Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 3001–3200
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kusum Devi and Ramsamujh Nishad, who were charged under Section 105 of the B.N.S. for the alleged murder of an informant's husband. The FIR was lodged four days after the incident, and the charge was later altered from Section 103(1) to Section …
The accused Nandkishor applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) alleging assault on the informant's family members, resulting in injuries including a fatal fracture to Kailash. The prosecution argued that the injuries were severe and that a co-accused had used an iron rod, seeking denial …
The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Civil Judge (S.D.)/FTC, Ghaziabad decide Original Suit No. 994 of 2018 against Devendra Kumar within a stipulated period. The core issue was whether a High Court can impose a time‑bound schedule on a …
The petitioners, Vikram Singh and nine others, challenged a 21‑April‑2022 order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer that rejected their application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was filed 14 days after the award was passed. They relied on a prior …
Petitioners Lila Singh and another challenged the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer dated 21‑04‑2022 which rejected their application under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was filed 14 days after the prescribed period. They relied on a prior decision …
Petitioner Etah Wine Traders AOP filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to contain incurable defects in its pleadings. Counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition and be allowed to file a fresh one. The respondents, representing the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summons dated 08.07.2026 issued by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, F.T.C., Ghaziabad in Complaint Case No.42088 of 2025. They contended that the summons under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) B.N.S.S. was issued …
The petitioners, Indravesh and another, challenged the cancellation of a lease granted to their mother and the expungement of their names from revenue records by the Deputy District Magistrate, Tehsil Gunnaur. They argued that the cancellation was beyond the magistrate's jurisdiction and filed a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramreet, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 53 of 2026) involving alleged assault on the informant’s father and grandfather, the latter dying from head injuries. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that …
Petitioner Ram Bahadur filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and its officials to compute and pay interest on his Provident Fund for the period 2003‑2012, and to order a reasoned decision on his representation dated 18‑07‑2026. The respondent, represented by Ved Byas …
Petitioner Priya Singh challenged the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against her while a criminal case under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was pending. She argued that the simultaneous proceedings would prejudice her rights and sought relief through a writ …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 12, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 334 of 2018. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …
The petitioners, Saniya Khan and another, both adults in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and interference from family members and sought a permanent injunction under Article 226. They requested that the respondents and police be directed not to disturb their peaceful cohabitation and to …
The applicants, Yusuf and another, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking discharge of the accused, asserting that the dispute with the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent had been amicably settled and a compromise was filed. The trial court verified the compromise on …
The accused, Satish Jayswal, applied for bail in a case arising from a road‑traffic accident alleged to have caused grievous injuries under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 109 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged by a relative with whom he has a dispute, …
The petitioners, Smt Karishma and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent protection order to prevent the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from family members. They asserted that they are …
The petitioner Mahesh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide his original suit (No.1553 of 2025) expeditiously, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s …
The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mohammadabad, Azamgarh to decide Original Suit No. 387 of 2009 within a time‑bound schedule. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar …
The petitioner, Chhote Lal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Banda to decide a Section 6‑C application pending in Original Suit No.18 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose and …
Kajoli Devi and another adult petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted evidence of their adult status, a joint …
The petitioners, Ravi Shankar @ Ravi Tiwari and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Varanasi, to decide pending objections dated 11 June 2026 and 17 June 2025. The petition argued that the objections had remained unresolved for an …
The applicant, Kamal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and recovery warrant issued by the trial court to enforce interim maintenance awarded to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife had obtained interim …
The petitioner, Smt. Jyoti Jhanji, sought relief from a home loan recovery proceeding initiated by Canara Bank. The bank stipulated that if the petitioner deposited the overdue amount of Rs.1,62,000 before the auction date of 28 September 2026, the loan would be regularized. The court ordered that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay alias Himanshu, who was arrested in a criminal case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by the victim’s mother and relied on a victim’s statement recorded under …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection due to threats from family members. The court observed that both parties are adults who have voluntarily …
The applicant Kamlesh Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an order dated 5 September 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge under the POCSO Act in a case involving alleged offences of rape, kidnapping and …
The petitioners, who are adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets and a marriage registration certificate to prove …
The petitioners challenged FIR No. 0219 of 2026 filed under sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and sought quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing police not to arrest them. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a judgment and order of the Special Judge under the PoxO Act dated 16‑07‑2026, and to obtain bail pending arrest. The High Court examined the allegations, finding that they disclose a cognizable offence and that …
The petitioner, Mohammad Rashid, challenged the Board of Revenue’s order upholding a Tehsildar’s mutation order dated 25‑June‑2026, alleging that a fresh mutation application by respondent No. 6 on the basis of a 1983 will was impermissible and that the revision was wrongly dismissed. The respondent …
Vishal, the brother‑in‑law of the alleged victim, was arrested in a case (Crime No. 181 of 2026) alleging that he and his father disrobed the victim and attempted rape during a property dispute. The victim and her husband, who is also a witness, later testified that the incident was a scuffle …
The petitioners, Smt. Simran Verma and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The court observed that a First Information Report (FIR) had already been registered under Munsif No. 244 of 2026, invoking Sections …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were …
Petitioners Smt Mohini and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction to prevent respondents from interfering in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members after their marriage on 08‑09‑2026. They …
Vijay Shankar Trivedi filed a writ petition under Article 227 on behalf of a third party, seeking speedy disposal of an application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC that had been pending since 11 November 2025 in Original Suit No. 1315 of 2020. The petition solely requested the court to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Vishal Singh, who was accused of rape under Sections 69, 352 and 351(3) IPC. The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a broken consensual relationship of eight years, and asserted innocence. The …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramshankar @ Biyaju, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 120B, 366, 323, 504, 506 and 376D of the IPC. The FIR alleged that the applicant had assisted a co‑accused in kidnapping the victim, but the victim’s …
The petitioners filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite Original Suit No. 303 of 1994, which had remained pending for over 32 years. The High Court referred to the decision in Ali Shad Usmani v. Ali Isteba (2015) which generally …
The applicants, Arjun Thakur and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash charge‑sheets filed against them under sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and …
The applicant, Umanand Upadhyay, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging theft of a cheque payment register, forgery and criminal breach of trust. The key issue was whether officers of a cooperative …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City Jaunpur, to decide a 6‑C application filed in Original Suit No. 508 of 2026. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose and therefore …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Pundir, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Deoband, Saharanpur to decide a 6‑C temporary injunction application filed in Civil Suit No. 228 of 2025. The High Court, after noting that keeping the matter …
Dr Manas Sharan Tiwari filed a contempt application against Dr Ajeet Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 18‑11‑2025 issued in Writ‑A No. 17290 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 22‑04‑2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 5753/2026 directing the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of willful disobedience existed but declined to issue a …
Akash appealed against the order of the Special Judge dated 17.08.2026 in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act alleging rape, video recording and other offences. The FIR alleged that the appellant had lured and assaulted the victim, a 21‑year‑old …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an NBW order dated 05-11-2015 issued by the Special Judge under the Gangster Act (sections 2/3) in Agra. The High Court examined the arguments of both parties. The court found the applicant's grounds for quashing …
Shivam Agarwal applied for bail in a criminal case where a charge under Section 27A of the NDPS Act was added after he had already been granted bail for other charges. He had been in jail since 3 April 2026 and argued that the material before the court was the same, warranting bail for the new …
Petitioner Jitendra Kumar Srivastava filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Meja, Prayagraj, to decide an application dated 26‑05‑2026, which was merely a reminder sent by registered post. The application is filed under Section 24 of the Uttar …
The petitioner, M/s Shri Raghav Anna Bhandar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 07.05.2026 passed by the State of U.P. and others. The High Court examined whether the order was appealable and whether the petition was barred by limitation. The …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members after their marriage on 29‑05‑2026. The court examined Supreme Court precedents …
M/s Yameen Ent Udyog filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16‑02‑2026 passed by the State of U.P. The Court examined whether the order was appealable and whether the petition was barred by limitation. It held that the order is appealable and no jurisdictional error exists to warrant …
Javed Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 906 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a gang chart and noting that he had already been granted bail in two …
Petitioner Smt. Priti Saini filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to decide her pending divorce petition (Case No.1309/2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a stipulated period, alleging undue …
The applicant, Parvez @ Kala, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 31‑07‑2024 and to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑06‑2024 in a Sessions trial involving offences under IPC Section 307, the Prevention of Cow Slaughter …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the summoning order dated 11‑08‑2017 in Complaint Case No. 3952 of 2016 (Rajesh v. Ramashankar) relating to alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that, on a perusal of the complaint and statements …
The petitioner, Asif @ Aasif Aktar Idreeshi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23075 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any appropriate remedy. The State of U.P. and other …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. It allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the …
Reema Devi was arrested under Section 105 of the B.N.S. for allegedly performing surgery on the daughter of the first informant without valid qualifications, resulting in the patient's death. The applicant contended that there was no incriminating material, no intent to cause death, and she had no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07-09-2024 and the cognizance order dated 23-09-2024 in case No. 5709 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 147, 392 and 325 of the IPC. They …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 09-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
The applicant, Chandra Bhushan Tripathi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh. He did not wish to contest the merits but requested liberty to file a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1015 of 2022, which arose from charges under Sections 323, 406, 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was instituted with a mala fide …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 24-04-2025 and to obtain liberty to file a bail application before the trial court. The counsel for the applicants did not contest the merits of the underlying criminal case but requested …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and proceedings in a case under Sections 323 and 504 IPC, alleging that these offences are non‑cognizable. They argued that, per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the CrPC, a police report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Virendra, accused under Sections 64(2)m, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a 17‑year‑old girl under false promise of marriage, resulting in pregnancy and a child. …
The accused Gautam applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 674 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the IPC and Sections 4, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated after the informant, Sabir Ali, added his name eight days …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amar Bahadur, who is charged with offences under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Income Tax Act for an alleged rape of his aunt, a married …
Amit Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 77 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 498-A, 304-B and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. This was his second bail application, the first having been rejected on 26.08.2025. The applicant's counsel submitted a second …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 52021 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 308(4) and 351(2) of the BNSS. A compromise between the parties had been reached and …
The appellant, a juvenile aged 16 years, was charged under IPC sections 363, 364 and 506 for the alleged abduction and attempted murder of the informant's minor daughter, based largely on an alleged extra‑judicial confession; the victim was never recovered. The trial court denied bail, but the …
Petitioners Sachin Kumar @ Sunny Deol and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They informed the Court that they had already been arrested by the police and expressed their desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the fourth respondent raised no …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favorable to them had been submitted, and they wished to withdraw the petition. …
The applicants, Kunwar Vikash Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 19‑04‑2019 and the criminal proceedings in Case No. 419 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 of the IPC and Sections …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 08‑06‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026 arising from FIR under Section 352. The High Court …
The petitioner, a seven‑month‑pregnant applicant for the post of Home Guard (Female), had cleared the written exam but was scheduled for the Physical Efficiency Test (PET) on 22‑09‑2026. She applied to the recruitment authority for a deferment, citing her pregnancy and medical documents, but the …
The applicants, Mohd. Suhail and five others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (No. 5475 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking relief in a criminal matter. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application, although counsel for the State was present. The court dismissed the …
The appellant, Lotan, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued a notice directing the sole appellant to engage another counsel for representation. No counsel or party appeared to prosecute the appeal. Consequently, there was no one present to press the second appeal. …
The appellant, Smt. Bimla, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnor, in Sessions Trial No. 209 of 1983 for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. She filed a criminal appeal (No. 1278 of 1989) before the Allahabad High Court …
The appellants were convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia. They filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. During the pendency of the appeal, appellants No.1, 2 and 4 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, even after a revised listing. Counsel for the opposite parties appeared, and the court noted the prolonged pendency and lack of prosecution. …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case involving sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the pendency of the petition, the parties engaged in mediation, …
The petitioner, a former Accounts Officer, challenged a disciplinary order dated 24‑12‑2002 that directed recovery of Rs.1,45,450 from his salary in monthly installments. The order, issued after a departmental inquiry into alleged irregularities, was never enforced during his service and was later …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Criminal Case No.2477/2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 04‑12‑2025 under IPC sections 85, 115(2) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, and a mandamus restraining their arrest. Both parties submitted that the dispute had been amicably settled through a …
The applicants, Mohd. Danish and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving this statement, dismissed the …
The applicant, Jitendra Kashyap, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet filed under Sections 323, 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a dowry harassment case. The marriage …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR No. 0074 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent further arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been settled through a mediation and conciliation agreement dated 27.06.2026. Both parties, including …
Petitioners Gajendra Singh Teotia and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24.01.2026 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest them. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar Dharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a murder case arising from the death of Nikita Dharma. The prosecution alleged that the applicant assaulted and threatened the deceased and that …
Petitioners Chetan Agarwal and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 04.12.2025 under IPC sections 85 and 115(2) BNS and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4, and a mandamus restraining their arrest. The parties had earlier settled the dispute …
Jita Yadav filed a criminal revision petition (No. 1970 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and another party. The revisionist's counsel informed the court that the parties had amicably settled their dispute outside the courtroom, resulting in the extinguishment of any …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑08‑2023 and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 10013 of 2023) arising from a dowry dispute under sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 420, 494 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry …
The appellant, Pradeep Kumar, filed a first appeal against the order dated 2010. The appeal was listed for hearing on a revised list, but the appellant failed to appear before the court. Counsel for the respondents, Sri Shiv Singh and another, were present. The court dismissed the appeal on the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mukesh Dubey, accused of murder under IPC sections 103(1), 115(2), 3(5) and 61(2)Ka BNS. The applicant claimed the death of his wife was a suicide by aluminum phosphide, citing an inconclusive post‑mortem and a delayed, unreliable statement from …
Dinesh filed a criminal revision under Section 126(2) of the Cr.P.C. challenging the Family Court's order dated 17.01.2025 that rejected his application for condonation of a 13‑day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The trial court had earlier served notice, proceeded ex parte, and passed …
The applicant sought cancellation of bail granted to the accused (opposite party No.2) on the ground that the accused misused the bail by threatening the applicant, who is a key witness, and that an FIR had been filed against the accused and his wife. The accused contended that the FIR lacked …
The petitioners Smt. Khushbu Prajapati and another filed a criminal revision (No. 2212 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, challenging an earlier order. During the pendency of the revision, the parties to the underlying case (Harshit Raj Sangam …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Rajdeep Rajawat, who is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting a victim and firing at him. The first bail plea was denied, but the applicant argued that the primary witness and the victim have …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohd Asad @ Asaad @ Kaliya, who is charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120B, 147, 148, 149, 286, 307, 386, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Mohd Faizan, in a similarly placed case …
The applicant, Rajnish Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 45143 of 2019) against the State of U.P. and another party. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance by the parties, and the applicant appeared to have …
The revisionist, Ravindra Kumar Tiwari, challenged a series of reassessment orders issued by the Commercial Tax authorities for Assessment Year 2000-01, alleging that the reassessments were based solely on an alleged undisclosed royalty payment of Rs. 9,67,587 and not on any fresh material. The High …
The petition filed by Ravindra Kumar Tiwari sought revision of a sales/trade tax assessment. The High Court examined the revision petition and, without providing detailed reasoning in the excerpt, allowed the revision. The Court directed that the orders be issued as per the order dated in STRE No. …
Ramesh Verma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The application remained pending for several years, and no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called. The State, …
The applicant, Harshit Raj Sangam, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20 March 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Basti, in case No. 480/11/23 (Khushbu Prajapati and Another vs. Harshit Raj Sangam) …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter had been pending since 2019. On the hearing date, no representative appeared for the applicants, while the State was represented by its Additional …
The Allahabad High Court considered four related bail appeals filed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by Rakesh Kumar, Vipin, Aman Kumar @ Tagharu and Rajendra Tiwari, who were accused of assaulting Kuldeep, who later died. The FIR was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23.05.2025 that gave rise to a criminal case under sections 352, 351(1) and 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Both parties later informed the court that they had entered into a compromise and a matrimonial alliance. The …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the complaint was a retaliatory counter‑complaint and that no prima facie case existed. The complainant, a member of the Jatav caste, …
The applicant, Mohammad Wasi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge-sheet and non‑bailable warrant in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and 313 of the IPC and the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed innocence and alleged that …
Petitioner Shahkab and five family members filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR lodged on 9 May 2026 under Sections 64(1), 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, arising from matrimonial discord with respondent No.4, the wife of petitioner No.1. The High Court …
The applicants, Vishvanath Pandey and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 79 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 147, 344, 347 and 506 IPC. They relied …
The applicants Sandeep Mittal and four others sought to quash a criminal proceeding (Case Crime No. 0421 of 2025) initiated under Section 316(2) BNS of the Uttar Pradesh code. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code, submitting a verified compromise report …
The petitioners, including Guddi Devi, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 24‑05‑2025 that alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act. They contended that they are adults who voluntarily married each other and that Guddi Devi's age was incorrectly …
The revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 challenged the Small Causes Court’s order rejecting an application for impleadment filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC. The applicant, claiming to be the Shebait/Mohatmin of a Hindu deity, sought to be joined so that the …
The applicant, Irfan Ali, filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Earlier, his first anticipatory bail application was withdrawn with a direction to surrender, but he failed to …
Petitioner Insad Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12.05.2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest under various IPC sections. The petition was filed in the Allahabad High Court. The State and other respondents submitted that …
The appellant Vipin filed Criminal Appeal No. 5793 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the lower court. The appeal sought relief including the grant of bail. After hearing counsel for both parties, the court granted bail to the appellant. The court also allowed the …
The applicant, Ram Ujagir Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 27‑03‑2025, the cognizance order dated 28‑05‑2025, and the entire proceedings of case No.17441 of 2025 relating to offences under Sections 420, 471, 419 and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upendra Paswan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 351(3) of the B.N.S., 67 of the Income Tax Act and Sections 13 and 14 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed that the alleged offence stemmed from a consensual …
The applicant, Anuj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 1185 of 2020, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had entered into a compromise on 6 November …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑07‑2017, the cognizance and summoning order dated 12‑04‑2019, and the entire proceedings of State Vs. Rajesh @ Tuntun (Case No. 2279 of 2019) relating to offences under …
Vikram Sharma applied for a re‑issue of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer raised objections on the ground that two criminal matters—one under the IPC and SC/ST Act and another under the Public Gambling Act—were pending and allegedly suppressed. Sharma submitted affidavits claiming …
The petitioner, Vishwa Prakash Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Secretary of the U.P. Madhyamik Sanskrit Shiksha Parishad to consider his representation dated 28‑04‑2026 for re‑evaluation of answer scripts in four subjects. The Court examined …
The applicant, Sanjay Bharti, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant, Sarthak Verma, requested that the matter be listed for filing a supplementary affidavit to explain the applicant's criminal history. The court, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sabir, who was arrested under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly possessing 104.4 grams of alprazolam. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the …
The applicant, Upendra Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have sent photographs of a minor. He contended that the relationship was consensual, the victim had married him, and her age had been …
Ezad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 458 of 2025) arising from a police firing incident in which he sustained a gunshot injury in the cross‑fire. The charges were under Section 109 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/25(1‑B)A/27 and 4/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant’s criminal history was …
The applicant Navdeep Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, before Justice Saurabh Srivastava, ordered that the matter be listed for hearing on 7 October 2026. No further factual or legal discussion is provided in …
Ms. Sayqua Injeel filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 23472 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The petition was listed before Hon'ble Justice Vinod Diwakar. On the last date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the …
The applicant, Lalchandra Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 19599 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 225 of 2025, including the charge sheet dated 23‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated …
The appellant, Aman Kumar, filed a criminal appeal challenging the order passed by the trial court. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and another, opposed the relief sought. The High Court of Allahabad examined the arguments and the material on record. The Court granted bail to the …
The appellant, Rajendra Tiwari, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. The appeal sought relief, including the grant of bail. The court, after hearing counsel for both parties, granted bail to the appellant. It also allowed the appeal, …
The applicant, Mrityunjay Rajbhar, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No.38 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the case was based on a single criminal charge shown in a gang …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings of the State, after a charge sheet had been filed against them on 19 July 2026. The State submitted an affidavit confirming that the investigation was complete and the charge sheet was already forwarded. The …
Waseem was arrested in connection with Crime No.10 of 2026 under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 27 of the Arms Act for alleged possession of a country-made pistol and recovered ornaments. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the recovery was fabricated, …
An application under Section 528 CrPC was filed by Anil @ Bhagwati Sharan Dwivedi seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in State vs Vishnu Kant (Case No. 2418 of 2019) which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 14‑07‑2025, the cognizance order dated 17‑11‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 388 of 2025 (State vs. Subodh Kumar and Others) arising from Crime No. 146 of 2025. …
The High Court considered the bail application of Rihan Khan, who is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 38 of the Aadhaar Act for an alleged fraud involving a Rs.2,000 transfer. The applicant pleaded innocence, described the allegations as petty, and pointed to a history of …
The petitioner, Rohit Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later informed the court that he no longer wishes to pursue the relief sought. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be allowed to be withdrawn. The court considered the request and, finding no …
The applicant, Rajkapoor Gihar, was injured in a police firing cross‑fire and is charged under Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial (Case Crime No. 167 of 2026). The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑11‑2020, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09‑12‑2020, and the entire Session proceedings (Case No. 770 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 392 and 411 IPC. …
The petition was filed by Naresh Singh, who was the Chowki In‑charge, challenging a tribunal order that had upheld a charge of negligence for failing to prevent a second explosion of seized explosives. On 7 November 2023 a large quantity of illegal firecrackers and related materials were seized from …
Avadhesh Sharma applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 534 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 IPC. He contended that the allegations were vague, the injuries were minor, he had cooperated with the …
The applicant, Dhiraj Shaw, was arrested on 11 May 2026 for alleged possession of 25.1 kg of ganja, seized in 12 packets, under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He filed a bail application claiming innocence, alleging that the quantity was inflated by …
Petitioners Uvaish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. The State filed a charge-sheet against the petitioners on 27 June 2026, concluding the investigation. The petitioners' counsel, without disputing …
The applicants, Avnish Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 6448 of 2024) initiated under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute with Khushbu Yadav. The parties had …
The petitioner, allotted a plot in 2001, had his allotment affirmed by an order dated 18‑12‑2023 under Section 198(4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950. He applied under Section 76 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 to be recorded as bhumidhar with transferable rights, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (ST No.1935 of 2024) arising from Crime No.455 of 2020, which involved offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar Maurya, filed a criminal revision seeking modification of the interim maintenance amount to align with his financial standing. The petition also asserted that, since the petitioner is now deceased, the revision should be treated as abated. The court considered the …
The applicants, Ajay Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet and proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2059 of 2013) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh under IPC sections 498-A, 323 and 504. The parties had entered into a compromise on 10 July 2024, which was …
Petitioner Sarwar Aziz filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The …
The petitioner, Harikesh Yadav, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the civil miscellaneous proceedings, the petitioner filed an application seeking withdrawal of the petition. The court examined the application and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. …
The petitioner, Nafees, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State had already completed the investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 23 July 2026. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Additional Chief …
The applicants, Ayyub and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 10457/22) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 352, 323 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The petitioner, Sri Sanjay Rajbhar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18651 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The investigation in the matter had already been concluded, and a final report dated 25.05.2026 was issued in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner later expressed a …
The petitioner, Vasudeo Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing a private respondent, his younger brother, not to interfere with his possession of a residential house, tube well, and chak that were mutually partitioned in 2014, and also seeking enforcement of his life, limb, and …
The petitioner, Zunaid Saifi, was arrested on 12 June 2026 and remanded in judicial custody until 19 June 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 31 March 2021 alleging offences under Section 66-C of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. …
The petitioner challenged a mutation order passed by a Naib Tehsildar under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which recorded the name of a private respondent based on a registered will deed dated 21‑02‑2009. The petitioner’s appeal under Section 35(2) and subsequent revision under Section …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 336 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report confirming the settlement was filed. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑01‑2025, the cognizance order dated 13‑11‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.62 of 2025) arising from Crime No.497 of 2024. Both parties had amicably …
The applicant, Kuldeep Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 2718 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification …
The applicant, Mohan Prakash, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to quash a summoning order dated 02‑08‑2025 issued in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant contended that the complaint was barred by limitation and …
The applicant, Anita Srivastav, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified before the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 131, 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified …
Anupam Verma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging forgery of remand papers and unlawful benefit. The petitioner claimed false implication and asked for an interim stay of investigation. The respondents argued that the FIR disclosed prima facie offences and …
Petitioners Naresh Kumar and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They later moved an application seeking dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The Standing Counsel for the respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined the application, noted the lack of …
Messrs Rajasthan Motors, a tenant, challenged an order of the Additional District Judge that directed it to deposit fifty percent of the monthly rent during the pendency of its appeal against a rent determination order. The petitioner argued that a one‑time pre‑deposit made at the time of filing the …
Messrs Hind Wheels, a tenant, filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an order of the Additional District Judge that, in an appeal, directed it to deposit 50% of the monthly rent despite having already made the statutory pre‑deposit under Section 35(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban …
Messrs Carmen, a tenant, challenged an order of the Additional District Judge that directed it to deposit 50% of the monthly rent while an appeal was pending. The petitioner argued that it had already made the statutory pre‑deposit required under Section 35(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar to decide a pending proceeding under Section 27 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding, initiated on 12 March 2026, was not being …
The petitioner, Vinod Jaiswal, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash orders dated 07.07.2026 and 14.07.2026 passed by the Gram Nyayalaya, Kerakat, on a criminal case (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC) alleging that the prosecution had failed to produce its key witness, Dr. A.P. Singh, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Case No. 46 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 136 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 281 and 106 (non‑compoundable). The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a …
Mohammad Farman filed a jail appeal before the Allahabad High Court challenging his conviction. The appellant’s counsel, Nishant Mehrotra, subsequently informed the court that the appellant wished to withdraw the appeal. The court considered the request for withdrawal and noted that no substantive …
The petitioner, Dharmesh Nishad, filed a reply under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 to a notice dated 10 April 2026. The authority (respondent 3) subsequently ordered his externment from the boundaries of District Basti for six months on 15 June 2026. Aggrieved, the petitioner …
The petitioner, Smt Subia Yunus, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18511 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a final report favored the petitioner. The …
Aazad Rajpoot applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.90 of 2026) charged under Sections 152, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 5 of the Official Secret Act, 1923. The application was heard by the Allahabad High Court, which noted that a co‑accused, Ajeem Rana, had already been released …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Up‑Ziladhikari of Etah to decide a suit filed on 31‑01‑2026 under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and to maintain status quo over certain lands. The petition also requested an order for an interim injunction …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash Criminal Case No.15564 of 2024, which involved non‑compoundable offences under Sections 379, 504, 506, 427 and 384 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, a compromise that was verified by the Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7748 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, involving offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an …
The applicant, Shivam Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 52096 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 281, 125A and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …
The petitioner challenged three orders that recorded the names of private respondents as owners of a plot based on a registered sale deed, arguing that the sale deed was under a pending civil suit for cancellation and therefore the mutation court lacked jurisdiction. The petition sought a writ of …
The petitioner, Kailash, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authorities to demarcate a plot allotted to his father and to grant him peaceful possession as per a 1973 lease. He claimed the plot, recorded as banjar in revenue records, was allotted to his …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second anticipatory bail application filed by Gaurav Singh after a chargesheet was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim, who was 22 days short of turning 18, had not implicated him in any assault and …
The petitioner, Usha, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the University to issue his computerized mark sheet and degree for the B.Ed. course of 2012-13 after having passed the examination. Although the university initially generated a mark sheet on its portal, it refused to issue the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 13‑12‑2016 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 308 and 325 IPC. The court noted that the parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was …
The applicant Shivam filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.125 of 2021) pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, Bareilly, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 325. Both parties had reached a compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent proceedings relating to offences under Sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise which was verified by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 17‑05‑2008 and related proceedings (Case No.313 of 2009) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 452 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …
The applicant, charged under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC in Crime No.510 of 2023, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 BNSS after being declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 CrPC/84 BNSS. The State opposed, arguing that the proclamation and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kadeer, who is named in an FIR for murder under Sections 191(2), 190, 103(1) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed the allegations were false, pointing to a post‑mortem report that showed a single head injury and no direct …
The applicant, Raj Kumari, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking recall of a non‑bailable warrant dated 3‑Jan‑2026 and a consequential order dated 5‑June‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Baberu, in a case arising from offences under Sections 420 and 468 IPC. The High …
Meera Devi filed a criminal appeal under Section 413 of the BNSS Act challenging the acquittal of two accused (Pushpa Devi and Arun alias Kallu) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, in a murder case arising from the death of her husband, Anil Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the accused …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.310 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 333, 192(2), 115(2), 351(3), 110 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had already reached an amicable …
The petitioner, Bhupendra Sahu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR alleging forgery of remand papers and misuse for unlawful benefit. The petitioner claimed false implication, while the State argued that the FIR disclosed prima facie offences and that investigation …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333 and 109(1) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act. The parties had reached a genuine compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicant Teja Pandey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 in State v. Teja Pandey, a case involving offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 8‑Nov‑2024 and a cognizance order dated 17‑May‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Ballia, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) BNS. The …
