Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 2001–2200

BRIJ KISHOR KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Brij Kishor Kushwaha filed a writ petition seeking post‑retiral benefits, having already submitted a representation to the respondent authority. The respondent’s standing counsel argued that the pending representation rendered the writ petition unnecessary. The Court agreed, noting that …

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to remove alleged illegal encroachments on a government drain at Village Lohara, Azamgarh. The court examined instructions from the Deputy District Magistrate showing that the land in question is …

GAUTAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gautam Singh, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash the rejection order and result notification that excluded his roll number from the list of qualified candidates for the post of Enforcement Constable, and also sought mandamus for the production of raw CCTV footage and …

SMT. NASHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering in their peaceful marital life and directing police protection. They submitted proof of age, identity documents, and a registered marriage …

ABDUL RAHIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Abdul Rahim filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to decide a representation he had submitted on 24-10-2025. The petition alleged that the representation remained pending. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents …

ARUN KUMAR PREMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arun Kumar Premi, filed a writ petition seeking mandatory orders for his promotion to Administrative Officer (due since 09-10-2019) and Senior Administrative Officer (due on 29-01-2026) along with all related service benefits. He also requested the court to direct the respondents to …

KAPIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kapil Kumar, a Part Time Instructor of Health and Physical Education since 2013, sought a writ directing the respondents to renew his contract and allow him to resume duties after his services were not renewed beyond the 2022-2023 session without notice or hearing. He also requested …

VINAY VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinay Verma, had been engaged as a Part‑Time Instructor (Computer Education) at a composite school in Pilibhit since 2013, with his contract last renewed for the 2023‑2024 session. After that session he was not permitted to continue, without any notice or hearing, and he filed a writ …

ABHINAY YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a part‑time instructor since 2013, was unable to attend duty after an accident on 19‑Oct‑2024 and received a show‑cause notice on 26‑Dec‑2024. He replied on 8‑Jan‑2025 but no decision was taken on his request for renewal of contract and payment of honorarium. The petitioner filed a …

RAJEEV KUMAR PANDEYversusT.K. SHIBU

The High Court considered a contempt petition filed in 2026 alleging that the opposite party had recovered Rs.98,560 from the applicant’s salary in violation of a 2009 order restraining such recovery. The petition sought to hold the opposite party in contempt for non‑compliance. The Court examined …

SMT MANASHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a man and woman who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection. They alleged that family members were threatening and harassing them, and they had applied for …

MAISAR JAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Maisar Jaha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and another respondent to release a family pension. The petitioner had already submitted a representation on 22 June 2026 to the second respondent regarding the same grievance. The court noted that …

MALTI @ MALTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Malti Devi under Section 482 CrPC in a case where a charge‑sheet had already been filed for the alleged suicide of a deceased woman. The applicant claimed innocence, cooperation with the investigation, and highlighted that the …

UMA RAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Uma Ram and Lal Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, were charged under Sections 80(2), 85 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that there was no material linking them to any dowry harassment and that the …

RAVI SHANKAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Ravi Shankar Verma, a 64‑year‑old former manager accused of sanctioning fake scholarships and misappropriating Rs.26,700. The FIR, lodged in 2009, alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, …

JUBAIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Jubair under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 340(2), 336 and 338 of the IPC. This was a second application after the first was withdrawn to allow the applicant to explain his …

PAWAN KUMARversusNIDHI BANSAL DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION) MEDICAL & HEALTH

Pawan Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that Nidhi Bansal willfully defied the order dated 23 June 2026 in Writ‑A No. 9157 of 2026. The Court required notice to the opposite party, but the applicant’s standing counsel appeared and produced the instructions and a copy of the order dated 23 …

DEVENDRAPAL SINGHversusCHETAN GARG AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a temporary injunction (6C) application filed in Original Suit No. 412 of 2026. The lower court had already issued notices and granted an ad interim injunction, and the defendant had filed objections. The High Court, …

ROOPCHANDversusASHFAQUE ALAM ANSARI, CONSOLIDATION OFFICER SADAR -II

The applicant, Roopchand, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Ashfaque Alam Ansari, willfully defied the order dated 13‑01‑2026 passed in Writ‑B No. 4840 of 2025. The court noted that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had not complied. …

ROJ MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Hafij Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-09-2026 registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner was arrested in the very case. The petitioner, …

M/S MUSKAN TRADING CORPORATION AND 2 OTHERSversusCANARA BANK AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Muskan Trading Corporation and others, approached the Allahabad High Court under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Lucknow, to hear and decide pending applications for interim relief, urgency, and amendment filed in Securitisation Application No. …

MITHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Mithilesh Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to halt and remove illegal encroachments on public utility land in Jaunpur district. The petition alleged that respondents 5 and 6 had constructed structures on …

BHAGWANDIN SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhagwandin Shukla, who was implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant had previously been granted limited anticipatory bail …

SUSHILA MAURYAversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sushila Maurya, filed a writ petition seeking that the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission treat her as a qualified candidate for the post of Health Worker (Mahila) by awarding 15 marks for her contractual service, despite a wrong roll number on her experience …

VINITA DEVI AND 38 OTHERSversusMR MUKESH KHARWAR

The applicants filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 17 September 2025 in Writ‑A No. 13974 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party, but compliance had not been achieved. The court observed that a prima facie …

SHUBHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shubhan, was charged under Sections 64(1), 77, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Section 67A of the I.T. Act for allegedly circulating an explicit video of the victim on Instagram. The applicant sought bail, arguing that the victim’s statements recorded during trial differed from earlier …

AFASARI KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts …

SEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Seema, who was alleged to have abetted the suicide of her sister‑in‑law under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that she was innocent, that the FIR was lodged with an unexplained delay, and that there was no …

SMT. MAMATA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Mamata Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a government authority, to pay Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation for the accidental death of her husband under the Chief Minister Farmer Accident Welfare Scheme, and to decide a …

UMESH CHANDRA TRIPATHIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Umesh Chandra Tripathi filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an encroachment by respondent No. 6 on plot No. 46 (Sector Road) in Village Tadwa Khurd, Gorakhpur. The petition alleged that respondent No. 4, a local authority, should be ordered to ensure the removal. …

CHANDRA KISOR SINGH AND 82 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a group of 83 employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant them an additional increment/selection grade after completing 19 years of service, pending a representation they had filed. The petitioners argued that the representation …

LAVKUSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Lavkush applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 179 of 2026) involving alleged offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, was not the driver of the vehicle, and that the only allegation was a minor …

SONI @ SONIYA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Soni @ Soniya Devi, mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act in a dowry‑death case. She argued that there was no material linking her to any cruelty or harassment and that the presumption of …

SMT. RITUversusGEETA CHAUDHARY, DISTICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt. Ritu, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties, Geeta Chaudhary and another, willfully defied the High Court’s order dated 28‑04‑2026 in Writ (A) No. 6076 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of that order, the opposite …

RAMESH PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusCHANDRIKA ALIAS MUNNA AND 19 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandauli, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 711 of 2022. The petition argued that the application had remained undecided for an unreasonable period. …

ASHISH KUMARversusSHRI SAMUEL PAUL N., AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashish Kumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied an order dated 08‑04‑2026 issued in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.1989 of 2025. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served but compliance had not occurred. While …

AADILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Aadil, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 68 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court noted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and his alleged involvement was based primarily …

SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents to grant him the third promotional pay scale/grade pay of Rs.4600 and the benefits and arrears of the 7th Pay Commission after completing 26 years of service. …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Santosh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 22 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 49, 317(5), 318(4), 351(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The court considered the facts, the applicant’s clean criminal record, and the …

SATYAM SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satyam Singh, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Divisional Manager, Railway, which rejected his claim for a compassionate appointment. The petitioner argued that the rejection was arbitrary and sought judicial intervention. The Union of India contended that the …

ILYASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ilyas, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 10 September 2026 that had rejected his earlier application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Session Trial concerning offences under various …

PAWAN AGARWALversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a sale notice and auction of a property by Union Bank of India, a refund of Rs.1,53,73,440 deposited by him, restraint on forfeiture of that amount, production of title and auction records, and compensation for alleged fraud. The petition also …

SAMEER @ GULAM MAUHIDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sameer @ Gulam Mauhiddin, was implicated in a criminal case (Cr. No. 382 of 2026) alleging rape based on a false promise of marriage, with the complainant a 37‑year‑old widow who had maintained a consensual relationship with him for about a year. The applicant contended that the FIR …

RADHE SHYAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Radhe Shyam, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No. 53 of 2026) in which nine persons were alleged to have assaulted the informant's father and grandfather, the latter dying from head injuries. The FIR named the applicant among the accused but did not assign him a …

MAHARJ SINGHversusMANMOHAN SINGH

Maharj Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Konch, Jalaun, to decide a 7‑C2 application pending in Original Suit No. 399 of 2023. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending served no useful purpose and disposed of it …

OM PRAKASH AND ANOTHERversusRAMA DEVI

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-11, Prayagraj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 2178 of 2023. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

CHHOTE LAL AHIRWARversusRAM CHARAN AND ANOTHER

Chhote Lal Ahirwar filed a petition challenging an order, alleging it was not appealable. The Court examined whether the order fell within the ambit of an appealable order under Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. It held that the order was indeed appealable under the said …

SMT PINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Pinki Devi filed a writ petition challenging a 19 September 2025 order of the District Development Officer, Basti, which reverted her basic pay scale. The petitioner sought to add the Chief Development Officer as respondent No. 6, alleging that an appeal against the order was already pending …

DEEPAK SARASWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Deepak Saraswat filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner sought dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed and requested liberty to approach the appropriate forum for relief. The …

VIPIN MITTALversusAJAY VERMA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Auraiya to decide a pending temporary injunction application (23-C) in Suit No. 109 of 2026 within a fixed time. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending …

SMT. JAGDAMBA @ SANVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jagdamba @ Sanvi and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requested police protection. They submitted school certificates proving they are above 18 and …

SMT. SAKSHI SINGH AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Sakshi Singh and 12 others, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order, arguing that the order was issued pursuant to a Division Bench decision in Special Appeal No. 398 of 2026. They sought to stay or withdraw the writ petition because they intended to intervene in the …

DINESH KUMAR AND 24 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners, a group of 25 government employees, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to grant them a Grade Pay of Rs. 4600 and revised pay scale benefits as per the 7th Pay Commission, including arrears and interest. They argued that their 16 years of …

SONAM GAUTAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sonam Gautam and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel submitted that a criminal case (FIR) under Sections 87 and 61(2) BNS had already been lodged, rendering the petition unnecessary. The petitioners did …

GHANSHYAM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ghanshyam and four others, claimed peaceful possession of a 0.114‑hectare plot (Arazi No.151M) in Saurai Khurd, Uttar Pradesh, and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the land until the disposal of their appeal under Section 38(1) …

MANTU YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Mantu Yadav filed a petition under Article 226 seeking disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (IPC Section 363) was pending against him. The Court observed that the petitioner must first comply with the …

VISHNU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Vishnu filed a habeas corpus petition claiming his wife Sapna Bharti is being illegally detained by her father Sunil Bharti in Gaya, Bihar, after their marriage. The petitioner lodged a police complaint but the wife has not been recovered and the father remains at large. The High Court …

SANDEEP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Sandeep Kumar filed a writ petition seeking the allotment of a fair price shop at Village Sikari, Tehsil Rajapur, District Chitrakoot. The Gram Panchayat had approved the proposal in an open meeting and forwarded the documents to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate on 17‑12‑2025, but the State …

M/S HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LTD.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

M/s Hinduja Housing Finance Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 26.03.2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which dismissed various applications due to the petitioner's non‑appearance. The petitioner had earlier approached the High Court for expediting the …

SMT. ROSHNI PARIHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Roshni Parihar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted school certificates and a marriage registration application to demonstrate that both …

AJIT CHAUBEYversusSULTAN SINGH

The applicant, Ajit Chaubey, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Sultan Singh, willfully defied an order dated 20‑02‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 2547 of 2026. The court examined whether a contempt proceeding should be initiated and whether notice should be issued. While it …

KIRAN LATAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kiran Lata, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved an application seeking to withdraw the petition while requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The court examined the petitioner's request and, invoking its inherent powers, allowed the …

MANJEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manjeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 146 of 2026) under Section 318(4) of the BNS and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, alleging involvement in a financial fraud. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no money was ever transferred to his bank account, and …

MONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Moni filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay the trial proceedings arising under the SC/ST (P.A.) Act. The applicant also requested that the trial court decide his bail application expeditiously, emphasizing that he is a lady. The State did not …

RAJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusRAJ KUMAR GUPTA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed by Raj Kumar Pandey and another against Sub Divisional Magistrate Raj Kumar Gupta for allegedly failing to comply with an order dated 25 March 2026 issued in PIL No. 756 of 2026. The applicant claimed that despite service of the order, …

SHAH MUHAMMADversusDOODHNAT

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Maharajganj, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 377 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

HARIOM GUPTAversusALOK KUMAR GUPTA

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Aligarh to expedite the disposal of an original suit pending since 2015. The petitioner relied on a recent Supreme Court decision that, except in exceptional circumstances, …

NOORSABA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

The applicant, Noorsaba Khatoon, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal and, finding no objection, dismissed the …

SMT. BHARATLALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Bharatlali and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. Both parties are adults who voluntarily solemnised their marriage and have applied for its …

SMT. SARITA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from private respondents. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming a consensual …

NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nadeem, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(b)(1)(17) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart and citing prior bail in two other criminal matters. He had been in custody …

REEMA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Kasya, Kushinagar to decide a pending revenue proceeding within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding was not being conducted expeditiously. …

CHHAVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Chhavi and another, adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order directing the police not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide security. They claimed they were …

AMIRversusSHEKH IBRAHIM AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Amir, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C2) in Suit No. 182 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an …

CHANDRABHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Chandrabhan, the father‑in‑law of a woman who had died by suicide, who was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …

PRIYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a protection order against interference by family members and a directive to the police to ensure their safety. They alleged threats and harassment that endangered their peaceful …

MANISH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Manish Rajbhar filed a writ petition challenging disciplinary and criminal proceedings instituted against him under Sections 7, 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner argued that the concurrent proceedings violated his rights and sought relief from the High …

RAM KISHUNversusSITAPATI

The petition filed by Ram Kishun challenged an order that was deemed appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioner, represented by counsel Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, sought relief from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The Court examined whether the order …

DHARAMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Dharampal Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to protect his life and property and to compel the authorities to decide his application regarding a 1/3 share in a land parcel. The Court observed that the relief sought amounts to an injunction arising out of a …

ADITYA RAJ AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Aditya Raj and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 48 of 2022) arising from offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The application was presented before the …

RAJPATI GAUR ALIAS RAJPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Rajpati Gaur filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove encroachments and illegal constructions on a pathway recorded as "Banjar" in the revenue records of Village Bagdaha Hawasabad. The respondents' standing counsel raised …

SONAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult interfaith partners in a live‑in relationship, sought a permanent injunction under Article 226 of the Constitution directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The court …

VIKASH SONKARversusSHWETA SONKAR

The petitioner, Vikash Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mau, to decide his pending divorce case (No. 257/2021) within a stipulated period. The petition alleged that the divorce petition had …

BABAR ALI KHANversusMOHIBURRAHMAN AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Babar Ali Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of a miscellaneous civil appeal (No. 28 of 2026) that was pending due to an objection by the defendant on its maintainability. The underlying civil suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution, …

RAM LAL JAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Lal Jayan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a further investigation, transfer of the investigation, and a supplementary charge sheet in a criminal case pending before the Special Judge. The applicant alleged that without these orders he would suffer irreparable loss. …

ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND 14 OTHERS5versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Director of the Printing and Stationery Department, U.P. Government Press, to decide their representation dated 07-08-2026 and to grant them pay scale and service benefits akin to similarly situated candidates. The petitioners …

RAKESH SINGH @ DABBUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rakesh Singh alias Dabbu, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the criminal proceedings, charge sheet, and cognizance order instituted under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The trial court …

KISHUN DEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Kishun Dev filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State to evict illegal encroachments on a public road in Ahirauli Lala, Deoria. The petition alleged that respondents 6‑8 were occupying 0.160 hectare of road land. The respondents’ standing counsel argued that …

SANTOSH KUMAR SAROJversusSTATE OF U.P.

Santosh Kumar Saroj applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and was only accused because he owned the …

MADHU SINGHversusRAM KUMAR

Madhu Singh filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, Division, Court No.5, Kanpur Nagar to decide an interim injunction application in Suit No.38 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the petition pending would serve no useful purpose and …

VIPIN MITTALversusAJAY VERMA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vipin Mittal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of District Auraiya to decide Suit No. 109 of 2020 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …

SUNEEL RAJPOOTversusSTATE OF U.P.

Suneel Rajpoot applied for bail in a case registered as Crime No. 03 of 2024, involving alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 120‑B of the IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only basis for …

ASHOK KUMAR PATELversusMANISH KUMAR VERMA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Patel, filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate and others willfully defied a High Court order dated 6 October 2025 in PIL No.2933 of 2025, which directed the State to remove obstructions, hindrances and illegal encroachments. The court noted that …

FAIZ TAIMURIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Faiz Taimuri, challenged his suspension dated 09.07.2026, alleging it violated the proviso to Regulation 4(i) of the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 2020, which permits suspension only when the allegations, if proved, would ordinarily …

SATISH CHANDRA TIWARIversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Satish Chandra Tiwari, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and later moved an application to withdraw the petition. The court entertained the withdrawal request, allowed the prayer, and consequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …

RAMESH CHANDRAversusDHARAMRAJ AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 342 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been left undecided for an …

RAJPALversusCHHATRAPAL AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Baheri, Bareilly, to decide a suit (Case No. 108/2024) expeditiously. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

SUBBA RAMversusRADHIKA RANI AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner Subba Ram filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Varanasi, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1842 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking payment of pension arrears dating from December 2016 to August 2020 under the fifth amendment to the 2016 Rules of the U.P. Nagar Panchayat Akendriyat Seva Nirvatti Labh. The respondents argued that the grievance should be dealt with by the …

TIJIYA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Tijiya Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, lacking any material showing she harassed the deceased for dowry, and that the …

DR. VIMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Vimal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking an interim mandamus directing the State to release his salary and Special ACP benefits payable after 17 and 24 years of service, along with interest. He had also submitted a representation/application for the same relief, which was …

SUNITA GAUTAM AND 12 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sunita Gautam and 12 others, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order. They contended that the order was issued pursuant to a Division Bench order in Special Appeal No. 398 of 2026 (Saurabh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.). The petitioners sought a stay on the writ …

MANOJ KUMAR AND 35 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners, who are constables with 19 years of service, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking an additional increment of pay, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The petitioners argued that the legal position affirmed in those judgments …

SUDHIR KUMAR DUBEY AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sudhir Kumar Dubey and 13 others, filed Writ‑A No. 15492 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition was found to be deficient because it was not pressed with the specific details required for a writ …

RAJKUMARversusHIMANSHU NAGPAL

The applicant, Rajkumar, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Himanshu Nagpal, willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 08‑04‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13479 of 2026. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, without issuing a …

RAM MURTI MISHRAversusTHE U.P. STATE PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Ram Murti Mishra filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Uttar Pradesh State Public Service Tribunal to expeditiously decide his pending claim petition (No. 2343/2018). The petition contained no other relief and no counter‑affidavit was filed. The High …

KARTIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kartik applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 523 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, Section 109(1) of the BNS Act, and Sections 3, 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, Gaurav, had already been released on bail in a …

SHANI KUMAR SAROJ @ RITIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shani Kumar Saroj, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that he was falsely implicated in four base cases from 2024 and that …

GAURA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gaura Devi and her partner, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that they have …

KUVAR ANSHUMAN PAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 26‑10‑2022 in a complaint case filed under sections 406, 417 and 420 of the IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated and that the trial court had not applied any …

SHAHID KHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Shahid Khan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents informed the Court that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case (IPC §§ 506, 504, 323, 452) pending against him. The Court observed …

GULABI DEVIversusCHANDRAKALA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gulabi Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Azamgarh, to decide a 7‑C2 application filed in Suit No. 1702 of 2026. The High Court examined the petition at the admission stage and found that keeping the matter …

KAPIL DEV SINGH AND 14 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they prayed for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The learned counsel for the petitioners made this prayer before the court. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition as …

AMIRversusSHAH ABID AND 2 OTHERS

Amir filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7‑C2) in Suit No. 816 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending for …

BABURAM THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Baburam Thakur filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.131 in Village Baraitha, Deoria. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar …

SMT. ROSHNI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Roshni Devi and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that they have …

BRIJESH KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSMT RAMA DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Bidhuna to decide Suit No. 584 of 2023 within a specific time frame. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which …

ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public‑interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No. 91‑Ka (0.3870 hectare) in Mauja Kharaujha, Chandauli. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar …

SMT. RANKU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted proof of age, affidavits, and …

BIRENDRA PRAJAPATI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Birendra Prajapati and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection. They asserted that both are of legal age, have voluntarily married, have registered their …

RAJA JANAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Raja Janak Singh filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the Executive Engineer (Commercial Vertical‑2, Madyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Bareilly) to decide on the petitioner’s reply dated 29‑08‑2026, which was filed in response to a notice dated 01‑08‑2026. The respondents argued that the …

RAMESH SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Ramesh Shukla filed a writ petition seeking the speedy disposal of his appeal (Appeal No. 111/B) filed under Section 13(1) of the U.P. Essential Commodities (Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016 before the Commissioner, Azamgarh Division. The petitioner argued that the appeal had …

RAJ AHIRWAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and related proceedings, claiming they were falsely implicated and that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute. The State did not object to a compromise being filed in the trial court. The …

SMT POOJA KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage …

BRIJESH KUMARversusAMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 13, Allahabad, to decide his civil suit (Original Suit No. 0724/2015) within a stipulated time, alleging irreparable loss if delayed. The High Court …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Om Prakash filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to remove illegal encroachments on specific village lands. The petitioners argued that the encroachments violated land records and demanded immediate court …

NAUSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Naushad filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a criminal case (Crime No.183 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the BNSS, fearing arrest. The State opposed, arguing the application was not maintainable because the alleged offences did not carry a …

TASNEEM @ TASLEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tasneem @ Tasleem, applied for bail in an arms‑related case (Crime No. 111 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5, 9, 25, 29 and 26(2) of the Arms Act. The applicant was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement rested mainly on a confessional statement of a …

AMAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Aman Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 22 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 49, 317(5), 318(4), 351(2), 352 of the BNS Act and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The court considered the facts, the evidence, the fact that a co‑accused, Satyam Singh, …

SUBHAWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhawati Devi, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and two other respondents to allot and regularise a staff quarter in Kanpur, to decide her pending representations dated 15‑1‑2015, 15‑12‑2021 and 18‑9‑2025, and to restrain dispossession from the said …

ANAND PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Anand Prakash filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and another respondent to regularize staff quarter No. 4/5, Shashtri Nagar, in his favour, invoking several government orders and prior decisions, and also to order the respondents to decide his representations dated …

ARCHANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Archana, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested that the application be dismissed as withdrawn. The court accepted the request and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No …

DHARMENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking payment of his salary from 8 May 2020 to 10 July 2022 and full salary during his suspension, along with other benefits. He had earlier filed a representation before the respondent authority on 19 January 2026. The respondent’s …

SMT. URMILAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Smt. Urmila filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act in a criminal case. She later requested to withdraw this application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court. The State, represented by the A.G., raised no …

BALISTAR SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State officials to delete their names from the Electoral List of Nagar Palika Parishad, Jaswant Nagar, Etawah, and to register them in the final Electoral List of the Gram Panchayat, Khitaura, Mahewa Development …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Salman, was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act in a case registered at Airport police station, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, …

SHAMIM AHMADversusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a fresh direction for the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, to hear and decide Revision No. 2512 of 2016 within a time frame set by the court. The High Court had earlier, on 1 November 2023, ordered the Board to dispose of the revision within six months of …

SURAJ TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Suraj Tiwari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 185 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a knife under several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to village politics and argued that the medico‑legal report did not corroborate the injuries alleged …

AYUSH KUMAR TOMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ayush Kumar Tomar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently moved an application for withdrawal of the petition. The court entertained the application and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive …

ANJALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a consenting adult couple, applied for registration of their marriage and sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life by family members who threatened them. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming their free will to cohabit. The …

RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS RAMESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 331 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj, to decide appeal No. 2322 of 2025 (Rakesh Kumar alias Ramesh Kumar v. State of U.P.) which had been …

ALKA RAOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Alka Rao, challenged a transfer order issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner argued that the order was already being contested in Special Appeal No. 398 of 2026 (Saurabh Kumar Singh & 6 Others vs. State of U.P. & 5 Others) and therefore the …

VIJAY SHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Vijay Shankar filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Consolidation Officer, Sadar, Ballia, to decide his pending case (Case No. 0118 of 2023) within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending since 2023 and that a judicial direction was necessary for …

GOMTI DEVIversusABIDA BEGUM AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gomti Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaushambi, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (Paper No. 6‑C) in Suit No. 44 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …

VIKAS THAKUR @ ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Vikas Thakur applied for bail in an abduction case (CrPC Sec. 140(1) & 61(2)(a)) alleging false implication. The FIR alleged that he, along with two others, assaulted and abducted the complainant, but the victim later released him with villagers' indulgence and only simple injuries were …

JAMILAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Jamila in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 156 grams of alprazolam, slightly above the commercial quantity threshold. The court noted the absence of independent public witnesses, the pending …

MANJU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Manju Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a public authority, to consider her pending application dated 24-08-2026 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner alleged that the authority had not yet …

NIRMLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Nirmla Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent, a government authority, to consider her pending application dated 24-08-2026 within a short period. The petitioner alleged that the authority had not yet acted on her application. The …

YUVRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Yuvraj Singh applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 144 of 2026, charged under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co-accused, Sarvesh @ Rahul Singh, had already been granted bail in a similar case. The court examined the material on record, …

PULKIT CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Pulkit Chaudhary, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving alleged assault with an iron rod, for which the FIR named four other persons but not him. He argued that he was implicated only due to a family relationship and that no specific act was attributed to …

SMT. MRIDULATAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Mridulata, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings pending against parties 2 to 5 in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 354 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant asserted that a …

BANK OF MAHARASHTRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

The petition titled Bank of Maharashtra v. State of U.P. and 12 Others (Writ No. 38722 of 2026) was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. After hearing the arguments, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court, …

MUJEEB MIANversusSHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD

Mujeeb Mian filed a contempt application against Rajendra Prasad alleging willful defiance of a February 19, 2026 order of the Allahabad High Court in Writ‑A No. 22365 of 2018. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the opposite party had not complied with the writ order. …

NAND KISHOR SHARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a police personnel, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider his entitlement to financial/pay upgradation under Government Orders dated 05.11.2014 and 03.03.2015 after a full review of his service records. He also requested that the …

SMT. MUSHKAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, both adults, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital cohabitation and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar proof of age, FIR details, and statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C. …

SANSKRIT DEGREE COLLEGE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petition under Article 227 sought direction on a suit where the plaintiffs had moved for a temporary injunction and the defendants had filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The High Court noted that ordinarily the lower court decides the maintainability of the suit by …

SHANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shanti Devi, who is serving as In‑charge Headmaster, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the payment of her salary and arrears pursuant to a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026, and also asked the court to compel the respondents to decide a representation dated 08‑09‑2026 …

SMT USHA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSHRINIWAS SHARMA

The petitioners, Smt Usha Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Gautam Budh Nagar to decide a specific application (6‑C2) filed in Original Suit No.1289 of 2026. The High Court examined whether it …

DHANESH KUMARversusCHANDRAKALA DEVI AND ANOTHER

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order to expedite a pending Miscellaneous Application (No. 467 of 2024) for restoration of a suit that had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The High Court observed that keeping the writ petition pending served no useful purpose …

PROP HARI SHANKAR AWASTHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Hari Shankar Awasthi filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner acknowledged that the pleadings were not proper and requested liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Hon'ble Judge …

UDHAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Udham Singh, a Gram Vikas Adhikari, filed a writ petition seeking protection and fixation of his pay. He had already submitted a representation to the second respondent on 11 September 2026 regarding the same matter. The standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the …

DHRUV RAJANversusLAXMI SHARMA

The petitioner, Dhruv Rajan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mainpuri, to decide a pending suit (Case No. 127 of 2025) filed under Sections 17 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 on an expedited basis. The petition …

DARKSA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a consenting adult couple, approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection against threats from the private respondent and family members. They submitted evidence of their age …

SURYAMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a decision on his representation dated 24‑08‑2026 for payment of pension and other post‑retiral dues. The respondent's standing counsel argued that the petition was redundant since the representation had already been made and should be dealt with by the …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Deepak applied for bail in a case under Sections 109(1), 118(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged assault on two injured persons. The FIR, lodged by the mother of one injured, alleged that Deepak and another person assaulted the victims, but the defence argued …

SUKHRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sukhram, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the present petition be dismissed, allowing the filing of a fresh writ petition with improved averments and documents. The court considered the request and granted …

AFREEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Afreen and another, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate R.K. Tiwari, submitted a vakalatnama stating that a First Information Report (FIR) had already been lodged in the matter, …

SMT SANJANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Sanjana and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Pradeep Kumar, later informed the court that he did not wish to pursue the petition and sought its dismissal as ‘not pressed’, requesting liberty to file a better petition later. The …

ANJALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Anjali and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, PAN/Aadhaar copies, and a marriage …

SMT. ARTIversusMANISH PANDEY @ SAGAR

The petitioner, Smt. Arti, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.4, Prayagraj to decide her divorce petition (Marriage Petition No.2204 of 2024) under Section 13A of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously. The petitioner argued …

KANCHAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kanchan Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted evidence of their ages, joint affidavits, and that …

GUDDI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Guddi Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR registered against them. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel, withdrew the request for quashing the FIR. The petitioners then asked the Court to grant them liberty to approach a competent …

SUBASH CHAUHANversusKUNWAR SACHIN SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Subash Chauhan, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite parties willfully defied the order dated 09‑06‑2025 in Writ‑C No. 19180 of 2025, which directed them to execute a revenue order dated 07‑07‑2023 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The applicant claimed …

NIRAJ NIGAMversusSMT ANITA GUPTA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Niraj Nigam filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jaunpur, to decide pending Case No.144 of 2025, which involves Section 7(g) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and Sections 7Ka and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The …

SMT. NARGIS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adults who have voluntarily solemnised a marriage, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members and submitted proof of their …

SMT. RANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Rani Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38761 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court, after considering the request, dismissed the present petition but …

KHURSHEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Khurshed, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 196 of 2025) alleging assault with a sharp-edged weapon. He argued that the FIR filed on 21‑07‑2025 was false, that the injuries were caused by a blunt object, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State and the informant …

ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Arun Kumar was arrested for murder under Section 302 IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act after allegedly stabbing a man who intervened in a quarrel with his father. He has been in custody since 29‑April‑2024 and the trial court has examined only four of the 26 proposed witnesses, indicating a …

RAJKUMAR TIWARIversusMUNNALAL TIWARI AND ANOTHER

The petition concerned a house inherited by two brothers, Rajkumar Tiwari (petitioner) and Munnalal Tiwari (respondent No.1), whose father had purchased. No partition of the undivided property had been effected, yet Munnalal sold his share to Bharat Kumar Tiwari (respondent No.2) and began …

SHAYAM SINGH ALIAS SWATANTRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shayam Singh alias Swatantra Singh applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The High Court initially granted interim anticipatory bail on 24‑11‑2025 with a personal bond and several conditions, noting the applicant's claim of a cross‑case and lack of …

RAMAUTARversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramautar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21814 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State and others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mohd. Shahrukh, informed the Court that the petition had become …

MUKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mukesh Kumar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.202 of 2024) involving offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The informant’s counsel informed the court that the trial had already concluded and the applicant had been convicted …

SONU AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge sheet and the POCSO trial (S.T. No. 363 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was …

VINDHYACHAL YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet dated 17‑11‑2020 and the pending criminal trial (S.T. No. 50 of 2023) involving offences under various IPC sections. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the trial …

SUSHIL SINGHAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sushil Singhal and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 518/9 of 2018) arising from a 2015 offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 316 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that …

ASHU SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashu Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 5278/9 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 316, 377 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …

SMT. RAM KALIversusLALTA AND OTHERS

The appellant, Smt. Ram Kali (deceased), filed a criminal appeal (No. 2972 of 1981) challenging the acquittal of the respondents, Lalta and others. The appeal was pursued on behalf of the deceased appellant by her legal heirs. During the proceedings, the legal heirs expressed that they did not wish …

DARUN PAL SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appellants – Darun Pal Singh, Jiledar Singh, Smt. Lajjawati, Prahlad Singh and Ved Pal Singh – filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the first three appellants, and the State was represented by A.G.A. The Court noted that the appeal of the first three …