Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 2601–2800

DINESH NAYAK AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Dinesh Nayak and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑02‑2026 and the subsequent trial in Case No. 391 of 2026, alleging that the alleged offences arose from mob violence and that the injuries were …

AVINASH SIROHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Avinash Sirohi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation into an FIR dated 12‑04‑2026. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu regarding the magistrate’s power under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to order further …

DEVENDRA ALIAS CHHOTEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Devendra alias Chhotey filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the chargesheet No. 159/2024 and the cognizance order dated 3‑Feb‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 587 of 2025. The High Court examined the record and observed that, at the pleading stage, it could not conclude …

VARUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Varun Singh filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 17‑12‑2024 against Manish Chaturvedi. A summons was issued on 11‑03‑2025 and the case remains pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Ghazipur. The applicant moved the High Court under Section 529 …

DHEERAJ KUMAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dheeraj Kumar Mishra, a manager of Indostar Capital Finance Ltd., sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections related to misappropriation of funds for a second‑hand vehicle purchase. He contended that his role was …

HARENDRA GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19.08.2026 under Section 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering the prayer to quash untenable in line with …

MUKUL DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 3 OTHERS

Mukul Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 481 of 2020, which involved charges under IPC Section 376-D and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the High Court …

SURESH KUMAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide their application dated 22 May 2026 and to grant a 10% annual honorarium increment for the period 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2024. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition was no longer necessary …

AMNAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an order directing the trial court to frame charges and decide two pending criminal cases (Case No. 7200 of 2025 and Case No. 8668 of 2025) within the stipulated period. The applicant, who is an informant, …

SHARIK AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Sharik and Smt. Bhuri, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case (Crime No.336/2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 363, 366, 506 and 368 IPC, fearing arrest after a charge‑sheet was filed. They had earlier been granted anticipatory bail during the investigation …

NAGINA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Nagina Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑08‑2026 that registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Passport Act. The petition sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that it did not disclose a cognizable …

DEENA @ DEENBANDHU YADUVANSHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Deena @ Deenbandhu Yaduvanshi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate did not oppose the applicant's request to approach the concerned court for regular bail. The High Court directed that the …

PRASHANT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Prashant Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, fearing arrest in a case alleging that he and others promised public employment in exchange for money. He contended that the FIR was false, filed after a long delay, and that no such employment could …

ANUJ KUMAR SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The opposing party’s counsel …

SONVEER @ SOHANVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sonveer @ Sohanveer, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) alleging forgery of a sale deed and several offences under the Indian Penal Code, including sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2). He claimed absolute innocence, arguing that the …

SHRIPAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where they were charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that the charge under Section 118(2) was unwarranted because the injuries sustained were not grievous, and that …

RAGHUNANDANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Raghunandan, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal complaint (Case No. 211 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 493, 504 and 506 of the IPC, arising from a dispute with the complainant over a cohabitation‑marriage relationship. The complainant had initially filed an application …

VINOD KUMAR TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vinod Kumar Tiwari and another, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the DGP (Fire) and the Commissioner to submit recommendations and prepare citations for gallantry awards as per Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines. The petitioners had already made a representation on …

LAL CHAND AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Lal Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 19 July 2026 that alleged offences under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …

MANJEET AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manjeet and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking the quash of an FIR dated 12‑07‑2026 filed under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners also made an …

NISHA BHARTI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Health Department to consider their claim for six‑month pre‑promotion training, include them in the list of eligible health workers for a January 2026 training, publish a seniority list of women health workers in Azamgarh, and act on their …

DHARMPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 333, 76 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie case of …

RAMSAKHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramsakhi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She sought bail, arguing that there was no material linking her to any dowry harassment and that she was falsely implicated; she also …

KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Krishna Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a decision on his representation dated 13 February 2026 for payment of honorarium. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, through standing counsel, contended that the petition served no useful purpose since the representation had already …

HASEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Haseen, who was implicated in Crime No. 152 of 2025 based on a co-accused's confessional statement, though his name was absent from the FIR and no weapon was recovered from him. The applicant argued that no prosecution witness …

NEERAJ KUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Neeraj Kumar Dubey, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) FTC CAW, Bhadohi, to expedite the trial of criminal case No. 2249/2015 (crime No. 207/2015) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 354, 316 IPC …

SATENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satendra Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 85, 109(1), 115(2), 117(3), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No.0152 of 2026). The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to appear before the concerned court and …

BANNEY QURAISHIversusSMT CHUNNI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide a rent case (Rent Case No.12 of 2011 / New Rent Case No.1719 of 2022) within a stipulated time. The petitioner alleged that …

RAM MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Mohan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Aditya Narayan Shukla and Rakesh Narain Shukla, moved that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court considered whether the petition was sufficiently pressed to warrant …

TANNU SINGH @ ROSHNI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tannu Singh, was charged under several IPC sections in a criminal case and filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …

DR. PRABHAT KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Dr. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of crime No. 172 of 2026 under sections 352, 351(3), 318(4) of the BNSS. The petition relied on Supreme Court observations …

SANJAY GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Sanjay Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 3 April 2025 that alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of …

SMT. NEERAJ AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Neeraj and five others, filed a writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17 July 2026 (Crime No.270 of 2026) that alleged offences under sections 333, 76, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on …

SMT. PRIYANKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent authorities to deduct Rs.8,000 per month from a respondent's salary and credit it to the petitioners, to enforce a maintenance order passed by a Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The …

CHATURI RAM GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Chaturi Ram Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to sanction his retirement pension and other benefits, including service rendered in a work‑charge establishment, and to act on his representation dated 07‑07‑2026 in line with Supreme Court …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra Singh, who was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 342 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged sale deed. The applicant claimed …

DEEP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Deep Narayan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide Case No. 9253 of 2026 (Deep Narayan v. Gram Sabha) pending under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a fixed time. The petition solely requested expeditious disposal of the said case. …

SERAJUDDIN QURAISHI @ BACHAUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Serajuddin Quraishi, was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 0304 of 2026, Chandauli. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court examined the facts, the evidence, and noted that a co‑accused, …

JASWANT SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Jaswant Singh and three others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh writ petition with more detailed particulars. The respondents' counsel raised no …

JAYABULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Jayabul, was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 08.08.2025 alleging enticement of a minor. He contended that the victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated he merely called her and she voluntarily went to Delhi, and that he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, …

PARMESHVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Parmeshveer, a government Lekhpal, was arrested after a trap team recovered Rs.20,000 of a demanded Rs.40,000 in a consolidation proceeding. He is charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, with a maximum penalty of seven years, and has been in custody since 18 July 2026. The …

RAM PRAKASH BHARTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Veterinary Officer, challenged a transfer order dated 28‑06‑2024 and a subsequent relieving order dated 29‑05‑2026 issued by the Director of Animal Husbandry, arguing that the delay of nearly two years made the relief inappropriate. The petitioner sought quashing of the relieving …

KAMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused, Kamal, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 89 of 2026, alleging that he was not named in the FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 filed by the victim's father for alleged enticement. He further submitted that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS showed she voluntarily went …

KANHAIYA LAL @ LALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kanhaiya Lal @ Lallu, who was arrested in a case involving alleged assault and the death of the informant's wife. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the FIR contained only vague allegations against him, with no corroborative …

UMESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Umesh Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS. After some deliberation, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to no longer pursue the relief sought and to withdraw the application. The court was informed that the applicant no longer wishes to press the Section …

ANKURAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ankuram Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 12-12-2024 issued by the Director (Ayurvedic Service) of Uttar Pradesh, which withheld two annual increments of his salary. The petitioner alleged that the order was illegal and sought …

SMT. MADHUBALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a fair‑price shop licence holder, challenged the cancellation of her licence after three surprise inspections revealed stock mismatches (60 kg wheat shortfall and 47 kg rice excess) and complaints from numerous card‑holders about irregular distribution. The petitioner submitted …

MIRZA AQEEL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Petitioner Mirza Aqeel Ahmad filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Jaunpur, to decide the pending case No. 1197 of 2024‑25 (Mirza Aqeel versus Riyaz @ Riju and others) under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation (Urban) Act. The petitioner …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shahrukh, sought bail in a NDNDPS case (Criminal No. 65 of 2026) charged under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court examined the facts, the applicant’s criminal history, and noted that a co‑accused, Pravej, had already been released on bail in a related application. …

RAJU KEWAT @ RAJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 1133 of 2025, which involved offences under the BNS and the POCSO Act. The case was at an advanced stage, and the first informant's statement had …

VIPIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash Advertisement No.17-Examination/2026 for the post of Pashudhan Prasar Adhikari and a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant them provisional permission to apply online and appear for the main examination. The High Court noted that the …

DEVENDRA KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Devendra Kumar Yadav filed a writ petition seeking arrears of medical leave for 91 days covering 2 June 2015 to 31 August 2015. He had already submitted a representation to Respondent No.2 on 24 November 2025 regarding the same claim. The learned Standing Counsel argued that the petition …

SMT. HEMLATA GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Hemlata Gupta, was receiving family pension from two Employees Provident Fund (EPF) organisations, leading to the seizure of one pension account. She sought permission to file an application before the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Regional Office, Meerut, to …

ASHISH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusRAMJANAM AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashish Yadav and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 70 of 2024) that arose from a rejected application for temporary injunction in their suit. The High Court noted that the writ petition had …

SIMRAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, adult individuals who have solemnised a marriage of their own free will, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members and intended to …

TUFANI YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Tufani Yadav and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑06‑2024, the cognizance and summoning order dated 31‑07‑2024, and the entire proceedings in case No. 9777 of 2024 relating to offences under …

BADALversusSTATE OF U.P.

Badal applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 523 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, Section 109(1) of the BNS, and Sections 3, 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, Gaurav, had …

JITENDRA @ JITUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra @ Jitu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 18‑08‑2026 that dismissed his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application to recall witnesses PW‑1 and PW‑2 in a murder trial (IPC §§302, 34). He further …

BABU RAMversusSHRI AVICHAL PRATAP SINGH, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, GHATAMPUR

Babu Ram filed a contempt application against Shri Avichal Pratap Singh, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ghatampur. The applicant's counsel, Manoj Kumar Verma, stated at the Bar that the order of the writ Court had been complied with. The court examined the statement and found no breach of the writ …

MAJOR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Major Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an eviction order dated 8 May 2026 passed by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar under Section 209(Ja) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and seeking a mandamus directing the officer to accept his restoration …

SUFIYAN @ SOFIYANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sufiyan @ Sofiyan, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and citing a single prior criminal case for which he had already been released on bail. He had …

DILEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a POCSO case. The applicant contended that the NBW was issued without first serving a summons or a bailable …

KUSUM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Kusum Devi, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal case (Crime No.101 of 2025) from Varanasi to Jaunpur on the ground of threat to her safety as complainant. The court noted that the case involves offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …

ARUN CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Arun Chauhan, appealed against the order of the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) that issued a non‑bailable warrant after he failed to appear in the trial for nine years. He claimed that a prior criminal miscellaneous writ petition dated 28‑09‑2016 had protected him from arrest and that he …

MAINUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mainuddin, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 540 of 2026) involving alleged offenses under Sections 126(2), 75, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 5 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. Counsel argued that the allegations were false, asserting that …

RAM BACHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Bachan, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate of Jaunpur to decide a representation he had filed on 24 May 2025, which remained pending. The petitioner argued that the delay violated his right to a timely decision, and requested the court to fix a …

SUSHIL KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sushil Kumar Sharma, a Lab Assistant, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to pay his service and pension benefits based on a pay grade of Rs. 4,600 approved on 22 September 2014 after completing 10, 14 and 26 years of service. He also sought …

REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.5 to consider and decide two representations dated 24 November 2025 and 3 December 2025, and to award medical, death benefits, gratuity, PPF and other allowances of a deceased employee. The Standing Counsel argued that …

ABDUL JABBAR SIDDIQUI @ ABDUL JABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Abdul Jabbar Siddiqui applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections and the Prevention of Corruption Act, where the alleged conduct occurred in 1999 but the FIR was lodged only in 2009. The applicant argued that there was no need for custodial …

JANARDAN YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Janardan Yadav and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 1 September 2025, the cognizance order dated 29 October 2025, and the entire proceedings of case 7719 of 2025, which arose from alleged offences under Sections …

ROSHANI CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Roshani Chaurasia filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 21‑09‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 10‑04‑2026 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Varanasi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) BNSS. The …

SHABANA BEGUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shabana Begum, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide her claim for a family pension under a government order dated 03.12.2012. She had already submitted a representation on 16.06.2021 to respondent No.4, which remained pending. The …

SMT SAPNA KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, wife of the accused, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide the pending dowry‑prohibition case (State v. Diamond Kumar) expeditiously, alleging that the accused were not appearing despite issuance of …

BALIRAM SONKAR @ BALLIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Balli @ Baliram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) dated 9 May 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Basti, in a case arising from offences under Sections 323, 325 and 504 IPC. The …

NARENDRA KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Narendra Kumar Tiwari, a Kanoongo, was arrested for allegedly demanding Rs.20,000 for land measurement, leading to a charge under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since July 18, 2026, and faces a maximum penalty of seven years, but has no …

ADNAN SHAKIL @ SAFAR SHEKH @ RAJAB SAHABversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Adnan Shakil, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 8 August 2025 that had been issued after he allegedly missed court dates despite having been granted bail. The High Court examined the record and …

AAS MOHAMMAD ALIAS AASHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aas Mohammad Alias Aashu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged theft of a motorcycle. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, asserted that his name was added later in the …

REKHA BHATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Rekha Bhati filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) to decide on her application for transfer of allotment rights of a residential plot in favor of a third party, Subhash Chandra, and also sought direction to the …

SHASHANK TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shashank Tripathi, a police constable, was charged under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) for allegedly taking a bribe of Rs.70,000, of which Rs.60,000 was paid to a co‑accused investigating officer and Rs.10,000 was seized. He has been in custody since 8 …

SHREE GANESH AGRO INDUSTRIESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shree Ganesh Agro Industries, the petitioner, challenged a notice issued by IDBI Bank under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and the subsequent order rejecting its representation under Section 13(3‑A). The bank had also issued a notice under Section 13(4) and claimed the loan had become a …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Amit Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of case No. 121 of 2023 (Computer No. 28027 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 324 and 504 of the IPC. He argued that he was …

KIRAN PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending criminal miscellaneous application under Rule 6(5) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules, 2005 and to expedite execution of a maintenance order (Case No. …

ROSHMIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Roshmin and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter related to a live-in relationship. The senior counsel for the petitioners highlighted that, based on the Aadhaar card, petitioner No.1 was born on 01-01-2010 and was therefore a minor of …

SATYA DEV KUSHWAHAversusSMT. DEEPMALA KUSHWAHA (SINCE DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Junior Division Civil Judge in Jhansi to dispose of an adoption‑deed cancellation suit pending since July 2018 without further adjournments, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court referred to a recent Supreme Court decision (High Court Bar …

CHANDAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chandan Yadav, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief on certain grievances. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the writ petition and asked for liberty to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars, …

SMT SWATI MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Swati Mishra, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Prayagraj, to decide her maintenance case (No. 818 of 2024) filed under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner argued that the …

RAJKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rajkumar filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in FIR No. 8151/2020 alleging offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed innocence and asserted that the charges were filed with malice, and offered to cooperate with the investigation. …

SUNIL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07-03-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State’s A.G.A. and the …

KAMLESH CHANDRA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Kamlesh Chandra Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to pay his pending gratuity, leave encashment, provident fund, LLTC encashment, medical reimbursement, salary arrears and canteen subsidy, and to decide a representation dated …

VIMLESH DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vimlesh Devi, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the petitioner, Bhole Ram, prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court considered the prayer and found no merit in proceeding with the petition. Accordingly, the …

SHIV KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the respondent (a judicial officer) to decide Appeal No. 182 of 2024, registered as Case No. 0150 of 2024, under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Child Health (UPCH) Act, which had been pending since 2024. The …

CHANDRAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 22 OTHERS

Petitioner Chandrapal Singh filed a writ petition alleging that, despite an interim order dated 15 May 2026 issued by the Additional Commissioner in his appeal, private respondents were attempting to dispossess him and cause damage to his property. He sought directions for the police to register …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash an order dated 8 June 2026 that had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application in a criminal trial involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 504 and 506 of …

RAJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking expedited consideration of his application for a firearm licence filed on 5 December 2025. The petitioner alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The High Court, without delving into the merits of the licence …

RAMAYAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on three revenue‑recorded plots in Village Parwa, Ghazipur. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar …

KUMAR PRASANT SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Kumar Prasant Srivastava applied for a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 after his father's death on 19‑02‑2026. He filed a representation on 13‑04‑2026, which remained pending. The petitioner …

LOVKUSH PATEL ALIAS TOOFANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Lovkush Patel, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead file a regular bail application before …

DEEPAK GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Deepak Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the magistrate’s cognizance order in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 303(2) and 317(2). The applicant alleged false implication and mala‑fide motives, contending …

AWADHESH BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Awadhesh Baghel filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, to decide his pending divorce petition (No. 1258 of 2024) within a fixed period, alleging undue delay since 2024. The petitioner argued that the prolonged …

SIYARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to enforce a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate’s order dated 07‑07‑2025 that declared him in peaceful possession of a disputed property and restrained private respondents from interfering. The petitioner claimed the respondents continued to …

KADEER AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) to execute a lease‑back deed for their 0.1150‑hectare share of plot No.152M, to prevent any allotment of that share to others, to protect their possession, and to consider a representation …

DURGESH KAUSHIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Durgesh Kaushik filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a Judicial Magistrate's order that rejected his Section 173(4) BNSS application on the ground that no offence was disclosed. The revisionist alleged that fraud had been …

SATISH KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Gram Vikas Adhikari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to resume his duties and to pay his full salary and arrears, relying on an inquiry report dated 16 June 2026 that exonerated him. The respondent argued that departmental disciplinary proceedings were …

AMARNATH UPADHYAYversusSMT SARIKA MOHAN

The applicant, Amarnath Upadhyay, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt Sarika Mohan, failed to comply with the order dated 24-04-2026 issued in Writ A No. 5948/2026 directing her to decide a claim. The court examined the allegation and found a prima facie case of …

SANDEEP TITORIYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sandeep Titoriya, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court alleging that he represented the aggrieved public. The court was asked to determine whether the petitioner had the requisite standing to file the writ and whether the petition was pressed. Counsel …

UMAPATI PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Umapati Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit (Dhruvnarayan v. Shiv Dayal) that had been pending since 2024 before Respondent No.3. The petition invoked Rule 109 of the UPCH Act to compel the respondent to decide …

MUKESH KUMAR @ JAI SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Mukesh Kumar (Jai Singh) filed a criminal revision challenging an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 05‑07‑2025 that required him to pay Rs 3,000 per month to his wife without a hearing. He argued the order was passed without due process and that the revision was filed after a 341‑day delay. The …

CHANDRADEO YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 17-10-2006 and the related proceedings in S.S.T. No.12 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 420, 471, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. …

SAHIL RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil Rajbhar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS and Section 18 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserting that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated she left …

SHASHI PRAKASH @ VINEET KUMAR TIWARI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑08‑2023 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑04‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Ghatampur, in a criminal case under IPC sections 323 and 504. The applicants later limited their …

SUNAINA VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Sunaina Vishwakarma sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 278 of 2026) alleging assault on the mother of an informant, resulting in a fracture of the temporal and parietal bones. The FIR, lodged on 2 August 2026, named six accused, but two were later exonerated; the applicant …

SMT. REENA RANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Reena Rani, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.2, Bulandshahr, to decide a pending maintenance case (Misc. Case No. 973/2025) filed under Section 147 B.N.S.S. against her husband, who had …

VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Virendra Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh authorities to promote him to Sub Inspector for a 2025 promotion and to Head Constable with effect from 2016, along with consequential benefits. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to file a fresh, …

AMIT KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Kumar Pandey, an informant in State Vs. Gulab Giri (Session Trial No. 109 of 2026), sought a direction from the High Court to compel the trial court to conclude the case within the stipulated period, citing non‑appearance of accused despite issuance of bailable and non‑bailable …

RAJU SHAH @ LAHEEKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Raju Shah, was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 141 of 2026) under IPC sections 309(6) and 317(2) and has been in custody since August 5, 2026. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and that the only items recovered from him belonged to …

AMARJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amarjeet Singh, a bank branch manager, who was charged under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code for alleged misappropriation of Rs.1,00,000 in a fixed‑deposit transaction. The applicant asserted that the amount had been …

KHALIL AHMAD AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 393 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC, sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act and sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on …

SHAILESH SINGH @ SHAILU SENGARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Shailesh Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 185 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a kulhari, iron rod and a country‑made pistol, resulting in six injuries, one of which was grievous. The FIR was lodged two years after the incident, and the applicant claimed political …

RADHEYSHYAM TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Radheyshyam Tiwari, filed a writ petition alleging non-payment of his retiral dues, specifically dearness allowance and other amounts. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and U.P.S.R.T.C., contended that the petitioner's pension had been re-fixed by an order dated …

ROHIT NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Rohit Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a snatching case (Crime No. 109 of 2026) under sections 309(4), 351(3), 317(2), 317(4) and 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleged false …

AMARJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 32948 of 2026 filed by Amarjeet Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 546 of 2023 under IPC sections 409, 120B, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that a Rs 10 lakh transfer alleged to be part of a …

SOURABH JURELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sourabh Jurel, claimed a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, after his father died on 6 December 2022. He filed a representation with the respondent authority on 2 December 2025, which …

RAMU AHIRWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramu Ahirwar, a Panchayat Secretary, was implicated in a case alleging forged signatures of a Village Pradhan to withdraw Rs. 5,43,747, leading to a charge sheet under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 of the IPC. The applicant sought anticipatory bail, contending that an inquiry found the …

VIMLESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant, the process under Section 82 CrPC, the charge‑sheet dated 5 January 2026 and the cognizance order dated 22 January 2016 in a case arising under Section 60(1) of the Excise …

SALAMUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Salamuddin, the accused in Criminal Case No. 4593 of 2026 under Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kasganj to dispose of the case within a stipulated time. The petitioner argued that the trial had …

RAJESH PAL AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged Advertisement No.17‑Pariksha/2026 for the post of Pashudhan Prasar Adhikari Mukhya Pariksha dated 10 August 2026, issued by the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission. They argued that because several writ petitions concerning the 2014 selection were still …

HARINATH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 266 (Naveen Parti) in Village Dalpatpur, Azamgarh. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …

SHAH ALAMversusNIGHAT AARA B.

Petitioner Shah Alam, married under Muslim rites, filed a restitution of conjugal rights case (Matrimonial Case/Hakook‑E‑Jaujiyat No. 434 of 2025) before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Sambhal at Chandausi. He subsequently filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a mandamus directing the …

DEEKSHA SWAROOPversusSAURABH SWAROOP

Deeksha Swaroop filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Agra, to decide her divorce case (Case No. 775 of 2026) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging undue delay since 2026. The petitioner argued that the family court had not disposed of …

SMT. RUCHI KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ruchi Kumari and her spouse, both adults, married on 07‑09‑2026 and residing in Uttar Pradesh, alleged that private respondents (family members) were threatening and harassing them to prevent them from living together. They filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining …

LEELADHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Leeladhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 19 August 2026 passed in Session Trial No. 240 of 2019, which had rejected his Section 311 Cr.P.C. application. The High Court observed that the application …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 17 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking speedy disposal of a stay application filed in Appeal No. 553 of 2025. The stay application and the appeal were delayed due to repeated lawyers' strikes and the presiding officer’s administrative commitments, as well as a pending substitution application …

RAMSURAT YADAVversusGULABARDHWAJ SINGH

The petitioner, Ramsurat Yadav, filed a defendant's petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction application (7-C) filed in Civil Suit No. 918 of 2026. The High Court noted that the injunction application and the defendant's objections were pending consideration. To …

ROBINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Robin, accused in Crime No. 142 of 2026 under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (sections 64(1) and 115(2)) and the POCSO Act (sections 3 and 4) for alleged rape of the informant's daughter. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement …

DALVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Dalveer Singh was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged abduction and assault. His first bail application was rejected, but three co‑accused were later released on bail by the same bench. The applicant argued that, given the parity with co‑accused and the …

KM. JYOTI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a protection order against interference by the respondents and their families, alleging threats and harassment. They submitted identity documents to establish their age and voluntary …

NIKIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nikit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a fresh one. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal, granting liberty to …

DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Criminal Case No. 18163 of 2025 (pertaining to offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the CrPC) within a stipulated period. The applicant argued …

SUKHDEV SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Rampur, to decide Appeal No. 343 of 2025, which had been pending since 2025. The petition relied on Section 11(1) of the CH Act, contending that the delay violated …

RANJEET KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ranjeet Kumar and two others filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. Both parties agreed that the petition could be disposed of in line with the coordination bench order in Bajanth v. State of Uttar Pradesh (Writ‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The …

MONUversusSTATE OF U.P.

Monu applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart. The applicant argued that he had already been granted bail in two related cases and that his alleged criminal …

SMT DARSHANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a widow, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the competent authority to sanction and pay her family pension with interest, and also directing the District Magistrate of Hapur to consider an application dated 29.05.2026. The respondents argued that the grievance should …

ANJALI VARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Anjali Varma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the recruitment authority to amend her category from General to OBC in an online application for the post of Health Worker (Female), alleging a clerical mistake. She submitted a representation dated 26.08.2026 …

SANGAM PASWANversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Sangam Paswan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 05.07.2025 under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and a writ of mandamus directing the police not …

MANJU GUPTAversusYADAV S. THAKUR

Manju Gupta filed a contempt application against Yadav S. Thakur alleging willful defiance of an order dated 24 April 2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 5930 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied with the writ court's directions. The High …

NEMPAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nempal Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider and determine their entitlement to financial/pay upgradation under Government Orders dated 05‑11‑2014 and 03‑03‑2015, after examining their complete service records. …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to consider his entitlement to financial/pay upgradation under Government Orders dated 05.11.2014 and 03.03.2015 after a full review of his service record. He also asked …

AKHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Akhilesh Kumar, accused under sections 64(2)(m), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for alleged obscene video and related offences. The investigating officer admitted that no obscene video was found on the accused's mobile, and …

DEEPANSHIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deepanshi, challenged Advertisement No. 11-Exam/2024 for the post of Swasthya Karyakarta (Mahila), alleging that only 435 out of 4,892 vacancies were reserved for Scheduled Castes, far below the statutory 21% reservation. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the …

SANTOSH KUMAR MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P.

Santosh Kumar Mittal applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a rape case where the complainant, a 49‑year‑old woman, alleged sexual assault based on a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual and lasted six years, and that the FIR was …

RAJNEESH MISHRA ALIAS VIKAS MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rajneesh Mishra (alias Vikas Mishra) in a criminal case involving alleged rape, sections 64, 351(3) BNS and 67 of the IT Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the allegations stemmed from a consensual …

MO ANEESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mo Anees, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking discharge of criminal proceedings (Special Session Case No. 47/2025, Offence No. 565/2024) that had been ordered to proceed by the Special Judge under the Poxo Act. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was …

RAM MILAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Milan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 21421 of 2025) and the charge sheet filed under Sections 329(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984. …

ISRARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Israr filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 26‑03‑2025 and the proceedings in Complaint No. 500 of 2025 (K.B.Police (India) Ltd. v. I.S. Enterprises) before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. The complaint was lodged on …

RAVI RANJAN KUMAR AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of junior assistants, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to prepare a correct seniority list in accordance with a prior judgment dated 2 August 2019 (Service Single No.15692 of 2018) and to consider a series of …

DURGESH JAISWAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, accused in a domestic violence case (Smt. Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Durgesh Jaiswal and others), filed a transfer application under Section 12(1) of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, alleging threats and seeking relocation of the trial to another district. The court noted a prior decision …

MOHD FARHAN RAZAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mohd. Farhan Raza under Section 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 492 of 2025. The applicant had previously been granted bail in other sections, but the new charge was added during investigation, …

KRISHNANAND UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnanand Upadhyay, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents to compute his combined military and civil service tenure and fix his pay and seniority as per Government Orders dated 26‑08‑1977 and 26‑03‑1980 and Civil …

SULEMAN HUSAINversusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA

Petitioner Suleman Husain filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of his pending Appeal No. 81 of 2025, filed on 28 August 2025, before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been unduly delayed and requested the Court to direct the …

HARISHANKAR SHARMAversusPRIYA KUMARI

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of the order dated 1.4.2026 passed in Writ-C No.12392 of 2026 (Harishankar Sharma Vs. State of U.P. And 3 others). The applicant contended that despite service of a certified copy of the writ court order, the opposite party had not …

USAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 24‑01‑2016 that had been issued after the applicant’s failure to appear before the trial court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the warrant should be vacated and that the …

M/S AGNIHOTRI MOTOR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, M/s. Agnihotri Motor and another, filed Writ No. 38194 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, referencing an earlier writ petition (Writ No. 11830 of 2026). The court accepted the withdrawal request. …

GAGAN KUMAR SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gagan Kumar Singhal, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23062 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Eishan Mehta, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The …

SHANKER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shanker Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant him pension benefits. The petition was opposed by the respondents, who argued that the grievance should be addressed by the Nagar Aayukt. The court found that continuing the …

HUZAIFAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Huzaifa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑01‑2016 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in Criminal Case No. 724 of 2016. The warrant arose from charges under several IPC sections (147, 148, …

BRIJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, a contract employee of Zila Panchayat Inter College, Prayagraj, filed a writ petition alleging that he was asked to return to the outsourcing agency without notice, violating Clause 10(4) of a Government Order dated 19‑09‑2025 which prohibits removal of outsourced …

SMT PARUL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming that …

SMT. GEETA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference by family members and to provide police protection. The court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision (Akanksha & …

AMEER BEGversusSMT. NAAZ PARVEEN

The petitioner, Ameer Beg, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Bareilly, to expedite the hearing and disposal of his matrimonial petition (No. 655 of 2024) filed under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939. The …

SMT. SARASWATI THAKUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Saraswati Thakur and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them in a case registered as Crime No. 26 of 2025 and a certiorari to quash the FIR dated 17.01.2025. The petitioners later made an innocuous prayer that …

BOBY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed a bail cancellation application seeking to revoke the bail granted to the second opposite party, the father‑in‑law of the deceased, on the ground that he allegedly threatened the first informant after being released on bail. The application cited Sections 85 and 80(2) of the Bail …

ANOOP KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Anoop Katiyar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 56 of 2025) under Section 229(2) of the CrPC, alleging false implication in an abduction‑ransom investigation involving his relative Harish Katiyar. He contended that three FIRs were filed on the same incident, and he had …

RAJ BAHADUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Raj Bahadur and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the summons dated 09‑12‑2024, quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑04‑2024 and the entire proceeding (Case No. 353 of 2024) arising under Sections 2 and 3 of the …

NEELAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the respondents and family members from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to obtain police protection. They alleged threats and …

VISHNU DUTT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction under Section 109 of the Uttar Pradesh Civil Procedure Rules for the Consolidation Officer in Baberu, Banda to decide a pending case (No. 147/289, Kaushal Kishore & others v. Gaon Sabha) that had been pending since April 12, 2010. The petitioners argued that …

NAJARE ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Najare Alam, filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide on a representation dated 9 July 2026 and to ensure deposit of Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees State Insurance (ESI) contributions for …

DHIRENDRA PRATAP @ DHEERAJ KUMARversusSONALI GUPTA

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the Family Court to expedite the trial of a Section 11 Hindu Marriage Act petition pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that the case had been unduly delayed. The court examined Section 21B of the Hindu Marriage Act, …

KHATOONversusMUZAFFAR ISLAM @ BABU AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Khatoon, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Thakurdwara, Moradabad, to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 130 of 2026. The High Court, without calling for a …

RAM KAWAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court heard an intra‑court appeal by Ram Kawal Yadav challenging an order dated 11 May 2026 that dismissed his writ petition. The court found a fundamental error on principle because the institution involved had been upgraded from a Junior High School to an Intermediate College, …

SANJAY JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 04‑06‑2012 under Section 135 of the Electricity Act and to have the proceedings stayed. Both parties’ counsel appeared, and the applicant expressed willingness to settle the dispute by …

VIKRANT PRASAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Vikrant Prasad and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 781 of 2023) arising from a 2020 case involving multiple IPC offences and the POCSO Act. The application …

DEEPAK KAPILMUNI MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachment on plot no. 341 in Jaunpur district. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing the recent Amaruddin …

PAWAN VERMA AND 43 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 44 government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to grant them the first salary increment on 1 January 2017, subsequent annual increments, and payment of arrears with interest, relying on the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, …

RAMKUMARversusRAMCHANDRA AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide an original civil suit (No. 2799 of 2020) within a stipulated time. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

PARSURAMversusPUSHPENDRA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Auraiya, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 122 of 2026. The High Court, finding no merit in keeping the petition pending, disposed of it at the …

DEENANATH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioners Deenanath and two others filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on specific land parcels in Village Bhendawa, Basti district. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners …

KANHAIYALALversusSHUBASH

The petitioners Kanhaiyalal sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Badohi to expedite case No.801 of 2018, invoking Articles 226/227 of the Constitution. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) …

ATUL KUMAR KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Atul Kumar Kushwaha, filed a PIL seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on plots 384 and 3855, designated as public utility land, by invoking Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others, contended …

SALMAN AKHTARversusSTATE OF UP AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Salman Akhtar, sought an expeditious disposal of a pending civil suit (Case No. 19447 of 2025) that had been delayed for over one and a half years, partly due to lawyers' strikes. The High Court noted that despite intermittent strikes, substantive orders had been passed on some …

SMT. LILAWATI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Lilawati and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh, other respondents and private family members from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats and harassment. They submitted proof …

RAM MURATversusREGIONAL MANAGER BANK OF BARODA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ram Murat filed a writ petition alleging that his savings account with Bank of Baroda was frozen on the premise that a loan taken by his father remained unpaid, which he contends has already been settled. The bank argued that it would examine any application made by the petitioner and, if …

SMT KAMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Kamla Devi filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to expedite the pending Employees' Compensation case (E.C. 201 of 2015) before the Employees Compensation Commissioner/Deputy Labour Commissioner, Prayagraj. The petition argued that the case had been unduly delayed. The Court, …

KAPIL BHARDWAJversusNISHU KUMAR

Petitioner Kapil Bhardwaj filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Ghaziabad, to hear and dispose of his Hindu Marriage Act petition (HMA Case No. 2979 of 2024) within three months without unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner argued that the petition under …

ILIYASversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Iliyas applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2026, charged under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. He alleged that the FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 was false, arising from a cross‑fight over cleaning a drain outside a mosque, with injuries on both …

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF UP AND 15 OTHERS

Pawan Kumar filed a writ petition seeking implementation of an order dated 06‑10‑2025 passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. An appeal against that order is pending and was admitted on 23‑07‑2026, with the file of the subordinate authority summoned. The petitioner argued that the …

MODEBE OOKPO JOSEPHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Modebe Ookpo Joseph applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 70 of 2024) where he is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B, 201 and IT Act section 66. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and noted that a co‑accused, Sunday Okonkwo, had already been released on …

SMT. SUNITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Sunita filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38281 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The counsel for Greater Noida and the standing counsel also expressed no objection to the …

SUNIL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Singh, accused in a case under Sections 118(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting two brothers with a kulhari and exhorting co‑accused to kill them. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the serious …