Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 1801–2000

RAVINDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ravindra applied for enlargement of bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 474 of 2024) involving charges of assault causing grievous hurt under Sections 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The first bail application had been rejected, and the applicant argued that he is innocent, that no witness …

HAPPY @ HARPREETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Happy @ Harpreet, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 367 of 2025) alleging assault under IPC Sections 351(3), 352, 3(5) and 109(1). He claimed innocence, asserted that no incriminating material was recovered from him, and argued that the …

SURABHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Saurabh, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged sexual offences against a 12‑year‑old boy under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 of the IPC and Sections 5M(L) and 6 of the POCSO Act. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication due to …

YOGESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Yogesh Kumar, filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 313 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 3(5) and 109(1) of the IPC, alleging grievous injuries to the victim. He argued that only five of the fourteen …

ARATI DEVIversusMISS. ARCHANA AGNIHOTRI, SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The High Court of Allahabad heard a civil contempt application filed by Arati Devi against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Archana Agnihotri for allegedly refusing to obey an order dated 15‑09‑2025 in Writ‑C No.32065 of 2025. The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy, the order …

PRIYANK TIWARI @ PRIYANK KUMAR TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a contractual medical officer, challenged an order dated 10 September 2026 that transferred him from Community Health Centre, Jakhaura to Community Health Centre, Madawara in Lalitpur district. He contended that the terms of his contract and two government circulars (dated 22 August …

PRITI CHAUDHARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged Advertisement No. 11-Exam/2024 for the post of Health Worker (Female), alleging that only 435 of the 4,892 vacancies were earmarked for Scheduled Caste (SC) candidates, amounting to 8.8% instead of the statutorily mandated 21% reservation. They sought certiorari to quash …

AJITversusMRS. SHRUTI, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Ajit filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate willfully disobeyed an order dated 17‑10‑2025 of the Special Judge (Gangster Act) in Criminal Misc. Case No. 314 of 2023, which directed the release of Ajit's attached property after the appeal period expired. The High Court …

ARJUN SINGH ALIAS DHEERAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Arjun Singh, filed a bail application after the trial had concluded and he had been acquitted. The applicant's counsel argued that the bail petition was now moot. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection. The Court examined whether a bail …

SHARDA PRASAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sharda Prasad and another, challenged two office orders dated 29‑12‑2016 and 05‑01‑2017 that directed their removal from contractual Technical Assistant posts after attaining the age of 62. They sought a writ of certiorari to quash the orders and a mandamus directing the respondents …

SMT. AYSHA AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. & 3 Others

The petitioners filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that Aysha, the corpus, had been forcibly detained by her father, Mohd. Anees, after purportedly marrying Nadim on 20 July 2023, and that the marriage document was forged. The father denied the allegations, claiming the Nikahnama was forged and …

M/S LORDS DISTILLERY LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, licensed distilleries, challenged a demand of Rs 54,52,731 for QR‑code costs imposed by the Uttar Pradesh Excise Department without any show‑cause notice or hearing. They argued that the demand violated natural justice, was based on an audit objection rather than an independent …

MOHAMMAD SUHAILversusD.M.ALLAHABAD AND OTHERS

The petitioner, originally appointed as a Seasonal Collection Amin and later temporarily promoted to Collection Amin, was terminated under the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975 after a show‑cause notice revealed that his appointment was based on an …

PREETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash a trial‑court order that dismissed a Section 311 CrPC application for cross‑examination of the victim (PW‑2) in a POCSO case. The trial court had held that the opportunity for cross‑examination had lapsed and relied on …

VIRENDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a former police constable dismissed in 1993, obtained a reversal of his termination from the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal in 2000, which directed that he be reinstated and granted all consequential benefits. The Tribunal's order was affirmed by the High Court in 2017, …

BIJJI ALIAS VIJAY ALIAS BRIJESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Bijji alias Vijay alias Brijesh was arrested in connection with a murder case (Criminal No. 165 of 2023) and alleged violations of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement stems solely from the confessional statement of co‑accused Shahbaz. The sole eyewitness, …

RISHI TYAGI AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 16 of 2021) against Rishi Tyagi and others under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants …

DINESH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused-applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a quash of proceedings. During the pendency of that application, three of the accused (Hemraj, Sher Singh and Malkhan) died. The counsel for the applicants thereafter moved a withdrawal application, …

CHHOTU VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Chhotu Verma was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence, including an alleged illicit relationship and motive, the recovery of an axe, and the presence of the victim's body in the house. The trial court relied on hostile statements from …

HARDEV SINGHversusS.P.E./C.B.I. DEHRADUN

The appellant, Hardev Singh, filed a criminal appeal (No. 3212 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, counsel for the appellant informed the court that Hardev Singh had died on 16 October 2022. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, issued a report on 9 September …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nirmala Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the criminal proceedings arising from a dowry‑related FIR. The deceased, married to the …

STATE OF UP AND ANOTHERversusRAM KISHORE AND ANOTHER

The Department of Minor Irrigation, State of U.P., challenged a Labour Court award that reinstated a workman and ordered back wages without giving the employer an opportunity to prove the charges against him. The petitioner argued that this violated the principles of natural justice, citing Supreme …

SARFARAZ ALAM AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ No. 56210 of 2009) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, petitioners informed the Court that subsequent developments had rendered the petition moot. No opposition was raised by the private …

SUMAN PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Suman Patel and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove they are major and …

SMT MALA TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt Mala Tiwari, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 376D, 354‑C, 342, 506, 323, 120B/34 of the IPC and Sections 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the informant had a …

PAWANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Pawan, along with his two brothers, was named in an FIR alleging that he assaulted the deceased with a spade, causing injuries that led to death. The applicant contended that the FIR statements were unreliable, the post‑mortem report suggested injuries could have resulted from a fight …

MOHD. FAROOKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd. Farookh's arms licence was cancelled on the ground of his involvement in a criminal case, although he was later acquitted. He appealed the cancellation, but the appeal was dismissed. The petitioner sought permission to file a fresh application for a licence, arguing that the earlier …

KIRAN PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U P AND 5 OTHERS

The case concerned a dispute over the mutation of land belonging to the estate of the late Dharampal Singh. In a partition suit under Section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, the court had determined Dharampal Singh’s share to be one‑fourth of 9.854 hectares. A …

M/S AMPH FASHION PVT. LTD.versusAUTHORITY UNDER UP INDUSTRIAL PEACE AND 2 OTHERS

The Trade Union filed an application alleging that contract workers employed by B.S. Enterprises for Amph Fashion Pvt. Ltd were not paid wages, bonuses or statutory benefits. The Additional Labour Court, after the contractor failed to appear, ordered Amph Fashion to pay the workers under Section 21 …

AMIT TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Amit Tyagi, a senior sub‑editor at Amar Ujala, sought a reference of his wage‑board dispute to a Labour Court under Section 17 of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1955. The Labour Court dismissed the reference, holding it lacked jurisdiction because …

ANTRIKSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Antriksh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Session Case No. 883 of 2022) against Bharat Singh and others, which involved offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The applicant later indicated that the …

MOHAN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6950 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement, which was verified by the …

ANJALI MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals of different faiths in a live‑in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them. The court observed that a similar matter had been decided in Noori …

JAN AUSHADHI MEDICAL STORE AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator. The arbitration agreement between the parties contains a clause stipulating that the place of arbitration shall be Lucknow. Respondents raised a preliminary …

SMT. SIMRAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Simran and her partner, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They asserted that they had solemnised their marriage of …

SMT MAMTA KUMARI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The revisionists, Smt Mamta Kumari and two others, filed a criminal revision challenging the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's order rejecting their application for discharge in a case under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. After the trial court later framed …

ASHIF AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashif and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted on 17 March 2026. The petitioners' …

SAURABH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Saurabh Yadav, accused of rape, blackmail, and recording an obscene video of the victim. The prosecution alleged that the accused forced the victim into sexual intercourse after blackmail, while the defense highlighted a delayed FIR, lack of …

MANJEET PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, husband of a woman who died by suicide within seven years of marriage, sought bail in a criminal case filed under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, 1961. He claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and that the charge sheet …

PURAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Puran Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to decide his application dated 08.05.2026, which sought protection against police interference in cutting popular and eucalyptus trees on his land in Muzaffarnagar. The …

BRIJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijesh Kumar, filed a writ petition alleging that the State and other respondents had marked his agricultural land (Gata No. 664) for the construction of a chakroad, which he contended should be laid in the adjoining Gata No. 641. The petitioner claimed that his land was under …

SMT. SARITA @ SAVITAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Sarita @ Savita, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Ghaziabad to decide her appeal under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and to stay the execution of an ex‑parte order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the …

AMIT TYAGIversusSHRI PRATIT SINGH, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL- DADRI AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Amit Tyagi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including the Tehsildar and the NOIDA Authority, had violated the status‑quo order dated 15 Oct 2025 issued in Writ C No. 33691 of 2025, which restrained any further development or alienation of certain land in …

JAUNIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jauni, was arrested in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25210 of 2026 in connection with Crime No. 245 of 2026, alleged to have participated in an assault that resulted in the death of the informant's son. The FIR was lodged on 31 May 2026, four days after the incident, and the …

SALAUDDIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Salauddin and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from Case Crime No. 361 of 2025, which involved multiple offences under the BNSS. During the hearing, the applicants' counsel …

JOKHAI AND ANOTHERversusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Jokhai and another filed a writ petition challenging a guarantee they had signed for a loan advanced by the Government of India. The petitioners admitted that they had executed the guarantee documents. The Court examined the original records and, noting the admission, declined to grant …

UTTIM CHAUHANversusMISS AKANKSHA MISHRA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

The applicant, Uttim Chauhan, filed a contempt petition alleging that the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Akanksha Mishra, failed to comply with a September 8, 2025 order in Writ C No. 31030, which required her to consider the applicant's application. The court noted that instructions had been produced …

SMT MEENU RANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The State was ordered to produce Smt. Meenu Rani, a 31‑year‑old woman, before the Allahabad High Court under a habeas corpus petition. Upon interaction, she disclosed that she had married Ashwani Kumar on 16 March 2026 and wished to reside with him, while currently staying at her parental home. The …

RIZWAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rizwan and Shahid were arrested in connection with a case involving alleged recovery of a mobile phone, Aadhaar card and SIM card, and charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Information Technology Act. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated, noting the …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ajay was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging that he, along with two others, abducted Rohit over a money dispute. He has been in custody since 04‑06‑2026 and filed a bail application under CrPC provisions. The State opposed bail but did not dispute the factual background. The Court examined …

SHARAD KUMAR PANDEYversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sharad Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to issue his experience certificate, appointment letter, and salary as Headmaster. The petitioner claimed to have worked as an Assistant Teacher from September 2010 to June 2011 …

PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Pnb Housing Finance Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner later moved the court seeking to withdraw the petition while seeking liberty to file a fresh one. The respondents and the State's standing counsel did not oppose the withdrawal. The court, noting the …

CHARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 11 OTHERS

Charan Singh filed a PIL seeking a mandamus directing the State to act against several respondents for illegal encroachment on a 0.2180 hectare plot in Ballia. The State's standing counsel objected, arguing that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …

BHOLANATHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner Bholanath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Shohratgarh to decide a pending revenue case (T201917630505885) under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay in the SDO's disposal …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 27646 of 2026 filed by Ashok Kumar, accused in Crime No. 186 of 2026. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, is not a medical practitioner, and that post‑mortem and viscera reports showed no external injury or poison, …

PERSURAM AND 2 OTHERSversusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a review application seeking reconsideration of the High Court's order dated 10‑08‑2021 dismissing their writ petition. The review was filed 811 days after the original order, and the petitioners submitted an affidavit attempting to explain the delay, citing lack of telephone …

REKHA GAUTAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rekha Gautam, sought a family pension after the death of her mother, who had been receiving the pension of her deceased father, a former Revenue Inspector. The petitioner, a divorced daughter, alleged that her application for the pension had not been considered by the authorities. …

MUKHTIYAR HAIDER RIZVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mukhtiyar Haider Rizvi, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and other respondents to dispose of a pending representation and to demarcate a specific parcel of land. The petitioner alleged that an application for demarcation had been filed but no action …

KAUSHAL RAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kaushal Rav, who was arrested in Crime No. 193 of 2026 for offences including assault, attempt to commit rape, and causing grievous hurt. The applicant …

SAAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 2133 of 2026, which pertained to offences under Sections 76, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the same statute. The application was presented …

SARITA CHAUHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court, acting on a habeas corpus petition, ordered the State to produce the minor Sarita Chauhan, who was then presented by police officers. Upon interaction, Sarita, an 18‑year‑old who had left home voluntarily to meet her parents in Gujarat, expressed her wish to reside with them and …

RAKESH KUMAR @ SADHU AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rakesh Kumar @ Sadhu and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh writ petition. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant. The Court dismissed the writ …

AMARWATIversusBACHCHU SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

The petition was filed by the proposed defendant seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the CPC, which was pending in the Civil Suit No. 22 of 2022 where the plaintiffs‑respondents had obtained an ex‑parte decree. The …

CHANDRVOSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Chandrvosh, filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Branch Manager of H.D.F.C. Bank Ltd., Bulandshahr to withdraw a notice dated 23.05.2026 and issue a fresh notice with the correct interest statement. The court, after hearing counsel, disposed of the petition at the …

RADHEY SHYAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by the father, Radhey Shyam, seeking custody of his six‑year‑old son Sani, who was residing with his mother, Sarita Devi, in Pune. After personally interacting with the mother, the child, and the father, the Court observed that the child was …

VIRENDRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Virandrapal, accused in a dowry‑related death case (Crime No. 272/2025) under Sections 115(2), 85 and 80(2) of the B.N.S and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant, husband of the deceased who allegedly committed suicide, argued …

MENPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Menpal Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Session Trial No. 278 of 2026) arising from multiple charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The application was …

AKHILESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, challenged a revenue record discrepancy concerning plots purchased by his father, where the original owner's name and his sons' names remained in the records despite a sale deed dated 1964. An application under Sections 31 and 32 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, to …

PAWAN GIHARversusSMT. ARTI SINGH AND ANOTHER

Pawan Gihar filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents failed to comply with a court order dated 04‑12‑2014 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 and with a Supreme Court directive in Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. An FIR (No. 0159 of 2026) dated 08‑09‑2026 was produced to …

JWALA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

Jwala Prasad was charged under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of his brother Chhabiram during a violent altercation at Lahta, Varanasi. The prosecution alleged that the applicant attacked his brother, who died two days later, while the defence argued that both parties were …

SWAMI CHARANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Swami Charan filed a PIL seeking a court order directing the removal of an illegal encroachment on plot No.94 (Chakmarg) in Village Ghilauva, Jalaun. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 and 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, citing the …

ASHOK CHAUHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

Ashok Chauhan filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a court order directing the Regional Passport Officer to dispose of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that the application had been closed because the petitioner failed to respond to a show‑cause notice, and that he …

BIRENDRA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Birendra Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to treat his service as continuous from 11 September 1987, granting him seniority, pay fixation, promotion, pension and related benefits, and to decide a representation dated 9 …

SMT MANI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt Mani seeking her liberty to reside with her husband, Mohit. The State was directed to produce Mani, who testified that she is about 18 years old, educated up to class V, and has married Mohit on 16‑04‑2026. Conflicting …

DEEPAK KUMAR URF NATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar Urf Nati, who was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 429 of 2025) involving alleged injuries to Bhagwati Prasad. The FIR, dated 08‑12‑2025, named four accused including the applicant, but did not assign any …

MANNU PAL @ RAM SUMERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mannu Pal, who is charged under Sections 64(1) and 127(2) of the same Act for an alleged rape. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, …

MANISH BINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Manish Bind was arrested in a POCSO case alleging rape of a 15‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statements under sections 180 and 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita claim a consensual relationship with the accused, and the medico‑legal report does not support a rape allegation. No radiological …

RAVISHARAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant issued in a case involving offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The counsel for the applicants indicated that they did not wish to …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash, accused in a case involving alleged rape and other offences under the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC and the lack …

RAMESHWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petition challenged the mutation of a half‑share of land originally belonging to Binda, which had been recorded in favour of respondent No. 5 (heir of Jageshwar) under the U.P. Land Revenue Act. Earlier orders (1998) upheld respondent No. 5's title and were held to have attained finality. …

HABIBULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Habibullah, who was alleged to be involved in a crime under Sections 103(1), 238(b), 61(2)(a), 309(6) and 317(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, and pointed out that co‑accused of similar …

ARUN KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusOM PRAKASH SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petition, filed on behalf of a third party, sought an order for the speedy disposal of an impleadment application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC in Suit No. 325 of 2020. The High Court observed that keeping the writ petition pending would serve no useful purpose and that there was no …

ARUN KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusOM PRAKASH SINGH AND ANOTHER

The petition, filed under Article 227, sought an order for the speedy disposal of an impleadment application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code in Suit No.326 of 2020. The High Court found that no further procedural steps such as counter‑affidavit or notice to private …

CHHAVIKANT SON OF GAUTAM ALIAS CHHAVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Chhavikant Gautam (alias Chhavi) in a criminal case (Crime No. 07 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 137(2), 351(2), 64 and sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a minor aged 17 years 11 months, had left her …

SAZIDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sazid in a murder case (Crime No.578 of 2024) involving alleged possession of a country‑made pistol under Section 103(1) of the IPC and Sections 3, 9, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that the case is based solely on …

SUGREEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sugreem, accused under Section 64(1) of the BNSS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged rape of a minor aged 16-17 years. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, there was no incriminating material, and he had no …

SHANI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani Kumar in Criminal Case No. 156 of 2026, which involved charges under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act, and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing the victim’s statement that she voluntarily left home and married …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek in a criminal case (Crime No. 476 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 65(1), 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim, a minor aged 14 …

SAUMIL MODENWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Shomil Modanwal and Abhay Maurya in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 50 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of various documents and valuables. The applicants contended that the recovered items were falsely planted and that there was no …

TAUFIQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Taufiq, who was arrested in Crime No. 180 of 2025 under Sections 87 and 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the victim, now 19 years …

SMT LAXMI KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

Smt. Laxmi Kushwaha filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a Family Court order and to compel the opposite party to pay her maintenance of Rs.25,000 per month, including arrears from 2020 to 2025, alleging she was unemployed for a period. She …

DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. Both the Assistant Government Advocate and the informant's counsel did not oppose the petitioners' request to approach the trial court for regular bail. The High Court directed that the petitioners may apply for …

PANKAJ GONDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pankaj Gond, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 64(2)M, 352 of the B.N.S.S and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act alleging rape of a 16‑year‑old …

GUDDI DEVIversusSHRI ABHISHEK KUMAR, CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.)/ FAST TRACK COURT

The applicant, Guddi Devi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the opposite party, Shri Abhishek Kumar, failed to comply with a High Court order dated 10 November 2025 under Article 227, which required him to consider the applicant's application. The court examined the instructions produced by …

NITISH @ BHOLA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Nitish @ Bhola Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel for the applicant requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail and sought temporary protection from coercive action. The opposing counsel …

PRAVINDRA YADAV @ LALA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Pravindra Yadav. The applicant’s counsel requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail and sought temporary protection of his interests. The opposing counsel raised no …

PRINCE YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Prince Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to approach the regular bail court and that his interests be protected temporarily. The opposing counsel raised no objection. The …

ANURAGversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 70(2) of the BNSS and Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing out contradictions between the victim's …

SHRAVAN KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shravan Kumar Yadav in a criminal case (Crime No. 118 of 2025) where he was not named in the FIR and was allegedly implicated five months after the incident. The applicant argued lack of corroborative evidence, no criminal antecedents, and parity …

SHIVAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shivam Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 137 of 2026) involving charges under several IPC sections for an alleged assault on 10 April 2026. He claimed he was falsely implicated by the informant, Shivam Gupta, and that the incident was a simple altercation without intent to murder, …

ASHUTOSH DUBEY @ VISHAL DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ashutosh Dubey, who is charged with offences including sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), 351(3), 352 of the same Act and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant …

VINAY KHARWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinay Kharwar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a girl aged about 16 years. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC indicated …

SAMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Samar Singh, who was arrested in a rape case (Crime No. 209 of 2026) alleged to have occurred on 15 February 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated to …

SANJAY KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Sanjay Kumar and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashing of the FIR registered against them. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners withdrew the request for quashing and instead prayed for leave to approach a competent court for anticipatory …

WASIM ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim Ali, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 216 of 2026 involving alleged sexual relations with a 17‑year‑10‑month‑old girl, false promise of marriage, and an alleged request to convert her religion. The applicant contended that he …

DEEPCHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepchand, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crim No. 188 of 2026) alleging rape of a minor under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)m, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5j(ii)/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

AJIT PASWANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajit Paswan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of the same Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the …

PRAMOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSHRI DIGVIJAY SINGH

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 21‑04‑2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 41374 of 2025. The court examined whether the alleged non‑compliance amounted to contempt and whether notice was required before …

ADITYA KUMAR JHAversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya Kumar Jha, who was arrested in a case alleging an attempt to commit rape under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 62 and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the 17‑year‑old victim was …

AMIT KUMAR OJHAversusSRI RAJEEV KRISHNA AND 4 OTHERS

Amit Kumar Ojha filed a contempt petition in the Allahabad High Court alleging that Sri Rajeev Krishna and four others failed to comply with a Supreme Court order issued in Lalita Kumar v. State of U.P. (AIR 2014 SC 187). The petitioner produced an FIR dated 17 September 2026 to support the …

MONU @ MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Monu @ Mohan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 217 of 2026) arising from an FIR dated 4 July 2026 alleging assault on 3 July 2026. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that affidavits of the injured and informant denied any role by him, and that no specific allegation …

GULSHAN NISHAD @ INDRA JEET NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gulshan Nishad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 64(2)(m), 87 of the BNS and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a minor girl away and committing sexual offences. The victim, aged 15 years 11 months, gave a …

POONAM DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court noted that the facts were identical to a prior decision (RIT‑35171/2025) and held that adult …

TRIPURARI PRAKASH TRIPATHI @ SONU TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Tripurari Prakash Tripathi @ Sonu Tiwari after an earlier application was rejected. The applicant argued that the victim’s testimony did not contain any allegation of rape, suggesting a low probability of conviction, and highlighted his …

JAIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaipal Singh challenged a surcharge determination order issued under Section 27 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, arguing that the alleged irregularities dated 2005-2008 fell outside the ten‑year limitation period prescribed in Section 28 of the same Act, as the notice was first issued …

RASHMI BIND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by Rashmi Bind, a 24‑year‑old graduate who had voluntarily married Sushil Kumar Srivastav on 5 August 2026. The petition sought her release from custody imposed by her parents who opposed the marriage. Upon hearing the corpus, she …

SHREYJAL @ SUJALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shreyjal @ Sujal, who was in judicial custody for a theft case (Crime No. 326 of 2025) involving the alleged snatching of an informant's bag. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that co‑accused Babu Pasi and Manish Chaturvedi had already …

DILSHAD AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dilshad and ten others, challenged the appointment of a specific individual as a fair price shop agent, alleging impropriety. They filed a public interest litigation seeking to set aside the appointment. The petition relied on Clause 13(3) of the U.P. Essential Commodities …

DEEPAK AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants argued that the cause of action had been exhausted, rendering the petition infructuous. The court examined the submission and found no remaining issue to …

SANJEET SINGHversusMS. RACHANA SHAH AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Sanjeet Singh, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondents, including the Delhi Police, willfully defied the High Court order dated 30 July 2026 which had set aside the cancellation of his candidature and directed that he be allowed to appear in the next stage of the …

ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Arjun Singh filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of an alleged encroacher (respondent No.5) from Gaon Sabha land (Gata No.90). The State of U.P. and six other respondents opposed the relief, arguing that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue …

NAVAJISversusSTATE OF UP

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita filed by the accused Navajis, who was charged under Sections 70(1), 123, 351(2) and 87 for alleged kidnapping, rape and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the victim was …

KAILASH CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kailash Chaurasia, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, fearing arrest in a case alleging forgery of appointment letters for a Class‑IV post in the District Legal Services Authority, Ghazipur. He contended that he was falsely …

SMT. NISHA SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court examined a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Nisha Sharma, who had left her matrimonial home alleging cruelty and her husband's alcohol addiction. The petitioner, Rabburaj, sought a court order directing her return to the marital home. The court interacted with both parties and …

RAM PRATAP PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ram Pratap Patel and another filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court. At the admission stage, counsel for the revisionists informed the court that they wished to withdraw the revision. The State’s Advocate General raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, having received …

HAJI NASEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Haji Naseem, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an order dated 09-07-2026 passed under Section 3 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act by the Additional Commissioner of Police, Agra. The petitioner alleged that both the appeal against that order and a stay …

HITESH KUMAR AND 29 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Thirty petitioners, including Hitesh Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a Finance Controller communication and a Director of Education order, and demanding that their salaries be re‑fixed with the first increment as of 01‑01‑2017, along with regular monthly payment and arrears with …

SHAMIM AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shamim Ahmad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged cheating and inducement to secure employment for an informant, with charges under several IPC sections. The applicant argued that there was no direct allegation against him, …

RAMSAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ramsagar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide Revision No.253 of 2024, which has been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the revision, filed before the Board of Revenue/Commissioner, is being unduly adjourned without justification, contrary to Rule …

PRATIK TRIPATHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Pratik Tripathi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21844 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Shri Shubhendu Mishra, informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous and the petitioner no longer wished to …

DEVANAND GIRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Devanand Giri, who is charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC and Section 67B of the IT Act for alleged rape, criminal intimidation and publishing a video of the incident. The FIR was lodged more than two years after the alleged …

SAIDAN ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Saidan Ansari, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2026) under Sections 318(4), 317(4) of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act, alleging that his bank account was misused by a villager named Shahid who paid a nominal fee for its use. He contended that he is a victim …

SAMEER ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Sameer Ansari, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2026) involving alleged cyber fraud under Sections 318(4), 317(4) of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act. He contended that his bank account was misused by a villager named Shahid, who paid him Rs.500 and used the …

NOMAN AKHTAR @ NUMAN AKHTARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Noman Akhtar, who was arrested in connection with an alleged attempted rape (Criminal Case No. 321 of 2025). The applicant argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the IPC indicated consent, that the victim was a major, …

FAZAL IMAM NAQVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Fazal Imam Naqvi, a judicial officer, filed a writ petition challenging two charge sheets issued in a disciplinary enquiry, alleging they violated the U.P. District Court Service Rules, 2013. He sought certiorari to quash the charge sheets, mandamus directing the authorities to consider his …

RAM KHILARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant, Ram Khilari, appealed against his conviction under IPC sections 302 and 504 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, contending that he was denied an effective opportunity to cross‑examine two prosecution witnesses, PW‑1 Raj Kumar and PW‑2 Deepchand. The …

PARAMJEET AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR. During the hearing, they informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the quashing relief. Consequently, the court declined the request to quash the FIR. The petitioners then asked for leave to …

MUNNI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusRAMSWAROOP SHUKLA

The petitioners sought a direction under Article 227 for the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Fatehpur to decide an original suit (No. 599 of 2014) on a permanent injunction within a short, court‑specified time. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar …

RINKIversusMEERA AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahganj, Jaunpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C) in Suit No. 891 of 2026. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been pending without …

JAI NARAYAN SINGHversusVASUDEV AND 25 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jai Narayan Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Kaushambi to decide a pending 6‑C application in Original Suit No.143 of 2025. The High Court examined the petition at the admission stage and found that keeping the …

BHUREversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhure in Criminal Case No. 277 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that the allegations were vague, that he was falsely implicated, and that there was no specific …

KUMARI DEVIversusBRANCH MANAGER UNION BANK OF INDIA

The petitioner, Kumari Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Union Bank of India to release her pension arrears of Rs.1,15,641 with interest for the period April to November 2019. She had previously filed an application on 10 July 2026 with the concerned …

VIKASversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas, accused in Crime No. 172 of 2025 for alleged rape of a girl aged 16 years 11 months under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, the victim had …

GEETA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tamkuhiraj, Kushinagar, to decide a pending revenue proceeding (Case No.11936 of 2025) under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding had been pending since …

SEEMA SRIVATAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Seema Srivatava, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur, to decide a pending mutation appeal (Case No. 10668 of 2025) under Section 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The appeal had been pending since 2 January …

MANDAKINI DEVIversusRAJESH KUMAR VERMA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

Mandakini Devi filed a contempt application against Sub Divisional Magistrate Rajesh Kumar Verma for allegedly refusing to comply with the High Court's judgment and order dated 29‑04‑2026 in her writ petition (Writ Petition No. 16087 of 2026). The applicant claimed that despite being served a copy …

PRACHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prachi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a court direction for the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and five others, to lodge an FIR. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the court should compel the respondents to register the FIR. The respondents contended …

NEERAJ BINDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Neeraj Bind, was named in an FIR alleging his participation in the murder of a deceased person, allegedly motivated by an affair between the deceased and the co-accused Priyanka, who is the applicant's sister. The prosecution's case is based solely on circumstantial evidence and …

ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Arun Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking the removal of alleged encroachers (respondents 4‑10) from three plots of Nagar Palika land (Plot Nos. 2091, 2261 and 1932). The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Nagar Palika, contended that the petitioner could obtain …

RITESH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Petitioner Ritesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition alleging trespass by private parties and seeking relief from the State of U.P. The petitioner argued that a suit filed by the private parties had been dismissed and that the State had not acted on his grievance. The State contended that the …

SACHCHIDANAND VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachchidanand Verma, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents (the State of U.P. and the Azamgarh Development Authority) to decide a pending case (No/AZDA/ANI/2024/0000750, State vs Renu Verma) and his application dated 16‑02‑2026 expeditiously. The petitioner …

MOHD KHALID AND 10 OTHERSversusSMT AKBARI AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 seeking an interim direction for the trial court to decide a pending miscellaneous case arising from a partition suit filed in 1964. The petition alleged that while a preliminary decree had been prepared, the final decree had not been issued, causing …

SATYAVEER SINGHversusRAJENDRA SINGH

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Etawah to decide Original Suit No. 265 of 2024 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar …

VIJAY @ BHURAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vijay @ Bhura, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 116 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He had been in custody since 29 June 2026 and was implicated based on a gang chart that listed four other …

MOHD SAIF ALI KHAN ALIAS MOHAMMAD SAIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd Saif Ali Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashing of the FIR registered against him. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, withdrew the request for quashing the FIR. Consequently, the court declined the relief for quashing the FIR. …

TARAWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to regularize her deceased husband's post as an Attendant/Ardali and to pay salary and benefits to his family. The respondents contended that the petitioner had not first approached the concerned …

ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ directing the State not to allow construction of a school managed by a private committee on public utility land in Village Bharpur Pichwar and to mandate that only a government junior high school be built there. They argued that under the Uttar Pradesh Matrabhoomi …

SUKHRAM YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioners, Sub-Inspectors in the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking an additional pay increment after completing 19 years of service, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The petitioners argued that the legal position …

PUNEET TANEJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Puneet Taneja and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS No. 41095 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. They later approached the Court seeking to withdraw the application, stating that certain documents could not be annexed and …

SMT NIDHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Nidhi, applied for a compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 after her father's death on 24‑04‑2025. She filed a representation on 06‑07‑2026, which remained pending without decision. The …

APARNA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aparna Singh, sought a water connection for the first‑floor residence, alleging that denial of potable water and electricity was unjust while a property dispute involving his mother‑in‑law’s house was pending in a civil suit. The respondent argued that there was no difficulty in …

ANJANI KUMAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anjani Kumar Srivastava, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to remove an alleged miscellaneous advance of Rs.13,60,140, issue a No Dues Certificate, and direct the Chief Engineer, Tubewell, Varanasi to decide a representation filed on 28‑12‑2025. The …

RAM SHIROMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later discovered that certain relevant documents and averments were inadvertently omitted. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the existing petition and to file a fresh one with complete particulars. The court …

SMT PRIYA KAUR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, an unmarried couple in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to protect them from harassment by family members. The second petitioner is a minor, and the respondents argued that protection cannot be granted. The Court …

RAKESH DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rakesh Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge of criminal proceedings initiated under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He alleged that the FIR and charge‑sheet mistakenly identified him, confusing his name …

SHAILENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSRI DEVLAL AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a suit and obtained an ad interim injunction, subsequently moving a temporary injunction (7‑C) application. The respondents appealed the ad interim injunction under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the CPC. The High Court partially allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the trial …

RAMSURAT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramsurat and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑Oct‑2011 issued by the Additional Civil Judge in a criminal complaint under IPC sections 427, 504 and 506. The applicants did not press the substantive relief …

SMT. KRISHNA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Krishna Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash a notice dated 11‑06‑2026 issued by Respondent No.3 and a mandamus directing Respondents No.3 and No.4 not to impede her peaceful possession of the land. The petitioner had replied to the notice on …

RAJENDRA @ BABIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rajendra @ Babi, was arrested as the driver of a vehicle allegedly carrying spurious liquor, charged under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) of the BNS and Sections 60(1), 63, 72 of the Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no knowledge of the contraband, …

LOKENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a public interest writ seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.3) to decide a recall/restoration application filed on 18‑02‑2025 concerning the mutation of a Gram Sabha name in revenue records for land in Village Ahilyaganj Khadar, Mathura. They alleged …

SATENDRAversusSRI MANISH KUMAR

Satendra filed a contempt application against Manish Kumar alleging willful defiance of the order dated 25‑03‑2025 passed in Writ‑C No. 8608 of 2025 (Satendra v. State of U.P. & 12 others). The applicant claimed that despite service of a certified copy of the order, the opposite party had not …

NEHA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Neha Yadav and another, both adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners argued that their right to live together peacefully is a facet of …

HARVINDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Harvindra Singh filed a second bail application in a case involving forgery and cheating under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS). The applicant relied on Section 480(6) of the BNSS, arguing that because the trial had not concluded within 60 days of the first date fixed for …

MAHTAB ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Mahtab Alam challenged his dismissal from the Uttar Pradesh Police by filing a departmental appeal under Rule 20 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. The appeal, filed on 23 February 2026, remained pending before the Deputy Inspector …

MURABBA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Murabba Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to disburse the full compensation amount under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, along with a weekly penalty of Rs.2500. The petitioner had already submitted a representation …

MANISH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manish Rajbhar was arrested under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 and has been in custody since 16 June 2026. He applied for bail, claiming he was falsely implicated and that he had already been granted bail in two other criminal cases cited in a …

ROSHAN PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, a widow, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to consider her claim for a compassionate appointment under the Dying‑in‑Harness Rule, 1974, to the post of District Minority Welfare Officer, Jalaun, following her husband's death on 16‑02‑2024. The petitioner had …

PRINCE SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prince Sharma under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No.180 of 2026 alleging assault under IPC sections 109(1), 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 324(4). The applicant argued that the injuries to the victim …

SHASHANK BAJAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shashank Bajaj, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart and noting that he had already been granted bail in three related …

AMIT @ RAVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Amit @ Ravi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Upper Sessions Judge in a POCSO case. The applicant contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was issued and that the warrant was passed without first …

RAMBABU PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a demolition order dated 2 December 2021 that was preceded by a final notice on 31 July 2021 and a subsequent notice on 13 August 2021. They argued that the Prayagraj Development Authority’s inaction from 2021 to 2026 amounted to a waiver of the notice and the order, and …