Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 3401–3600

KRISHNANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Krishnanand filed a criminal revision (No. 2349 of 2026) against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist's counsel, Arun Kumar Srivastava and others, submitted that the revision had become infructuous. The court considered whether the revision could still be entertained. Relying on the …

SHEKHAR ANAND AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 23.08.2025 and a cognizance order dated 21.11.2025 in Criminal Case No. 441 of 2025. They alleged that they were falsely implicated in a …

SMT.VIJAI LAXMI DEVIversusGANGA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vijay Laxmi Devi, entered into an agreement to sell property with the late Jamuna Prasad in 1995 and paid part of the consideration. Jamuna Prasad filed a suit for cancellation of the agreement, which was dismissed under Order IX Rule 5 CPC, and his subsequent restoration application …

SMT. NEERAJ KUMARIversusPRADEEP GAUTAM

Smt. Neeraj Kumari filed Transfer Application (Civil) No. 642 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit against Pradeep Gautam. The applicant’s counsel argued that the matter should be transferred, while the opposite party’s counsel contended that subsequent developments …

SMT. NEERAJ TIWARIversusState of U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Neeraj Tiwari filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to expedite the transfer of a firearm licence that had been issued to her deceased husband. The petition, filed in 2021, remained pending and the only relief sought was the issuance of the writ. The High Court …

GANESH SINGHversusPRESIDING OFFICER AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a former bank employee, was terminated on 27 November 2001 on the ground that he was involved in three criminal cases. The Labour Court upheld the termination, noting the seriousness of the pending cases. While the writ petition was pending, the petitioner was acquitted in all three …

VIKAS KUMARversusTHE STATE OF U.P.

Vikas Kumar, the husband of a woman who died by hanging, applied for bail in a case under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the dowry demand allegation was vague, that he had no prior criminal record, and …

RAKESH KUMAR GARGversusADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the proceedings of a trial court. The trial court had already concluded its proceedings, as indicated by an office report dated 14 July 2026. The High Court observed that because the trial court proceedings were …

RAM RATAN PASWANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Ram Ratan Paswan, a former Constable of the CRPF, was discharged in April 2001 for alleged unauthorized absence after taking leave for his wife's illness. He challenged the discharge in Writ Petition No. 4467 of 2005, and the Allahabad High Court reinstated him, directing that the period of …

RAM PYARE CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ram Pyare Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer of Birno Tehsil, Ghazipur, to decide his application filed under Section 109 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, and to enforce an order dated 31 March 2012. The Court sought …

MAHARAJ SINGHversusSTATE PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for its prosecution. The State’s standing counsel was present, but no representative for the petitioner was available. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition on the ground of …

ANKU SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Anku Shakya was charged under IPC sections 376(1) and 506, the POCSO Act sections 3 and 4, and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(2)(5) and 14A(2). The Additional District & Sessions Judge denied bail in Bail Application No. 421 of 2017. The appellant filed a criminal …

DILSHAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Dilshad and three others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑06‑2022 and the cognizance order dated 24‑02‑2023, and to stay further proceedings. Although two counsel were listed for the applicants, no one …

TINKUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Tinku filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking to set aside a bail rejection order dated 19 May 2017 in a case involving charges of rape under Section 376 IPC, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The appeal was …

DILEEP GAUDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant Dileep Gaud filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 challenging a bail order dated 26 July 2017 passed by the Special Judge in a case involving offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The State informed the Court that …

UPENDRA MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Upendra Mohan, filed a writ petition challenging the result of a recruitment process for various police posts in Uttar Pradesh, seeking a certiorari to quash the result dated 19 July 2022 and a mandamus directing the Police Recruitment and Promotion Board to issue a fresh list that …

UDIT SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Udit Sharma, accused under IPC sections 302, 120-B, 34, 420, 467, 468 and 471 for a murder case. The prosecution’s case relied on statements of several witnesses, many of whom were later hostile or did not support the prosecution, and the recording …

MAHENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ of mandamus seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Jakhaniya, Ghazipur, to decide a revenue case (Case No. 6998 of 2025) pending under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since 2024. The petition alleged undue delay and attached the order sheet …

KUSUM LATA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The revisionists challenged two orders of the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate who, on the basis of police and revenue reports indicating a dispute and apprehension of breach of peace, attached agricultural land and refused to drop proceedings under Section 145 CrPC. The revisionists argued that a civil …

SUNEEL SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Suneel Sagar, husband of a deceased woman, in a criminal case (Crime No. 561 of 2025) involving alleged dowry demands and related offences under the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the deceased committed …

GYANENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gyanendra Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑02‑2023 and the pending criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation …

SUKHA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Sukha Singh, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order that denied bail in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120B of the IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of …

SMT SAMPAT DEVIversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Smt Sampat Devi, a licensee of a country liquor shop in Kotra, Jalaun, challenged the cancellation of her licence on the ground that her husband, a history‑sitter, was merely accused in a criminal case. The licensing authority cancelled the licence under Section 34 of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 and …

IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Imran appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 24 March 2026 in a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking bail. The FIR, lodged on 22 January 2026 by a 40‑year‑old married woman, alleged rape, blackmail and theft, but was filed after an unexplained …

VISHWANATH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vishwanath Singh, sought restoration of a kiosk allotment originally granted in 1988 after it was cancelled in January 2025 for non‑payment of a premium that had accrued to Rs. 2,52,374.55. He also requested that the authority consider his application under the One‑Time Settlement …

MANISH KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS MANISH GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manish Kumar Gupta appealed to the Allahabad High Court against an order dated 28‑03‑2026 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge that denied him bail in a case under Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellant had earlier been granted bail on 09‑03‑2026 by a …

TASABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 46372 of 2019) was filed by Tasbbar against the State of U.P. and ten others. The matter was listed but the applicant's counsel did not appear, while the Attorney General for the State was present. The court observed that the …

SRIPAL SINGH RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Sripal Singh Rawat, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C. No. 1, Gautam Budh Nagar to decide Criminal Revision No. 343 of 2023, which arose from an order dated 26.3.2025 and has …

IBNE HARABversusSURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

Ibne Harab filed a contempt petition alleging that Surendra Kumar Tiwari failed to comply with the order dated 25 July 2025 in Writ A No. 10085 of 2025, which required the opposite party to consider the applicant’s application. The opposite party produced an order dated 2 May 2026 deciding the …

JAI PRAKASH JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 19, Deoria, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 4252 of 2023) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

SADIQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sadiq, filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 19006 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court after being convicted on 25 May 2026. Counsel for the applicant argued that since the trial had concluded and a conviction was recorded, the bail application was no …

HITESH RAOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hitesh Rao, husband of a woman who had committed suicide, in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 483 of 2025) under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. While the deceased’s parents and siblings …

BALWAN SINGversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Balwan Sing filed a review application challenging an order dated 24 April 2026 in Writ‑C No.10711 of 2026. The High Court examined the petition and observed that the applicant had approached the Court belatedly. Relying on several Supreme Court decisions, the Court held that the delay precluded any …

CHANDRAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandrawati Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who had died by suicide following a domestic dispute. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Section 4 of the Dowry …

ASHISH AGARWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashish Agarwal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate‑II, Jhansi to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 12883 of 2022) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …

SMT. RABEENA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Rabeena and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or parties appeared on either side, although a senior government advocate was present. Due to the non-appearance of both parties, the court treated the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, …

BIRESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Biresh Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pass a reasoned order on a representation dated 23‑24 June 2025 and to provide full protection of his dignity, life, liberty and property. The …

SMT. NIDHI YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Nidhi Yadav and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent order restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing authorities to provide them protection. The petitioners, both adults, submitted their school certificates and marriage …

SMT VITAN DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSHRI BHAGWAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Vitan Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the lower court to expedite Suit No. 405 of 2021. Their counsel clarified that they were not pressing the original prayer but only wanted the lower court to speed up the pending suit. The …

POONAM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Poonam Devi applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 313, 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She claimed innocence and alleged that the charges were false and that she would cooperate with the investigation. …

SHAFIQURRAHMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shafiqurrahman appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order that granted monthly maintenance to two opposite parties, alleging that the court had erred in finding a valid marriage and paternity without proper evidence. The revisionist contended that the alleged marriage to …

SHUBHAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shubham Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a 19‑year‑old woman with a false promise of marriage and attempting to coerce her. The FIR was lodged on 12 March 2026, but the appellant contended that …

HEERA LAL ALIAS GABBAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The High Court examined a criminal revision filed by Heera Lal and others challenging a City Magistrate's order of attachment of land under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. The magistrate had attached the property despite a pending civil suit (Original Suit No. 137 of 2026) that had granted an interim …

PARASNATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Parasnath filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Consolidation Officer to decide his objection on the maintainability of a proceeding initiated under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 by respondent No. 4. The petitioner argued that his objection should be …

ABHISEHK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The husband, Abhisehk Kumar, filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 05.08.2024 under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code granting maintenance to his wife, Pinki Sahu. Both parties later settled their matrimonial dispute through mediation, agreeing to divorce under …

DIGVIJAY NARAYAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Digvijay Narayan Singh and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition sought appropriate relief against the respondents. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice …

AZAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Azad Khan, who is charged under Sections 302, 147 and 506 of the IPC for a murder‑related offence. The applicant had previously been denied bail and was later declared a juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board, being about 16 years old at …

MOHD. AKRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Mohd. Akram filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other revenue authorities to reconstruct the Sarai Wali Masjid in Rampur and to decide his pending application. The respondents contended that the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of …

DHIRENDRA YADAV @ DHEERU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an informant and others during a dispute over paddy harvesting. They argued that the summoning order was issued mechanically and that a parallel …

RAJAT SAHUversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajat Sahu, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal complaint (M.A. No. 413 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 63/65 of the Copyright Act, which had been ordered to be dismissed by the Special …

JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jeetu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging an order dated 02‑12‑2024 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant's counsel argued …

FATEH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petition challenges three orders dated 11 July 2024, 26 November 2025 and 25 April 2026 issued by the Consolidation Officer (CO), the Sub‑Office Consolidation (SOC) and the District Deputy Commissioner (DDC) in Etah concerning the record of Khata No. 396 (Gata No. 864). The petitioner claims …

M/S RIDDHI SIDDHI CONTRACTORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/s Riddhi Siddhi Contractor filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and two others. The court examined a report submitted by the Divisional Commissioner, Agra Division, dated 15 September 2025. The petitioner sought dismissal of the petition with liberty to challenge the matter before the …

KAJAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them police protection. They submitted identity proof and a marriage registration application, alleging threats from …

MOHD REHAN @ REHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the FIR, charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Computer Case No. 37472 of 2026) arising from offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the …

PREM SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Prem Singh and two others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil‑Khair, Aligarh, to decide a pending revenue proceeding (case No. 3817 of 2021, State v. Suresh) that had been remanded under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners …

RAHEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Raheema, was implicated in a case where her husband was found dead, allegedly after an altercation with her. The FIR, lodged nine days after the incident by the mother‑in‑law, accused Raheema of causing the death, which was later treated as a suicide and the charge was upgraded to …

GULAB SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Gulab Singh and three others filed a writ petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under Sections 104/105 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, alleging that they are not members of the Scheduled Caste and therefore the embargo under Section 98 does not apply. The State, …

VIKRAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Banda to decide an objection filed on 11 March 2024 in a revenue proceeding under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The objection relates to a case concerning land parcels in Village Bhawanipurwa, …

PARASHURAM RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy District Magistrate of Ballia to register and decide two applications for demarcation of arazies filed on 30‑04‑2025 and 02‑06‑2026. The petitioner alleged that the applications had not been registered, while the State …

I.C.I.C.I. LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDHEERAJ JAIN

The petition filed by I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. challenged an order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had decided a dispute with Dheeraj Jain without complying with the conciliation requirements of Section 22‑C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued …

PRAHLAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Prahlad Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing revenue officials to investigate and order the return of his alleged illegally possessed land (Gata No. 621, 266 hectares) in Sambhal district. He asked the court to compel the officials to act on his application dated …

MOHD. HASAN @ HASSAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd. Hasan @ Hassan Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of a criminal investigation that had already culminated in a charge-sheet dated 18 May 2026. The State, represented by the Additional Government …

CHHOTELALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Administration (Gorakhpur) to decide appeal No. 657/2026 under Section 207 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since April 4, 2026. The petitioner alleged undue delay and …

RAMESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ramesh and others, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner (respondent No.2) to decide appeal No. 1159 of 2025, which arose under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zilla and Land Revenue Act, 1950, and to prevent their …

RAVI SAHANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Ravi Sahima​ni, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 141 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 49, 70(2), 74, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated …

SOHAN URF GOREversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohan Urf Gore, who is charged under several IPC sections for an alleged assault that resulted in one death and three injuries. The prosecution alleged that the applicant participated in the assault, wielding a spear, while co‑accused Vivek used …

SEETU @ BANTI @ VIRESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Seetu alias Banti alias Viresh Kumar, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code for offences alleged to have occurred in Pehso, Bulandshahr. This was his second bail application; the first, filed on 03‑04‑2025, had been dismissed. Counsel for the …

MAHENDRA KUMAR AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners Mahendra Kumar and others filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 20‑06‑2022 passed by the Sub‑Collector under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in a revenue case initiated in 2018. They argued that the initial decree was one‑sided and should be …

AJAY KUMAR RAI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3, a Sub‑Judge, to expedite the disposal of civil suit No. 9784/2024 (Horizon Rai v. Satish Kumar) filed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. They alleged that the lower court had delayed the case …

JUBAIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jubair in a criminal case (Crime No.55 of 2025) where he was not named in the FIR but his name appeared in statements of the informant and alleged injured. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had cooperated with the …

RAM SEVAK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Ram Sevak Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Gaon Sabha (respondent No.2) to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.15290 of 2024) under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a time frame fixed by the court. The High Court examined whether it …

SUDAMAversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sudama, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate and others to decide Suit No. 70 of 2023, which is pending before the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Padrauna, under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged that the suit had …

INDRAJEET PANDEYversusMR. MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA, DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

Indrajeet Pandey filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Inspector of Schools, Ballia, had unlawfully withheld his salary for the period February 2011 to July 2014 despite a prior High Court order directing payment. The High Court had earlier quashed an order dated 3.11.1999 for …

BUNTY @ BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Bunty @ Ballu filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18399 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Kumar Pal, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue …

SHRI KRISHAN @ KISHAN CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Krishan @ Kishan Chand, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed against the petitioner on 18 May 2026. The petitioner’s counsel acknowledged …

ADITYA JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Aditya Jaiswal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Attorney General for the State of Uttar …

RAKESH CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Rakesh Chaurasiya filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to dispose of criminal case No. 162 of 2026 (arising from crime No. 399 of 2025 …

TUKTUK @ YUVRAJ MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Tuktuk @ Yuvraj Minor filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State's Additional …

PUSHPENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Pushpendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a court direction that the police conduct a fair and impartial investigation in four pending criminal cases registered at Police Station Dholna, Kasganj. The petitioner alleged that the investigations were not being …

NEELOFER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The respondent's counsel submitted that the relief prayed for had already been granted to the petitioners, rendering the petition infructuous. The petitioner's counsel did not contest this submission. The …

SMT. SUMITRA BARMAN AND 2 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The petition was filed by Smt. Sumitra Barman and two others challenging the actions of the Union of India and another respondent. The petition was heard by the Hon'ble Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal in Court No. 9 of the Allahabad High Court. The Court disposed of the petition by referring to a prior …

FATEH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged a series of orders relating to Khata No. 418 in Etah district, alleging that the Consolidation Officer’s (CO) order of 11 July 2024 allowing objections under Section 9 of the Consolidation of Holdings (CH) Act was improperly appealable and that the subsequent dismissal of …

SUNNY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Sunny and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petition sought relief (the specific relief is not detailed in the record). During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced …

MUKESH GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Mukesh Gupta and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 29 July 2026. The petitioners did not dispute this but expressed …

DR. ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Dr. Anil Kumar challenged a suspension order dated 21 July 2026 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary of the Uttar Pradesh Animal Husbandry Department, alleging it was based on a complaint filed by an MLA on 21 May 2026. The petitioner argued that the MLA had withdrawn the complaint before the …

DHARM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 17 OTHERS

The applicant, Dharm Singh, lodged an FIR on 13 November 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The investigating officer filed a charge‑sheet on 29 June 2019 omitting Section 307 and instead including Section 323. The applicant sought, through an application …

KAPILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Kapil filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner, Varanasi, to decide Appeal No. 3962 of 2024 filed under the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed time. The petitioner claimed to be the opposite party in …

SMT. PAYAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Payal and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others from interfering in their marital life and directing authorities to provide them protection. The respondents argued that the petitioners are in a live‑in …

SHARMILA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sharmila Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18422 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. The investigating agency had already concluded its inquiry and on 13 July 2026 forwarded a final report in favour of the petitioner. …

MOHAMMAD HAMZAversusCHAIRMAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Hamza, filed a writ petition seeking correction of his name and his father's name in educational records maintained by the National Institute of Open Schooling. He alleged that the records erroneously listed his name as "Mohammad Humza" and his father's name as "Gayasuddin" …

YOGENDRA SINGH RAJPUTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Yogendra Singh Rajput appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act to quash a summoning order dated 29.06.2026 that charged him with offences under Sections 452, 323, 354, 506 IPC and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …

KASHI RAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the respondent Awas Vikas Parishad to restrain the sale and construction on agricultural land (plot no. 193, 0.534 hectare) and to prevent interference with possession. A parallel civil suit (Original Suit No. 306 of 2005) was already pending for the same …

CHHEDI ALIAS SHIV SHANKAR SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Chhedi alias Shiv Shankar Seth, charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376-D and POCSO Act sections 5 and 6, has been in custody since July 2018. He filed a second bail application, alleging that the FIR was false because the victim was in love with him and the case was fabricated to obtain money, …

SMT LAXMI DEVI CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, Laxmi Devi Chauhan and another, appealed against a cognizance and summoning order dated 15‑01‑2025 issued by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Agra, under IPC sections 323, 452, 504, 506 and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. They …

VISHNU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents and their family members not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them security. They submitted identity documents to establish that both are adults who married …

AMRITA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants were summoned by a Special Judge under the SC/ST Act and IPC for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using casteist slurs during a property dispute on 30 March 2024. The appellants contended that the summoning order was passed without proper consideration of contradictory …

AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought quashing of a Sessions Trial under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, arguing that the Act does not create a substantive offence and therefore violates the principle of nullum crimen sine lege. The State contended that a thorough …

SARMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sarman in Criminal Case No.135 of 2025, which is based on Sections 103(1) and 238. The case rests on circumstantial evidence; the FIR did not name any accused and the applicant was implicated solely on suspicion and his own confessional …

KAMRAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Kamran and others were charged under several IPC sections for assaulting police officers on 19 April 2024. They filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order rejecting their discharge application and the framing of charges. The High Court examined …

ASALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his fair price shop licence by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate and the subsequent rejection of his appeal by the Additional Commissioner. The licence was cancelled on the basis of statements from 40 card‑holders alleging irregularities, but the petitioner …

MUSTKEEM AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09-07-2026 that alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and provisions of the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act. The High Court …

AKSHAY KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akshay Kushwaha, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 19 July 2026 under Sections 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The High Court …

MUDASSAR AHMAD AND 3 OTHERversusMOHD. KASIM

The applicants, Mudassar Ahmad and three others, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 512 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. Subsequently, counsel for the applicants, Vinod Kumar Tripathi, moved before the court to withdraw the transfer application, stating that …

SHIPRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shipra Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the respondents to renew her appointment as a part‑time instructor at an upper primary school and to pay her honorarium. She claimed that her contract, originally dated 20‑06‑2013, continued until the 2024‑2025 …

SAJJAD HUSSAIN AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under multiple sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. They contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no offence was made out, seeking quash of the FIR. The respondents …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar, owner of a pickup vehicle seized while allegedly transporting a cow for slaughter, challenged the District Magistrate's confiscation order under Section 5-A(7) of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. He filed Revision No. 146/2026 before the Commissioner, …

KULDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, a senior lineman, sought to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order filed under Section 125 BNS in a case arising from an alleged electric shock injury to the complainant’s son. He contended that the victim’s injury was caused by a bent pole and a wire touching the high‑voltage line, …

GOVIND KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 8 July 2026, registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 127(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and found that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …

RAVI @ RAVIKANT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ravi @ Ravikant and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 353(3), 74, 85, 89 B.N.S. and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that the FIR was false, malicious …

ASHISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ashish Kumar in Criminal Case No. 27 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 137(2), 87 and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The …

AADIL FARUQHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aadil Faruqhi, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging sexual harassment of a minor girl under Sections 65(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 5(M)/6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

SANI BATRA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 918 of 2026) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Mawana, Meerut, where a charge‑sheet had already been filed against them for offences …

SHASHANK SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 14 July 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 356, 117(2), 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer …

SHIVAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shivam Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed …

BARKAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Barkat Ali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Sections 2(b)(xv) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest in Crime No.113 of 2026. He sought interim protection to appear before the trial …

TIPU SULTANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tipu Sultan, who is accused under Sections 62, 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(m), 6 and 18 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against two minor girls. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to …

RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravindra Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.14 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 123, 303(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the FIR was …

SOORAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of respondent No.8 from the post of Administrator of the Village Panchayat of Ramana Taufeer, alleging that a District Magistrate’s order dated 15 July 2026 had found the respondent guilty of wrongdoing and ordered a recovery. The …

RAKESH KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner claimed that plot no. C/84 in Ghaziabad was allotted to him but possession was not handed over, prompting a District Consumer Forum order directing the Ghaziabad Development Authority to refund his deposits with 12% interest. The Authority allegedly continued demanding additional …

SURJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Surjeet applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the D.P. Act, where the victim, a minor aged 17 years 11 months, alleged that the applicant had established a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the …

TULSI SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01.08.2026 that alleged offences under sections 329(1), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of commission of …

FAIZANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faizan, accused in a case of alleged gang rape of a 13-year‑10‑month‑old girl under the POCSO Act and several sections of the CrPC. The applicant claimed false implication, citing contradictions between the victim’s statements under Sections 180 …

ANIKET PANDEY CARPORALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Aniket Pandey Carporal filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 1511 of 2023) arising from charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 377, 504 and 506. The application was heard before Justice …

ARVIND GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arvind Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 62 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …

PANKAJ KUMARversusSNIGDHA SHARMA

The applicant, Pankaj Kumar, filed a civil contempt application (No. 6529 of 2026) alleging that the respondent, Snigdha Sharma, failed to comply with an order dated 07‑01‑2025 in HMA Petition No. 529 of 2024. The applicant, through counsel Samar Bahadur Harijan, later filed a supplementary …

RAJKUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑02‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 329(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State …

AVNEESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Avneesh, accused under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to the victim’s statement that she left home voluntarily, conflicting age determinations …

ATISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Atish Kumar, who was arrested in a gang‑rape case (Crime No. 120 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing a delayed FIR, lack of injuries on the victim’s private parts, and an earlier grievance filed by the victim’s …

KARMVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Karmveer in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged after a long delay and …

MAHENDRA CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mahendra Chaudhary, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27 July 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 69, 77 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, the alleged relationship with the informant was consensual, and the FIR …

DR VIJAY KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 17 July 2026 that registered a case under Section 304-A IPC for an alleged offence in Robertsganj, Sonbhadra. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a …

AMIT @ AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was arrested in Crime No. 97 of 2026 under sections 3(5), 69, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The allegations involved establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage and alleged rape, but the victim’s statements …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 115 of 2026) under Section 69 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim's statement under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship and …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sachin, who was charged under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictory statements by the …

SAHIL ALIAS ROCKYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil alias Rocky, who was arrested in Crime No. 381 of 2026 for alleged rape of a 15‑year‑7‑month‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s …

VIPIN URF VIPIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 3 July 2026 registered under multiple IPC offences (Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506) at Kalan Police Station, Shahjahanpur. He contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no …

DEVENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devendra Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 338 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304‑A of the IPC. After hearing arguments, the …

MOMEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Momeen, accused in Crime No. 115 of 2026 under sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a minor by false promise of marriage, resulting in pregnancy. The applicant claimed the victim was a …

NABI HUSAINversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nabi Husain, who was arrested in Crime No. 161 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m of the BNS Act and Sections 51/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing and having sexual relations with a minor. The applicant claimed he was falsely …

GULAB CHANDRAversusRAVINDRA KUMAR

The applicant, Gulab Chandra, filed a contempt application alleging that the order of the Writ Court (Writ‑C No. 68719 of 2024) had been complied with when a subsequent order was passed on 01‑09‑2026. Counsel for the applicant, Mangal Rai, stated this compliance at the Bar. The High Court noted the …

FARMAN AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Farman Ahmad, who was arrested in a case registered under IPC sections 64(1), 115(2) and 351(3). The FIR does not allege rape, but the victim’s statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 accuses the applicant of rape, although the medico‑legal …

KAUSHIK SHUKLAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Kaushik Shukla filed a petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the State to release seized money of Rs.2,190,000 and other articles, based on an order of the Judicial Magistrate dated 18‑09‑2025. The State had filed Criminal Revision No.271/194 of 2025, which remains pending …

VISHAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vishal Gupta was arrested in Crime No. 309 of 2026 under IPC sections 69, 352 and 351(2) for allegedly establishing a physical relationship on a false promise of marriage. The victim, a 21‑year‑old woman, recorded a statement under CrPC sections 180 and 183 indicating she was a consenting party and …

AMIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Amit Kumar and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 2029 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 514 of 2024 under Sections 103(1), 238 and 140(1) of the BNSS. The …

ROLI GUPTAversusALOK KUMAR GUPTA

Roli Gupta filed a civil transfer application (No. 548 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit against Alok Kumar Gupta. The applicant, through counsel, later informed the court that due to subsequent developments, he no longer wished to pursue the transfer. The court …

MOHD ZAVEDversusSRI ABHISHEK, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

The applicant, Mohd Zaved, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Superintendent of Police, Sri Abhishek, failed to comply with an order dated 06‑02‑2026 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2024 of 2026, which required the police officer to consider the applicant’s application. The court …

SANJEEV KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for a case involving multiple IPC offences (147, 323, 342, 376, 420, 504, 506, 34, 392, 411). He claimed that a prior grant of bail was not acted upon due to a communication gap, …

DEEPAKversusANIL SINGH

The petitioner, Deepak, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a writ directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.11, Prayagraj to decide his pending application 14C dated 03.11.2025 in case 2505 of 2025. The petition merely requested expeditious disposal of that application …

SHAMA PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Shama Parveen filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Wazirganj, Budaun demanding payment of electricity dues. The respondents argued that the notices were the only procedural step and that the petitioner …

SMT. SHAKUNTLA SINGHversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Smt. Shakuntla Singh filed a contempt petition against the District Magistrate alleging failure to comply with the order dated 31.05.2022 passed in Writ A No. 18331 of 2022, which required the magistrate to consider her application. The magistrate produced, for the first time, a copy of an order …

CHANDRASHEKHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants Chandrashekhar and Shani Kumar filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 493 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87 of the B.N.S and Sections 16/17 of the POCSO Act. They contended that they were falsely named in the FIR and that the victim, …

SOHILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sohil, who is charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 352, 64 and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had given a consensual statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. and …

SIKANDAR ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sikandar Ansari, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 359 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 84, 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, argued that the victim, a minor, …

RAVINDRA SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Ravindra Singh Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to decide a representation dated 31 July 2026 concerning the alleged illegal restriction of water flow from the Nali to a pond in …

SURAJ VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Suraj Verma applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 201 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of the BNS, arising from a failed consensual relationship with a 22‑year‑old woman. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had misled or deceived the victim, while …

PRADUMAN PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Praduman Pandey, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual intercourse with a minor aged 15 years 9 months. The applicant claimed false implication, citing …

ASHISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application filed by Ashish Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC, relating to offences under various sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead seek regular bail …

ARSHAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Arshad and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR registered against them. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel Sharda Prasad Mishra, withdrew the request for quashing the FIR. The court consequently declined the relief for …

AKASH KANNAUJIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Kannaujiya, who was charged under Sections 69, 127(2), 351(2) and 352 of the same Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a woman on a false promise of …

MANISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manish was arrested in a case of alleged rape under Sections 127(2), 65(1), 352, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim's age was disputed: an ossification test indicated 17‑18 years, while a school certificate suggested 15 years 5 months, …

KANHAIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Kanhaiya in a rape case (Crime No. 242 of 2026). The applicant claimed false implication, citing missed calls from the victim, contradictions in the FIR and …

AZAD PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Azad Patel, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged false promise of marriage and alleged offences under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the same …

VISHNU ALIAS VISHNU PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Vishnu Prasad, who was charged with murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and related offences and had been declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pledged cooperation, while the …

SMT. SONI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Soni Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction that the Judicial Magistrate‑III in Gorakhpur decide Complaint Case No. 36267 of 2025, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic …

NISAR AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nisar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Kanpur Dehat, to decide a complaint (Case No. 1659 of 2019) filed under Section 138 of the …

SHIVA RAIKWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shiva Raikwar, who was charged under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he had been granted bail earlier but …

MASTRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mastram was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, arguing that the alleged victim, though stated to be 16, appeared to be a major and that an ossification test placed …

MAQBOOLversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Maqbool, who was implicated in a case under several sections of the B.N.S. alleging ransom demand and other offences. Maqbool contended that the allegations were false, that he had no role in the incident, and cited prior acquittals …

VIKKIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the accused Vikki, who is charged with offences under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the same Act and provisions of the POCSO Act. The victim, a minor aged 15 years and 5 …

SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Shukla, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing CRPF officials to process his voluntary retirement application under Rule 43(d)(1) of the CRPF Rules, 1955, without requiring NPS option forms, and to release his pension and other benefits under the Old Pension …

PAWAN GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Pawan Gupta filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act in Criminal Case No. 193 of 2026. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead move a …

PANCHAM GOND @ ABHISHEK GONDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pancham Gond (also known as Abhishek Gond) in a murder case (Crime No. 152 of 2026) involving firearm injuries. The applicant argued that he was merely a co-accused, that the eye‑witness statement did not implicate him, and that the principal …

JAI KRISHNA KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The applicant, Jai Krishna Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Basti, to conclude the pending Complaint Case No. 80 of 2026. The High Court noted that the …

ANIS SAQLAINIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Anis Saqlaini applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 492 of 2025) involving multiple serious offences under the BNS. The FIR, lodged on 27 September 2025, named 15 persons and 450 anonymous individuals, but did not specifically name Saqlaini. He was alleged to have attended a meeting on 19 …

SHRAWAN KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shrawan Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent to compute and pay his pension, final pension, gratuity, arrears and other retirement dues with interest, and also to consider a representation dated 23/07/2026. The petitioner’s counsel …

UBAIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ubaid, who is accused under several IPC sections for a murder allegedly committed by firing a weapon, resulting in two injuries to the deceased. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, that he had no prior criminal record, and …

RITIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritik, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, aged 15‑16 years according to an ossification test, claimed to be a consenting party, had …

SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Suraj filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1041 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 352 and the SC/ST Act, and also requested that his bail application be decided expeditiously. The …

PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioners Pramod Kumar Pandey and two others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh State Medical Faculty, Lucknow to register their Bachelor of Physiotherapy degrees. The petitioners argued that the matter was not res integra, citing a 2018 Lucknow …

AJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 28‑05‑2014 in a case under Section 354(D) IPC, alleging a 12‑year delay violating his right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution. The applicant …

SMT JYOTI GANGWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt Jyoti Gangwar filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.)/Fast Track Court, Rampur to decide Complaint Case No. 369 of 2025 filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, …

RINKU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rinku Yadav, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.342 of 2025) involving several IPC sections and the Arms Act. While the application was pending, the applicant died in custody due to illness. Counsel for the applicant argued that the bail petition had become …

MOOL CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mool Chand, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Jaunpur, to dispose of a pending complaint (Case No. 14455 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable …

MOHD. AQUIL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under sections 115(2), 352, 74 and 351(3) of the IPC. They claimed false implication and mala‑fide investigation. The …

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH PALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Singh Pali, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Secretary of the U.P. Basic Education Board to consider his candidature for district allotment and to decide his representation dated 27.05.2026. He alleged that despite having higher quality point marks, …

KURBAN ALIversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Kurban Ali filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking issuance of a fresh passport, which was pending with the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 275 of 2007) …

SAHAB SINGHversusAMIT KUMAR (DECEASED) AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sahab Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Shamli to decide Case No. 72 of 2023 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in connection with Crime No. 192 of 2026. The applicant had earlier obtained a stay on his arrest through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, which was ordered to remain in …

SMT REENAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Smt Reena, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act in connection with Crime No. 192 of 2026. The applicant had earlier obtained a stay on her arrest through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, which was ordered to …

SMT CHINTAMANI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt Chintamani and two others, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a directive to the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in Hasanpur, Amroha, to dispose of a criminal case (Case No. 423 of 2007) that had been pending since 2007 …