Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 1601–1800

JITENDRA DHAR DWIVEDI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jitendra Dhar Dwivedi and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the pendency of the petition, the investigating agency filed a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal …

YOGENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yogendra Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation and arrest the accused under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 315 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, after a magistrate had ordered further investigation. The police had …

AJAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Ajay filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.04 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC arising from a crime in Shahzadnagar, Rampur. The parties had already reached an amicable settlement, …

HARIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Haripal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to approach the competent magistrate instead. The …

AHSAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 44245 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 333, 115(2) and 352 BNS. A compromise verification report dated 14 September 2026 confirmed that the parties had …

PRADEEP KUMAR JOSHI @ JOSHI KHARWARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar Joshi, who was implicated in a double murder case (Crime No.309 of 2019) under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only linked to the crime through the statements of co‑accused and …

DILIP KUMAR SONKARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revisionist, Dilip Kumar Sonkar, filed a criminal revision challenging a trial court order under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a subsequent appellate order that imposed a cash payment, monthly maintenance, and compensation for mental agony on him. He …

SANTOSH KUMAR UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, impartial, and expeditious investigation into FIR No. 0217/2026. He alleged that the police were not investigating the case properly despite being the first informant. The court …

DHANI SHARAN GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings (Case No. 547 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 323, 427, 504 and 506 IPC. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute, …

KAMAL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court disposed of two connected bail applications filed by Kamal Sharma and Lalley Dhuriya, who were named in FIR No. 47 of 2026 for murder. The prosecution’s case relied solely on CCTV footage showing co‑accused Vimal Panda and Akash firing at the deceased, with no eye‑witnesses …

BEERESH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Beeresh Kumar and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Nikhil Pratap Singh, announced that the petitioners no longer …

KULDEEP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the entire Session Trial proceedings arising from a case involving offences under Sections 363, 366 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and a compromise verification report …

MANI GUPTA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge-sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 131, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by …

FARMAN @ FARMAN ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 08‑01‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 320 of 2023) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, …

ADITYA RAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Aditya Raj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's …

AKASH KUMAR @ KALE AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3012 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 76, 352 and 351(2) of the Bijnor North Special (BNS) Act. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the …

FASIH AKHTAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Fasih Akhtar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, reserving the right to file a …

MEENA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Meena Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18568 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Surya Prakash Yadav, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ …

VINAY KUMAR SACHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vinay Kumar Sachan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against them. The State had already completed the investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 7 June 2026. The petitioners' …

DR. IBNE HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Ibne Hasan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State had already concluded the investigation and filed a charge-sheet against him on 19 May 2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ …

AKHIESH KUMAR CHAUBEYversusDR. NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN AND ANOTHER

The petitioner‑accused filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to quash a revisional judgment and an earlier order, alleging that he was denied a fair chance to cross‑examine the complainant after the complainant’s evidence was closed. The trial court had allowed the complainant’s recall …

SMT. VIMLA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Vimla and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State, represented by …

HARSHITA VASHISTHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Harshita Vashistha, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18573 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the relief sought. The …

BABU RAM PRAJAPATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Babu Ram Prajapati and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The investigation in the matter had already concluded and a charge sheet was filed against the petitioners on 26 July 2026. …

MUTTUR PRAJAPATI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Muttur Prajapati and six others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18560 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to …

SANTGIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santgiri, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and expressed his desire to withdraw the writ petition. The State, represented by an Additional Government …

SURAJ VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suraj Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Kumar, informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a charge sheet had been filed, …

MATARU NAGAR @ RANBIR NAGAR AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1777 of 2023) arising from Crime No. 424 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …

GAURAV SAXENA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gaurav Saxena and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation had already concluded and a police report was filed on 24 …

RUBINA @ RUBYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rubina @ Ruby filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Tariq Naiyer, informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and that she no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The …

RATIRAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Ratiram and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (ST No.211 of 2014) arising from Crime No.67 of 2014, which involved offences under Sections 316, 323 and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered …

MUNAVVAR HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Munavvar Hasan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against him. The State of U.P. and two others were respondents. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the …

KALLU AND AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Kallu and others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 700 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 394 and 325 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the …

SHRIMATI POOJA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Shrimati Pooja Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19247 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. The investigation in the underlying matter had already been concluded and a charge sheet was filed on 17 May 2026. The petitioner later informed …

WASIF ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Wasif Ali, the owner of a truck, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23 June 2026 under Section 316(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging misappropriation of 574 crates of foreign liquor during transport. The FIR alleged that 785 crates were entrusted to the petitioner’s …

SUMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sumit Kumar, was charged in a 2015 FIR for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC, alleging indiscriminate firing that caused a death. He was arrested at the scene along with co‑accused but escaped custody in 2018 and was re‑arrested only in September 2025, having spent a …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Manoj Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.150 of 2026 (State vs. Manoj Kumar) that arose from a charge of criminal breach of trust under Section 406 IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise on 20 July 2026, which was …

RAMFAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with better …

PRINCE AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. They asserted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the Additional Chief …

ROOP CHANDRA PAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1146 of 2024) arising from Case Crime No.62 of 2021, which involved multiple non‑compoundable IPC offences. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, a …

SATYA NARAYAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.175 of 2007 (State & Manik Singh vs. Sovran and Others) concerning an offence under Section 364 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was verified by the …

AJAYAB SINGH @ JAYAB AND 3 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 17 September 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …

SMT. SMIT TIWARIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Smit Tiwari, filed a writ petition seeking relief regarding arrears of salary. The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a compliance affidavit indicating that the arrears of Rs. 92,880, covering July 2023 to 31 August 2026, had been paid to the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel …

SUMIT SHUKLA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sumit Shukla and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to set aside a charge sheet filed under IPC Section 447 for criminal trespass. They argued that, pursuant to the Uttar Pradesh Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961, a written notice under the …

TASABBAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 22.08.2023 and related proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC, alleging that a compromise had been reached and verified by the magistrate on 24.08.2026. The court noted …

INTAJAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 06‑06‑2021 and the cognizance order dated 18‑01‑2022 in a criminal case (Case No. 367 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants …

MADAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Madan Singh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings. The State disclosed that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed against the petitioners on 27 July 2026. The petitioners, through …

ANWAR HUSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 07‑10‑2024 in a case involving offences under Sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. The court was shown a compromise deed …

VINOD KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a Circle Officer, was suspended on 15‑02‑2019 and penalised for allegedly leaking confidential information during a criminal investigation, based on call records showing personal calls with a woman. He challenged the disciplinary enquiry, the suspension order, and the subsequent …

SMT. MADHUR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The High Court, acting on a compliance affidavit filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh, noted that arrears of salary amounting to Rs.6,45,965 covering July 2023 to August 2026 had been paid to the petitioner, Smt. Madhur Dwivedi. The petitioner’s counsel confirmed receipt of the payment. Since the …

GAURAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 29.07.2026 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest petitioner No.1. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the statutory investigation was completed and the …

LALLEY DHURIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Lalley Dhuriya filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 28648 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court seeking release from custody in a case pending against the State of U.P. The primary issue was whether the applicant was entitled to bail. The court examined the application and, …

ASHUTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ashutosh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition (WRIT‑C No. 32586/2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The standing counsel submitted instructions indicating that the Sub‑Collector of Jaunpur assumed charge on 3 June 2026 and that the order passed in RIT petition No. …

PREM PAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Prem Pal and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing investigation. The State had already concluded the investigation and forwarded a police report against the petitioners on 06-07-2026. The petitioners, …

SAZIDA BEGHAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 29936 of 2023 (State vs. Smt. Sajida Begum & Another), which involved offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. During the pendency of the application the parties entered …

CHANDRAWATI DEVI @ CHANARAUTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandrawati Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a criminal complaint (Section 316(2) BNSS) filed against her in a criminal case arising from a dispute over Rs 1,00,000 transferred to her bank account. She alleged that the dispute was …

RAM BABU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Babu and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on …

HEM LATEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hem Late, a school instructor appointed in 2013, sought a writ directing the Block Education Officer to allow her to join as Instructor and to compel the District Magistrate to renew her contract and pay honorarium for June-July 2025. She claimed her services were regularly renewed …

LAL BAHADUR @ BANTU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Lal Bahadur @ Bantu and two others against the State of U.P. and another. The applicants sought relief, but no counsel appeared on their behalf to press the application. The counsel for the opposite party, Hem Pratap Singh, …

SALONI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Saloni and another filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash FIR dated 24.07.2026 under Section 87 of BNS and a mandamus to prevent their arrest. The State, represented by the learned AGA, informed the court that the statutory investigation was completed and the investigating …

ASHOK KUMAR VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and the Session Trial No. 514 of 2020 relating to an alleged attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the …

BALESHWAR RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Baleshwar Ram, who was arrested in connection with a suicide case originally registered under Section 125 of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act, but later amended to Section 108 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …

ANURAG SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anurag Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 and the related warrant trial (No. 1670 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the …

IRFAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323 and 504 IPC arising from a dispute in Ghaziabad. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by a …

DUSHYANT KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 17518 of 2026) arising from offences under IPC sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). The applicants asserted …

THAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P, AND 5 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Session Trial No. 797 of 2015, which stemmed from a 2013 case involving multiple IPC offences, many of which are non‑compoundable. A compromise verification report confirmed that the parties had …

GOPAL CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gopal Choudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 30‑12‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 02‑05‑2026 in State vs Gopal Choudhary. He contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2) and 324(4) of the BNS are …

AMARNATH PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a direction to the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ghazipur to decide a revision filed under Section 48(1) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act concerning land in Arazi No.103. The revision arose after the respondent No.4 approved the petitioners' application for restoration …

BHAGWAT PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court corrected a clerical error in an earlier order, changing the date to 17‑12‑2019 and the writ petition number to Writ‑A No. 20654 of 2019. The respondents claimed that most of the dues owed to the petitioner had been paid, but the petitioner asserted that Rs. 9,15,033 …

MUZAMMIL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 2 January 2019, the cognizance order dated 4 November 2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 106 of 2019) relating to offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, …

ABBAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 16171/9 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 131, 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable …

AMIT NIRANJAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 112/2024) arising from offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 354‑A, 323, 504, 506, 427 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached a …

HEMANTversusSTATE OF U.P.

Hemant was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he and nine others opened indiscriminate fire on 5 February 2026, resulting in the death of a man whose maternal grandfather, Shyamveer Singh, is the sole eyewitness. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, filed nine hours after the …

SYED ASAD ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Syed Asad Ali and others filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 21 July 2026 and a mandamus to restrain the State from arresting them. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State’s Additional …

PRADEEP KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Pradeep Kumar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because a charge-sheet had been filed in the underlying criminal case. The court examined this submission and found …

BRIJPAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Brijpal Singh and another filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑03‑2019 in Criminal Case No.18042 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. They contended that, based on …

ALOK RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Alok Rai applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 112 of 2018, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 323/149, 325/149, 308/149, 504 and 506 of the IPC. He claimed he was falsely implicated, was exonerated during …

AAKASH PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aakash Pradhan under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging firing, where the applicant feared arrest. The applicant's counsel argued that the video evidence only implicated co‑accused Shekhar and Keshav, and that …

SAHEEBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted the applicant's prior criminal case (Case Crime No. 398 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC, which was not disclosed in the affidavit as …

DR MAN SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 11 OTHERS

Dr. Man Singh Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking multiple mandamus orders directing cyber authorities and global platforms to investigate and curb alleged AI‑generated deepfakes and cyber offences under the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and related provisions. …

VINOD CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the State counsel informed the Court that additional, more serious charges had been added to the case. The petitioner …

MADINA MASJID AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, Madina Masjid and another, challenged a notice dated 20 July 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) ordering demolition of constructions on a 0.1940‑hectare plot where the Masjid stands. They sought certiorari to quash the notice and …

SALEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Saleem Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 26‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 27‑02‑2026 in Criminal Case No.13253 of 2026 (State v. Fuzail Ahmad). The applicant contended that the charge‑sheet improperly invoked …

SAHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil in Crime No.311 of 2026, alleged under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that Sahil had enticed a minor girl, but the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated she was older, had left …

SHAHNAWAZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 and later sought to withdraw it, requesting a short protective period to approach the regular bail court. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court permitted the withdrawal, directing the …

AYUSHMAN CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ayushman Choudhary, a member of the Scheduled Caste 'Chamar', challenged the rejection of his caste certificate application, which was denied on the ground that his father had left the family and moved to Uttarakhand, raising a domicile issue. The petitioner submitted his mother's …

SMT GULISTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Smt. Gulista filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21983 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet …

RAMESHWAR TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rameshwar Tiwari and Sarojani Devi, who are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have committed suicide by hanging. The FIR, lodged on 26‑11‑2025, alleged dowry demand and harassment but was filed 15 days after the …

MOHAMMAD KHALIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Khalid, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where an FIR alleged his involvement in a violent incident, though he claimed to be a victim and sustained injuries. The FIR named eight accused and several unknown persons, but did not …

RAVINDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 140(1) and 3/5 of the B.N.S. for alleged abduction of a husband. The applicant claimed innocence, stating the alleged victim was a relative and that the abduction was a money dispute, and …

RAMESH KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ramesh Kumar Verma, a government employee, challenged an order dated 27 July 2026 that placed him under suspension without any disciplinary proceedings. He filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief from the suspension. The Court granted the petitioner two weeks to file a …

VIKAS YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Vikas Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑05‑2022 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑06‑2022 in Criminal Case No. 230 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant …

ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rohit, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He later moved the court seeking permission to withdraw that application and instead file an appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of …

NAZIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nazim (applicant) in Criminal Case No. 148 of 2026 under Section 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the prosecution's key witnesses – the mother of the deceased (PW‑1) and the injured party (PW‑2) – …

PRIVATE MOTOR OPERATORS UNIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The Private Motor Operators Union challenged a Ministry of Road Transport and Highways order dated 17 November 2025 that required its vehicles to obtain fitness certificates exclusively through an Automated Testing Station (ATS) at Varanasi, alleging it forced vehicles to travel outside permitted …

ANANT BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anant Bahadur Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a judgment and order dated 15 April 2026 passed under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy by filing an …

BRIJRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Brijraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. (respondent No. 3) to upload his new caste certificate on the E‑District website in place of the old 1988 manual certificate, and also to decide his representation dated 18‑08‑2026 within the stipulated …

V,S, PALITUBEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petition under Article 227 was filed by V.S. Palitube against the State of U.P. and another. The High Court of Allahabad considered the petition and, after hearing, allowed it. The Court directed that the orders be as per the order dated in case Pappu Met @ Pappu v. State of U.P. and Another. No …

ASHOK KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the railway authorities to pay compensation for land on which a railway track was constructed without formal acquisition. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 establishing a District …

VIRENDRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 04‑09‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 26‑02‑2024 in State v Virendra et al., alleging that the offences (IPC 323, 504) are non‑cognizable. They contended that, per the explanation to Section 2(d) CrPC, a …

SMT SHAHNAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 34422 of 2026 filed by Smt Shahnaz, who was named in an FIR for the murder of a man who allegedly owed her Rs 5,000. The FIR alleged that she and three co‑accused intercepted the deceased, inflicted knife injuries and further assaulted him …

RAMCHARITARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner alleged that certain lands were taken over without proper acquisition, referencing an acquisition that occurred in 1976, but failed to specify the date of possession. The respondent argued that the claim was stale and should have been raised in the year of acquisition, relying on the …

MUKESH PAL @ KALLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Mukesh Pal @ Kallu, who was named in FIR No.65 of 2025 for alleged assault causing injuries to three persons, one of which was a temporal bone fracture. The applicant …

DABLU SAROJ @ ALOK SAROJ AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 33448 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed. Neither the informant's counsel nor the Additional Government Advocate …

SATYDEV YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satydev Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case (Crime No. 158 of 2015) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The State opposed, noting that the applicant had earlier filed a Section 482 application (No. 39713 …

GORIYANK TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Goriyank Tomar, who alleged false implication in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 109, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted …

AADIL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aadil Chaudhary in a case involving alleged offences under sections of the BNS and the Passports Act, 1967. The applicant argued he was falsely implicated, noting that his name only appeared in the co-accused Wahab Pradhan's …

YOGENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ YOGESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Yogendra Kumar Singh and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a Civil Judge’s order that dismissed their discharge application in a dowry‑related criminal case. During hearing, the applicants’ counsel withdrew the challenge to the order …

SUKHVINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sukhvinder Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 27 July 2026 and a mandamus directing the release of his two-wheeler (Regn. No. U.K. 06-BK-6735) held at a police station. After arguments, the …

SMT INDUMATI DUBEY AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 4‑September‑2026 and to restrain the police from any coercive action, also praying that the police follow the Supreme Court’s arrest guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits of the petition but …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Nirmala Devi, a former Block Pramukh, who feared arrest in a case (Crime No. 08 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 120B and 34 IPC. The FIR, relating to a 2005 incident, was …

INDERRAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Inderraj, the sole accused in a murder case (Criminal No. 937 of 2018) under Section 302 IPC. The applicant, who is deaf and dumb, had been in custody since October 2018, amounting to nearly eight years, with only six of fifteen witnesses …

NIRANJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 8 OTHERS

Petitioner Niranjan Singh filed a writ petition alleging inaction on a representation he had made to the Commissioner of Police, Commissionarate, Ghaziabad. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, argued that the appropriate forum for deciding the representation was the District …

ISMAIL AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ismail and six others filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20‑04‑2026 registered under multiple criminal provisions, seeking its quash and mandamus to prevent their arrest and any coercive action. The petition also prayed that the police follow the arrest guidelines laid down …

AMARDEEP AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

Amardeep and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 25 July 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the POCSO Act, and seeking a mandamus to prevent their arrest. The petitioners also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court’s …

KAMLESH BHARTIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Bhartiya, who was arrested in Crime No. 412 of 2026 under Sections 109(1) and 115(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that a similarly situated co‑accused, Neeraj Bhartiya, had already been granted …

SHIVDHANI SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was made, but no rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) award was issued as required by the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency …

ARSHAD MIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arshad Miyan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of FIR No. 244 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2) and 352 of BNS‑2023 (corresponding to IPC sections 341, 323 and 504) and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The petitioner also made an …

RAVI SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ravi Shakya applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 of the B.N.S. after being accused of firing at the son of an informant, causing a fracture to the left ulna as evidenced by an X‑ray report. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging a delayed FIR and false allegations, and …

ARIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered the bail application of Arif, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act falling within the statutory definition of …

IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Irfan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 226 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault after a broken promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the relationship was consensual, the FIR was false and …

PRATEEK DEV AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners Prateek Dev and five others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to release their land in Village Manchna, Mainpuri, which had been earmarked for acquisition under a government order dated 06‑03‑2025 for a bypass project, or to pay compensation as …

ARUN KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Arun Kumar Gupta and Anil Kumar Gupta were charged under Sections 419, 420, 504 and 506 IPC in Crime No. 181 of 2019. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and lack of credible evidence. The High Court initially granted them interim …

GOLU PATEL @ BEER BAJARANGI PATELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Golu Patel, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 300 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged four …

DHARMENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23463 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Chandra Prakash Pandey, sought leave to withdraw the petition, …

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Santosh Kumar Gupta filed Writ Petition No. 15741 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the Union of India and others. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner, through counsel Kedar Nath Kumar and Vishnu Kesarwani, sought to withdraw the petition. The …

PRIYANSHU SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Priyanshu Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under sections 111(2)(B), 318(2), 319(2) of the B.N.S. and section 66D of the IT Act in a criminal case. He later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …

RAHUL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to settle the criminal case (Case Crime No.14 of 2019) through compromise. The court noted that a compromise deed had been prepared but not yet filed. It directed the applicants to file the deed before the Additional Civil …

DEEPA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepa and Preeti in Crime No. 477 of 2026, which involved alleged offences under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 127(2), 109(1) and 351(3) B.N.S. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated in a matrimonial dispute, …

PREM DUTT PACHAURI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 23.01.2023 and the cognizance order dated 05.07.2023 that had summoned them under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The opposite party contended that, according to the …

KALLU @ ASHOK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant, Kallu alias Ashok Yadav, argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act …

AJEET YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajeet Yadav under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the …

REV DEEPAK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for Rev. Deepak Kumar, who was charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act in a property dispute. The applicant argued that the matter was …

SHUBHAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Shubham, accused in a rape case arising from a long‑term consensual relationship allegedly based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, the victim’s statements were inconsistent, there was no …

RABAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rabal Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and requested its dismissal as not pressed. The Standing Counsel for the State and the counsel for …

KAVITA TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 12‑09‑2026 and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar when making any arrest. The State opposed the …

ISHAN UPADHAYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ishan Upadhaya, accused in Crime No. 265 of 2026 under sections 89, 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in a case involving the death of a newborn at his hospital, noting that the victim’s …

VIMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Vimal, the applicant, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 189 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The State argued that the investigation had been converted under Section 70(2) of the B.N.S., rendering the …

ZEESHAN AHMAD FAREEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Zeeshan Ahmad Fareed filed a writ petition seeking to quash a show‑cause notice issued under Section 27(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and to restrain the demolition of Mustafa Masjid, invoking Supreme Court directions in In Re: Directions in the matter …

FARHAN AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 01‑08‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 14‑07‑2026 in a case arising under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. The sole contention was that these offences are non‑cognizable and, per the …

RAJU MANJHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Raju Manjhi, sought bail in a murder case (S.C.No.519 of 2026) where he was not named in the FIR but eye‑witness statements implicated him. The applicant argued that the witnesses’ statements were recorded after a delay, were doubtful, and that he had no prior criminal record and was …

AMARJEET (MINOR)versusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S. on behalf of Amarjeet, a minor aged about fifteen years, who was named in an FIR alleging assault along with several other accused. The applicant contended false implication and highlighted his …

ANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Anoj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 14.07.2026 under Sections 318(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus restraining his arrest. The petitioner also prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State …

AIMS GREEN AVENUE WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Aims Green Avenue Welfare Association filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39073 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel indicated that the petition contained mistakes and …

POLAVARAPU KRISHNA MOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Polavarapu Krishna Mohan filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of an FIR dated 17/04/2026 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him under sections 308(2), 319(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S.S. 2023 and section 66D of the IT (Amendment) Act. While the State opposed the merits of …

RAJ CHAUHAN @ SATYAM SINGH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Chauhan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07‑09‑2026 under Section 87 of the BNS, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that …

UDAY LAIKAR @ UDAY LIKHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 11‑09‑2026 under sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S., and a mandamus restraining his arrest pending the petition. The petitioner’s counsel also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow …

PRATEEK @ PRIYANSHU @ PRATEEK JHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Prateek Jha filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (i) quash of an FIR dated 11/09/2026 under sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S., and (ii) a mandamus restraining his arrest pending the petition. The petitioner also made an innocuous prayer that the police …

HONEY RAI @ PRAFUL RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Honey Rai @ Praful Rai filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑09‑2026 under Sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S., and a mandamus directing that he not be arrested while the petition is pending. The petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous prayer …

AMAN AKHTAR @ AMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Aman Akhtar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 11‑09‑2026 under Sections 318(4), 317(5) and 112(2) of the B.N.S. and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest him while the petition is pending. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that the police be …

SANDEEP AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sandeep and four others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to allot them 10% of developed Abadi land as per a 2011 Full Bench order in Gajraj v. State of U.P., and additionally 4% …

RAJESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rajesh filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.153 of 2025) alleging involvement under several IPC sections. No counsel appeared for the applicant or the informant, though the State's A.G.A. was present. The court observed that the passage of time had …

FARHEEN IRFAN AHMED AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR dated 09.09.2026 under Sections 316(2) and 351(2) BNS and mandamus to prevent their arrest and any coercive action. The respondents opposed the merits but did not object to an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh …

ROBIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Robin Kumar and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 09-11-2025 under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the …

ROBIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Robin Kumar and two others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 26-11-2025 under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They also prayed that the police follow the …

ROBIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Robin Kumar and two others filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 04‑02‑2026 under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, and a direction that they not be arrested. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court …

FARZANA BEGUMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Farzana Begum filed a writ petition seeking extraordinary pension, retiral dues and terminal benefits of her husband who died on 17 January 2002. She had already submitted a representation to the respondent authority, the State of Uttar Pradesh, for the same relief. The learned Standing …

RAFIK KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rafik Khan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged assault on his sister‑in‑law, who is the wife of his brother Majid Khan. The FIR named eight accused, and the applicant claimed he had no criminal antecedents and was …

CHIMMAN @ NASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 18.07.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, and a writ of mandamus to restrain the State from arresting him. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous …

SMT. SANTOSH DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Smt. Santosh Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 23469 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted leave for …

UDAY PRATAP SINGH @ RAJA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Uday Pratap Singh (applicant No.1) and Anand Kumar (applicant No.2) in a criminal case involving offences under sections 320, 332(c), 335, 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The court noted that applicant No.1 was not named …

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shailendra Kumar Saxena, a Senior Assistant, filed a writ petition seeking his promotion to Chief Assistant and a mandamus directing the Director (Administration), Medical and Health, Uttar Pradesh to consider his application dated 5 September 2026 within a stipulated period. The petitioner alleged …

YATISH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yatish Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant him the third time pay scale, adjust his salary accordingly, and pay arrears for a period of suspension from 24 September 2005 to 12 October 2006 with interest. …

CHANDUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to settle the pending criminal case (Case Crime No.566 of 2015) with the State of U.P. Both parties had already reached a compromise, but the deed had not been presented before the court. The High …

AMARENDRA @ AVANEND SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 06.08.2026 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners prayed that the police follow the …

JAIRAM PAL AND 18 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioners, who are Sub Inspectors in the Uttar Pradesh Police, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking an additional increment after completing 19 years of service, relying on the precedent set in Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and subsequent cases. The petition referenced earlier …

GAARAD NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaarad Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 89 of 2026) involving alleged assault, use of a country‑made pistol and iron rod, and injuries to the complainant. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …

SMT NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Nirmala Devi, filed a writ petition challenging an appellate order dated 12 May 2026 passed under Section 27(2) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973. The respondent authorities argued that the petitioner could seek a revision before the State Government. The Court, …

VIRENDRA SINGH AND 16 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioners, owners of plot no. 266‑Kha (2.47 acres), alleged that the State of U.P. and other respondents were illegally dumping seized and abandoned vehicles on their land. They filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to stop the dumping. The Court examined the records and held that the …

DHARMVEER ALIAS DHARMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dharmveer, was charged with murder under Section 103(1) of the CrPC based on an FIR lodged 11 days after the incident. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an eye‑witness, Pramod, recorded after 12 days, and CCTV footage that allegedly identified the applicant and a co‑accused …

MOHD. SALEEM KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd. Saleem Khan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to grant him a Grade Pay of Rs.4600 (Level‑7) and the annual promotional pay scale, alleging that his seniority was ignored in favor of juniors. He also requested that Respondent No.3 decide his pending …

PARAMVEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Paramveer, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC claiming that a compromise deed had already been executed with the State of U.P. and two other parties. The court noted that the original compromise deed had not been presented before the trial court and ordered its return …

GANESH KASHYAPversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Ganesh Kashyap filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 30‑07‑2026 under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and also sought mandamus to restrain his arrest and any coercive …

MOHAMMAD TAFAZZAL BEGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Tafazzal Beg, filed a writ petition seeking transfer of his posting from the Agra district to the Lucknow zone. He had already submitted a representation to the concerned authority for the same relief. The respondent, the State of Uttar Pradesh, through its standing counsel, …

SUSHMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sushma, filed a writ petition seeking to extend the benefit of a judgment dated 09.07.2026 in Special Appeal No. 467 of 2026 to herself, as she was not a party to the earlier proceedings. The respondent‑Commission argued, citing a later judgment (14.09.2026, Writ‑A No. 13927 of 2026, …

PRAMODversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pramod, accused in Crime No. 245 of 2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and related IPC provisions. Pramod claimed he was falsely implicated, that no specific overt act was attributed to him, and highlighted that a co‑accused had already …

JASVEER SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an urgent application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to record a compromise in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 307, 323 and 506 IPC. The court noted that the parties had already reached a compromise but had not filed the deed before the trial …

LOKESH @ TAUSIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Lokesh @ Tausi, who is charged under IPC sections 354 Ka, 354 Kha, 376 AB and POCSO Act sections 5M/6, 9M/10 for alleged indecent acts with a minor. The applicant claimed false implication and no prior criminal record, while the State …

SUSHMA GIRI AND 36 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Sushma Giri and 36 co‑accused who were named in FIR No. 36 of 2021 for offences under numerous IPC sections, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and the Prevention of Damages to Public …

PAPPU MET @ PAPPUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, disposed of four writ petitions concerning systemic delays in criminal trials and non‑compliance with bail‑surety directions. In Pappu Met’s case, the court modified the bail order, reducing the personal bond to Rs …

DR. SHASHI BALA BHADANA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings, asserting that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 07‑02‑2024. The trial court had earlier been directed to verify the …

UMESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 15‑07‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 03 of 2023) instituted under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both parties agreed to refer the …

ABHISHEK BHASKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Abhishek Bhaskar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.125243 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 403 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

MUSTKINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mustkin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief pending the filing of a charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the writ petition …

UDAI VEER SINGHversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE OC. LTD. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, a police constable, claimed compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 from an insurance company for injuries sustained in a motorcycle accident on 5 July 1998. He alleged that the accident occurred while he was on patrol duty and that he incurred medical expenses not reimbursed by the police …

SMT. PREM WATI AND OTHERSversusNEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS

The appellant, Smt. Prem Wati and others, appealed against the award of compensation for the death of Ram Sevak in a motor vehicle accident, contending that the deceased's income was understated and that the 50% deduction for contributory negligence was unwarranted. The trial Tribunal had assessed …

SMT. SAROJ AND OTHERSversusSMT. NATTHI AND ANOTHER

The appellant appealed the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.1,79,500 in a claim for the death of Bhagwat Singh, arguing that the notional income of the deceased was grossly undervalued. The Tribunal had assessed the deceased's income at Rs.15,000 per annum and awarded compensation …

BANSHI RAM AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA THRU G.M. N.E. RAILWAY

The appellant Banshi Ram filed a claim for compensation of Rs.4,00,000 after his son Dinesh Ram died in a railway accident. The Railway Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs.2,00,000, deducting Rs.2,00,000 on the ground that the appellant could not prove he was the legal heir of his deceased wife Jasmati …

PHULWA AND OTHERSversusA.D.J. ANPARA SONBHADRA AND OTHERS

The petitioners Phulwa and others filed Writ Petition C No. 28738 of 2002 in the Allahabad High Court against A.D.J. Anpara Sonbhadra and others. Counsel for the petitioners were listed as Rahul Sripat, A.K. Narayan, Chandreshwar Prasad, Dhuru Narayan, Ishir Sripat, J.H. Khan, J.K. Yadav, M.L. …

SMT. KIRAN SANKHWAR AND OTHERSversusASHOK KUMAR PANDEY AND OTHERS

The appellant sought compensation for the death of Suresh Kumar Shankwar, who was struck by a tanker on 12 September 1999. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the claim, deeming the sole eyewitness, PW‑3 Raghvendra Singh, unreliable. On appeal, the High Court examined the inconsistencies in …

SMT. PUSHPA DEVI @ PUSHPA SHUKLA AND 2 ORS.versusSHREEKRISHNA

The dispute concerned ownership and possession of a house inherited from the deceased Sri Ram Kishore Tiwari. Two wills were executed by the deceased, the earlier (1984) granting a life interest to his wife and thereafter to his daughter and grandchildren, and a later (2008) revoking the earlier …

GOPAL GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Gopal Goswami filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and pointed to a history of 26 cases where bail …

USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Usman under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged possession of 20.870 kg of ganja under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act. The applicant claimed false implication, non‑recovery of the narcotic, and non‑compliance with …

AHSAN @ KATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Ahsan @ Kati filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the 517 g of smack seized from him was not actually recovered from his possession and that the seizure violated the mandatory procedure of Section …