Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 3201–3400
The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR alleging forgery of remand papers and misuse for unlawful benefit. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, argued that the FIR discloses a prima facie offence and that investigation is underway, invoking …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Ram Vilash Yadav in connection with a case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, through counsel Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested …
Akshay Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case involving multiple offences under the IPC, the Banking and Negotiable Instruments Act and the Income Tax Act. He argued that a co‑accused, Ashwani Jadaun, with an identical role and no prior record had been granted bail, and therefore parity …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhola Rajbhar and Rajesh Rajbhar in a case under Sections 105 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging they assaulted an informant’s son who later died of hemorrhagic shock. The applicants claimed false implication, absence of any weapon, lack …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 15‑02‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 26‑05‑2026 issued by the Village Court, Tundla, in a case arising from offence under Section 351(2) BNS. The applicants contended that the offence is …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC filed by Munib Ansari and six others seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 493 of 2011 (State vs. Munib Ansari et al.) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 504 IPC. The applicants had …
The applicant, Ramashray Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant, represented by Satish Chandra Singh, sought anticipatory bail but later requested to withdraw the application and …
The petitioners, Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking to quash a communication (No. 938/Stamp Clerk/2023) issued by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Kanpur Nagar. The petition raised procedural and substantive objections to the said …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 34 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 706 of 2016) relating to offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 452, 323, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial …
The applicant, Suneel @ Girdhari, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 29035 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release from custody in connection with charges framed by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Sameer …
The applicant, Khalil @ Faridi, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 444 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The co‑accused, Anees Ahmed, had made a confessional statement implicating the applicant, but the court held that such a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑01‑2005 and related proceedings (Case No.1628 of 2005) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 353, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.2911 of 2026) arising from a 2016 offence under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was recorded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on …
The petitioner, Tanu Singh (Roshani Singh), filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Station House Officer of P.S. Rasra to conduct a fair and unbiased investigation in a criminal case (Crime No. 0238 of 2026) under various sections of the BNS. The State, represented by an Additional …
The petitioner, Fareed Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and other respondents to comply with a July 17, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate to register an FIR against certain individuals and to investigate the matter expeditiously. …
The High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Rohit and Suneel @ Girdhari, who were named in an FIR for murder under Sections 103(1) and 238(K) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants argued that the case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, that the alleged application …
An application under Section 528 of the CrPC was filed by Alam and two others seeking to quash criminal case No. 975 of 2024, which arose from Crime No. 146 of 2023 and alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise verification …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55062, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 406 and 420 IPC. The applicants contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑09‑2024, the cognizance order dated 06‑08‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 1054 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 281, 115 and 351 of the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Gulzar, accused in Criminal Case No. 451 of 2026 under Sections 61(2)Ka, 310(2), 311, 317(3), 317(5) and 336(2) of the IPC. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through the …
The petitioner, Rajnath Ram, filed a writ petition seeking a temporary injunction against private respondents who were allegedly interfering with his right to construct on a demolished structure he claims as his own. The petitioner had already instituted a civil suit on the same matter and argued …
Petitioner Dinesh Kumar challenged his suspension dated 14 May 2026, alleging that no disciplinary inquiry, charge‑sheet or inquiry officer had been appointed. Respondents produced the charge‑sheet dated 8‑11 August 2026 and stated that an enquiry officer was appointed under Rule 33 of the Uttar …
Shailendra Kumar Verma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case where he was accused of forging documents to transfer title of property belonging to his sister (the informant). The prosecution alleged that the applicant illegally obtained the title …
Ashok Kumar filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and others. The petitioner argued that the accused had been arrested, rendering the petition moot. The Court examined whether a petition under Article 227 can continue when the subject …
The petitioner, Vijay Nath Pandey, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside two orders: one dated 30 July 2026 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) directing the lodging of a First Information Report (FIR) in a civil matter, and another dated 10 August 2026 by the Session Judge in a …
Two civil suits for partition of land (Arazi Nos. 257, 283, 284) were dismissed by the trial court under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, holding the property to be agricultural and thus within the jurisdiction of the Revenue Court. The trial court's orders were reversed by a lower appellate …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained the appeal filed by Pappu Agrawal @ Prabhakar and two others against Praveen Modi and eight others. The court, after considering the matter, allowed the appeal. The order directs that the detailed orders be read in FAFO No.2427 of 2026. No further factual …
Petitioners Krishna Murari Mishra and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus to compel respondents 2 and 3 to vacate a road and to direct respondent 6 to decide their application under Sections 153 and 157 of the BNSS. After hearing, the …
The applicant, Chandra Bhan Yadav, was charge-sheeted for offences under IPC sections 424, 467, 468 and 471. He had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 528 of the CrPC (BNSS No.24850 of 2025), which the High Court dismissed, terminating the interim relief previously granted. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 08‑09‑2025, the cognizance and summoning orders, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 09 of 2026 arising from FIR Crime No. 332 of 2025. The High Court examined the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mahendra Pal under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 347 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 352, 109(1) and 351(2) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
Petitioners Furqan Mohammad Khan and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 20 June 2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain their arrest in a case registered under several sections of the BNS. The State, …
Petitioner Kaushal Ahirwar, an untrained Assistant Teacher appointed in 1995 and later promoted to Head Master, challenged an order dated 04‑08‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer that declared respondent No. 5 senior to him on the basis of a higher grade‑pay, thereby affecting his …
The petitioner, Lokendra, was detained under the PITNDPS Act and filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the legality of his detention. The core issue was whether the detaining authority had specifically informed him of his right to make a representation to that authority, as mandated by Article …
The petitioner, Jagdish, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representations dated 22 June, 23 June, and 1 July 2026 and to restrain private respondents from forcibly taking possession of his abadi land in collusion …
The applicant Kaif sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming innocence and alleging that the FIR is vague and not maintainable. The State opposed, arguing that the applicant is a gang member …
The petitioner, a temporary Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking to halt a permanent appointment advertised on 09-07-2026, arguing that his honorarium must be released before any such appointment. He also sought to link this petition with an earlier writ (Writ‑A No.8123 of 2024) …
Petitioner Lalji Nishad filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide his representation dated 09-07-2026 and to grant a ferry licence for a water boat on the Tons River in Mau district. The petitioner alleged that the competent …
The petitioners, Satish Yadav and three others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, citing inherent defects in the filing. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party, were represented by …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the enforcement of an injunction order previously granted by a trial court. The petition argued that the High Court should compel the police authorities to enforce the injunction. The Court observed that enforcement of an injunction …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 29‑12‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 3258 of 2026 arising from FIR No. 597 of 2024. The High Court …
Seeta Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police, Fatehpur, to decide her application dated 13-07-2026 within the stipulated time. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged threats, poisoning, and a forced marriage. The applicant claimed false implication, stating that the victim was being coerced into marriage and that no …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of FIR dated 19.08.2026 (Case Crime No. 404 of 2026) under Sections 69, 316(2), 351(2), 352 and 78 of the BNS, seeking its quash and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest or harass them. After hearing, the …
Petitioners Amritpal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 16‑01‑2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain the police from arresting them. The FIR alleged offences under sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 352, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, to decide a pending revision (Case No.2036/2024) expeditiously. The petition alleged undue delay in disposal of the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamal Rathore under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication based on a …
The applicant, Shavej, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case (Crime No. 240 of 2026) under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, fearing arrest. He disclosed three prior criminal matters, two of which …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S. application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 15 July 2025 in Criminal Case No. 12081, alleging that they were charged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) B.N.S. which, according to Supreme Court precedent, cannot be invoked …
Ram Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑09‑2013, the cognizance order of 05‑05‑2015 and the non‑bailable warrant of 14‑07‑2026, along with the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.1539 of 2016) instituted …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 24.08.2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the …
Kulwant Singh, an employee of the Defence Research and Development Organisation, was arrested in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) arising from a matrimonial dispute involving the informant's daughter. He applied for bail, claiming absolute innocence …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC for Sabir, who was implicated in a NDPS case involving 100 grams of heroin, a quantity below the commercial threshold. The applicant argued that the FIR was fabricated and highlighted his lack of prior …
Harihar Prasad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to order further investigation after his application on 5 January 2026. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's learned Additional Government Advocate informed the court …
The petitioner, Ram Gopal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) 2nd Agra Division to decide appeal No. 935 of 2026 filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, and a certiorari to quash the order rejecting his interim relief. The petition …
The Committee of Management of Sanskrit Vardhini Sabha filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Inspector of Schools, Muzaffarnagar, to consider their request for fresh election proceedings at Janta Girls Inter College and to act on a notice dated 06.04.2026 that remained …
Petitioner Sofiyan Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10.05.2026 under Sections 110 and 352 of the BNS, and a writ of mandamus to restrain the police from arresting him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, …
Petitioner Jabbar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking an interim mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other officials to act on several complaint applications filed in 2025. The petitioner relied on a specific Government Order dated 17 February 2020 to support the relief. The Court …
Manju (Phoolwati) applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0162 of 2026) where she is charged under several IPC sections and sections 17 and 18 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, alleged to have trafficked a woman and sold her for Rs. 1 lakh. The applicant claimed …
The petitioner, Saurabh Agrawal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the third respondent, a municipal authority, to consider his representations dated 28 January 2026 and 12 May 2026 for the mutation of his father's name in the Nagar Nigam …
The applicant, Kousar, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the prosecution was based on police rivalry and that he is not a gang member. He claimed he had already been granted bail …
Petitioner Rajendra Nisad filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar to decide his representation dated 24 July 2026 by passing a reasoned order within a time frame fixed by the Court. The Court examined the petition and observed that …
Shahida Bano filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction that the police not harass her or her son, who is named in a criminal case, and that the pending application dated 13 August 2026 be disposed of. The State’s standing counsel submitted that the son was called for investigation, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to correct his date of birth in his Aadhaar card from 05.01.2007 to 01.01.2006. The respondent argued that the correction must follow the procedure prescribed under the U.P. Janhit Guarantee Act, 2011, which requires an …
The petitioner, Priyanka Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, Prayagraj, to decide her pending Stamp Appeal No. 997 of 2017. The petitioner alleged that the Board had not rendered any final decision despite the appeal being pending for years. The court …
Petitioner Sonu filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending application for a fresh passport. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0563 of 2022) under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC was pending …
The petitioner, Anushka Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the University Controller of Examinations to conduct a back-paper examination for her B.Sc. Physics V semester or to declare her result as passed within a specific time. The petitioner alleged that the university had …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application within four weeks. The Assistant Government Advocate had no objection. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nishant, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(3), 118(1), 118(2) and 324(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …
Vinod Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he is falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record except one case where he is already on bail. The State opposed, alleging he is a gang member …
The applicant, Sujeet Kumar, was charged under Sections 137(2), 127(2), 143(1), 3(5) of the BNS, Sections 9 and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial. The court noted that a co‑accused, Ritu Devi, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Agra Division to decide Appeal No. 701 of 2024, filed under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal had been pending since 29‑12‑2023, and the petitioner alleged that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑06‑2021 and a cognizance order dated 28‑10‑2021 in a case pending under Sections 188 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that these offences are …
The applicant, Chhotu @ Arun, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a notice and a Cr.P.C. order dated 19 January 2026 and 14 July 2026, as well as the pending criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …
Petitioner Chandrajeet Yadav filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to complete the investigation of an FIR dated 25.09.2025 and to arrest accused persons. The State argued that the investigation was completed and a charge sheet had been filed only against one accused, with …
The petitioners sought enforcement of a temporary injunction order issued by the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Prayagraj. The High Court observed that a breach of such an injunction can be remedied by filing a miscellaneous application under Order 39 Rule 2‑A of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudhakar and Surendra Bind, who were arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 92 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including assault and criminal conspiracy. The applicants claimed …
Vikas Pandur Pandey applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 601 of 2026) filed under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case in a gang chart for which he had already …
The applicant, a Russian national, entered India on a tourist visa that expired on 31 March 2020 due to the COVID‑19 lockdown. The Government later issued guidelines extending the stay of stranded foreigners up to 30 September 2021, effectively giving the applicant a valid visa on the date of the …
The petitioner, Nirmit Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the university to award his B.Sc. (Ag.) degree, alleging that he had passed all examinations but that a clerical error showed zero marks in a remedial mathematics subject. The university contended that the petitioner …
Shivam Chaturvedi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 21 June 2026 (Case Crime No. 0350/2026 under Section 74 B.N.S) and a writ of mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State, represented by the …
The petitioners Saurabh and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They sought the quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing the …
Manorma Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code after a prior order denying bail under the SC/ST Act. The State's Additional Government Advocate argued that the anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable because the correct remedy was an appeal under Section …
Saroj Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Cr.P.C. §§438/482 after an earlier order rejecting bail under the SC/ST Act. The State objected, arguing that the correct remedy was an appeal under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, citing the decision in Kailash v. State …
The petitioner, a minor, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the principal of St. Xavier Intermediate School to decide a representation filed on 08.08.2026, which remained pending. The petitioner argued that the school had not rendered any decision despite the representation being …
Petitioner Yogesh Kumar Agrawal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking re‑issuance of his expired passport, alleging that his criminal conviction and two‑year sentence should not bar the passport as he has already paid the imposed fine and the case is concluded. The respondents argued that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jamal Kha in a criminal case (Crime No. 93 of 2026) involving offences under sections 115(2), 352, 109(1), 125, 324(4), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the aggressor could not be …
Ramesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (case no. 55514 of 2026) arising from a FIR under IPC sections 115(2), 333, 352, 351(2) and Section 110. The High Court examined the record and held that no ground existed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3185 of 2023, which involved charges under sections 323, 352, 504, 506, 427, 365, 324 and 308 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicant, Hasnavi, sought bail in an arms case (Crime No. 05 of 2025) under Sections 109 BNS, 3/25(1‑B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was injured in police cross‑fire. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the applicant's criminal history, which was explained, and noted …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Suhail, who was arrested in a double‑murder case under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. Although Suhail’s name did not appear in the FIR, the informant’s second statement and a later statement by the …
The petitioners challenged the election held on 28 June 2026 for the Committee of Management of an institution, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the election and subsequent orders of the District Inspector of Schools that rejected their objection. The Court noted a preliminary objection raised …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 115174 of 2023) arising from offences under IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had entered into a compromise on 11‑08‑2026, which was …
Smt. Ramwati filed a writ petition seeking her retiral dues and consequential benefits. She had earlier submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 on 2 April 2026 requesting the same relief. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition served no useful purpose since the representation …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Omkar Verma in a case of alleged abetment to suicide under Section 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the post‑mortem showed death by hanging, and that there was no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under the IPC and D.P. Act, claiming they had reached an amicable compromise with the complainant. The State's Additional Government Advocate …
The applicant Jagpal applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 415 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Saran, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that Jagpal had no prior criminal …
The applicant, Chandramani @ Dablu Pandey, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 79 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court considered the applicant's criminal history, the absence of any contraband recovered from him, and the fact that the only incriminating evidence was the …
The petitioner, Smt Shruti, a wife, filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking a direction that the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 4, Ghaziabad, expedite the pending complaint (Case No. 04 of 2025) and decide it within the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC by Mohd Wasim, who feared arrest in a criminal case (Crime No 158 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 110, 352, 351(2) and 117(2) of the BNSS. The State’s Additional Advocate General objected, …
Om Prakash Ram filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondent, U.P. Power Corporation Ltd, to pay his gratuity, provisional pension and salary arrears with 12% interest, alleging illegal withholding due to a pending criminal case. The respondents argued that the grievance should be …
The applicant, Mohammad Imran, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Darshan Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 for allegedly forging documents to obtain a teaching post. The applicant claimed innocence, cited a prior stay of arrest and the fact that the …
Petitioners Gopal Jee and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, they moved the Court seeking to withdraw the petition while being granted liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court entertained this application and allowed the withdrawal. …
Petitioner Dharam Raj Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Divisional Manager of the Food Corporation of India to deduct his contributory provident fund from his wages. The respondents argued that the grievance should be addressed by the Assistant General Manager (CPF) and …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and they received compensation, but no rehabilitation and resettlement award under the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
Petitioner Madhu Gupta filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Kaushambi to decide an application filed on 12 December 2020. The petition alleged undue delay in the adjudication of the application. The learned Standing …
The petitioner challenged a punishment order that placed him at the minimum pay scale for one year and sought direction for the respondents to grant increments now that the year had elapsed. He had already submitted a representation to Respondent No. 4 regarding this grievance. The petitioner’s …
The applicant, Saleem, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 597 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, pending trial at the Bareilly police station. The court noted that a co‑accused, Shakir, had previously been released on …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Prashant Sharma, who was alleged to be involved in offences under various IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant claimed innocence and cited that co‑accused had been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Brijesh Kumar, who was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 279 and 304-A in two related FIRs. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that he was falsely implicated as a nominee of the insured, and highlighted his clean …
The applicant, Ashish Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑06‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 25‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8229 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC …
The applicants, Rajendra Singh and two others, were charged in a 1999 case under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 470 and 471. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Subsequently, they sought to withdraw that application and instead file a regular bail petition, …
The petition was filed by a minor victim of sexual assault who was approximately 13-16 years old and pregnant at about 29 weeks, seeking a medical termination of pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The High Court directed the Chief Medical Superintendent to admit the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the cognizance, charge sheet and all proceedings in State v. Nitish Hitaishi (Case No. 25014/2024) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party, which was verified by the trial court. …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 212 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 351(3), 74, 76 and 333 of the BNSS. The State opposed, arguing that the offences do not attract a …
The applicant, Ajad Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 508 of 2025). He later requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court, asking …
Mahendra Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Old Case No. 777/9 of 2020, now New Case No. 1422 of 2020) that were instituted under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1678 of 2021, Crime No. 544 of 2021) that alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 377 IPC, Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanjay Gautam @ Rahul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and argued that he was not named in the FIR, with only a weapon, cartridge, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 07‑03‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 21‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 16525 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections 131, 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS – are …
The petitioner, Angoori Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment for her daughter in a government position. The Court examined whether such a petition is maintainable under the writ jurisdiction. It held that the petition was not maintainable as it did not fall within the …
Petitioner Veena Singh filed a writ petition seeking her transfer from the District Commissionerate of Kanpur Nagar to the District Jhansi Range. She had earlier submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 on 7 September 2026 requesting the same transfer. The Standing Counsel for the respondents …
Alok Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 711 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vinay Sahani, had already been released …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Kushwaha, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 207 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences including sections 79, 75, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 317(2) and 304(2) BNS. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was …
The petitioner, Smt Shalini Kapila, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District and Sessions Court, Agra, to conclude pending criminal and domestic violence proceedings against the respondent, Neeraj Kapila. The petition concerned Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 7225 of …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Anash, who was implicated in a rape case arising from a broken consensual relationship where the complainant alleged a false promise of marriage. The applicant asserted his innocence, highlighted the lack of medical evidence, the …
The petitioner, Shiv Tiwari @ Ashutosh Tripathi, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking the High Court's intervention to ensure a timely decision on a recall application filed on 06.03.2026 in Session Trial No. 1263 of 2020 (State vs. Shyam Bajpai and others). The petitioner argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shivam @ Shiva @ Krishna, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 313 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318, 115, 127, 308, 351 and 3 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, stating that his name only …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sudhir in Criminal Case No. 139 of 2026, which is registered under Sections 309(4) and 317(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant asserted that he is innocent, his name having surfaced only in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, …
The applicant, Ramjeet, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial court, …
The applicant, Sadik @ Lallu, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 320 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution pointed to the applicant’s name appearing in a co‑accused’s confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The court held that …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Intakhab under Section 482 CrPC in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that his inclusion in the FIR was based solely on the confessional …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Smt. Ramwati, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that she had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry, had no …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, invoking Sections 85 and 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, in a criminal case registered at Bijnor. During the hearing, the senior counsel for the applicants sought to …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ajay Verma, who was charged under Sections 74, 76, 333 and 115(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, citing lack of medical evidence of assault and contradictions in the victim's statements …
The applicant Pawan Kumar applied for bail in Crime No. 03 of 2026, charged under sections 318(4) and 317(5) of the BNS and section 66D of the I.T. Act, arising from a cyber‑crime investigation. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Sonu Singh, had already been released on bail in a similar case …
The applicant, Sadik @ Lallu, sought bail in a case registered as Crime No. 8 of 2026 under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The State opposed bail, relying on a confessional statement of a co‑accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The court examined the evidentiary value of such a …
The petitioner, Shriram, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Director General of Prantiya Rakshak Dal and other respondents to appoint him as a Guard in the Ghazipur unit and to release his salary regularly. He also requested a reasoned order on his representation dated …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNDS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.342 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar Jain & Others). They argued that the investigating police failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.39 of 2025 (State vs. Mukesh Kumar Jain & Others) on the ground that the investigating police failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNSS) Act seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.46 of 2025, alleging that the investigating police officer failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Sections 29 and 30 of the Banning of …
Manoj Kumar Gaur and five others filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash an order dated 17 September 2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and to restrain the State from registering a …
Petitioner Rampa Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to decide her application dated 28‑08‑2025, which sought rejection of proceedings under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to act against other respondents for alleged forgery and false …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 34072 of 2024) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a dowry‑related case (Cr. No. 27610 of 2024) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage between the first …
Anit Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 7,000 per month granted by the Meerut Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a dispute with his wife, Smt. Anju Devi. The revisionist alleged that the order was arbitrary, illegal, and that …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Pathak, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and summons dated 6 September 2025 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. He contended that no prima facie case existed and …
The applicant Sandeep filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a supplementary charge‑sheet (No. 81‑A/2024) and the cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 4228 of 2025. The charge‑sheet was filed after a second investigation was conducted without the magistrate’s permission under …
The petitioners, who had served as contract optometrists under the National Health Mission from 2012 to 2017, sought weightage and age relaxation for a post of Optometrist advertised on 12.07.2023, which they were denied as they were over the age limit. They relied on the judgment in Seema Singh …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Ram Chandra and another seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicants were represented by counsel Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Richa Srivastava and Shikha Srivastava, while the State was represented by …
The petitioners, who had served as contract optometrists under the National Health Mission from 2009 to 2017, sought quashing of the order dated 21‑11‑2023 that rejected their representation for weightage and age relaxation in the recruitment advertisement of 12‑07‑2023 for the post of Optometrist. …
The appellant, a school headmaster, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the CrPC seeking registration of an FIR against three teachers alleging casteist slurs and assault. The trial court rejected the application, finding no prima facie cognizable offence and viewing the move as a …
In Criminal Appeal No. 1211 of 1988, the appellants Harish Chandra and others challenged a conviction. The High Court initially abated the appeal with respect to appellants 1, 2 and 4 and ordered a non‑bailable warrant against appellant 3, Mam Chandra @ Toti. Subsequently, the Chief Judicial …
The appellants Raffu and Kallu were convicted for the murder of Yamin under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that both participated in a quarrel that led to Raffu shooting Yamin, with Kallu allegedly assisting. The High Court examined the evidence and found that …
The appellants Krishna Kumar, Lallu and Suresh were convicted under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting the complainant Badri Prasad and his family members, based on the testimony of two injured eyewitnesses. They were released on probation instead of being sentenced to imprisonment. …
The appellant Bhagwat was accused of raping a nine‑year‑old girl on 5 August 1984; an FIR was lodged the next day and the victim was medically examined, revealing severe genital injuries. The victim, her father, and several eyewitnesses identified Bhagwat, while the medical officer’s report and …
The applicant, Omsaran, filed a bail application in a murder case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) in which he is accused of killing his wife. He contended that he was the informant who lodged the FIR after his wife was assaulted and that the prosecution's case is based solely on suspicion of an illicit …
The appellant, Hafeez Ullah, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, it was submitted that the appellant had died on 8 October 2025, supported by a death certificate, a letter from his son, and a letter from the Gram Pradhan, all annexed to a compliance …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.4,06,000 compensation to Pramod Kumar for injuries sustained when his motorcycle was hit by a Maruti car on 6 February 2007, assessing his monthly income at Rs.4,000 and applying a multiplier of 18 under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. Iffco …
The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Sunny Kumar and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel appeared for the applicants, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the matter. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506, 354, 354‑B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both the applicants and the second …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Indar Kumar, who was arrested in a rape case under Section 65(1) of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute, pointing to the absence of injuries, lack of …
The petitioner, Achyutanand Singh, filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 7250 of 2009) which the court ordered to be connected with two earlier writ petitions, Chhotey Lal Verma v. State of U.P. (Writ-C No. 45382 of 2008) and Virendra Pathak v. State of U.P. (Writ-C No. 62361 of 2008). The first …
The petitioners, members of the Meena community, applied for Constable positions in the Provincial Armed Constabulary of Uttar Pradesh, claiming Scheduled Tribe reservation based on a Rajasthan ST certificate. Their recruitment was cancelled, and they sought a mandamus directing the state to train …
Petitioner Vedansh Sonkar and others filed a habeas corpus petition and later sought permission to withdraw it. The petitioners, through counsel Abhishek Tiwari and Shivendra Singh, requested the court to allow withdrawal of the petition. The High Court, after hearing the application, dismissed the …
The Allahabad High Court heard an appeal by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a 2014 road accident that killed a 37‑year‑old daily labourer. The Tribunal had fixed the deceased's annual income at Rs.36,000, applied a 1/4 deduction for …
The appellants, Abhay Raj and three others, appealed to quash the charge‑sheet and summoning order issued under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code relating to assault. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the …
Mukesh applied for bail in a 1992 case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC. He claimed that his earlier bail in 1994 was terminated because he had to leave the city for livelihood reasons, not because he absconded, and that he has been in custody since March 2024. The State …
The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus for Aman Rathore, alleging he was being illegally detained by his estranged wife and her relatives. The court noted that Aman’s marriage involved a dowry dispute, leading the wife to file an FIR under sections of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition …
Rashid @ Dangal was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 and has been in custody since 10 January 2026. He applied for bail, contending that he was falsely implicated and that his prior criminal history had already resulted in bail in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Yadav, who is charged under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault leading to death. The applicant argued that the FIR assigns only a general role to all accused, the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 61(2) of the CrPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the victim’s statement that she left home voluntarily and entered into a …
Manoj Yadav and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 03‑09‑2024 in State vs Manoj Yadav case No. 5458 of 2024. The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 379 and …
Petitioner Nisha Singh Shakya filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that her husband Vinay Shakya was being held in illegal custody by respondent No.6, Devesh Kumar Shakya. The petition was listed, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the case. Consequently, the Court found …
The petitioners filed a habeas corpus writ petition (No. 424 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was listed before the Court, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the matter. The Court noted the absence of any …
The applicant, Smt. Preeti Devi, filed a transfer application seeking to move a matrimonial suit (Case No. 2945 of 2023) filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, from the Family Court in Kanpur Nagar to the Family Court in Fatehpur. She alleged hardship in attending proceedings in …
The applicant, Pallavi Singh @ Kshama Yadav, filed a transfer application (civil) No. 437 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No substantive material or pleadings were filed by the applicant to press the application. The opposite party, represented by Gaurav …
Dharmendra Kumar filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 9504 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Akanksha Gaur, informed the court that subsequent developments had eliminated any surviving cause of …
The applicant, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, and no counsel represented her at the hearing. The opposite party and the State's counsel were present. The court observed that …
The applicant, Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant at the initial hearing or at the revised call, and the applicant himself was absent on the subsequent date. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hemant Rai, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 3(5), 103(1), 351(3) of the IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that there was no eye‑witness to the alleged killing and that the only witnesses named the accused …
Petitioner Prabhat Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the absence of representation for the petitioner and …
The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied several orders dated 13 January, 19 January, 20 January and 17 February 2026 in Writ‑A No.179 of 2026. The opposite parties submitted an affidavit of compliance on 9 September 2026, stating that the …
Mahendra Kumar Mishra filed a second appeal (Defective No. 84 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against Smt Chandra Lekha and six others. The appeal was listed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. Counsel for the appellant, Arvind Srivastava, appeared, but no …
Mahendra Kumar Mishra filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court against Smt. Chandra Lekha and three others. The appeal was listed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, and no steps could be taken pursuant to …
The applicant Sonu, husband of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Section 85, Section 80(2) of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act. While the deceased's parents initially supported the prosecution, they later turned hostile, stating that Sonu never demanded dowry and that the …
Mehadi Hassain Shamin applied under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings filed against him under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.37,500. The cheque was given to settle a cash loan obtained from the complainant’s wife but was …
Aftab Alam filed Criminal Revision No. 2355 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The revisionist was represented by counsel Mir Sayed, while the opposite party was represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 131 of 2026) initiated against them. The High Court examined the material and observed that the existence of an offence against the applicants could not be dismissed at …
Petitioner Chhedi Lal filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to decide Revision No. 5321 of 2024 (Mohd. Saeed v. Chhedi Lal) filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the revision had been pending since 2024 and was being adjourned …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the licensing authority to decide his application dated 10 September 2021 concerning a fair price shop. The High Court, in an earlier order (Writ C No. 125/2022), directed the Assistant Collector to decide the …
The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad, challenged a series of revenue orders concerning Plot No. 1957 in Jalaun district, asserting that the land was non‑Zamindari‑Abolition (non‑ZA) and thus governed by the U.P. Tenancy Act, 1939, allowing him to maintain proceedings under Section 60 of that Act. The …
The petition filed by Jai Prakash Narayan et al. before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 was not pursued by the petitioner. No substantive material was presented, and the petitioner failed to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, accused in a murder case (Criminal Case No. 283 of 2024) under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant argued that the FIR named him only because he was a friend of the prime accused, Arbaz, the husband of the deceased, and that …
The petitioners filed a criminal revision (No. 2201 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the trial court. Counsel for the petitioners argued that the revision had become infructuous because a final judgment had already been rendered by the trial court. The court …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 11546 of 2014) was filed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in …
The petitioner, Ram Pravesh Sonkar, was selected as a constable in the Railway Protection Force and sent to a BSF training centre. He was reported to have absconded from training on two occasions, despite being given two opportunities to complete it. The petitioner alleged that the training …
