Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 3601–3800

MOHITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohit, who was charged in FIR No. 279/2026 for offences including Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 131, 115(2), 352, 117(2), 351(2) and 103(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the allegations were false, that the case was …

PUTTI LALversusSHRI SANJAY PRASAD AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Putti Lal, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, Shri Sanjay Prasad and another, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20‑11‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 17493 of 2025, which required the training period of police constables to be counted for promotional pay scale …

SMT. ISTUTI SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Istuti Sharma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 169 of 2025) filed under Section 12 of the Protection of …

SANJAY RAGHAVversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sanjay Raghav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking reinstatement in his government service. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others, opposed the relief. The learned Standing Counsel submitted instructions indicating that the petitioner …

AVKASH MAURYA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Avkash Maurya and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar National Security Act (BNSS). The State, …

PANKAJ AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Pankaj and another, challenged an objection raised by respondents 4 and 5 to the removal of a tamarind tree that had fallen on the petitioners' land. They argued that the tree was originally standing away from the disputed land, which is already the subject of writ petition 8928 of …

GULFAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists challenged the trial court's order of 10‑08‑2026 that framed charges under Sections 109(1)/3(5), 115(3)/3(5), 117(2)/3(5), 351(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, contending that there was no evidence to support the charge of attempt to murder and that the injured's statement was …

LUCKY SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lucky Saini, accused under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) BNS for a firearm assault on Navin Khanna. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the actual firing was done by co‑accused Dhruv Dhawan and that a monetary dispute …

BHOOP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Bhoop Narayan was arrested in connection with FIR dated 23.06.2026 lodged by the victim's father alleging enticement. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated she went with the accused voluntarily and no wrongdoing occurred. The accused, having no prior criminal record, had been in …

VIDYA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Vidya Devi filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 167 of 2026) invoking Sections 80(2) and 85 of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. She later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court. The …

SHIVAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Shivam filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 192 of 2026. The applicant had earlier obtained a stay on her arrest through a writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 18968 of …

BALRAM PANDEY URF BALIRAM PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Balram Pandey, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 335 of 2025) under Sections 65(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of an eight‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim’s medical report as showing no injuries …

VARUN SINGH @ ARVIND KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Varun Singh (also known as Arvind Kumar Singh) under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act in a case where the deceased had allegedly committed suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged …

OM PRAKASH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Om Prakash Nishad, who is charged under IPC sections 376, 506, 452 and IT Act section 67 for alleged rape, intimidation, house‑trespass and possession of an obscene video. The applicant contended that the victim’s statements and the …

SURENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Surendra Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 98 of 2026) involving alleged assault under Sections 109, 115(2), 117(2) and 352 of the BNS. The FIR, lodged two days after the incident, alleged that the accused assaulted the informant's wife with weapons, causing multiple grievous …

GOLDEE KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Goldee Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 772 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115, 351, 109, 191 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from an alleged assault and firing incident on 14 July 2026. The FIR named four persons, including Kumar, as …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vijay Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 165517 of 2024) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …

SAHIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sahid, was arrested in Crime No. 326 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and has been in custody since 15 July 2026. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that …

SMT VINITA VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Vinita Verma, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 3, Meerut, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 13526 of 2025) under Section 138 of the …

SMT. SARITA GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sarita Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a notice dated 01‑07‑2026 issued by Respondent No.3, alleging that her reply submitted on 30‑06‑2025 had not been considered. The Standing Counsel for the respondents raised no objection to disposing of the …

VISHANT @ VISHANT RAGHUVANSHI @ SINGHANIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 6 March 2026, the cognizance order dated 5 August 2026, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2689 of 2026) arising from FIR charges under Sections 281, 109(1) and 352 …

UME KULSOOM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dilshad Khan and his parents, sought custody of the four‑year‑old minor, Ume Kulsoom, after the child was produced before the court following an order directing the State and private respondents to do so. The private respondents, who are the child's maternal grandparents and aunt, …

DHANPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Dhanpal filed a bail application in Crime No. 149 of 2026, claiming he was not named in the FIR and was implicated on false allegations. His counsel pointed out that the post‑mortem report showed no external injuries and the cause of death could not be ascertained, creating doubt about …

BHARAT LODHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bharat Lodhi, who was charged under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting the nephew and sister‑in‑law of an informant, resulting in the nephew's death. The applicant contended that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's …

NIKHIL GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nikhil Gautam in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 103(1) of the IPC. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his name surfaced only in a later statement of an informant who was not an eye‑witness. The eye‑witness, …

RAIS AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Rais Ahmad filed a writ petition seeking a direction from the authorities to allow him to fill the examination form and pay the requisite fee for appearing in the 7th semester B.A. LL.B. examination, so he could complete the course within the stipulated time. The respondent university …

HUB LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hub Lal and another, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Sant Ravidas Nagar, to decide an application they had filed on 14 July 2026 in Execution Case No.70 of 2016. The Court examined whether the writ petition was …

SHESHNATH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Sheshnath Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove an illegal encroachment by respondent 6 on Plot No.705Mi, recorded as Usar in Mahuwari village, Jaunpur district. The petitioner argued that a proceeding under Section …

GAURAV VERMAversusSMT. PRAMILA SINGH

Petitioner Gaurav Verma filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Shahjahanpur, to decide his pending divorce case (Matrimonial Case No. 600 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had …

RAMESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Ramesh and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 10‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑05‑2026 in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3) and 352 of the IPC. They alleged false …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (G.T. No. 521 of 2008) initiated under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, along with IPC …

RAHUL MADANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 9, Varanasi, to dispose of a criminal case (Case No. 110142 of 2024) that had been pending since 2024. The case involved …

RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to dispose of Complaint Case No. 2205 of 2025 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

SUNIL KUMARversusPRAMOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner Sunil Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a civil judgment and decree dated 19-11-2025 and the related execution proceedings, and to direct the lower court to expedite an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The petitioner also requested a stay on …

RAM NARESH PRASADversusMAHESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Deoria to decide the original suit No.70/2020 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

PRAVESH DHAMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Pravesh Dhama, charged under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. in Binauli police station, filed a second bail application after his first was rejected. He argued that the co-accused Madhur @ Kukki had been granted bail, and asserted that he is a law‑abiding citizen who would not misuse …

RAM MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ram Mohan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the University of Medical Science, Saifai, to issue a disability certificate based on a medical test conducted on 5 August 2026. The University produced a written instruction indicating that the medical board found the …

NITIN GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 20‑01‑2021 issued in a criminal complaint (Arjun Singh v. Nitin Gupta, case No. 739 of 2014) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The counsel for the applicants …

HUSSAIN MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hussain Mohammad and Nagina (applicants) who were arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 405 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2) and 191(2). The applicants, who are in‑laws of the deceased, argued that they were implicated …

RADHEY SHYAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Radhey Shyam, applied for bail in a criminal case under IPC Sections 109(1), 3(5) and 117(2) arising from a delayed FIR dated 01‑06‑2026. He claimed false implication, stating the FIR was lodged by the victim's brother against two other persons and that his name was added only after a …

SMT. MEERA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 10(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, seeking an expeditious decision in the pending criminal case State vs. Mammu alias Ramdevi (Case No. 513 of 1976-77). The petition argued that undue delay in adjudicating the …

MAHESH PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahesh Prasad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had consented to the relationship …

PRAVEEN KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2206 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, …

PRAVEEN KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Praveen Kumar Tiwari, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Azamgarh, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2126 of 2025) filed under Section 138 of …

SMT. SHALINI KAPILAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Shalini Kapila, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C‑I, Agra, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 25631 of 2021) filed under Section 12 of the …

NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Naresh under Section 105 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.274 of 2026) where he was alleged to be involved in the death of an informant's wife. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of mens rea, delayed FIR …

MANJU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Manju Devi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having noted the parties' …

LALIT NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lalit Nagar, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 133 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) and 238(a) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case was based solely on the statements of a co‑accused, Sagar Kumar, …

SMT. ABHILASHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Abhilasha Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Etawah, to decide a pending maintenance case (No. 318 of 2023) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. …

ATI PICHHADA EKIKARAN MAHAABHIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner-society filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to issue a Scheduled Caste certificate to the Prajapati caste of the Shilpkar community. The petition was presented as a public interest litigation, but the court observed that the …

RAJENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusAJAY SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the dismissal of their civil revision against an order dated 27‑8‑2026. The lower court had earlier granted an ad interim injunction (application 6‑C) in the original suit and the petitioners …

GAURAV SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Singh, who was in custody for offences under Sections 305(a), 317(2) and 331(3) of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged theft. The applicant argued that his name was identified only through a co‑accused’s statement and that he has …

HARSH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order dated February and April 2025 in a case involving alleged offences under sections of the IPC. They alleged false implication and mala fide motives, arguing lack of evidence and …

UMESHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Umeshankar Shukla, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking protection of his possession rights under a decree dated 21 May 2025 in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. The High Court examined whether the petitioner could obtain relief through a writ or should …

VINOD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vinod Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 4 June 2015, the cognizance order dated 16 September 2015 and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No. 8100 of 2015 arising from an FIR under Section 409 of the Indian Penal …

IMRAN @ ROMIYOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Imran @ Romiyo, applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 565 of 2025) involving alleged assault with a knife and a blunt object under several IPC sections. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the assault resulted from sudden provocation, and that the injuries to the two …

HAZI SALMAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Hazi Salman and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking quashing of the FIR registered against them. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners withdrew the request for quashing the FIR. The Court consequently declined the …

SUDHIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sudhir and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summons and cognizance order dated 23 July 2026 in Criminal Case No.1464 of 2026, which arose from Crime No.459 of 2025 and alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS. …

KAMLESH NISHAD @ GURUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 305 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR named the applicant, but the eye‑witness statement …

TANVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Tanveer applied for enlargement of bail in a pending trial under Section 307 IPC (case No. 383 of 2019) alleging false police implication in an encounter with no injury to police. He had previously been granted bail in 2019 but could not appear due to the Covid‑19 pandemic and …

ABUZARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Abuzar, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no prior criminal record. He had been in custody since 14 August …

VIJAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vijay Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gorakhpur, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 118885 of 2021) filed under Section 138 of the …

ANGIRA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Angira Devi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 187 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR filed by a victim's brother. She contended that the alleged victims were friends who voluntarily accompanied her and that there was no injury, as shown by the medical report, …

DEVESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devesh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Jaunpur decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 178 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …

ANMOL SINGH @ CHHANGURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anmol Singh @ Chhangur in a murder case (Crime No. 130 of 2026). The applicant was named in the FIR, but the prosecution's case relied solely on circumstantial evidence, a confessional statement, and the recovery of a wooden stick pointed out by …

RAMADHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ramadhar Yadav, sought bail in a case originally filed under Section 87 of the Indian Penal Code against his son, which was later converted to Section 103(1) after a death. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rests solely on the statements of his son, a co-accused, and his …

BALVIR SINGHversusANIL KUMAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NALKOOP DIVISION

Balvir Singh filed a contempt application against Anil Kumar, Executive Engineer, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 10‑02‑2026 in WRIT‑A No. 19725 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing a notice, it granted the opposite party two …

RADHEYSHYAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners claim ownership of a parcel of land originally belonging to the deceased Sugia, having obtained mutation in the revenue records, while respondent No.3 (Sriram) asserts title based on a sale deed dated 25‑Jan‑1985, a claim upheld by the Additional Commissioner in 2004. In 2013 …

SMT. KIRAN DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Kiran Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to regularize her appointment as a Staff Nurse and to compel the Chief Medical Officer of District Chitrakoot to decide her pending representation dated 25-07-2026 within a fixed period. The …

DINESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Dinesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 130 of 2026. The petitioner alleged that the investigation had not been conducted properly and requested a time‑bound …

SMT. PRATIMA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Pratima Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to regularize their appointment as Staff Nurses and to compel the Chief Medical Officer of District Chandauli to decide their pending representations …

RIJWANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Rijwan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 94 of 2026) involving an alleged robbery of a cash‑laden van during an ATM cash‑loading operation. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no other material …

SUNITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Chief Medical Officer of District Chandauli to regularize her appointment as a Staff Nurse and to decide her pending representation dated 23-07-2026 within a fixed period. The petitioner …

SHYAMSUNDAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shyamsundar Singh, a recorded tenure holder of two plots in Deoria, challenged the compensation awards dated 16‑02‑2024 and the supplementary award dated 10‑07‑2024 issued by the Additional District Magistrate under Section 3‑G of the National Highways Act, 1956. He contended that the mandatory …

SMT. PREETI @ RUBYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Preeti @ Ruby under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) alleging her involvement in the death of a woman. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was based on false allegations and …

RADHIKAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Radhika filed a writ petition (WRIT‑B No. 4167 of 2026) seeking a direction to the Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Mau (respondent No. 2), to decide the pending proceedings of Case No. 1274 of 2025 under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Child Health (UPCH) Act. The petitioner argued that the case had …

HAIDAR ABBASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Haidar Abbas, who feared arrest in a criminal case involving alleged forgery of a sale deed. The prosecution alleged that Abbas transferred Rs 1,00,000 to an impostor who had executed the deed, and he was named as the primary …

JAKIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jaki, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party as per her …

TINKUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Tinku applied for bail in a Section 307 IPC case (Crime No. 881 of 2015) alleging false implication in an FIR dated 06-11-2015. He surrendered on 27-07-2026 after learning of the trial and has been in custody since then, while the other co‑accused have already been released on bail. The …

ATUL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Atul Kumar, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 266 of 2026) involving sections 64(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. He argued that the allegations arose from a consensual relationship and that the victim's testimony lacked credibility, also highlighting an unexplained …

AMOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amod Kumar, who was charged under sections 69, 352, 351(2) and 115(2) of the IPC for alleged rape. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship and a broken promise of marriage, and argued …

SMT MAMTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Mamta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 3 August 2026 that had rejected the victim’s application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Session Trial concerning offences under …

LAKHVINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Lakhvinder Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order dated 23‑08‑2024 that dismissed his discharge application in a rape case (Section 376‑C IPC) pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah. The …

DEEPAK JAIN NIRALA @ POET DEEPAK NIRALAversusSTATE OF U.P AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepak Jain Nirala, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 36373 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Chitranshu Srivastav, sought liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition with better …

MONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Monu Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22‑08‑2023 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑03‑2024 in a case under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The applicant contended that the offences are …

RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajesh, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 450 cartons of illegal liquor and charged under Sections 60, 63 and 72 of the U.P. Excise Act and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was merely the driver of the vehicle, had no role …

VIRENDRA @ CHHOTEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Virendra (also known as Chhote), applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, with the bail petition filed under Sections 137(2) and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim’s mother’s statement under …

MOHAMMAD ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohammad Arif, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication due to police rivalry and asserting that he is not a gang member. He had already been granted …

PRABHAT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prabhat Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State respondent No.3 to address his grievance and decide on his complaint letters dated 06.07.2026 and 07.07.2026. The respondents argued that the petitioner, being only a complainant and not an aggrieved party, lacked …

GAURAV SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Sharma, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 151 of 2026) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was initially lodged at a different police station and later transferred, …

PRITHVI SINGH DECEASED AND 3 OTHERSversusSADHU RAM DECEASED AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Saharanpur to decide Original Suit No. 231 of 2007 within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

KAMLESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kamlesh and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and others from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The respondents argued that petitioner No.1 is already married and is in a live‑in …

SUBEDAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Subedar Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State authorities to remove an encroachment on a public utility road (Gata No. 262) in Gudnupur village, Basti district. The petitioner argued that the encroachment caused irreparable loss and demanded …

DHEERAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Dheeraj Kumar was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 36 of 2026) alleged under IPC sections 103(1), 351(3) and the Arms Act (sections 4 and 25). The prosecution’s case rests on a knife allegedly recovered from an open place and statements of witnesses who were not eye‑witnesses. The applicant …

SUDHIR SHAHversusANUJ MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS

The plaintiff obtained a temporary injunction in a suit, which the defendants allegedly violated. The plaintiff filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the CPC seeking enforcement, which remains pending. A writ petition was filed seeking expeditious disposal of that application. The High …

PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMAversusLALVATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pramod Kumar Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Sadabad, Hathras, to hear and dispose of Case No. 51 of 2024 (Lalvati Devi v. Tarun Tyagi) within a fixed time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s …

RAMPAL YADAVversusPREMLATA

The petitioner, Rampal Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Azamgarh, to decide a divorce case (Case No.99/2018) pending since 2018. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been unduly delayed. The Court examined …

ISRARversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Union of India to pay compensation for Arazi No. 472, alleging a right over the land. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 providing that such claims be examined by a District Level Committee for compensation under the …

PITRAM AND 3 OTHERSversusCHINKU

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate at Dumariyaganj to decide a temporary injunction application (7-C2) dated 21.05.2026 filed in Original Suit No. 202 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending …

SMT. RAJNI SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Rajni Sharma, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and other respondents to renew her appointment as a part‑time instructor for the 2026‑27 session. She had served as a part‑time instructor from 2013 to 2024 and again in 2025‑26, but the respondents did …

SMT. SANGITAversusMANOJ KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sangita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (North, Meerut) to expedite the pending MAC case No. 246/2024 and decide it within two to three months. The High Court noted that the MAC petition had been pending since 2024 and that …

SUDHIR KUMAR SINGHversusBHARTIYA MEENA

The applicant, Sudhir Kumar Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Bhartiya Meena, willfully disobeyed the High Court's judgment and order dated 21 May 2026 in Writ‑C No.42933 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy of the order, the opposite …

CHANDRABHUSHAN SINGHversusYOGENDRA KUMAR PANDEY, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL- BADALAPUR

The applicant, Chandrabhushan Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Tehsildar Yogendra Kumar Pandey, failed to comply with an order dated 27 April 2026 issued in PIL No. 1063 of 2026. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no action was taken. …

SHIV KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Shiv Kumar Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State Bank of India to de‑freeze his account (No. 20239675247) which had been frozen following a complaint from an investigating agency about doubtful transactions. The bank contended that the freeze was …

SMT MUNNI DEVIversusANOOP KATIYAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a third party, filed an application under Order XXI Rule 97 of the CPC in an execution proceeding, which the Executing Court held maintainable. The decree‑holder filed a civil revision against that order, and the revisional court allowed the revision, effectively deciding the …

SMT MADHU RANIversusSHRI ANIL BHUSHAN CHATURVEDI

Madhu Rani, a teacher at the same Montessori school, filed a contempt application alleging that the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Director of Education had failed to comply with the 16 November 1998 order granting full salary and benefits to teaching and non‑teaching staff of private recognised …

ATUL TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Tripathi, who is alleged to be involved in the death of his daughter‑in‑law, a suicide by hanging that the prosecution treats as a dowry‑related offence under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The …

BHANU PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Bhanu Pratap Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) alleging that his name was only mentioned in the statement of a co‑accused and that there is no other material linking him to the alleged siphoning of funds. The FIR, lodged by a bank manager, did not name him, …

SINKU @ MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sinku @ Mukesh, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 168 of 2026) based largely on a second statement by an informant and a confessional statement recorded by the investigating officer, with no other substantive evidence. The applicant sought bail, arguing that the …

IDDU SHEKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Iddu Shekh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2024 and the Section 82 process in Sessions Case No.1253 of 2013, arising from offences under Sections 41, 411, 413 and 414 of the IPC before a Special …

RAMVEER MAURYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramveer Maury, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that there was no material linking him to any dowry harassment and that the presumption of dowry …

POONAWALA FINCORP LTD.versusKRISHNA BAKERY AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Poonawala Fincorp Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑II, Kanpur Nagar, to decide Misc. Case No.1188/2026 against Krishna Bakery and others without further delay. The petitioner argued that an inordinate amount of time had …

NEERAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeraj, who was arrested in a case registered as Crime No. 137 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that the alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old girl, was a consenting …

SHYAM @ ATENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Shyam @ Atendra applied for bail in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109 and 131 of the BNS, alleging false implication in a FIR dated 27‑07‑2026. The FIR alleged an assault involving his brother and father, resulting in minor injuries without any bony fracture. The applicant …

INDIAN BANKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Indian Bank filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing arguments, the petitioner's counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The judgment also clarified that …

SHANKAR LALversusINDRAJEET SINGH AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Shankar Lal, filed a contempt application alleging that he willfully defied a status‑quo order dated 12 September 2024, which had stayed the decree of the Board of Revenue and directed both parties to maintain possession of the suit property. The order required the parties to refrain …

RAJKUMARversusSRI RAVI KUMAR NG, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Rajkumar filed a contempt application against Sri Ravi Kumar Ng, CEO, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment dated 12 May 2026 in writ petition C No. 17544 of 2026. The High Court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but declined to issue notice at this stage. Instead, the Court …

SMT NOOR JAHANversusMR MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt Noor Jahan, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties wilfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 30.03.2026 in Writ Petition No. 3803 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, at this stage, no notice was issued to the …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, an outgoing Pradhan, faced two separate inquiries—one for alleged embezzlement and another under Section 95(1)(g) of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. Notices for recovery under Section 27(1) and for inquiry under Section 95(1)(g) were issued, and the petitioner’s reply was …

MOHIT KUMARversusMR. VIKAS KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 16 June 2026 issued in Writ C No. 23905/2026, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but no compliance had …

ARMAANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Armaan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 248 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely …

MANOHAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manohar Singh filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and a bank. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in accordance with the coordination bench order in Bajanth v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The court …

RAM BAHADUR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ram Bahadur Singh and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant them regular pension benefits with interest and to compel the Director (respondent No.2) to consider a representation dated 27.07.2026. The petitioners …

SHAKIR @ MOHD SHAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shakir @ Mohd Shakir, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.2327 of 2025, which arose from Crime No.95 of 2025 under Sections 64, 351(3) and 123 of the BNS. The application was filed …

SUBHASH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Subhash Chandra, who was accused under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide following the death of his wife. The applicant argued that the FIR and investigation did not establish any act of instigation, conspiracy or …

BRAMHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bramha Singh, challenged the cancellation of his arms licence on the ground that he has two pending criminal cases and claims false implication. The court noted that the petitioner has a history of multiple criminal cases, with five acquittals and two cases still pending, including …

PALTURAM NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Palturam Nagar applied for bail in a case filed under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had already been granted bail in a related gang‑chart case. He had been in custody …

ADARSH VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Adarsh Vishwakarma was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 and has been in custody since 10 March 2026. He filed a bail application claiming that the charges were based on a fabricated gang chart and that he had already been granted …

SHIV KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Shiv Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Mathura, to decide Appeal No. 183 of 2024 filed under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, which had been pending for a long time. The petitioner argued that …

GAYA PRASADversusLAL BAHADUR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaya Prasad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Duddhi, Sonbhadra, to decide Original Suit No. 107/2022 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. …

MOHAMMAD MUNNAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Munna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his passport for a ten‑year period, relying on a trial court order that gave a no‑objection but did not specify a duration. The Regional Passport Officer had instead issued a passport valid for only one …

DIVYANSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Divyansh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to grant him a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, and to compel the District Magistrate of Hamirpur to consider his pending application within a reasonable time. …

SHIV KESHARWANI ALIAS ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shiv Kesharwani, filed a criminal transfer application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to challenge any future rejection of the transfer. The court granted this …

RAJIV RANJAN MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 31.10.2016 and the cognizance order dated 13.10.2017 in a criminal case under Section 507 IPC. He contended that Section 507 IPC is a non‑cognizable offence and, per the …

AMBIKA RUGHTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ambika Rughta and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNSS and the D.P. Act. An inadvertent error duplicated petitioner‑3’s name in the cause title, and the court allowed amendment of the …

UMESH KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Umesh Kumar Sharma appealed a single judge's dismissal of his writ petition challenging his non‑transfer under Clause 3(2) of the Transfer Policy Act. He had been posted at Etawah since 7 November 2025, less than a year, and argued that a junior colleague was transferred before him, violating the …

RITA DEVIversusSHRI MAHENDRA SINGH TANWAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KUSHINAGAR

Rita Devi filed a contempt application against District Magistrate Mahendra Singh Tanwar alleging willful non‑compliance with an order dated 03‑07‑2026 issued in Writ‑C No. 22586/2026 directing the magistrate to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of the order had been served but the …

HARSH @ GOLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Harsh @ Golu was arrested in Crime No. 389 of 2026 for allegedly assaulting a deceased with a pointed object, leading to death. The FIR was lodged on 16‑07‑2026, four days after the alleged incident, and the informant was the brother of the deceased, not an eye‑witness. Statements of the deceased’s …

SIMPU DEVIversusSHRI MAHENDRA SINGH TANWAR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate failed to comply with an order dated 06‑07‑2026 issued in Writ‑C No. 22936/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to …

YASHVIR SINGHversusSHRI RAKESH BABU AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yashvir Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Firozabad to decide case No. 1103 of 2025 expeditiously. The High Court examined the authority of a constitutional court to impose a time‑bound schedule on a …

PAWAN KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

Petitioner Pawan Kumar Pandey filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on land recorded as Banjar (Khalihan) in the revenue records of Mauja Majhauwa, Madhuban, District Mau. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and 16 others, contested the …

AKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 06-11-2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 03-12-2025, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.434 of 2025. The High Court examined the …

SURENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious decision on his representation dated 10 May 2026 concerning the allotment of a fair price shop under the dying‑in‑harness rules. The High Court noted the petitioner's request and, after hearing counsel, directed the respondent authorities …

ANKUR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankur Chauhan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim, who appeared to be a major, had …

PULKITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Pulkit filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 28‑05‑2025 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 17‑03‑2026 in Sessions Case No. 992 of 2026. The charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS, which the …

RAVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Ravi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 112 of 2026) involving alleged assault and grievous injuries under IPC sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) BNS. The FIR was lodged by Chandini Pal a day after the incident, accusing four persons of breaking into her house and …

VINOD ARORA ALIAS RAVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Vinod Arora, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 340(2), 336(3), 338 and 318(4) of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025). The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to appear before the trial court and seek regular bail, …

MUKESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Mukesh Kumar, Edal Singh (alias Yashveer Singh) and Arvind Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 214 of 2025) involving alleged assault with an axe and resulting injuries. They contended that the FIR dated 19 July 2025 was false, arising from a family dispute over garbage …

CHUNNU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the State respondents, particularly respondent No.2, to pay compensation for their land that became unusable after submergence caused by the Chaudhary Charan Singh Rasin Dam. They relied on a prior coordinate bench decision (Writ‑C No.25521 of 2022) which …

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Kumar Shukla filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking that an inquiry initiated against the Village Pradhan, based on complaints, be concluded expeditiously. The court noted that a preliminary inquiry had been conducted and a show‑cause notice to the Village Pradhan and …

SMT ANEETA SINGHversusSHRI PAWAN KUMAR GANGWAR, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Smt. Aneeta Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Shri Pawan Kumar Gangwar, District Magistrate, had failed to comply with an order dated 13-08-2026 issued in Writ C No. 24016/2026 directing him to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a copy of …

NISHA DEVIversusMR. RAJESH KUMAR PAL

Nisha Devi filed a contempt application against Rajesh Kumar Pal for allegedly refusing to comply with the judgment and order dated 25‑02‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 35370 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy of the order, the opposite party had not acted on it. …

SMT. CHETNA MISHRAversusANKUR SHUKLA AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Chetna Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑4, Kanpur Nagar to decide a Section 6‑C temporary injunction application pending in Suit No. 2247 of 2024. The High Court observed that keeping the petition …

SMT. RIYA RAJPOOT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining any interference in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school certificates and a marriage registration to prove they …

VINAY SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vinay Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 711 of 2026) where he was charged under IPC sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) and IT Act sections 66(C) and 66(D). The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no money was transferred to his account, and that the FIR …

RASHIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rashid, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.151 of 2026) involving offences under Section 109(1) BNS of the IPC and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed, pointing out that the applicant’s prior criminal history – involving three earlier bail cases and a …

RAJ KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Police Inspector, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State to consider his promotion to Deputy Superintendent in accordance with service rules, to examine his seniority vis‑à‑vis a junior who had already been promoted, to produce relevant seniority and assessment …

RAJESH KUMARversusSHRI S RAJALINGAM DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER

Rajesh Kumar filed a contempt application against the Divisional Commissioner alleging willful non‑compliance of an order dated 06‑08‑2025 passed in an application under Section 529. The applicant claimed that despite service of the order, the opposite party had not complied. The court observed that …

SMT JUHI KHAN AND ANOTHERversusJAWED KHAN

The petitioners, Smt Juhi Khan and another, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jhansi, to expedite the pending case No. 481 of 2025 (Smt Juhi Khan & others v. Jawed Khan) that was proceeding under Section 144 of the …

UVAISversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Uvais, who was implicated in a case under Sections 64(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. for alleged misconduct with a 19‑year‑old woman who had previously been married and divorced. The applicant asserted that the relationship was …

LUCKY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Lucky Singh, the accused in Crime No. 267 of 2026, filed a bail application claiming he was falsely implicated in an assault case involving injuries to several persons. The FIR alleged that a group, including the accused, assaulted the informant and his relatives, but the medical report indicated …

SMT. POOJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Pooja and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar copies to prove they are adults and asserted that …

RAM DEV MATHURversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Dev Mathur, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, alleging unpaid salary from a private insurer, PNB Metlife India Insurance Company. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the standing counsel for the …

PARASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Paras, accused under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, the suicide note did not show any positive act of instigation, and that the essential ingredients …

HELAL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Helal Ahmad, challenged the Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta's proceeding with a complaint concerning the execution of a sale deed that is also the subject of a pending civil suit (O.S. No.1614 of 2024). The petitioner argued that under Section 8(1)(b) of the Lokayukta Act, 1975, the …

SHABNAM PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Shabnam Parveen filed a writ petition challenging the Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta's jurisdiction to entertain a complaint concerning the execution of a sale deed, which is also the subject of a pending civil suit (O.S. No.1614 of 2024) filed by the same complainant. The petitioner argued that under …

SAMRUN NISHA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑02‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 12543 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNSS—are non‑cognizable and …

RAISUDDIN KURAISIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, claiming ownership of a plot in Village Kaila, Ghaziabad, challenged a demolition notice issued by the Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam under Article 226 of the Constitution. He had filed a reply to the notice on 21‑08‑2026, which remained unconsidered. The respondents, representing the …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Deepak, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, who stated she was 17 but appeared …

POORAN SINGH SINCE DECEASED AND ANOTHERversusSHANKAR LAL AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Pooran Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 8, Mathura, to promptly decide Application 4‑A (RM No. 23 of 2026) for incorporation of the legal heirs' names in the plaint of …

ANITA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusREYASH INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

The petitioners and respondents entered into a registered rent agreement on 13‑03‑2015 for eleven years, which expired on 12‑03‑2026. The respondents had obtained a temporary injunction against the petitioners in a suit for permanent injunction, and the petitioners appealed the trial court's order …

AJAY KUMAR PATELversusSMT MEERA PATEL

The petitioner Ajay Kumar Patel filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to dispose of his pending divorce petition (Case No. 1830 of 2024) within a month, alleging irreparable loss due to delay. The petitioner relied on Section 21‑B …

ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

Arif applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 823 of 2015) involving alleged cheating with forged gold bars under IPC sections 419, 420, 392, 342, 504 and 506. The FIR, lodged on 26‑11‑2015, alleged that Arif transported the informant to the co‑accused but claimed he had no knowledge of the …

RAHUL ALIAS AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rahul alias Akash, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.259 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry and that he was not a gang member. He …

AMAR SINGH YADAV @ PILLI PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amar Singh Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. The court examined whether an …

RAJ KUMAR YADAV AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, twelve teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in primary/composite schools, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the payment of Headmaster salary and arrears, relying on a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite several representations to the competent …

PREM NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner’s arms licence was cancelled and his appeal against the cancellation was dismissed on the ground that he was implicated in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The petitioner argued that it had not been established whether the licensed firearm was actually used, that the …

SHISHUPAL SINGHversusVIRENDRA SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner Shishupal Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 6, Kanpur Nagar, to decide an application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 1879 of 2023. The High …

FAIM @ SHANSHAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad disposed of an application filed under Section 528 of the BNSS by the petitioner, Faim @ Shanshah. The court directed that the orders for this application be the same as those passed in the earlier application of Kalim Khan vs. State of U.P. and Another. No …

SUNNY JAISWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Sunny Jaiswal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (case crime no. 54 of 2025 under Section 223 IPC) was pending against him. The Court held …

SMT. GUNJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Gunja and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, not to interfere in their marital life and to provide them protection. The petitioners alleged they were in a live-in relationship and …

SHRI NARAYANversusVIKAS YADAV, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Shri Narayan filed a contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Vikas Yadav alleging failure to comply with the order dated 27‑02‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 3066 of 2026. The court noted that a copy of the order had been served but the respondent had not acted on it, establishing a prima …

DHARMENDRA KUMARversusSHRI DEVASHISH JANA, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Divisional Forest Officer Shri Devashish Jana, failed to comply with an order dated 20 May 2026 issued in Writ A No. 7654 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed …

VIJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Vijay Singh, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Gorakhpur, to conclude a pending complaint (Case No. 5036 of 2020) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued …

YOGENDRA SINGHversusSRI DEVASHISH JANA, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

Yogendra Singh filed a contempt application against Divisional Forest Officer Devashish Jana alleging willful non‑compliance of an order dated 20‑05‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 7661 of 2026. The Court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but refrained from issuing a notice at this stage. …

RAM CHHAIL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ram Chhail Sharma, who was arrested under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 0159 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a gang chart …