived her with a false promise of marriage, spiked her drink, recorded obscene …
The petitioner, Prem Chand Pankaj, filed Writ A No. 9550 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear, and no indication was made that the cause of action still survived. …
The petition Hira Lal v. State of U.P. & Others was filed in the Allahabad High Court in 2019 seeking relief through a writ petition. The matter was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the court. The case was placed in the category of writs likely to have become …
The petitioner, Hira Lal, filed Writ‑A No. 11288 of 2020 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The matter was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel did not appear, nor was the case marked to show that the cause of action still survived. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Rakhi @ Rekha and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to intervene in a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed but no counsel for either side appeared, although the State's …
Hira Lal and others were convicted under IPC sections 323/34, 325/34 and 504, receiving six months, two years and one year of imprisonment respectively, along with fines. They filed a criminal revision contending that they had already served more than six months, suffered health ailments, were not …
The petitioner, Jiwan Bima Rashratiya Sahkari, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner’s counsel later moved that the petition should be dismissed as it had become infructuous. The …
The applicant, Ramkrit Yadav, filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32338 of 2023) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was heard by Justice Samit Gopal. The court rejected the bail application. The order refers to the form of order issued in Criminal …
The applicant, Wali Ahmad alias Waliyat, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. after his earlier bail plea was rejected. The case involves charges under Sections 333, 352, 64 and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. based on a complaint lodged at Kemri police station. The trial court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anil in a criminal case under sections 115(2), 352 and 105 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out a four‑day delay in lodging the FIR and reliance on independent witnesses who said the incident was a …
Raj Kumar Verma filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 34114 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The application was opposed by the State of U.P. and another party. Counsel for the applicant were Kamlakar Pal and Satish Chandra Mishra; counsel for the opposite parties were Rahul …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Khan (alias Sameer Khan) in a case registered under Section 105 B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated, and that there was an inordinate delay in filing a Section 175(3) application, resulting in …
The petitioner, U.P. State Handloom Corporation Ltd., challenged an award of the Labour Court that declared the retrenchment of respondent Dinesh Mishra illegal and ordered his reinstatement with full back wages. The High Court examined whether the retrenchment complied with Section 6(P) of the U.P. …
The petitioner, Mohar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. did not object to the withdrawal. The Court allowed the withdrawal application, dismissed the writ …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Altaf, accused in a case under Sections 131, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 105 of the IPC for assault leading to the death of the informant. The informant’s FIR alleged that Altaf and three others, armed with danda, assaulted him, but medical reports …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Sharma in a criminal case (Crime No. 358 of 2025) under several sections of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal antecedents, and offered to pay the entire amount alleged to be due to the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Rishikesh Tripiri, informed the court that the matter had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The court considered whether the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramnaresh, accused under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem report could not ascertain the cause of death, the viscera report was missing, and there was no concrete evidence of his …
The petitioner, a former UPSRTC employee, was initially appointed Chowkidar in 1977, promoted to Office Assistant (Second) in 1978, then reverted to Chowkidar. Industrial disputes in 1984 and subsequent awards (1985, 2004) directed his reinstatement as Office Assistant and later promotion to Head …
A petition under Article 227 (No. 3705 of 2017) was filed by Krishna Gopal and another against Smt. Raj Kumari and others. The matter was listed as 'Likely to be Infructuous' and no counsel or parties appeared before the court. The bench noted the absence of any representation to press the petition. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief concerning a civil appeal filed by the respondent. The respondent's civil appeal was subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution, rendering the subject matter of …
Petitioners Gulrej and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑02‑2026 and a mandamus restraining their arrest, invoking several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …
Petitioner Rakesk Kumar Garg filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging an order in Original Suit No.06 of 2013. The petitioner produced a certified copy of the order, but the underlying suit had been withdrawn by order dated 12 September 2026. The Court held that the withdrawal of the suit …
The petition filed by Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology & Sciences was heard before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition sought relief against the Labour Court U.P. Varanasi and 28 others. The Court, after considering the submissions of counsel for both sides, …
The Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology and Science filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 30129 of 2015) against the Labour Court Varanasi and 28 other respondents. The petition sought relief (details not specified) and was heard before Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The Court …
The Sam Higginbottom Institute challenged awards of the Labour Court that held the retrenchment of 22 workmen illegal on the basis that they had worked more than 240 days in a calendar year, allegedly violating the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Institute argued that the workmen …
Petitioners Kanti Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 29‑April‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled through a compromise deed verified by the Special Chief Judicial …
The petitioner sought to quash a November 5, 2025 notification of the Uttar Pradesh Government that delegated the power to declare mining areas for e‑tender under rule 23(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021 to a District Officer via rule 73. The State argued that …
Mahendra Singh, a tenant, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging the eviction and rent-arrears decree dated 19‑02‑2024 passed by the Small Causes Court, Budaun, and its affirmation by the District Judge on 04‑02‑2026. He sought an extension of time to vacate the premises until 30 March 2027, …
The petitioner, Lalaram, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 17440 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Gufran Ahmad Khan, informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail relief and requested that the application be treated …
The applicant, Adil, was charged under IPC sections 376(3), 376(1), 506 and POCSO Act sections 5(3) and 2/6 for alleged offences in Muradnagar, Ghaziabad. His first bail application (No. 24585/2024) was rejected, but he filed a second bail petition (No. 17750/2026). The defence argued that the …
The applicant Lokendra Singh filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate II, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of Criminal Case No. 3060 of 2014 (State vs. Lokendra Singh), originally pending since 2009 under IPC sections 379 and 411. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradyuman Dhanak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 499 of 2025 alleging gang rape of a minor under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
Uttam Basaur applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 499 of 2025) alleging gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, a delayed FIR originally lodged in Madhya Pradesh, …
The petitioner, Suraj Kannaujiya, cleared the Uttar Pradesh Police Constable written exam, medical test and was declared successful, but his appointment was cancelled after a character verification report revealed two pending criminal cases – one under Section 60 of the U.P. Excise Act and another …
The applicant, Radhey Shyam Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the Secretary, Basic Education Parishad, U.P., willfully defied the High Court order dated 03.12.2025 which directed the filing of a fresh representation and a decision within six weeks on his grievance regarding the …
The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar Gupta and another, filed a writ petition challenging an enquiry report submitted by the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur, which investigated eleven allegations against them and found none established. The petitioners sought to object to the report, arguing that it was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking continuation of interim protection previously granted. The coordinating bench had directed the applicants to file a supplementary affidavit, which they failed to do despite receiving the interim order. On …
The applicant, Matin Husain, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel Suresh Kumar Gupta sought to withdraw the application. The standing counsel for the opposite party raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the request …
The petitioner, Smt. Birendri Devi, applied for an electricity connection to operate a private 10 HP tube well on her agricultural land under a government scheme. She submitted an affidavit, together with co‑sharers of Khasra No. 26, stating that there was no objection to the connection. The added …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mahtab, who had been in custody since 29 June 2025 in a case under Sections 123, 70(1) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim's statements recorded during trial did not support the prosecution's …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 443 of 2022, which pertained to crime No. 408 of 2020 involving offences under Sections 376, 377, 452, 323 and 506 of the IPC. The trial …
Ajay Chandra Seth, charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC for an offence alleged in a 2012 FIR, had been granted bail by the Sessions Court in 2014. The trial court cancelled his bail and issued a non‑bailable warrant because he failed to appear on three consecutive dates, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shyamveer in a case where a charge‑sheet under IPC sections 281, 191(2), 191(3), 352, 115(2) and 109 had been submitted. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was never arrested during investigation, and offered to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh @ Brajesh, who was charged under Section 64 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a medico‑legal report and forensic lab report that did not support …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision (No. 7632 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested to withdraw the revision and sought liberty to file an appropriate application before the trial court. The Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) …
