Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 2201–2400
The appellant Munna Lal filed Criminal Appeal No. 950 of 1988 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the pendency of the appeal, the counsel for the appellant, G.P. Dixit, died, and subsequently the appellant himself also passed away. The court was required to …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs.1,67,000 with interest to the claimant, holding Oriental Insurance Co. liable for compensation. The insurer appealed, contending that the offending vehicle was not insured on the accident date because the premium cheque issued by the owner was …
M/S Ramnath Sanjay Kumar (the assessee) challenged a best‑judgment assessment made by the Commercial Tax authority after a Special Investigation Branch survey on 12‑09‑2012 revealed large stock discrepancies. The assessing authority rejected the assessee’s books of account and enhanced the taxable …
The appellant filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. alleging that the respondents had abused him with filthy language and threatened him, claiming the conduct amounted to an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The Special Judge …
Durga Prasad, a Technical Assistant appointed in 1980, was asked by the Department to produce his High School Certificate and Intermediate marksheet, which he could not furnish because the school was closed during his leave. The Department threatened discharge for non‑compliance and subsequently …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 20‑11‑2019 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Special Judge (Gangster Act), Fatehpur, in a case arising under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster Act. The High Court …
Ranveer Singh filed a revision petition (S.C.C. Revision No. 17 of 2024) against The Co-Operative Assurance Company Limited in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The matter was listed in the revised list and was to be heard by Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J. Counsel for the …
Vimla Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail in a case originally filed under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, which was later amended to charge her under Section 108 and Section 92 of the B.N.S. Act for alleged abetment to suicide. The …
The petitioner Khinni Lal, a defendant in a suit under Section 229‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950, challenged two orders of the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO). The SDO had dismissed the suit on 11‑Nov‑1991 on the ground that no family settlement was on record, but …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Joni, the husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident and was later amended, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aviral Yadav in a case under Sections 309(6), 317(2), 317(5), 109(1), 111 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the co‑accused’s statements implicating him were unreliable, with no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd Azad, who was arrested in connection with a murder case under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the informant was not an eye‑witness, with witnesses indicating a spontaneous …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Yadav, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the post‑mortem showed death due …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandrapal Singh Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a suicide case under Sections 108, 308(5) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing a post‑mortem report indicating death by asphyxia due to …
The applicant, Vinod Bharti, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 4210 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for a status of trial on 9 July 2026, and a report dated 25 July 2026 indicated that the applicant had already been convicted in the case. Because …
The applicant, Vijay Keshsharwani, a father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide after a domestic dispute, was charged under Sections 85 and 80 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations of dowry harassment were unfounded, that there was …
The applicant, Mohd Nadeem alias Raju, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 09.03.2017 passed under Section 245(2) CrPC and to stay criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 323 and 504 IPC. The application also requested that the …
Gyan Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and the criminal proceedings against him in Criminal Case No. 40 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant’s counsel, Kamal Singh, did …
Constable Bacha Lal Singh, appointed to the Border Security Force in 1973, voluntarily resigned in 1984 after serving just over ten years due to family circumstances. He later sought a proportionate pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, but the respondents rejected his claim, stating that …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 03 of 2019) involving allegations under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the dispute had been amicably settled, …
Ashok Kumar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner later filed a withdrawal application (No. 4/2026) seeking to withdraw the writ petition. The Court heard counsel for the petitioner and allowed the withdrawal …
The petitioner, Shiv Ji, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the Nagar Palika Parishad Ballia and others, claiming possession of Plots No.163 and 182 based on his father's name in old records. He also applied for a temporary injunction, which was rejected by the trial court and the …
Jagdamba Prasad filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his application under Rule 109 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954, which sought to correct revenue records in line with a Settlement Officer’s order dated 19‑July‑1966. The Consolidation Officer held that because the …
The applicant Masook Ali filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order, summons and the entire criminal proceedings for an alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC. He contended that the investigation material – a disputed suicide …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shah Alam, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a minor under the POCSO Act and several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the alleged incident occurred before his …
The petitioners, elected as President of the Nagar Nigam Karmchari Sangh, Ghaziabad, sought registration of their election with the Deputy Labour Commissioner, but the registration was denied by an order dated 23‑Jan‑2026 on the ground that the election did not comply with the union's bye‑laws. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal case (Case Crime No.215 of 2007) involving charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed innocence and alleged that the parties had amicably resolved their …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate's order dated 16‑04‑2019 in a criminal case (State vs. Praja Ram) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑05‑2025, the summoning order dated 23‑06‑2025, and the entire proceedings in case No. 8170 of 2025, alleging that the prosecution was malicious and intended to harass them. …
The petitioners, Smt. Munni Devi and others, filed Criminal Revision No. 2725 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an earlier order. Counsel for the revisionists informed the court that the matter had been settled between the parties and requested that the revision be withdrawn. The …
The applicant, Sangita, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge to conclude the trial in State v. Sangita (S.T. No. 946 of 2021) expeditiously. The trial concerns an alleged murder under Section 302 IPC and has been …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions trial and summoning order issued under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that the applicants were members of an organised criminal …
Ashwini Kumar Agarwal filed a revision petition before the Allahabad High Court against Smt. Uttam Agarwal and another. The petition was listed in Court No. 35 and counsel for the parties were recorded. No appearance was made by the revisionist to press the revision. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner, Hargovind, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious completion of land consolidation proceedings in Village Bara Keshav, Farrukhabad, under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. Earlier, a notification under Section 20 of the Act led to agitation by villagers …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quash of a charge‑sheet dated 15‑07‑2019 and the entire criminal proceeding (Special Case No. 73 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 452, 352, 504, 506 and 307 IPC. Both parties appeared before the Additional District and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amitosh in a case registered under Sections 125, 352, 351(2), 105 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a delayed FIR and a hostile prosecution witness who did not support the prosecution. The State …
The applicants, Mohd Nadeem @ Raju and Mohd Faheem, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 08.03.2019 and the subsequent order of cognizance, as well as to stay all related criminal proceedings pending before the Additional Chief …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute, which included charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506, 377, 313, 354, the Dowry Prohibition Act (sections 3 and 4) and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shiva Gupta, who is charged under several IPC sections (65(1), 89, 127(2), 123, 352, 115(2), 351(3) BNS) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the victim was an adult and the …
Petitioner Yaseen Ansari filed Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3884 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, although the petitioner's counsel names were listed. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was …
Petitioner Mayank Gupta filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, he submitted a withdrawal application supported by an affidavit seeking to dismiss the writ petition. The Court examined the application and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was …
The applicant, Piyush Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application after the trial concluded and he was acquitted on 31 October 2025. Counsel argued that since the applicant had been acquitted, the bail application was no longer necessary and should be dismissed as infructuous. The State, …
Petitioner Hazi Ilias filed a writ petition under Article 227 against Nagar Palika Parishad and another respondent. The petition was listed but no party appeared to press the writ. The court observed that the petitioner seemed to have lost interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the writ …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Munnar, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material …
The complainant, Smt. Reena, married Sunil Kumar (alias Bablu) on 28‑04‑2005. A matrimonial dispute led her to file a complaint under Section 498‑A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During trial before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, the parties reached a compromise, …
The appellant, Jay Prakash, filed a special intra‑Court appeal challenging a penalty imposed on him in disciplinary proceedings that had concluded during the pendency of the appeal. The appellant sought leave of the High Court to contest the penalty order. The respondent State of U.P. and others did …
Rajesh Mani Tripathi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The application was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Samit Gopal. The court noted that a detailed order had been passed in a related matter, …
Pheru Prasad filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed under Section 33-C(2) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking interest on a delayed payment of Rs.31,132. The petitioner claimed that the amount was due on 30 September 2000 but was actually paid on …
The petitioners, M/S Popular Iron and Steel Company and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents. During the proceedings, the parties reached a compromise, which was placed on record. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 17‑03‑2025 and the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑11‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 2516 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS. The High Court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 10‑11‑2021 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3753 of 2018) filed by the complainant under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They asserted that they were falsely implicated and that the dispute between applicant No.4 and the complainant …
Kavita Traders filed a writ petition against the Panchayat Raj Department and three others. The petition was taken up out of turn after a request by the petitioner's counsel. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition for want …
The petitioner sought restoration of a fair‑price shop licence originally held by his deceased father, which had been cancelled and later reinstated by the High Court. While the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate initiated proceedings to allot the shop to the petitioner on inheritance grounds, the shop had …
Central Electronics Ltd entered into agreements in 2016 for supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of solar water pumping systems. The work was completed and a Completion Certificate was issued on 7 January 2021, but a subsidy amount of Rs. 1,51,51,636 remained unpaid. The applicant …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak, who is accused in a rape case involving a minor girl aged about 14 years. The applicant argued that the medico‑legal report did not support the allegation of …
The petitioner, U.P.S.R.T.C. through its Regional Manager, terminated the respondent conductor in 1987 and a Labour Court award in 1999 reinstated him and ordered backwages. The award was partially modified by the High Court in 2012, limiting backwages to 50% of the deposited amount and directing …
The petitioner, Sant Prasad Dubey, married the respondent, Madhuri, under Hindu rites in 2008 and they have three children. In the divorce proceedings, the respondent sought maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The trial court ordered a modest lump‑sum litigation …
Petitioners Jamiluddin @ Jameel Ahmad and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The learned Additional Government …
The petitioners, Akshat Bhardwaj and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to …
The applicants, Raees (alias Rahees) and Kallu, sought bail in a murder case (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15439 of 2025) where they were not named in the FIR but were implicated through a witness statement. The prosecution had filed a charge sheet under IPC sections 333, 310(3) and 317(3) …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2314 of 2019) instituted by the complainant under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute arose from …
The applicant, Afsaar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 20686 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking release from custody. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, opposed the bail. The Court had earlier, on 09 July 2026, ordered a status …
The applicant, Dildar Ali, filed a bail cancellation application seeking to cancel the bail granted to Mukim Parvez on 23 September 2026. Counsel for the applicant, Abhay Mishra, subsequently requested that the application be withdrawn. The court considered the request and noted that the applicant …
The petitioners Osama Jafri and four others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30 March 2024 passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. Both parties' counsel agreed that the controversy was identical to that already decided in Writ‑C No. 18255 of 2024. The High Court, relying on …
Smt. Priya @ Gudiya filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 253 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer of the suit. The applicant's counsel was listed as Abhay Mishra, Ajay Kumar Pal and Vikrant Pratap Singh, while the opposite party was represented by Vivek Chaturvedi. No counsel …
Petitioners Smt Saumya and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite being listed. The learned Additional Government Advocate was present for the respondents. The Court dismissed the petition …
Petitioners Shabana Begam and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioners, Navin Kumar Pandey, was shown in the cause list, but no counsel appeared to press the petition. The learned Additional …
The applicant, Dr. Rajaram Singh, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Jagdish Singh, later moved the court seeking to withdraw the contempt application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. No substantive hearing on the merits of …
Vikas alias Maddy applied for bail in a criminal matter before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The Court had earlier ordered a status report of the trial, which revealed that the trial court had recorded a conviction based on the accused's confession. Since a conviction …
Munavvar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7371 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioner, Mohd. Naushad, was recorded in the cause list. However, no counsel appeared on …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7363 of 2024) was filed by Sayed Murtaza @ Mudassir against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The matter was taken up in the revised call before Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant. Although counsel for the petitioner was listed in the …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7365 of 2024) was filed by Hasnain Ahmad @ Sajan and others against the State of UP and others. The petition was listed in the revised call, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, although the learned Additional …
The petitioner, Narendra Singh Sengar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7414 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was listed for hearing, and counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kamal Singh, was recorded in the …
Shailendra Singh alias Rajor and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition listed Sudhanshu Pratap Singh as counsel for the petitioners and G.A. and Ravi Shankar Yadav for the respondents. When the matter was taken up, no counsel appeared …
The petitioners, Saddam Hussain and seven others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioners, Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, was noted in the cause list. However, no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to …
Petitioners Kailu Chaupal and another filed a writ petition challenging the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Court noted that the claim had already attained finality by its earlier judgment in Ram Naresh Singh and 5 Ors. Vs. Union of India dated 10 September …
Ashok Maurya and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7567 of 2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was listed in the revised call and the names of counsel for the petitioners were shown in the cause list, but no counsel appeared to press the petition. …
Petitioners Indrajeet Kaur and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ …
The appellants, who had executed registered sale deeds in 1995 and 1997 transferring land to the informant, were later accused in a 2019 FIR of removing soil, assaulting the informant, and using caste‑related slurs, leading to charges under several IPC sections and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. …
Petitioners Kasim and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called for hearing, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of representation and the …
Gaurav Bhal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7640 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging orders of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioner, Mr Sunil Dubey, was shown in the cause‑list, but no one appeared …
Ram Niwas @ Bitu filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7667 of 2024 against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The Court noted the absence of representation for …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from a case under Section 115(2) of the B.N.S and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the parties …
Shahrukh alias Tutu filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Sri Shashwat Srivastava, sought to withdraw the bail application. The State's counsel, G.A., was present. The court entertained the request to withdraw and dismissed the bail …
Vinay Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7715 of 2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition sought relief through a writ proceeding. Counsel for the petitioner were listed as Ashwani Singh and Vineet Singh …
The applicant, Pankaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 18506 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued notices and listed the matter, seeking the trial status, but the applicant failed to appear on the scheduled dates. The State’s Additional Government Advocate …
Petitioners Smt. Geeta Devi and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8845 of 2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was listed in the revised call, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, although the learned …
Petitioners Matganjan Sahu and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite their names being listed. The State's learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court dismissed the petition on …
Lav Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8440 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed in the revised call but no petitioner appeared to press the petition. The names of the petitioner's counsel were shown in the cause list, while the State's AGA was present. …
Sunil and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8401 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite their names being listed. The learned Additional Government …
The petitioners obtained a decree in their favour in Civil Suit No. 101 of 1984, which was upheld by the High Court in 2002. Subsequent applications under Sections 33/39 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, were allowed on 08.01.2024, but the Tehsildar later recalled this order on 30.03.2024, …
The petitioner, Bharat Verma, sought a writ of mandamus directing that all FIRs filed for non‑payment of deposit maturity amounts be merged with the first FIR (Case Crime No. 612 of 2024) and that no further FIRs be registered against him. The petition argued that the multiple FIRs were identical in …
Ritesh Kushwaha and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8318 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The matter was taken up in the revised call, but no petitioner appeared before the Court despite …
Mrs. Kiran Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8280 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, although the names of the petitioner's …
Smt. Reeta Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8988 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State and three others. The petition was listed for hearing and counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Raju Kanaujia, was noted in the cause list. However, no …
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8633 of 2024) was filed by Jikarullah against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition sought relief, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the names being listed. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the …
The applicants Sumit Saini and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 2803/2022 pending before the CJ(JD) FTC (CAW), Saharanpur, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 313, 354(b), 504, 506 and the DP Act. …
Petitioners Smt. Chandni and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the learned Additional …
The applicants, Arasad @ Raja and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet dated 29‑07‑2001 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that they had reached a …
The petitioners, Raghuvir and another, filed a writ petition seeking the release of the entire claim awarded by the Railway Claims Tribunal. The High Court observed that the question of release of the claim had already been finally decided in the earlier judgment of Writ‑C No.27617 of 2026 in Ram …
Sharda Devi filed a writ petition seeking cancellation of land consolidation proceedings against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner argued that the consolidation process should be halted. The court examined the record and noted that the required CH Form No. 41 and CH Form No. 45, …
Ram Chandra Yadav filed a civil contempt application against Bachcha Ram and nine others. The applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, citing incurable technical defects, and requested liberty to re‑file. The standing counsel for the respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The …
The petitioner, Prem Chandr, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 9609 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State and three others. The petition was listed for hearing but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, although the names of counsel (Lal …
Petitioners Kishori Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Kasimabad, to decide Declaratory Suit No.119 of 2015, which has been pending since 10 February 2015. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the High Court’s intervention to ensure the speedy disposal of a civil suit (Suit No.D202102030006842) pending before the district court. The petition alleged that the suit was being unduly delayed and requested the …
The petitioner, Dipoo Kumar, filed a civil miscellaneous amendment application seeking permission to amend the prayer and to have the pending restoration/tajbisani application decided expeditiously by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi. The State of U.P. and other respondents …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Himanshu Kumar, who was arrested under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act for alleged inappropriate touching of a minor. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, and the medical …
Smt. Sapna Dubey and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 10615 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, although the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was …
The applicant, Smt. Sonvati Alias Sonam, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 347 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the Court found that the application was not prosecuted. The Court dismissed the transfer …
The applicant, Aman Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 2305 of 2025) arising from charges under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the BNSS, Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) …
Shyamlal filed a writ petition under Article 226 against the State of U.P. and others, challenging the inspection of certain land parcels (Gata Nos. 116, 132, 136) by a revenue team appointed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate. The State submitted written instructions indicating that Gata No. 116 was …
Maya Devi filed a writ petition along with three other petitioners seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to decide her application filed on 15 May 2025 under Section 76 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners numbered 2, 3 and 4 withdrew their participation, and …
A writ petition (Writ C No. 22952 of 2026) was filed by Rinku Kumar Gautam against the State of U.P. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petition was not prosecuted. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay costs …
The petitioners, Anil Kumar and another, filed a writ seeking a certiorari to quash a notice dated 14 January 2026 that led to their eviction and demolition of a house on Gata No.79 Mi, which they claimed was an abadi area and thus protected. The State respondents argued that the eviction was based …
The applicant Sunil Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging rape and trafficking. The FIR was lodged by the victim's father, and the victim initially corroborated the allegations, but later, during …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 18 April 2026 issued by the Additional Collector (Finance & Revenue) of Ghazipur, alleging that the order failed to consider objections raised and merely accepted the lekhpal's report. The State's standing counsel argued the order was lawful but conceded that …
Vijay Kumar was arrested by the police. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The court, after …
The revisionist, Sri Raju Singh (Avnindra Singh), filed a civil revision challenging the Additional District Judge's order rejecting his amendment application in Election Petition No.01 of 2021. The amendment sought to insert additional paragraphs in the written statement alleging criminal …
Dilip Kumar filed an application to cancel the bail of four accused (Kuldeep Yadav, Ratan Singh @ Suneel Yadav, Chintamani and Vikas Yadav) alleging that they were threatening him to prevent his deposition before the trial court, and he had lodged two FIRs against them. The accused argued that the …
The appellant, Raj Kumar Singh, filed a withdrawal application for his appeal before the Allahabad High Court. The appellant's counsel, Anil Kumar Bajpai, submitted the application, and the standing counsel, Birendra Prasad Shukla, raised no objection. The court allowed the withdrawal application. …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order to prevent the respondents and their families from interfering in their peaceful marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted identity documents to prove they are both over 18 and consented to …
The petitioner, Dharmveer Singh, filed a writ petition seeking the cancellation of consolidation proceedings that were initiated under Section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The High Court had earlier directed the State's standing counsel to obtain instructions, which …
The petitioner, Munnu Lal @ Monu, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15400 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Dinesh Mishra, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government …
The appellants Vijay Shankar Yadav and Kamlesh Singh Yadav were charged under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly kidnapping, extorting money and using caste‑based abusive language against the …
The petitioner, Sonelal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing on several dates (19 September 2025, 26 February 2026, and 9 July 2026) but the petitioner failed to appear on any of these occasions. The …
The petitioner, Surendra Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later submitted an affidavit indicating a desire to withdraw the petition. Counsel for the petitioner moved that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The court examined the affidavit and the counsel's …
The petitioners sought a review of the High Court's order dismissing their writ petition concerning a title dispute over land claimed on the basis of a registered sale deed. They alleged that the consolidation officer and subsequent appellate authorities had acted arbitrarily, failed to give them a …
The petitioner, Malakh, filed a writ petition seeking the speedy disposal of an application filed on 18‑02‑2026 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The respondent State of U.P. and others indicated that notices had already been issued to private respondents and the matter would proceed …
The petitioners, Neelam Kesari and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Phoolpur, to expedite the decision on their restoration application (Case No. RST/4515 of 2023) pending in case 3807 of 2017 under Section 24 of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 16 October 2025 and 5 February 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in Case No. 0988 of 2023, which allowed an amendment by respondent No.3 and rejected the petitioners' application to recall the first order. …
Kuldeep filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the pending Special Case No. 1642 of 2025, which arose from a crime under Sections 363 and 376(2)(N) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5I, 5J(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act. The case was at the …
The applicants, Dhruwa Kant Yadav and another, filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court seeking enforcement of a Writ Court order. Counsel for the applicants informed the Court that the order had already been complied with by the opposite party. On this basis, the Court found …
Petitioners Smt. Pushpa Devi and two others filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against Dr. Satish Kumar Verma. No counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents, and the petitioners themselves failed to appear or present any …
The petitioner Shankardas filed a writ petition under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari and Land Revenue Act seeking certiorari to quash an order dated 20‑04‑2026 issued by the Commissioner, Chitrakoot Dham, Banda in the case of Guljari v. Shankardas & others. The petitioner alleged that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 27-08-2024. The trial court confirmed the parties' settlement, and the …
The appeal challenges the conviction of Ritesh Maurya under sections 366 and 376 of the IPC arising from an alleged abduction and sexual assault of a girl from Varanasi. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. indicated that she was 18 years old, left home of her own free …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dilshad Hashmi (alias Rahul) in a criminal case (Crime No. 182 of 2026) involving alleged enticement of a minor under sections of the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s statement under …
Badku filed a writ petition (Writ No. 27094 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of UP and others. The court, after hearing arguments, recorded written instructions from the Standing Counsel. The petitioner subsequently prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition, …
Satish Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 26‑06‑2021, the cognizance order dated 28‑07‑2021, and the entire proceedings in Criminal Case No.1765 of 2021 (State v. Yogesh & others) arising from a Section 406 IPC offence. The High Court …
The petition concerned the Committee of Management of Ballabh Bhai Patel Inter College, an aided intermediate college, where rival elections were held by the petitioners and the respondents. The petitioners claimed that the electoral roll of 901 members was final, while the respondents asserted a …
The applicant, Kamna Devi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Dilip Kumar Pandey, failed to comply with a court order dated 29 January 2026 which required him to consider her application. The court examined the matter and noted that instructions dated 19 August 2026 showed …
The petitioners Sudha Devi and others filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the respondents Arun Kumar Agarwal and another. The petition was listed in Court No. 35 and was to be heard on September 23, 2026. No counsel …
The petitioner, Hinchh Narayan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) of Handia, Prayagraj to decide a pending suit for division of holding under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The suit had been pending since 15 September 2025, and …
The applicant, Pawan Kumar, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS pending the police report. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the State argued that the bail application was no longer maintainable, relying on a recent Supreme Court decision (Ram Pukar Yadav v. State of …
Natthu Singh filed a contempt application alleging that the Director General/Inspector General of Prison Administration willfully defied the High Court's order dated 06.04.2026 in Writ‑A No.4752 of 2026, which required the petitioner to submit a fresh representation within two weeks and the …
The applicant filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party failed to comply with an order dated 21‑Nov‑2025 in Writ‑A No. 17594 of 2025, which required the opposite party to consider the applicant’s application. The opposite party produced instructions indicating that the required …
Petitioner Priya Upadhyay filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (respondent No.2) to decide her pending appeal (Case No. 21688 of 2025) under section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal arose from orders passed under Section 34 of the U.P. Land …
Petitioner Smt. Jyotiya filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Sub Divisional Officer (ASDO) of Sadar Ghazipur to decide a pending suit (No. 10555/2025) under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 11 September 2025. The petitioner alleged …
Azam Hussain filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17449 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner was represented by counsel Pramod Kumar Pandey. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel …
Petitioner Narendra Singhal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17447 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the other respondents, represented by their counsel, raised no objection …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani, who is charged under Sections 64, 74, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly outraging the modesty of a minor. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act in a case where the FIR alleged he had enticed the daughter of the first informant. The victim’s statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS …
The petitioners, Rinki and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their live-in relationship and to provide them protection. They asserted that both are adults, have voluntarily cohabited, and face threats from family members, …
An FIR was lodged against Omkar and eight others under sections 69, 123, 351(2) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accused filed a writ petition seeking quash of the FIR, and the High Court ordered mediation, directing a deposit of Rs.25,000 and prohibiting any …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a contempt application filed by Bijendra Bahadur Singh alleging that the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Chunar, had failed to comply with the order dated 19.04.2024 in PIL No. 83 of 2024 directing a spot inspection and demarcation of alleged road encroachments …
Mulki Devi filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to implement an order dated 09‑06‑2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to consider her subsequent applications dated 13‑02‑2026 and …
Petitioners Smt. Vimla Devi and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj Division, to decide a restoration application dated 9 December 2025 that had been pending since that date. The petitioners argued that the application was …
Ramsingar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial) of Mariahu, Jaunpur, to hear and decide a recall/restoration application filed on 26 July 2024 against an order dated 15 April 2024 under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner …
Animesh filed a writ petition under Section 29/41 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to decide Appeal No.149/M, which challenges a 15 April 2023 order of the Deputy Collector. The petitioner alleged that the appeal, filed under Section 210 …
Ashok Giri filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a revenue authority, to register and decide an application dated 20‑01‑2026 filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated period. The petitioner’s sole prayer was for the expeditious …
The appellants, Shamshad and another, appealed against a summoning order dated 21 January 2026 issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in Complaint Case No. 29 of 2025 (Ramchandra vs. Shamshad). The order was based on sections 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Mau to decide a case filed under Section 27(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner alleged that the case had been pending for an inordinate period without resolution. The court …
The petitioners, Dharmjeet Chauhan and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Kuber Singh Yadav, announced that the petitioners no …
Petitioner Reena Yadav filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17434 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and …
The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, was summoned under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC in Criminal Case No. 15119 of 2022. He filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order, arguing that the two offences cannot arise from the same set of …
The petitioner, Akanksha Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation in which the charge under Section 103 of the B.N.S., 2023 was later substituted by Section 108 of the same Act. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel admitted the factual correctness of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Officer Second, Azamgarh to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.10529 of 2026) under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding was not being conducted expeditiously. The …
Petitioner Neeraj Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Piyush Patel, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the third respondent, Ravi …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash a notice dated 02‑07‑2026 issued under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code that threatened dispossession and demolition of their house on plot No. 1286. They relied on a settlement order dated 07‑01‑2004 confirming their title to the …
The petitioner, Sharik, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17490 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue …
Petitioners Vijay Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings after a charge sheet was filed on 15 July 2026. The State of U.P. submitted that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed. Petitioners did not …
The petitioner, Anupma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the electricity authorities to provide her a residential electricity connection. The respondents, including the state electricity board and distribution companies, indicated that the petitioner’s in-laws objected to the …
The petitioner, married under Hindu rites on 5 March 2025, filed a joint petition for mutual divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act on 16 March 2026. An application to waive the statutory cooling period was filed on 8 April 2026 but was rejected by the family court. The petitioner …
Mohan Chandra filed a revision petition against Awdhesh Kumar in the Allahabad High Court. No parties appeared to prosecute the revision. The Court dismissed the revision petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. No substantive merits of the dispute …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide the pending revenue case Sanjay Pathak v. State of U.P. (Case No. RST/2247/2026) filed under Section 209(Ja) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending for …
The applicant, Shahid, filed a bail cancellation application (No. 278 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Bharat Bhooshan, informed the court that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The opposing counsel, G.A., raised no objection to this …
Aman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18148 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. No counsel appeared for the third respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to …
The petitioner, Mahilal, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Dadri, to conclude demarcation proceedings and decide case No. 15293 of 2025 filed under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the proceeding had …
The petitioner, Pramod, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending fresh passport application. The respondents, Union of India, informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner in connection with a criminal case (case crime no. 64A of …
In Writ No. 28910 of 2026, petitioner Narvada Prasad Pandey filed a petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to decide an application dated 07‑08‑2025. The petitioner’s counsel, Vishal Tandon, specifically prayed for a time‑bound disposal of that application. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and a bank, seeking relief. The High Court ordered the petitioner to deposit a bank draft of Rs. 7,50,000 in favour of the respondent bank by 04‑08‑2026 and to produce proof of deposit. The petitioner failed to appear, sought …
The petitioner, Ankur Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation that had concluded with a final report favoring the accused on 12 April 2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation …
The High Court examined a contempt application filed by Virendra Kumar Srivastav alleging willful defiance of its earlier order dated 27 October 2025 (corrected 17 November 2025) in Writ‑A No. 9777 of 2021, which had quashed recovery orders and directed the respondents to refund Rs 2,20,129. The …
Israr filed an application to cancel the bail granted to Suhail in a criminal case involving sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act. The applicant alleged that Suhail was threatening him to force a settlement and had complained to the Senior Superintendent of Police. The respondent argued that no …
The petitioners, Fariyad Husain and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation, but the investigating agency had already submitted a final report in their favour on 2 July 2026. The petitioners later informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue …
Madhuri filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court against Deepnarayan. The applicant's counsel did not appear to pursue the application. The court noted the lack of prosecution and dismissed the transfer application. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. No …
The petitioner, Sudhiram, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18158 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Om Prakash, informed the court that the petitioner no longer …
The petitioner, Krishan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and six others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the investigation had been completed and the final report was …
Jyoti Tyagi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18144 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. No counsel appeared for the fourth respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Gyanendra Prasad …
Petitioners Saiz Chand and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 04-12-2025 that alleged offences under sections 351(3), 318(4), 352 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and section 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000. The High …
The petitioners filed a contempt application alleging that the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee willfully defied the order dated 09-10-2025 issued in Writ-C No. 30557 of 2025. The respondents produced instructions showing that the writ order had been substantially complied with on 16-09-2026. …
The petitioner, Alam @ Sahre Alam, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18152 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the parties' statements and allowed the …
Petitioners Praduman Joshi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The State and the other respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …
Hareram filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Azamgarh Division, to decide Appeal No. 589/2017 (Triloki vs. Triveni) filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal, arising from a suit …
The petitioners, Kuldeep Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 10 July 2026. …
The petitioners, Urmila Bhartiya and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they wished to withdraw the present …
