Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 2801–3000

AVANISH KUMAR AGRAWALversusNATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Avanish Kumar Agrawal filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Bijnor, to decide the execution of an arbitral award dated 27 September 2025 in his favour against the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). NHAI had filed an application under Section 34 of the …

SHIVA TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shiva Tyagi was charged under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for the murder of a deceased, with the firearm recovered and sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory. After a first bail application was rejected, a second bail application was filed, contending that …

FAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Fahim Khan, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to enforce two orders dated 30 September 2023 and 30 September 2019, issued under Section 122B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 for eviction of encroachers and recovery of …

NIVEDIKA TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nivedika Tiwari, a former Instructor in a primary school (2013-2022), filed a writ petition seeking direction to be appointed as Instructor in an Upper Primary School and for the respondent to decide her pending renewal representation. She had left the post for medical reasons and a …

KHUSHBUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Khushbu, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have died by dowry‑related poisoning. The FIR, lodged a week after the incident, implicated the applicant based on a dying declaration that named her as the person …

SAKIRversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sakir, challenged the sale and impending dispossession of his house by the Bank of India after the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) had ordered a stay on confirming the sale. Despite the DRT’s interim order, the bank sold the property and the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate directed possession …

SURAJ KALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Suraj Kali, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was implicated in a dowry‑death case (Crime No. 205 of 2026) under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the IPC, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that the allegations were vague, that there was no …

SHYAMVEER SINGHversusSRI AKASH YADAV ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a petition challenging the order of a civil miscellaneous appeal that had allowed an appeal against an ad‑interim injunction granted in a suit for a temporary injunction (6C2). The petitioner contended that such an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC was not maintainable. …

TARANNUM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members and requesting police protection. They submitted identity documents to establish adulthood. The …

SMT ASHA AND ANOTHERversusRAVINDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Asha and another, filed a defendant's petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking an order for the speedy disposal of an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code in the original suit No. 465 of 2009. The High Court observed that keeping the …

JAIVEER SINGHversusSMT. RINKI AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaiveer Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Aligarh to dispose Suit No. 295 of 2025, filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, within a stipulated period. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …

SONU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Yadav, who was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 110 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR listed seven accused without assigning a specific role to him …

SMT. PRIYA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Priya Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent restraining order against certain family members who were allegedly threatening and interfering with their peaceful marital life after they married on 11 September 2026. Both parties are adults, as evidenced by …

RAMKESH SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramkesh Seth filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR dated 09.09.2026 under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes/Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The petitioner sought quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing …

AVADHESH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Avadhesh and nine others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 07‑09‑2026 registered under Sections 191(2), 333, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S.S., seeking its quashment and a mandamus to restrain their arrest. They also made an innocuous prayer that the …

SMT SONMATI DEVIversusRAM SHABD YADAV AND 21 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Sonmati Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Bansgaon to expedite Original Suit No. 624/2023. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Rohit filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 981 of 2026, which arose from Crime No. 137 of 2025 and involved sections 87, 137(2), and 64(1) of the BNS as well as a pending POCSO case. …

AJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ajeet Singh, the owner of vehicle UP25EM2866, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking release of the vehicle that had been seized by the police in connection with NDPS case MU‑A‑155/2026. The seizure order was passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly on 3 July 2026. The …

AZAD KHANversusSAZIDA KHATOON @ SANJEEDA KHATOON AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Azad Khan, filed a contempt application seeking to summon and punish the opposite parties for willful disobedience of a court order dated 17 December 2024 in Civil Misc. Writ‑C No. 35752 of 2024. The applicant later moved to withdraw the contempt application, citing an inherent …

SMT PRAGYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, an adult married couple, sought a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering with their peaceful marital life and requested police protection. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and affidavits establishing that both are sui …

ANJALI PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Anjali Patel and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The senior advocate for the respondents informed the Court that an FIR under Munsif No. 350 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., had already been lodged on 9 September 2026 at Madiyahu police station, case …

POORAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad disposed of a writ petition filed by Pooran Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and a bank. Both parties agreed that the petition should be decided in accordance with the Coordinating Bench order in Bajanth v. State of U.P. (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. …

KRIPA SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the State respondent to decide Revision No. 16 of 2025 within a specific time. The petitioner alleged that the revision had been pending for over a year, contrary to Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, which mandates a …

PRIYANKA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Priyanka Chauhan and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court was informed that an FIR (First Information Report) had already been registered under MCO No. 343 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., at Kasimabad police station on 10 September 2026 …

BANSHIversusVENKATESHWAR AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Banshi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 26, Deoria decide Original Suit No. 646 of 2013 expeditiously. The petition relied on alleged urgency and asked the High Court to fix a time‑bound schedule …

ARUNDHATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arundhati Devi, wife of the deceased employee Sarvesh Kumar Dwivedi, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her claim for family pension and death gratuity. The respondents rejected her claim on the ground that the deceased had nominated his mother for all retiral …

OM PRAKASH SINGHversusSEEMA @ SIMMI AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kasya Kushinagar, to decide a Section 6‑C temporary injunction application pending in Case No. 801 of 2026. The High Court examined whether it should entertain the …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Iglas, Aligarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C2) in Suit No. 63 of 2023 within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the injunction …

BASHIR HAZIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Bashir Hazi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 01‑09‑2026 and to restrain the police from taking coercive action against him under sections 74, 351(3) of the IPC, the B.N.S. Act and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The petitioner’s counsel also prayed that, …

SMT SHEELA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Smt Sheela Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material to support a presumption of dowry death, and that she …

RAFIQ AND 5 OTHERSversusAAS MOHAMMAD AND 3 OTHERS

The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction and, during the proceedings, applied for a temporary injunction. The trial court dismissed the temporary injunction application on the ground that the appellants had not produced the latest record of rights (Khatauni) for the disputed agricultural …

PRATHAM SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pratham Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner, Meerut Division, to decide his pending appeal (No. 2210/2026) and stay application under Section 6 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970, and to restrain any coercive action arising …

RAJENDRA PRASAD SONKARversusRAM BABU AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajendra Prasad Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)‑II, Kanpur Nagar to dispose of Civil Suit No. 1789 of 2018 within a time‑frame fixed by the petitioner. The High Court examined the recent …

VINOD KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSRI ASOK KUMAR SINGH

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 06‑02‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 1756 of 2026. The order required the opposite party to comply with directions of the writ court, but the applicants claim no compliance has occurred …

NITESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Nitesh Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 385 of 2026, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co‑accused, Tejas Pal, had already been released on bail in a similar case. The court …

SMT. SHEELA DEVIversusSHRI DR. ARUN KUMAR TIWARI, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

The applicant, Smt. Sheela Devi, filed a contempt application against Dr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, the Chief Medical Officer, alleging willful disobedience of a judgment and order dated 28‑10‑2025 in Writ A No. 15749 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy of the order, the …

ANJALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted …

RAJU BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, husband of a woman who died by hanging, sought bail in a criminal case alleging dowry harassment under Sections 80(2), 85 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. He argued that the charge sheet had been filed, there was no need for custodial …

DEVESH KUMAR GOELversusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) to decide Suit No. 374/2001 within a stipulated time. The petitioner later clarified that the suit had already been decided and the real relief sought was the expeditious disposal of Civil …

PRAMOD DWIVEDIversusRAJ KUMAR AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Pramod Dwivedi filed an election petition before the District Judge, Fatehpur, challenging the election of the Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad Fatehpur under Sections 19 and 20 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. The petition, pending since 3 June 2023, sought an order for its …

BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ballu filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29‑06‑2026 in a complaint case (Kamla Devi v. Ballu) and to stay the proceedings. The court noted that the petition was incomplete because the referenced medical examination reports were not …

MUKESH BABUversusRAM NARESH AND 3 OTHERS

Mukesh Babu filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a restraining order against the respondents for allegedly violating an interim injunction granted by a trial court. The Court examined whether a writ petition was the appropriate remedy for such a breach. It held that the correct …

PARMESH BABU PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on several plots of land designated as public utility in Payagpur village, Prayagraj district. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …

BRIJESH KUMARversusDIVYANSHI SINGH, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL PHOOLPUR

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 05.12.2025 in Writ Petition (C) No. 42926 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, at this stage, no notice was issued to the opposite party. …

BRIJESH KUMAR BHARTIversusKRISHNA RAJ AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction that the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Prayagraj decide Original Suit No. 1003 of 2023 within a fixed time‑frame. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

NETRAPAL SINGHversusSRI SHLOK KUMAR, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Netrapal Singh filed a contempt application against Senior Superintendent of Police Shlok Kumar alleging willful non‑compliance with an order dated 04‑02‑2026 in Writ‑A No. 1555/2026 that required the police officer to decide a claim. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but …

BANSHIDHAR TIWARIversusSHRI MOHD AMAN AND ANOTHER

In a civil contempt application (No. 6684 of 2026), the applicant Banshidhar Tiwari alleged that the opposite parties, Shri Mohd Aman and another, had willfully failed to comply with an order dated 24‑04‑2026 issued in PIL No. 1055/2026 directing them to decide a claim. The applicant claimed that a …

RAMDAUD GOND RAMDEV GONDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramdaud Gond, father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, in a case registered under Sections 80(2), 85, 61(2) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, with no material showing …

SMT. KOMIT SIROHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Komit Sirohi and another, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They asserted that both are adults, have voluntarily married, and have submitted school certificates and joint …

SHASHANKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Shashank filed a public interest litigation alleging that private individuals had encroached upon Gaon Sabha land in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner sought the High Court's intervention to stop the encroachment. The Court examined whether it could entertain the petition or whether the petitioner had …

AVADHESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of an appeal dated 18‑03‑2026 that was pending before the Principal General Manager (Administration), Disciplinary, Uttar Pradesh, after an order dated 10‑12‑2025. The petitioner alleged that no response had been received from the …

GULFAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from a case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, on the ground that the parties had …

SUNITA DEVIversusSADANAND MAURYA AND ANOTHER

Sunita Devi filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Jaunpur, to decide Application 25C pending in her original suit for specific performance (Original Suit No. 389/2019). The petitioner argued that the pending application was …

RAHUL SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking dismissal of criminal proceedings arising from case No. 69822/2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 380, 427, 454, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5 of the Arms …

JUNAID AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants indicated that they no longer wish to pursue the application and requested its dismissal. The court accepted this position and dismissed the application as not pressed, …

NARENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSOHAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) in Agra to expedite the disposal of a pending claim (MACT No. 371 of 2019) under Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioners argued that the claim had been pending …

KAVITA DEVIversusBRAJMOHAN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Kavita Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a High Court order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mau to dispose of her suit (Case No. 1385 of 2025) within two months. The Court examined precedent, noting the Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association v. …

ANITA TRIVEDIversusRAVI TRIVEDI

The petitioner, Anita Trivedi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to expedite the pending matrimonial application (Case No. 1334 of 2021) filed under Sections 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petition …

REENA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Reena Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The senior permanent advocate informed the court that an FIR under Section 87 of the B.N.S. (case No. MU‑A‑S‑417 of 2026) had already been registered on 15 September 2026 at Bilgram police station, Hardoi …

SABARUN NESHAversusMD CHHAGUR AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Deoria to decide a civil suit (Original Suit No. 1919 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State …

SHASHANK MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shashank Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a transfer to District Ghaziabad on the ground that his wife suffers from multiple sclerosis. He relied on a recommendation from the Chief Engineer (Distribution), Prayagraj, to support his request. The respondent, …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 49 of 2026, which arose from a POCSO matter involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 61(2)(a), 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 …

ANNU KUMARversusVISHAL RANA

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Muzaffarnagar, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 01 of 2023. The High Court, finding no merit in keeping the petition pending, disposed …

KALYAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusBOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners Kalyan Singh and others filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh (respondent No.1) to decide a stay application filed along with Revision No. 6235 of 2025, which had been pending since December 2025. The petitioners argued that despite …

SMT SUNDARA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Sundara Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent protection order against the respondents, alleging that family members were threatening them and interfering with their peaceful marital life after they married on 12‑09‑2026. The petitioners submitted proof of …

ARCHANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Archana and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and alleged threats to …

SAHINA PARVEEN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought an expeditious disposal of Restoration Application No. 6571 of 2026 (Kamar Jahan v. Abdul Raseed) after two scheduled dates were missed because counsel were on strike. The court noted that the restoration application could not be delayed indefinitely. It therefore ordered the …

GAUTAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gautam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a charge sheet dated 26‑07‑2023 that alleged offences under Section 420 IPC, the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that no …

UMESH RAI AND 3 OTHERSversusKULDEEP @ MUNNA RAI AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners sought an expeditious disposal of a temporary injunction (7C) application filed in Original Suit No. 468 of 2022, where an ad interim injunction had already been granted. The respondents had filed objections under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC, and the petitioners moved a writ …

HARI OMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Hari Om filed a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings of a bank. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed in line with the coordination bench's order in Bajanth v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026, 22‑07‑2026). The court also referred to the Anjani Kumar v. …

VIMLESH PATI TRIPATHIversusSHRI MADHUSUDAN HULGI

Vimlesh Pati Tripathi filed a contempt application against Madhusudan Hulgi alleging willful defiance of an order dated 01‑05‑2026 passed in Writ‑C No.16962 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied with the writ court's directions. …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Sachin Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant later expressed a desire to withdraw the application. Counsel for the applicant submitted a request for withdrawal. The court considered the request …

JAUHARI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 306, which is recorded as public utility land in Deoria district, Uttar Pradesh. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …

KGR GREENS INFRATECH PVT LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kgr Greens Infratech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, asking that the pending appeal …

SUPRIYA PATHAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Supriya Pathak, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abetment of suicide in a case arising from the death of her husband. The applicant argued that the death was due to antemortem hanging and that she had no …

GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Gaurav, who was charged under sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the B.N.S., sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act and section 3(2)V of the S.C.S.T. Act for an alleged offence involving the alleged enticement of a minor. The applicant argued …

KUNDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kundan Singh, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2), 115(2) and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, 1961. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material to invoke the presumption of dowry death, and that his …

RAVINDRA KUMAR MAURYA AND 35 OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioners, 36 contractual watchmen, cooks and peons employed in Kasturba Gandhi Residential Girls Schools across Uttar Pradesh, sought a mandamus directing their regularization, payment of basic salary, and inclusion in welfare schemes. They relied on a recent Lucknow Bench judgment that …

VIJAY BREWERIES LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusASHOK MITRA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vijay Breweries Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fatehpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7-C2) in Suit No. 298 of 2026 within a fixed time. The petition …

LAVKUSH AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Lavkush and 11 others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23066 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State, represented by …

M/S KESARWANI SHEETALAYAversusSMT. PARWATI DEVI AND 6 OTHERS

M/S Kesarwani Sheetalaya filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 against Smt. Parwati Devi and six others. The petition sought relief, the specifics of which are not detailed in the judgment. The Court, after consideration, allowed the writ petition. The operative …

AMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amit, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.306 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The High Court examined the facts, the applicant’s clean record, and the fact that co‑accused Rambabu @ Pappu and Abhishek had …

VINODversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused Vinod applied for bail in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 131, 118(1), 351(3) and 109(1) IPC arising from a family dispute that led to a cross‑fight on 1 August 2026, injuring both parties. The FIR was lodged by the informant, who is the wife of the accused’s …

M/S KESARWANI & COMPANYversusSMT. PARWATI DEVI AND 6 OTHERS

M/s Kesarwani & Co. challenged a Commercial Court order that summarily rejected its applications (Ga/31 and Ga/33) seeking execution of a 2016 arbitral award. The petitioners argued that the order was unsustainable because it was passed without any reasons, violating the principle that every …

ASHISH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ashish and Ajay applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 306 of 2026, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicants argued that bail could not be granted in other pending cases concerning the same alleged offence. …

RAJKUMARI GUPTA URF RAJKUMARversusPYARE DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rajkumari Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 677 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …

MANOJ YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manoj Yadav, an In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition seeking to quash his suspension order dated 01‑06‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Etawah, and to be allowed to continue in his post with full salary and benefits. The respondent B.S.A. submitted that a charge‑sheet …

VIPIN MITTALversusHARIOM PORWAL AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Auraiya, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 168 of 2026. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

ANOOP SINGHversusGARIMA SINGH

Petitioner Anoop Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Chitrakoot, to dispose of his pending divorce case (Case No. 48 of 2023) within a month. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since 2023, causing …

ANIL CHANDRA TRIPATHIversusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS

Anil Chandra Tripathi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue to decide Revision No. 1644 of 2019 within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that the revision, filed by respondent No. 5, has been pending since 2019 despite the petitioner …

VIKAS YADAVversusVIJAY BHAN BIND

The petitioner, Vikas Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Azamgarh to decide his civil suit (No. 229 of 2025) expeditiously, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

SMT. VIMLA DEVIversusSRI SATENDRA KUMAR MAURYA, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL GOLA

The applicant, Smt. Vimla Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Tehsildar Sri Satendra Kumar Maurya, willfully defied the High Court’s order dated 26‑11‑2024 in Writ‑C No. 38095 of 2024. The court noted that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the …

SMT PRERNA VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Prerna Verma and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and a marriage application, …

MOHD SARWARversusDOCTOR BRIJESH KUMAR

The applicant, Mohd Sarwar, filed a contempt application alleging that Dr Brijesh Kumar willfully defied the order dated 24 April 2026 issued by this Court in PIL No. 1046 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had not complied with …

AVINASH CHANDRA GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusRAJ KUMAR SAHU URF RAJU

The petitioners, Avinash Chandra Gupta and others, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Allahabad, to dispose of Suit No. 50 of 2015 within a stipulated period. They alleged that despite numerous dates being fixed since the suit was …

NISHA BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Nisha Bharti sought enforcement of a resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat granting her an allotment of a fair price shop, alleging that the authorities had not expedited the subsequent proceedings. The petitioner filed a writ petition contending that there was no legal barrier to …

DIWAKAR PATEL AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Diwakar Patel and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, appeared and expressed the desire to withdraw the petition. The court recorded this request and proceeded to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive …

LAL SAHAB AND ANOTHERversusSHRI S.K, MADHUKAR

Lal Sahab and another filed a contempt application alleging that S.K. Madhukar failed to comply with an order dated 02.02.2026 in Writ‑A No. 19789/2025, which required the opposite party to decide a claim. The court noted a prima facie case of willful disobedience but refrained from issuing a notice …

LAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Lal Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, without arguing the merits, requested permission to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The …

SMT RAMRATIversusVIJAY KUMAR MISHRA

Smt Ramrati filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Purvi, Prayagraj, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Suit No. 2318 of 2026. The High Court, after examining the petition at the admission stage, found no …

ANMOL RATANversusSRI SALEEM SAI TEJA, NAGAR AYUKTA

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 17 July 2026 in PIL No. 1515/2026, which directed the opposite party to decide a claim. The court examined the allegation and found that a prima facie case of willful disobedience …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Deepi, was arrested on 7 February 2026 in connection with a case registered under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) and 326(g) at Sajeti police station, Kanpur Nagar. He claimed that the FIR and charge sheet were filed with mala‑fide intent to harass him and his family, and that the …

AKKU @ ANUKALP SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akku @ Anukalp Sharma, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 324 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed false implication, citing a gang chart and an earlier bail in another case, and explained his …

HARIKESH LODHI @ KHARKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harikesh Lodhi @ Kharkhar, who was charged under several IPC sections for an alleged assault that resulted in the death of a victim. The applicant argued that the medical evidence did not support the prosecution's case and that the allegations …

ROSHAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Roshan Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 219 of 2026) alleging assault with an iron rod that resulted in serious injuries, including a claimed linear fracture of the left temporal bone. He contended that the FIR was filed belatedly, that the medical evidence was …

MAHESH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Appeal No. 57/2022 arising from FIR No. 53/2021) and the order dated 05.01.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra. The applicants contended that no offence was made out against …

RAJEEV KUMAR CHOUDHARYversusSMT. SEEMA SHARMA

The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Choudhary, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide his divorce case (Case No. 475 of 2020) filed under section 13(1‑ka) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, within a …

RAKESH KUMAR AGRAHARIversusPISHOO @ SONU AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order for the speedy disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC, which remained pending after the original suit was dismissed for want of prosecution on 13-08-2015. The court noted that the writ petition had no …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Ajay applied for bail in criminal case No. 229 of 2026, charged under Section 137(2) for alleged enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged by the victim’s father on the same day the girl left home, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated that …

SMT SUNNY YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Sunny Yadav and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. They informed the court that they are residents of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand and are currently residing together in Uttarakhand. The petitioners expressed that they no longer wish to pursue the …

ANURAGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Anurage applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 135 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the CrPC, alleging that the FIR for enticement was filed by the victim's father and that the victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated no enticement or sexual intercourse. The …

SMT. KAVITA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Kavita and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The court observed that a First Information Report (FIR) under MCO 310 of 2026, invoking sections 87, 137(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., had already been …

KHUSHI FATMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Khushi Fatma and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and asserted that their marriage was …

DWARIKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Dwarika and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 05‑01‑2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate that stayed the criminal proceedings against them. The High Court examined the allegations, which disclosed …

SATYAVEER AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Satyaveer and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07‑09‑2012 and all proceedings in Sessions Case No. 149 of 2024, alleging that they had reached a compromise with the State, which was verified by the trial court. The …

NISHA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nisha and four others, filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 02‑09‑2026 under IPC sections 351(2), 49 and 303(2) and protection from arrest. They also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of …

BHAGVAT MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 140 in Village Sameda, Azamgarh. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing earlier …

OMVEER SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a Special Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order dated 23‑03‑2015 and a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued on 24‑07‑2026, which were based on a complaint under the Lok Sampatti Kshati Nivaran Adhiniyam, §§3‑5. The court …

VINEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vineet applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 07.05.2025 filed by the victim's mother alleging enticement. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, testified that she visited a friend's house of her own volition and does not know the …

RAJENDRA PRASAD VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajendra Prasad Vishwakarma filed a writ petition and later moved the court to withdraw it, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The respondent State of U.P. and others did not oppose the withdrawal. The court, after noting the petitioner's request and the …

KALA @ RIHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Kala @ Rihan sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 148 of 2026) involving alleged assault on the informant's son Amit on 3 April 2026. The FIR, lodged on 4 April 2026, initially named four persons and an anonymous individual, but did not name the applicant; identification was later …

IBRAHIM KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ibrahim Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …

DEENDAYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deendayal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 22 April 2026 issued by the Prabhari Adhikari (Shastra), which was a consequential order following the cancellation of his arms licence by the District Magistrate of Pilibhit. The cancellation order itself was not annexed to …

SATYAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The applicant, Satyapal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. He sought permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a revision thereafter. The State, represented by the Advocate General, raised no …

MANAUVAR ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manauvar Ali challenged two orders dismissing his first appeal and subsequent restoration under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for want of prosecution. He filed a second restoration application on 16‑06‑2026, after which the officer orally informed his counsel that the application was …

MANGARUversusSTATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mangaru, filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 38433 of 2026) seeking expeditious disposal of his pending criminal case (Case No. 1339 of 2026) before a subordinate court. The petition argued that the matter was languishing and required a directive for timely resolution. The High Court …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vishal was arrested in connection with FIR No. 316 of 2026 alleging enticement, filed by the victim's mother. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated a consensual relationship with the applicant, denying any enticement or sexual intercourse. The …

SMT PINKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Pinki and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against interference in their marital life, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They asserted that they are adults who voluntarily married on 12 September 2026, …

SMT KAMALA DEVI AND 5 OTHERSversusVISHNU SINGH

The petitioners, Kamala Devi and others, obtained a decree for a mandatory injunction and eviction in a suit filed by the plaintiff, which was upheld by the trial court and the appellate court. The plaintiff's civil appeal was dismissed, and an execution case (No. 26 of 2021) remains pending. The …

NAGMA KHANversusRAMVILAS AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nagma Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Civil Judge (JD) in Mohammadabad, Ghazipur to expedite the hearing and disposal of a stay application filed in Misc. Case No. 32/2026. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the stay application was …

SMT SUNITA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Sunita Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 23021 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court. …

M/S HC INFRACITY PVT LTDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, represented by counsel Tanmay Sadh, sought the disposal of their writ petition on the ground that both parties were before the revisional authority in Lucknow and had undertaken to submit written arguments. The State, through counsel Shyam Singh, agreed that the revisional authority …

AASIA PARVEEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Aasia Parveen and another petitioners filed a writ of Rit seeking a protection order directing the respondents, who are family members, not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them security. The petitioners submitted age proof, Aadhaar/HSC copies and a marriage registration …

RATAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ratan Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38529 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the petition, an order was passed in the matter, and the petitioner, through counsel Shri Deep Agnihotri, indicated that he no longer wished to pursue the writ. The court …

M/S SHARDA METALS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

M/s Sharda Metals and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 02‑09‑2026 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Aligarh under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners contended that they were aggrieved by a possession notice issued under Section …

SMT PREMPYARI PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusOMVEER SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kanpur to decide their civil suit (Case No. 705 of 2021) expeditiously under Sections 31 and 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The High Court examined whether it could impose a time‑bound schedule on a subordinate court …

HARMEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, suffering from cancer, sought a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Basic Shiksha Parishad (respondent No.2) to transfer him from District Bahraich to District Moradabad, where his wife is posted, and to decide his application dated 10‑09‑2026 promptly. The petitioner alleged that …

DWARIKA KANNAUJIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dwarika Kannaujiya, was arrested in a case under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging abetment of suicide following the death of a person by hanging. He contended that he was falsely implicated, arguing that the post‑mortem report, the suicide note, and the …

ARMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arman filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging the order dated 23‑06‑2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act)‑II, Hapur, which had rejected his request to recall the victim‑witness for further cross‑examination. The trial court observed that the accused had already …

SUKHPAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and an order dated 25‑07‑2026 passed by the ACJM II Kasganj. The lower court had issued the NBW because the applicants failed to appear on the scheduled date. The High Court heard …

BHAGWAN DAS SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet and the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1977 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely …

RAM KARANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Karan filed a petition on 6 April 2026 seeking expeditious disposal of an appeal in which he is the opposite party, arguing that a status‑quo order is causing him hardship. The petitioner’s counsel urged the court to decide the appeal promptly. The court observed that only one or two dates have …

VIDYA AND 5 OTHERSversusSHATRUGHAN AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Azamgarh to decide Suit No. 2300 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …

SAKIB AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sakib and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 03‑11‑2025 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 09 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 276 of 2025. They asserted that they had amicably settled the dispute with …

SMT. ANUSHKA MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was entered into …

SMT. TANU GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Tanu Gupta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 19 July 2026 (Case Crime No.0348) under Section 87 of the B.N.S., and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The State, through the learned Additional …

DHIRENDRA NATH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dhirendra Nath Dubey, filed a writ petition seeking an expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit (Case No. T202516670506653). The High Court examined the order sheet and found that the matter warranted a direction for speedy hearing. The Court directed the lower court where the …

KESHAV LAL YADAV AND 19 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, twenty teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, claimed entitlement to salary and arrears under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite multiple representations to the competent authority, no decision had been rendered. The petition sought a …

HARIBHUVAN SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Haribhuvan Shukla, filed a writ petition under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking expeditious disposal of a civil suit (Case No. 2004 of 2026) pending before the Nagar Panchayat. The petition lacked an order sheet and the case was still awaiting service of notice on …

VIJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vijay, was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant had already been taken into custody, rendering the anticipatory bail application moot. The court held that an …

AASHU SAINI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the FIR and related proceedings arising from a criminal case (Criminal No. 225/2025). They argued that no offence was made out against them and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined the submissions …

FARAKATversusRAMNATH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Buddh Nagar, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 568 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

SUHAIL KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged an ex‑parte order dated 25‑08‑2026 that dismissed their appeal against a stamp‑duty assessment on a gift deed, solely on the ground of delay. They argued that the deed, executed between close relatives, was exempt from stamp duty and that the delay was not wilful. The …

UMARESH @ NETA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Umaresh alias Neta and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They …

VINOD PATEL @ TILLU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the Session Trial No. 76 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 103(1) and 61(2)(A) of the BNSS and the Arms Act. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted that the …

RAMENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. The applicants claimed innocence and that the dispute was amicably resolved, while the State did not object to a …

SANJU JAISWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sanju Jaiswar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0031 of 2023) where he is charged under IPC sections 363, 364A, 302 and 201. His first bail application was rejected on 8 July 2025. In the second application, the court noted that a co‑accused, Vikas Singh Patel, had already been released …

MUKESH PATELversusRAKESH PATEL AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukesh Patel, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Hawali, Varanasi to decide Suit No.34 of 2014 within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

SAJDA @ SAJIDA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order to prevent the respondents and private family members from interfering with their peaceful marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted age proof and joint affidavits confirming their …

KULDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kuldeep Singh, who has been working as an adhoc Principal for over six years, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and other respondents to regularize his post. He argued that the Director of Education (Secondary) had requested details of such employees in 2019 and …

MEENA KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Meena Kumari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0249 of 2026) involving sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 352 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. She claimed she was falsely implicated based on a co‑accused’s statement and that the FIR was lodged by the injured’s daughter against …

TUPHANI GIRI AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Tuphani Giri and another filed a writ petition against the Union of India seeking the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Court noted that the issue of release of that claim had already attained finality by its earlier judgment dated 10 September 2026 …

BHARATI NAG AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Bharati Nag and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief concerning a live-in relationship, asserting that both families had consented to their marriage, which the court noted as contradictory. During the hearing, the petitioner's senior counsel …

SANJAY SINGH DHAKREY AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sanjay Singh Dhakrey and eight others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 459/2026 dated 7‑September‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested under various IPC and B.N.S. sections. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …

SANGEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sangeeta Devi, applied for the issuance of Form F.L.7, which was pending before the second respondent. An adverse report dated 02‑06‑2026 was made by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gorakhpur, and a copy was provided to the petitioner. The High Court, without examining the …

JANARDAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Janardan Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings (Session Case No. 432 of 2026) against him, alleging irreparable loss if the case proceeded. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant clarified that he no longer wished to …

RAMESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramesh Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.12.2024 in a case under Sections 406 and 506 IPC and to stay his arrest. He prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar when making any arrest. The …

SUSHIL KUMAR KHANNA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the NOIDA Authority and related officials to demolish an unauthorised construction on Plot D‑07, Sector 40, Noida, and to restrain further violations of the sanctioned building plan. They also requested inspection, measurement, and enforcement …

SANTOSH KUMAR RAIversusSMT. NAGEETA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Rai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge Junior Division, Poorvi, Ballia, to expedite the disposal of Original Suit No. 403/2013. The petitioner relied on a recent Supreme Court decision that, in exceptional circumstances, …

KAILASH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a order dated 14.07.2026 issued by the Deputy Registrar, Gorakhpur, which barred them from participating in the governing body meeting of Pipiganj Educational Society on the ground that their membership was time‑barred. They argued that the Deputy Registrar ignored the …

STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERSversusDINESH CHAND PANDEY AND ANOTHER

The State of Uttar Pradesh and three others appealed against the order of a single judge dated 25 May 2026 granting Dinesh Chand Pandey appointment as Library/Lab Bearer and directing the respondents to honor his appointment. The appellant sought to set aside the judgment, arguing procedural and …

KALPNATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Kalpnath filed a writ petition challenging orders passed under Sections 67 and 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in two revenue cases. He alleged that the authorities ignored material evidence that would have shown he was not an encroacher of the Navin Parti land. The respondents …

KRISHNA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on plots 733 and 738 in Village Jagdishpur, Uttar Pradesh. The respondents contended that the petitioner has a specific statutory remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …

DEEPSHIKHA MISRA ALIAS DEEP SHIKHA MISRAversusMADHURLATA MISRA AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepshikha Misra, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Budh Nagar to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 1229 of 2024. The High Court, after noting that keeping the …

BHUPATI DAS (SINCE DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the State of Uttar Pradesh’s appeal under Section 13 of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, which was filed after a five‑year lapse and without the required affidavit. After a 12‑year delay, the State finally filed an affidavit seeking condonation of …

ANIL JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusKM. LAXMI DEVI AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anil Jaiswal and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC, Kanpur Nagar to decide a 6‑C application filed in Original Suit No.2306 of 2024. The High Court found that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful …

PRIYANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Priyanshu, accused in FIR dated 17.03.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS for alleged enticement, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He contended that the FIR was false and that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC shows a consensual relationship with no sexual …

SHAKTI DIXIT AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, ten teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters in a U.P. Basic Education Board school, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a Government Order dated 14‑10‑2025 and mandamus directing payment of salary and arrears. They claimed entitlement to full salary under a later Government …

ANSHIKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision …

SATISH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Satish Rajbhar in a criminal case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s recorded …

ADALAT SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Adalat Sharma and Shiv Kumari, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging their involvement in the suicide of a relative under Sections 85 and 108 of the BNS Act, with the prosecution charging them under Section 306 IPC. They argued that the FIR was filed after an unexplained delay, …

SMT GEETA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Geeta Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction that the police conduct a fair and impartial investigation into a case (Crime No. 547 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal …

PRASHANT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Prashant Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. His counsel, Surendra Singh, sought to withdraw the application, stating that the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act had been initiated and a fresh bail application …

MEERUT NAGAR NIGAMversusBABURAM AND 3 OTHERS

The Meerut Nagar Nigam filed a petition under Article 227 challenging a civil appeal in which its application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act had been rejected, effectively dismissing the appeal. The petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a second …

DIKSHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Diksha and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and others. The court noted that a First Information Report had already been registered under M.P. No. 546 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., at Kotwali Urai, Jaunpur …

SONI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Soni Devi and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners, both adults, married on 16‑09‑2026 and submitted school …

RAJAN SHARMAversusPRIYANKA SHARMA

The petitioner, Rajan Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, to expedite the disposal of a pending case (No. 1925 of 2025) filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890. The petition solely requested …

SMT. CHANDNI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They submitted proof of age and a joint affidavit confirming …

SMT. POOJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Pooja and another, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of their marriage on the ground that the birthdate entered online (18-02-2005) conflicted with the birthdate on their affidavit and Aadhaar card (18-02-2006). The petition alleged that this discrepancy …

SANTOSH KUMAR AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, fourteen teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them the salary and benefits of a Headmaster, relying on a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite multiple representations to the competent …

ANJANA GUPTA AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, thirteen in-charge headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to pay them the salary and benefits of a headmaster, relying on a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They claimed they had made several representations to the competent authority without any …

BITTU ALIAS ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging a trial court order that rejected his request, under Section 348 B.N.S.S. and Section 311 Cr.P.C., to summon prosecution witness P.W.13 for further cross‑examination. The applicant argued that certain questions remained …