Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 2401–2600
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and the final report was favorable to them, and …
Petitioners Raju @ Prem Narayan and another filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the State respondent to decide an objection raised under Section 21(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Child Health (UPCH) Act in case No. 1813 of 2026, which had been pending since 2026. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioner, Shri Rahul Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him dated 20 July 2026. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that the investigation was complete …
Petitioners Sadab @ Mohd Shadab Kureshi and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18204 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned …
The petitioners, Gulshan Khan and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favorable …
The petitioner, Avnish, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18192 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Nirbhay Singh, announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the …
The petitioner, Gaurav Saxena, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18216 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge sheet on 23 July 2026. During the hearing, the petitioner’s …
The applicant filed a petition under CrPC Section 482 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge sheet and summons issued under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petition argued that the Act does not create a substantive offence and that the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18203 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced at the Bar that they wished to withdraw the petition and would file a fresh one with better particulars. The respondent’s counsel and …
The petitioner Rakesh Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 13 July 2026 passed by Respondent No.4, a mandamus to stay that order, and a mandamus directing Respondent No.4 to decide the petitioner's application dated 17 July 2026. …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 03‑05‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him, alleging offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the …
The appellants Ramesh Singh and another appealed against a cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑12‑2024 passed by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case arising from FIR No. 319 of 2024. The appeal challenged the existence of an offence under Section 3(2)(va) …
The petition under Article 227 was filed by Shashi Srivastava seeking relief against Smt. Sushila Devi and others. The petition was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 35, before Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner …
The petitioner, Ankit, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The investigation in the matter had already concluded, and a final report favoring the petitioner was submitted on 23 August …
Babulal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The investigation had already concluded, and a final report favoring the accused was submitted on 15 May 2026. The petitioner, through counsel, did …
The petitioner, Umesh Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the investigation had been concluded with a final report favorable to the petitioner and expressed a desire to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Siya Maternity Centre, challenged the sealing of its premises and the filing of an FIR. The State of U.P. sought an adjournment to obtain written instructions on whether the sealing should continue despite a final report. The court noted that the petitioner's earlier challenge to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order and the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 10503 of 2026) filed under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354C, as well as sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Marriage Act. They …
The applicant, Dinesh Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate, Mrs. Kavita Meena, failed to comply with a High Court order dated 18 July 2025 in Writ C No. 21926 of 2025, which required consideration of the applicant’s application. The court examined the matter and …
The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully defied the order dated 03‑09‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 13136 of 2025, which required the appeal to be decided. The court examined the instructions produced, which showed that the appeal had indeed been decided on …
The applicant, Vishnu Jangid, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the Session Trial No. 254 of 2026 and related POCSO proceedings. The charges framed included offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 64(2)(m) of the BNSS and Sections 5L, …
Sri Dhaniram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The investigation had already concluded, and a final report favoring the accused was submitted on 27 July 2026. The petitioner, through counsel, did not contest this fact and expressed …
The applicant, Gulzar Ahmad, filed a contempt application alleging that the Superintendent of Police, Ganesh Prasad Saha, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20 May 2025 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10252 of 2025, which directed the petitioner to move a fresh representation before …
The appellant, Sumit Rastogi, filed a criminal appeal (No. 7953 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Ankit Kapoor, informed the court that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The State, represented by …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Auraiya, to decide an application filed on 27 May 2026 under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The High Court, after obtaining instructions, learned that the application had been registered as case …
Manoj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed for leave to withdraw the petition, indicating an intention to pursue other legal remedies. The State of U.P., represented by the Additional Government Advocate, …
The applicant, Priyanka, filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad seeking to shift the proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application before the hearing. The court noted the absence of prosecution of the application. …
Rajesh filed a contempt application against Smt Nidhi Bhardwaj, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 07-08-2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17249 of 2025. The High Court sought instructions on the matter and received them, noting that the …
Shuaib applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 310 of 2026) involving sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act. The FIR, lodged by the victim’s father, alleged disappearance, but the victim’s statements under sections 180 and 183 BNSS were contradictory and the medical report showed no …
The appellants challenged an order dated 22 July 2026 of the Special Judge (SC/ST) that, on an application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. Act, directed the police to register an FIR against them. The trial court held that a prima facie cognizable offence was disclosed and ordered registration …
Smt. Shivangi Devi and another filed a contempt application against Shri Shaurabh Dixit, Superintendent of Police, Shahjahanpur, and others. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicants to prosecute the application. The Court noted the absence of any representation to press the …
M/s Hariom Industries Ltd. filed a writ petition under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.3) to decide a pending partition suit (Case No. 44493/2025) and to restrain private respondents from altering the disputed land. …
The appellants challenged the charge‑sheet and the summoning order issued by the Special Judge under Sections 351, 352 (B.N.S.) and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the case was based on a vague claim of intimidation linked to a long‑standing rivalry and …
The appellant, Ankit alias Akhilesh Srivastav, appealed against a charge-sheet and a cognizance order issued by a Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alleging assault and casteist slurs. The appellant contended that the FIR only …
The petitioner, Rampati, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of an application dated 06-11-2025 that was pending before the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil‑Soraon, District Prayagraj (respondent No.3). The sole relief prayed for was a direction to the officer to decide the …
The revisionist, through the juvenile’s natural guardian, filed a criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015, seeking to set aside the Juvenile Justice Board’s order dated 27‑01‑2026 and the appellate court’s order dated 03‑07‑2026, and to obtain bail …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raj Gupta @ Mohd Kayyum Saifi, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he established a physical relationship with a married woman under false pretences of a job and was accused of rape. The applicant argued that the FIR was …
The petitioners, Sarthak Chaturvedi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Ashutosh Gupta, expressed that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 8637 of 2024) filed against them under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police Act. They claimed innocence and alleged that the dispute with the …
Mahaveer Sharma filed a contempt application alleging that Ravi Kumar willfully defied the High Court's order dated 18 July 2025, which directed the Development Authority to pass a reasoned order on the allotment of 4% of acquired land within eight weeks. An affidavit indicated that the claim was …
Veer Singh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10 lakh, with Rs.9 lakh directed as compensation under Section 357(1) of the Cr.P.C. Both parties later entered …
Vijay Kumar Srivastava filed a contempt petition alleging that the District Magistrate failed to comply with the High Court's order dated 03‑12‑2024 in Writ‑A No. 58950/2009, which directed the petitioner to file a detailed application for his grandfather's freedom‑fighter pension arrears within …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the proceedings of Case No. 31977 of 2025, which arose from a criminal case against Mahesh Chandra and others. The applicant alleged that the magistrate had treated the matter as a complaint, issued a notice under …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.122 of 2024, which involved offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, as well as the charge sheet and cognizance order. The parties attempted mediation, which failed, and the …
Petitioner Sandeep Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer (Second) Varanasi, the second respondent, to decide a pending case (No. 75/109/158) filed under Section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner alleged that the case …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ritesh Pal, who is charged under Sections 64(2)m, 351(3), 352 BNS of the IPC and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act for an alleged rape that was reported in an FIR two years after the incident. The applicant contended that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Madan Pandey, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 5j(2) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended …
The petitioner, Mulayam Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to decide his claim and a representation dated 08‑07‑2026, alleging that his services were terminated on 30‑12‑2017 and that the authorities had not responded to his RTI applications. The respondents …
Ibrahim Ansari applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the Information Technology Act and the Aadhaar Card Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that no fake driving licence was recovered from him and that the two laptops seized were not …
Smt Babita, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under IPC Sections 80(2), 85, 123(2) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material to establish a dowry‑death presumption, and that she had no …
The applicant, Hariom Rajbhar, husband of a woman who died under unnatural circumstances within seven years of marriage, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 291 of 2025) alleging dowry harassment. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and that the charge sheet …
The applicants, Sanjay Kumar Shashtri and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking execution of a decree. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application because possession of the …
The petitioners Vinod Kumar Joshi and another filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21 September 2026 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tajatalab, District Varanasi, which had held an application filed by respondent No. 6 under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and …
The petitioners applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (Computer) but were rejected on the ground that they did not possess the prescribed qualification of B.Tech/B.E. in Computer Science or its listed equivalents. They contended that a B.Tech in Information Technology should be treated as …
The applicant, Kamla Kant Mishra, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Sri Navneet Sankhwar, failed to comply with a court order dated 09‑09‑2025 in Writ C No. 31152, which required consideration of the applicant's application. The opposite party, represented by Munna Pandey, …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.1033 in Village Kushaliya, Ghaziabad. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act alleging sexual relations with a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and …
The petitioner, Fatima Begum, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C.-II, Deoria, to decide Domestic Violence Appeal No. 97 of 2025 within a stipulated period. The appeal concerns an order dated 13 October 2025 passed in …
The applicant, Ashok Kumar, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents failed to comply with a Supreme Court order dated 12 November 2013 in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. The petition was supported by an FIR dated 20 August 2026. The respondent counsel did not contest the facts …
The applicant, Rajesh Mani Tripathi, filed two applications before the Allahabad High Court: one under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a July 30, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a rape case (CrPC Section 376) and another under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 2 August 2025 passed by the Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia, which had rejected a compromise entered on 3 April 2025 in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, …
The applicant, Rohtash Singh Sharma, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Shri Omkar Shukla, willfully defied an order dated 03.11.2025 issued in Writ‑A No. 21835 of 2018. The High Court sought instructions on the matter, which were produced and recorded on 18.09.2016. Upon …
The petitioner, Ram Lakhan, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the respondent No.4 to decide a case filed on 13-10-2025 under Section 109 Ka of the Uttar Pradesh Child Health (UPCH) Act, which had been pending for over a year. The petitioner argued that expeditious disposal was …
The petition under Article 227 challenged an order of the Additional District Judge, Mathura, which had set aside a 2010 order rejecting a landlord's application under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Act No.13 of 1972 and allowed a release application. The petitioner, a tenant, contended that …
The appellant, Promod Kumar, appealed against the cognizance and summoning order of the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that the FIR did not specifically allege casteist slurs and that no prima facie case existed. The State argued that the injured witnesses' …
Balraj Singh Dedha applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after receiving a notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. The investigation was later altered to offences carrying a maximum imprisonment of seven years or less. The applicant argued that there was no apprehension of …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove illegal encroachments on land identified as Khasra No.427 (recorded as Manure Pits). The petition relied on earlier eviction orders passed under Section 122-B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 against respondents …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State to demarcate specific land plots in Bareilly district. They claimed the court had previously ordered the Tehsildar to act, but no demarcation had occurred. The State contended that the petitioners had not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Zeeshan, accused of rape under IPC sections 64(1), 333 and 351(3). The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident, the victim's medico‑legal report did not substantiate rape, there was no alarm raised, and he …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Yadav, who was arrested in a rape case under Sections 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Suresh, the father‑in‑law of a woman who allegedly committed suicide, in a case registered under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the summoning order dated 4 April 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24805 of 2024, wherein he was charged under Sections 420, 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The crux of the dispute was …
Petitioner Ritik Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking expedited consideration of his application for a firearm licence dated 06-02-2026. The petitioner alleged delay by the competent authority in processing the licence. The Court, without delving into the merits of the licence application, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Krishna @ Kishan Yadav, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) of the same Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramkaran, accused under Sections 137(2), 64(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual intercourse with a 17‑year‑old girl. The applicant claimed the relationship was consensual, that the victim had …
Vivek Pathan was arrested in Crime No. 425 of 2026 under several IPC sections and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act for allegedly forcing a Hindu woman to convert to Islam. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, he had no prior criminal …
The applicant Vikash filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a criminal case (Crime No. 198 of 2026) that alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 351(3), 64(1) of the BNS and Sections 5N/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim, aged …
The petitioner, Sudarshan Yadav, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to the Tehsildar of Kaptanganj Tehsil to decide a pending case (No. T202405440603317) concerning encroachments on public utility land under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition alleged …
Inspector Prakash Singh filed a contempt application alleging that the Superintendent of Police, Pilibhit, willfully defied the Allahabad High Court's order dated 14 January 2026 which set aside his suspension and directed his reinstatement. The Superintendent issued a new order on 15 September 2026 …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Mohd Irfan, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 317(2), 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 276 of 2026. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of …
Nikhil Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that Tehsildar Sri Javed Ansari willfully defied the High Court's order dated 07-11-2025, which directed the Tehsildar to decide a mutation suit within three months. The order, issued in Writ‑C No. 38509 of 2025, warned that non‑compliance would …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dilshad, who was charged under Sections 87, 137(2), 64 of the BNS and Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant …
A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Smt. Dipika Chaturvedi against Sarthak Chaturvedi. The petitioner, through counsel Saurabh Pandey, expressed that she no longer wishes to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel was present but no opposition to the …
Petitioners Smt. Maya Srivastava and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The Attorney General informed the Court that the investigation had already concluded and a charge sheet was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dinesh Saket, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2) of the same Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishnu Kumar, accused of rape under a First Information Report dated 30 June 2026. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, citing contradictions in the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, the absence …
The petitioner, Devendra Singh @ Jaggu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to approach the …
The petitioners, Manoj Kumar and three others, filed a writ of mandamus seeking the transfer of the trial of case No. 0329 of 2022 (Manoj Kumar v. Bachhan) from the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi Division, to another competent court under Section 48(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of …
Husain applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 358 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 66C & 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR lacked any named victim and …
Petitioners Dev @ Dara and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection. The court …
The petitioner, Priti Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Selection Board to re‑examine specific questions and re‑evaluate her marks in the Trained Graduate Teacher Examination‑2021. She argued that the delay in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sanjeev, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin, accused of alleged gang rape of a girl aged about 14‑15 years under Sections 352, 351(2), 76, 70(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, …
The applicant, Rahul Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of Family Court III, Gorakhpur, to expedite the pending criminal case (Sindhu v. Rahul) under Section 144 B.N.S.S. The applicant argued that the case had been pending since …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Kumar Pal and others, alleging willful defiance of its earlier order dated 23 March 2026 directing the Special Land Acquisition Officer to process and disburse compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. …
The petitioner, Vipin Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent’s Additional Government Advocate raised …
Shravan Kumar Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police (respondent No.4) to conduct a fair investigation and submit a report under an FIR dated 19‑06‑2026. The petitioner relied on Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. and cited Supreme Court …
The petitioner, a former Commission Amin who retired on 31‑07‑2021, filed a writ seeking payment of outstanding retirement, pension and gratuity dues. The High Court ordered the respondents to clear the remaining Rs 12 lakh within eight weeks and later directed payment within two weeks, rejecting …
The petitioners, Khushi and another, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 under Section 137(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS) alleging cognizable offences. The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib …
The petitioners, Dharmendra Yadav and six others, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 8‑8‑2026 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Execution Case No. 10 of 2025 (Prabhawati vs Saral) within a stipulated period. The petition contended that the original suit was decreed ex‑parte on 5 April 2022 and that no appeal or application under …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ramkaran, who was arrested in connection with a human trafficking case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33836 of 2026) involving IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 143, 145, 127(2) and 316(2). The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The applicants, Hosiyar Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 4 September 2014, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11 October 2018, and the entire proceedings of State of U.P. v. Hosiyar Singh (Case No. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sheshnath Rajbhar, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault with an axe. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR and medical report were inconsistent and that no specific role was attributed to him. The …
The accused, Dasrath Nandan, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 109 and 352 of the BNS, alleging that the FIR was lodged belatedly and that the incident description was inconsistent. He claimed the assault allegation was false, highlighted a change in the reported location of the …
Krishna Murari filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 8‑April‑2026 in Case No. 7493 of 2026 (Crime No. 64 of 2025). The High Court examined the FIR, the impugned order and the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhavi Nath, who is accused in Crime No. 228 of 2022 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 325, 323, 504, 506 and 304, including murder. The prosecution alleges that the accused and co‑accused attacked the deceased and other persons, …
Petitioners Ashraf Khan Chaudhary and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 17 July 2026, registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Mirzapur Police Station, Saharanpur. They contended that the FIR does …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upkar alias Jhalak in Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026, where the FIR dated 15‑07‑2026 described an assault on four persons but did not name the applicant. The applicant argued that he was not mentioned in the FIR, that his identification was made …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishan Yadav, who was accused in a rape case involving a minor girl aged about 16 years. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR or the victim's statement …
The applicant, Atahar Hasan Saiyed, sought anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging violations of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act for misbranding of a tablet called 'Safetrin-20'. The prosecution alleged that the tablet contained 9.9 mg of Isotretinoin per tablet, exceeding the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 15‑12‑2024 and the accompanying summons in Criminal Case No.1163 of 2020, which arose from FIR No.562 of 2024 alleging offences under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS Act, 2023. The …
Petitioner Ashuddin filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21006 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the Attorney General, raised no objection to …
The accused Ajab Singh and Ramji Lal applied for bail in a case under Sections 109(1), 115(2) and 352 of the BNS, alleging they were implicated in an assault involving knives on two injured persons. The informant’s brother filed the FIR, claiming the accused surrounded and assaulted the victims with …
The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State, represented by …
The applicant, Raj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 696 of 2021) instituted by the State of U.P. under Section 135 of the Electricity Act Amendment, 2003. He argued that the offence is compoundable and …
The accused Karan Saini applied for bail in a case involving alleged assault under several IPC sections, claiming false implication and that the injuries were minor except one grievous fracture. The informant alleged that the accused and others assaulted them with an iron rod and a sharp-edged …
The petitioners, Uman Khan and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional …
The petitioner, Mohd. Khalid Siddiqui, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 14159 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order that rejected his claim. After filing, the petitioner learned that his claim had indeed been rejected and sought to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s …
The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed by Gulsher Ahmad and others, alleging that the respondents had willfully defied the Court’s order dated 23‑10‑2024 which prohibited demolition of the petitioners’ houses without proper acquisition and statutory compliance. The order in …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Ajay Kumar Singh alleging willful defiance of its earlier order dated 12 March 2025 in Writ‑A No. 3428 of 2026, which had directed the Ministry of Urban Development to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 9 January 2026 …
Petitioner Keshav Lal and another filed a writ petition seeking that a revenue case (No. T202514360614849) pending under Section 134 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 be decided expeditiously. The petitioners prayed for a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Mariahu, to dispose of …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sunil Gupta, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he had been falsely implicated, citing a gang chart and noting …
The petitioners, Shahid Fakeer and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the registration of an FIR dated 29 July 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the BNS. The FIR pertained to a cognizable offence recorded at …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to enforce an eviction order dated 29.05.2023, issued by the Tahsildar under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the order had not been executed and requested the court to order …
Jai Prakash Gaud was detained since 22 May 2025 in Crime No. 85 of 2026 under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated because no cow was actually slaughtered or injured and that he has no prior criminal record. The State …
Petitioners Udaybhan and nine others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 29‑07‑2026 and a mandamus restraining their arrest under sections 191(2), 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. The State opposed the merits but did not object to an "innocuous …
The petitioners, owners of Gata No. 391, filed a writ petition alleging that the State respondents were attempting to create a chak marg over their land without any notice or due procedure. They had previously submitted a representation to the District Magistrate on 04.08.2026, which remained …
The appellants Raja Ram and another appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhadohi‑Gyanpur, which rejected their discharge application in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …
Petitioners Pappu and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 20‑08‑2026 under Sections 115(2), 191(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, …
The petitioner, Aasif, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but the accompanying affidavit was found to be defective. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh petition with a correct affidavit. The Court considered the procedural defect …
Petitioners Sitaram Maurya and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04.08.2026 under Section 305(a) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, rendering …
Vikas and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to expedite a pending Section 128 Cr.P.C. proceeding for recovery of maintenance arrears. The trial court had issued notices, a recovery warrant and a letter to the Superintendent of Police, …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 110, 351(3), 352 and 115(2) of the IPC, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing the application was not maintainable because none of the alleged offences attracted a …
The applicant, Smt Preeti, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, where the prosecution alleged possession of 172 g of Alprazolam. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that no contraband was …
The petitioners, two adult women in a live‑in relationship, sought a permanent protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution, alleging threats and harassment from family members and requesting police protection for their peaceful cohabitation. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and …
The applicant, Imran, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case alleging forced conversion of a woman under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim’s statement under …
Manoj Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide Reference Case No. 21 of 2026 concerning the classification of his land as non‑agricultural under Section 143 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the claim for …
The applicants, Mohd Kalam and four others, were charged under Sections 191(1), 115(2), 352 and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code in a criminal case filed by the State of U.P. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the summoning …
Arjun Singh filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 08.07.2026 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, which dismissed his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS on the premise that he was not interested in pursuing it. The revisionist contended that the magistrate’s …
The accused Ratan Gupta applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31931 of 2026, relating to Case Crime No. 410 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 109, 228 and 3(5) of the BNS. He argued that the FIR dated 26‑11‑2024 was filed late, that his name was derived only from the sister’s …
Shyam Narayan Yadav filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a relieving order and a transfer order issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh, alleging that he was not relieved within ten days of the transfer. The petitioner contended that the delay rendered the orders illegal and …
The accused, Ashok Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 385 of 2026) alleging assault with an iron rod that allegedly caused injuries, including eye damage, to the victim Amrendra. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the injuries were not of a magnitude to …
The Sessions Judge rejected the revisionists' application for discharge and proceeded to frame a charge under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code in a case involving assault with lathi, danda and axe that caused serious injuries. The revisionists contended that the investigating officer, after …
The petitioner, Siddharth Singh, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders issued in revenue mutation proceedings under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. raised a preliminary objection that such summary mutation proceedings do not determine …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quashment of criminal proceedings after reaching an amicable settlement with the respondents. The trial court verified the compromise on 2 June 2026, and both parties, including the State, did not contest the settlement. …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, challenged an e‑auction notice dated 4 August 2026, arguing that the auction was conducted while his writ petition was pending. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, contended that bids were not public and sought an adjournment to allow the …
The petitioner, Sarita, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 19 September 2026 issued by the State of U.P. and others. The High Court, after receiving the standing counsel's written instructions, noted that the petition only challenged the communication and could not proceed. The …
The applicant, Nasim Ahmed, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to conclude the pending Session Trial No. 408 of 2019 (State vs. Abdul Mazid and others), which involves offences under Sections 498A, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08.07.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) alleging abduction of a minor. The alleged abductee was later recovered and, in a statement under Section 180 BNS, said she had voluntarily left her …
Petitioner Sikandar and another filed a writ petition seeking a court direction under Section 11(1) of the CH Act for the speedy disposal of a pending case (Case No. 1786/3951) before Respondent No. 2. The petition argued that the case had been pending since 2023 and that a judicial directive was …
The applicants, Ravi Shankar Patel and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑03‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 15‑04‑2026 in a case where they were charged under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the BNS, …
Harphool applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 25 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, alleging false implication for an enticement charge. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she voluntarily left her home, married the accused, and that no sexual …
Petitioners Sandeep and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09‑07‑2026 in Crime No.165, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court …
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of his result on the ground that, although the numeric entry of the Question Book Number on the OMR sheet was correct, an extra bubble was inadvertently marked in another column. The respondents, including the State and the examination commission, argued …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 02-06-2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and both the State's A.G.A. and the …
The High Court considered a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Punit, accused in a rape case (Crime No. 506 of 2026) where the FIR alleges he stood guard while co‑accused Anshu allegedly raped the victim. The applicant argued that the victim’s …
The petitioners filed a contempt application alleging that the Municipal Commissioner willfully defied the High Court’s order dated 2 July 2026 directing demolition of a dilapidated building. The opposite party produced a notice dated 8 September 2026 showing the building remained unsafe, occupied, …
Petitioners challenged the FIR dated 17-08-2026 in Crime No.227, which alleged offences under Sections 75, 191(2), 333, 115(2), 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The High Court examined the FIR and, finding a prima facie case of commission of …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by two applicants in a 2017 case involving offences under Sections 323, 354(D), 392, 427, 436, 452 and 504 IPC. Applicant No.1 was denied bail because he has a history of eight criminal cases, seven of which were disclosed, indicating …
Mohd Shakeel applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC after a charge sheet was filed. The learned Additional Government Advocate argued that the alleged offences did not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, so there was no fear of arrest. The applicant sought permission to …
The petitioner, Dilshad Qurashi @ Mallu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a notice dated 20‑07‑2026 issued by the District Magistrate, Mau under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gunda Act, and a writ of mandamus to restrain any coercive action. The …
The petitioner, Smt. Shalini, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to consider her representations dated 28‑02‑2025 and 16‑05‑2025 and to appoint her to a suitable post under the Dying‑in‑Harness Rules, 1974, as well as to release all …
The petitioners, Om Narayan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 18‑08‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie …
Petitioners Zaid and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 17.05.2026, registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The Court examined the FIR and held that it discloses a prima facie commission of offence, citing Supreme Court precedents …
Petitioners Kasim Malik and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 22‑07‑2026 in Crime No.0208 of 2026, which alleged offences under various sections of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the D.P. Act. The Court examined the FIR and held that …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the Public Gambling Act, fearing arrest in a criminal case. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment exceeding seven years and that Section 35(3) of the …
Mahendra Singh Tyagi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (Respondents No. 2 and 3) to conduct a fair investigation into Crime No. 307 of 2023 under various IPC sections. The petitioner argued that the investigation was unsatisfactory and that the High Court could …
Vinod filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs.2500 granted by the Family Court, Mau, on 10‑01‑2025 to his wife. The revision was filed after a delay of 509 days, which the revisionist sought to condone. The High Court observed that …
Irfan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0095 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) and 112(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed absolute innocence, stating he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was found on him, and that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 20.08.2026 that alleged violations of Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it prima facie disclosed the commission of an offence, citing Supreme Court precedents that …
The applicant, Aditya Singh Dhama, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case pending under Section 420 IPC. The Additional Government Advocate objected, arguing that the alleged offence does not carry a punishment exceeding seven years, a chargesheet has already …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom Pandey, who was arrested in a case originally registered under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and later converted to Section 107 B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out a five‑day delay …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail and requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail, seeking protection of his interests for a short period. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the prayer. The court directed that the applicant may appear …
The petitioners challenged the validity of question No. 96 in a Teacher Grade T (T.G.T.) recruitment examination, alleging it was outside the prescribed syllabus. The respondent Commission submitted a revised expert committee report dated 26.08.2026, which held that question No. 61 was out of …
The petitioners, Anjani Kumar and five others, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the respondent to decide pending Case No. 135 of 2024 (Anjani Kumar Prannath) filed under Section 109 of the Uttar Pradesh Child Health (UPCH) Act. The petition argued that the case had been pending …
The petitioner, an ad‑hoc Assistant Teacher appointed in 1993 and regularized in 2017 under Section 33‑G of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, reached superannuation on 31‑03‑2026 but his pension calculation excluded the ad‑hoc service period. He filed a writ petition seeking …
Petitioner Jeeshan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30 July 2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. Habib Abdullah …
Petitioner Tej Pratap Singh, through counsel, withdrew his challenge to the impugned order in a writ petition under Article 227. The High Court, noting the withdrawal, directed the petitioner to file an application for expeditious disposal of the related Original Suit No.1051 of 2024 within 15 days, …
Petitioners Ismail and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 30.07.2026 registered under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The High Court examined the FIR and, relying on Supreme Court precedents (State of Telangana v. …
The applicant, Ajay Kashyap, was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 148 of 2026) after a CCTV footage and victim's statement identified him, although his name was absent from the original FIR filed on 4‑April‑2026. He has a modest criminal record and has been in custody since …
The applicant, Tejveer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a 2001 case involving multiple IPC offences. He claimed false implication, lack of specific role, and cooperation with the trial, noting his age (61) and no prior convictions despite three pending cases. …
The petitioner, Kamran Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 16 July 2026 under Section 316(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) registered at Police Station Fareedpur, Bareilly. He contended that he was not responsible for the loss of certain records and …
Petitioners Rakesh Kumar Dubey and others filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that the pending case No. TB of 2024 (Rakesh Kumar Dubey v. Gram Sabha) be decided expeditiously under Section 9(ka)2 of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act. The petition argued that the case had been …
The petitioner, Vindhyachal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to investigate Crime No. 176 of 2026 without collusion and to conduct a fair, impartial investigation under several sections of the B.N.S. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s observations in Sakiri Vasu …
Tara Singh, a contractual employee, was arrested with Rs 12,000 allegedly received from co‑accused Sudhir Kumar, a junior engineer, under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Amendment 2018). He has been in custody since 21 July 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The …
Manoj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an order dated 25‑01‑2021 passed by the District Magistrate of Farrukhabad under Section 14(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petitioner did not raise any objection to the order …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Agra, to expedite the pending claim (M.A.C. No. 710 of 2019) under Section 166 read with Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioners argued that the claim had been pending since 2019 without …
The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 07-08-2026 filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, seeking its quash. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed prima facie cognizable offences, making the petition untenable. …
Petitioners Rohit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Babli Urf Bablu in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only evidence against her was …
The applicants, Sarvesh Kumar Maurya and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 61(2), 340(2), 336(3), 338 and 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 in a criminal case (Crime No. 349 of 2026) fearing arrest. The counsel for the applicants sought interim protection to appear before the …
The applicant, Mrityunjay Prasad Gupta, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied an order dated 12‑12‑2025 issued in Writ‑C No. 43927 of 2025. The court noted that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite parties had not complied. While a …
The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge’s orders rejecting their discharge application and framing charges of attempt to commit culpable homicide (Sec. 110 BNS) and related offences. They argued that the injuries were simple, not grievous, and that a separate FIR lodged by a victim undermined …
The applicants, including Smt. Reema, filed an application under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. on 1 June 2026 in the Family Court, Etah, seeking relief from neglect by the husband, Shri Dilshad, and the case remained pending. They moved the High Court under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. requesting the …
The applicant, Veerampal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 25‑03‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 28‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 1164 of 2026. He contended that the offences alleged—Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS—are …
The applicant, Sandeep Singh, filed an application under Section 528 seeking modification of pleadings and a stay of prosecution in a power theft case initiated under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act. The court allowed the requested amendments and considered the applicant's request to …
The petitioners challenged the FIR dated 18.08.2026 registered under Section 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arguing that the FIR did not disclose any cause of action and merely reflected a grievance about a pending application. The court examined the FIR and …
