Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 1401–1600

GULMOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gulmohammad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The investigation had already concluded with a final report favoring the petitioner dated 21‑08‑2026. The petitioner later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, which the …

PRIYA GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Priya Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 5 …

MANTU VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mantu Vishwakarma, who was named in an FIR alleging assault leading to death and injuries under various IPC sections and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that no medical evidence existed for the …

GYAN CHANDRA @ PRADUMMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gyan Chandra @ Pradumman in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, with the FIR containing vague allegations against him and no corroborative evidence linking him …

RUKHSAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rukhsar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared before the Court to address the matter, although the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court examined the lack of prosecution of …

RAM ASHISH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Ashish and four others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22800 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the Court that they no longer …

VINAY PRAKASH SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinay Prakash Singh, challenged an order dated 05.05.2026 issued by a University that rejected his claim without providing any reasons. He argued that the order suffered from a lack of application of mind and was inconsistent with the benefits granted to a similarly situated …

SURESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suresh, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 38149 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to approach the appropriate authorities for relief. The …

ANIT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anit Kumar and Vinayak, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 266 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. They contended …

RAKESH @ RAKESH BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. for Rakesh Babu, who was charged under IPC sections 351(3), 352, 137(2), 87 and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the victim’s age was …

IMRANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Imran under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged violations of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The FIR was originally lodged against a co‑accused, Raja @ Rajuddin, for …

SUNILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil, accused in a murder case (Crime No.184 of 2026). The applicant was named in the FIR based on circumstantial evidence: he allegedly took the deceased from his house on 18 April 2026 and later pointed to a blood‑stained spade and his own …

SHAMSUDDIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Shamsuddin and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 65 of 2022 (Najrana v. Samsuddin et al.) which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence …

SMT. FATIMA BEGUM ALIAS KISHWARversusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE AND 8 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Fatima Begum, challenged orders that removed her name from land records on the ground that her widow, Rukaiya Begum, had allegedly remarried. The dispute arose from proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, where lower authorities had allowed the removal …

DEVI DAYAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devi Dayan Gupta under Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic and Dangerous Substances Act in a case of alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a 72‑day delay in filing the FIR, lack of direct evidence, …

JITENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order relating to offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNSS and sections 3 and 4 of the DP Act. The applicants asserted that they had reached a compromise with the …

VINAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Vinay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case (Crime No.604 of 2022) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. He claimed innocence and argued that the police were attempting an unwarranted arrest, citing a prior interim bail order and the Supreme …

PREMWATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought compensation for the remaining 0.1610 hectares of land after a sale deed of 0.3000 hectares was declared void. They requested that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition for compensation. The petitioners were informed that any …

VINOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought compensation for 0.1610 hectares of land after a sale deed covering 0.3000 hectares of the total 0.4610 hectares was declared void. They approached the High Court seeking a writ for the same. Subsequently, the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the writ and instead …

DEEPUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Deepi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 257 of 2026) alleging false implication by the victim's father. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship with the accused and denied any enticement or sexual intercourse. The State …

BYAS MUNI GIRI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Byas Muni Giri and two others in a criminal case involving alleged assault under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. The applicants claimed false implication, lack of serious injury, and no prior criminal record, while the informant …

OMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Omveer Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other authorities to release his pensionary and other retiral benefits accrued since 1 November 1989 as a work-charge employee. The petition also requested that all service benefits be …

HARIKESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Harikesh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking (i) a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 01‑02‑2026 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S 2023 and sections 3/4 of the DP Act, and (ii) a writ of …

SHIV KUMAR GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shiv Kumar Gupta and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation, wherein additional sections were added during the probe. The State's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) highlighted the addition …

SAVITRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Savitri filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Azamgarh Division, to decide Revision No. 388/2025 (Ashwani alias Mauzi v. Tehsildar) filed under Section 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901, which had …

SHARAFAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sharafat Ali, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of a non‑bailable warrant dated 03‑04‑2023 and a Section 82 CrPC process dated 13‑07‑2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar. …

ABHISHEK SONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Abhishek Soni, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 1048 of 2024) that alleged offences under Sections 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B IPC. The ground relied upon was the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State of …

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Sunil Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 492 of 2026) involving alleged assault on an informant and her husband, with injuries reported. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed due to a family property dispute, that he himself suffered an injury, and that he had …

ATUL SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 40156 of 2026) seeking relief. They had previously filed an application under Section 482 CrPC (No. 22081 of 2011), which was disposed of on 12 July 2011. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that …

DANISH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Danish and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Rampur. The applicants and the second opposite party had settled their …

LAKHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lakhan, who is accused in a criminal case (Crime No. 57 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences. Lakhan claimed he was falsely implicated and that the dispute was essentially civil, citing a sale deed executed by the landowner. He had been in …

RAJEEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajeev, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 21.01.2026 and the related criminal proceedings. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew all prayers except the request to surrender before the trial court within …

BHEEM PRIYA BHANUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bheem Priya Bhanu under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, fearing arrest in a case involving alleged preparation of fake Inter State Transit Passes. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR named 23 …

SUBHASH CHANDRA AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Subhash Chandra and 11 others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Anurag Kumar Goutam and Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, later informed the court that they no longer wished to press the prayer and sought to withdraw the …

ASHISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ashish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case (Crime No.114 of 2025) where he is alleged, along with five others, to have assaulted three persons, causing various injuries. The applicant claims he is innocent, that the allegations against him are vague, and that he has no …

SHOKEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in an NDPS case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) alleging false implication after his name appeared in a co‑accused's confessional statement. The co‑accused was linked to the recovery of 261 g of smack, exceeding the commercial quantity …

VIKRANT PRAKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikrant Prakash Singh, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 384 of 2025) based on confessional statements of co‑accused, though his name was absent from the FIR. The applicant argued innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that …

SONAKSHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonakshi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 318(4), 61(2) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to a forged marriage. The applicant claimed absolute innocence, alleging false implication due to an ulterior motive, and highlighted …

AWADHESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to decide Revision No. 3277 of 2023, which had been pending since 2023 and repeatedly adjourned. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and invoked paragraph 458(2) of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, which …

EX-CONSTABLE OM PRAKASH GAUTAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an appeal by ex‑Constable Om Prakash Gautam challenging a penalty order that dismissed him from service, which had been confirmed by an appeal order and earlier dismissed in a writ petition. The appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the special appeal and a …

TAUSEEF RAZA @ ADILversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tauseef Raza @ Adil, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 10158 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application contained glaring procedural defects that could not be cured by …

RAM NIWAS SHARMAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

Ram Niwas Sharma, a retired caretaker of a government inter‑college, filed a writ petition seeking his retirement dues. The High Court earlier directed him to make a representation before the Deputy Director of Education, which was disposed with the observation that the District Inspector of Schools …

KUNJ GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kunj Gupta and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a case filed under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The …

SUNIL KUMAR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Chauhan under Section 482 CrPC in a rape case (Crime No. 225 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication and that the alleged victim was a consenting party, while the State opposed the bail but …

SHAYRA KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shayra Khatoon and her son applied for anticipatory bail in a criminal case alleging assault on four injured persons. The FIR and a Section 180 statement allege that Shayra was armed with a sword, but the prosecution could not link any injury to a sharp weapon. The applicants belong to the same …

RAKESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rakesh in a murder case (Criminal No. 88 of 2026) where the prosecution alleged involvement based on circumstantial evidence, a recovered mobile phone, and statements of co‑accused. The applicant argued that no one was named in the FIR, there was …

AJAY KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Registrar of Tehsil Soraon to decide an application dated 11‑09‑2026 and to refrain from interfering with their peaceful possession of land comprising Gata Nos. 294 and 202 in …

MD KAUSAR KURESHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Md Kausar Kureshi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code, fearing arrest in a case involving alleged violations of the Arms Act, the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. He argued that he was falsely …

SHAHGAZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahgaz, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Sections 85, 108 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged nine days after the alleged incident, that the delay undermined the …

ABHISHEK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code in connection with a shooting incident in Deoria. The prosecution alleged that Yadav had called the victim, Prakash Yadav, to a park where co‑accused …

ANUP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but later requested to withdraw the application and instead apply for regular bail. The opposing counsel did not object to the withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal, directing that the applicant must …

NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naresh Kumar, who was implicated in a case under Sections 316(5), 317(2) of the IPC and Section 61(2) of the Banking Regulation Act for alleged misappropriation of gold from a bank safe. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, had no …

HARIOM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hariom Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 324(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name was not in the FIR and was only mentioned in a co‑accused's …

TRIVENI RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

The petitioner, Triveni Ram, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Azamgarh Division to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 218/2022) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the case had …

AMIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Kumar, who was implicated under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged 24 days after the incident, that there was no direct or indirect evidence linking him to …

SHIV KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shiv Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑12‑2022 and the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1238 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. …

ARSHAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arshad Ali, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to protect his life and property from alleged political harassment by ruling party elements. The petition was dismissed because the prayer was vague and could not be granted on that …

ROHIT RAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Rohit Ram, who was named in an FIR for alleged offences under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (section 11). The applicant …

RAJARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rajaram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22 September 2024 and the cognizance order dated 26 November 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24878 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 182, 200, 506 IPC and …

SHIVALAYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Shivalaya, who was in custody for a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act fitting the …

GABBAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Gabbar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash a judgment dated 10 September 2026 of the Special Judge (POCSO Act) in Budaun, which arose from a criminal case under Sections 452 and 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. …

SAROJ VIKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The appellant, Saroj Vikash, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS seeking registration of an FIR and police investigation against five accused for alleged injuries and caste-based abuse. The Special Judge treated the application as a complaint rather than ordering an FIR, prompting …

RAVI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of Ravi Chaudhari, who was charged under Sections 3(1), 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 2(b)(xiv) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that …

JUGANOOversusPANKAJ GUPTA, BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK

The applicant, Juganoo, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent bank, represented by its branch manager, willfully defied a January 20, 2026 order of the Allahabad High Court in Writ‑C No.205 of 2026, which required the applicant to deposit Rs.1,50,000 and stay any recovery action …

SURJEET KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Surjeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 150 of 2026) filed under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS. He contended that the FIR, lodged by the victim's father, falsely implicated him for enticement, and the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS affirmed that she voluntarily …

GOVIND SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Govind Singh, sought bail in a dowry‑death case where his wife was found dead by throttling. The FIR originally alleged offences under sections 80(2), 85 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the charge‑sheet was later filed under sections 85, 103(1) …

DHARMVEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmveer, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 77 of 2026) alleging assault that led to the death of an informant's father. The FIR charges him under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 105 of the Indian Penal Code and a provision of the …

SANJAY VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Verma filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Vice Chairman of the Agra Development Authority to demarcate plot no.602 in Chhipi Tola, Sabji Mandi, Agra. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be compelled to demarcate the plot under the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …

CHANDRA PRAKASHversusBOARD OF REVENUE UP AND 12 OTHERS

The petitioner, Chandra Prakash, filed Writ Petition No. 4340 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was found to contain incurable defects, prompting the petitioner's counsel to seek its withdrawal and permission to file a fresh petition with complete particulars. The court examined …

SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Shekhar applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving offences under several IPC sections, including assault and grievous hurt. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the investigation only implicated him through a vague statement, with no specific role …

TUSHAR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tushar Kumar, accused in a case involving alleged assault over a property dispute, where the FIR listed several violent offences under the IPC. The applicant argued that the injuries to the victims were simple, he had no prior criminal record, …

FAIM ALIAS FAHIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faim alias Fahim in a criminal case under Section 105 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication, citing a three‑day delay in lodging the FIR and that the informant’s statement under Section 180 indicated intoxication and no prior …

MRS MEENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Mrs. Meena filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03.09.2026 issued by M/s Nirmal Facility Management Service Private Limited. The respondents, including the State of U.P., raised a preliminary objection that the order was passed by a private limited company, and therefore the petition …

RAJ SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Raj Shekhar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 238 of 2026, alleging false implication and lack of independent witnesses to the recovery of two mobile phones and Rs.500. The applicant argued that no corroborative evidence linked him to the offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of …

KRISHNA JATAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krishna Jatav under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the definition of "gang" or "gangster", and that he …

RAJKUMAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Rajkumar Dubey, who feared arrest in a 2018 case involving offences under Sections 147, 406, 420 and 120‑B IPC. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences did not attract a …

OM SHARAN PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Om Sharan Pal, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondent authority to pay arrears of the 5th and 6th pay scales with interest and to consider his representation within a fixed period. The respondent argued that the grievance should be addressed by the Executive …

KRISHNA MURARI PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Krishna Murari Pandey, a government employee, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to grant him promotional pay‑scale benefits after completing 16/18 years of continuous service, relying on earlier Lucknow Bench judgments dated 11‑Nov‑2021 and 24‑Sep‑2025, and also to compel the Managing …

DIGAMBER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Digamber Singh, was charged under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and faced both criminal prosecution and disciplinary proceedings. He filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent proceedings, alleging prejudice. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Bharar Lal …

ADESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Adesh, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 167 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. The dispute arose from a village quarrel over garbage dumping, leading to a cross‑fight on 14 August 2026 in which both parties …

SUDHIR KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sudhir Kumar Yadav, a contractual employee since 2018, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order treating him as an outsourced employee and a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay his honorarium directly. He previously obtained a protective order in Writ A No. 3493 of …

KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Krishna Kumar, sought bail under Section 483 of the CrPC for a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the definition of a "gang" or "gangster", and that he had already …

ARVINDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner Arvind filed a writ petition seeking permission to appear for counseling for the Assistant Teacher recruitment and to have his actual date of birth corrected in the application form, alleging that the date of birth was wrongly entered. He claimed that his earlier writ petition (Writ‑A …

SUNIL KUMARversusSRI RAJENDRA PRASAD, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

Sunil Kumar filed a contempt application against Sri Rajendra Prasad, Executive Officer of Nagar Palika Parishad, alleging willful defiance of an order dated 20‑05‑2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 7760 of 2026 (Sunil Kumar (Safai Nayak) vs State of U.P. and others). The court noted that a prima facie case …

SANTARA DEVIversusSMT YOGITA SINGH SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER

The applicant, Santara Devi, filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Smt Yogita Singh, Sub‑Divisional Officer, willfully defied an order dated 04‑Oct‑2024 issued in Writ‑C No. 32451 of 2024. The court noted that a certified copy of the order had been served but compliance had …

SMT. SEEMA ANJUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Smt. Seema Anjum, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court No.03, Muzaffarnagar to decide a pending family law case (Case No.1468/11 of 2024) within a stipulated time, alleging that delay would cause irreparable injury. …

MOHD HAMID @ SADDAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohd Hamid @ Saddam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the definition of "gang" or "gangster", and that …

OM VEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERSversusSANJAY PRASAD AND ANOTHER

Six Sub‑Inspectors (Om Veer Singh and five others) filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondent, the Additional Chief Secretary (Home), willfully defied a High Court order dated 2 December 2025 which directed the Deputy Inspector General of Police to decide their claim for an additional …

ABDULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ directing the State to remove an encroachment by respondent No.4 on a pond and to compel the Tehsildar to conclude pending proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petition relied on an eviction order dated 11‑April‑2025 that had not been …

RANDHEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to remove an alleged illegal encroachment on Arazi No. 249, Mauza Donwar, recorded as a road in the revenue records. The petitioner relied on RC Forms 19 & 20 issued under Rule 67 of the Uttar …

UMESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Umesh in Criminal Case No. 171 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is based on circumstantial evidence, and the applicant was named as an accused during investigation along with …

AJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Ajay Kumar Singh filed a petition under Article 227 challenging an order of the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge) under the Essential Commodities Act and an order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC that refused registration of an FIR …

GANGA PRASAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to halt construction on their private land and to compel the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings with full compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State …

DEVI PRASADversusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Devi Prasad, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue to decide Restoration Application No. 130 of 2025 (Ram Sewak v. Smt. Shivpati) which had been pending since 2025 and repeatedly adjourned without justification. The …

M/S MODERN METALS OVERSEASversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

M/S Modern Metals Overseas filed a writ petition challenging the Director General of Foreign Trade's rejection of its waiver application dated 20‑12‑2025 under the third proviso of Section 15(1) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The court examined whether the authority …

MONU @ ROHITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Monu @ Rohit, who was implicated in a suicide case under Sections 108, 115(2), 333 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a delayed FIR, lack of evidence of abetment, and asserted that the arrest would …

M/S SUPERIOR METAL OVERSEASversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

M/S Superior Metal Overseas filed a writ petition challenging the Director General of Foreign Trade's (DGFT) order rejecting its waiver application dated 20-12-2025. The petitioner sought a waiver under the third proviso to Section 15(1) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, …

FATICHAND YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Fatichand Yadav, who was implicated as the owner of a vehicle alleged to have been used for transporting cow progeny in violation of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, the Cow Protection Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to …

VISHAL PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vishal Pandey, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The respondent's counsel and the Standing Counsel raised no objection to the dismissal. The Court considered the lack …

SHIV SAHAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Shiv Sahay Singh filed a PIL seeking a court direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove illegal encroachments on plot No. 522 (Chakmarg) in Basantpatti, Varanasi. The respondent's standing counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Sections 26 …

RAMJEETversusSTATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

Ramjeet filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the removal of encroachments on several revenue‑recorded plots in Village Jaswal, Sant Kabir Nagar. The respondent’s standing counsel argued that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the …

SATYAM TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Satyam Tiwari in a case under Sections 248(1), 238(1), 3(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the only allegation against him was participation in a conspiracy, …

DHARMA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Dharma Devi filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order directing the State of Uttar Pradesh to remove illegal encroachments on a plot of pasture land (Plot No.100Kha) in Village Ram Gadh Kothari, Allahabad district. The respondent's standing counsel argued that the petitioner has an …

M/S RAHUL CONSTRUCTIONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Rahul Construction filed a writ petition challenging an ex‑parte adjudication order dated 23‑03‑2026 passed under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2019‑20. The petitioner argued that it could not appeal within the prescribed limitation due to lack of knowledge of the order, …

M/S KAKA STORESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Kaka Stores filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 08‑04‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2018‑19. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the prescribed …

BALDEVversusSRI ARPIT UPADHYAY

The applicant, Baldev, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of an order dated 20‑02‑2026 passed in Writ‑A No. 2584 of 2026. The High Court heard the matter without giving notice to the opposite party, where counsel Munna Pandey produced an order dated 28‑09‑2026 concerning the …

MAIYADEENversusSRI ARPIT UPADHYAY COMMISSIONER

The applicant, Maiyadeen, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a February 20, 2026 order issued in Writ‑A No. 2560 of 2026. The court heard the matter without giving notice to the opposite party, and counsel for the opposite party, Sri Munna Pandey, produced a September 28, 2026 …

MANOJ KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Manoj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S. in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), 105 and 106(1) B.N.S., where he was seated on a tractor driven by co‑accused Virendra Kumar who lacked a driving licence and …

SHER ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Sher Ali, a truck driver, was arrested after his vehicle carrying 525 bags of urea was intercepted. He claims he is falsely implicated, is not the owner of the goods, and seeks bail on parity with co‑accused who have already been released. The State’s counsel highlighted his criminal antecedents but …

OMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Ompal Singh, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 409, 406, 120-B, 467 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that he had cooperated with the …

KULDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kuldeep in a rape case (Crime No. 323 of 2026) where the complainant alleged sexual assault based on a false promise of marriage. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, the relationship was consensual for 3-4 years, and …

NAKSHATRA VINAY AGARWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nakshatra Vinay Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner indeed …

HARBHAJAN SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Harbhajan Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner …

SHIV MURAT PATELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the respondents to remove illegal encroachments on Plot Nos. 484 and 485 in Sikandarpur village. The petitioner relied on an order passed under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for eviction and recovery of damages, …

VIKAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. After hearing, the applicants sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular …

AVANISH KUMAR MITTAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑05‑2024 in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race …

SHIV SARAN SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shiv Saran Singh, was issued a show‑cause notice by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, for allegedly suppressing information about a pending criminal case (Crime No. 24 of 2013) in his passport application. The petitioner contended that the case was false, that the investigating …

GAJNDRA PAL SINGHversusJAIYKARAN YADAV AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Gajndra Pal Singh, filed a contempt application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the applicant later moved that the contempt application be withdrawn. The court considered whether a contempt proceeding could be dismissed upon the applicant's request for …

BHUDEVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Bhudev under CrPC Section 482 in a case involving alleged offences under several IPC sections. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. …

PRADEEP @ DEEPAK SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, concerning Pradeep @ Deepak Sharma, who was in custody since 21‑04‑2026. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act fitting the …

ABHISHEK PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Abhishek Pandey and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 01‑08‑2026 in State v. Satya Prakash Pandey, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (i.e., IPC Sections 420 and 406) along …

ALEY HASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Aley Hasan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 209 of 2026) alleging violations of the Cow Slaughter Act and the Arms Act, stemming from an alleged firing on police where no police officer was injured but a co-accused, Javed, sustained a leg injury. The applicant claimed the recovered pistol, …

SHUBHAM SINGH @ BOSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shubham Singh, who was charged under Sections 105, 115(2), 303(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code in a case arising from an incident at Bidhnu police station. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR and that his …

ANIKETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aniket in a case under Sections 191(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) and 342(4) of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and pledged cooperation with the investigation, while the State opposed the bail but did …

ARVIND TRIPATHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and related proceedings in a case where they were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicants argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi Race Club Ltd. v. State …

IRSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Irshad in a case under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 5.008 kg of ganja. The applicant argued that the recovery was false, there was no independent witness, the quantity was below commercial level and mandatory …

AAJEETversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aajeet, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a criminal case (Crime No. 408 of 2026) alleging Sections 76 and 351(2) of the BNSS, claiming apprehension of arrest. The State opposed, arguing that the alleged offences do not carry a punishment …

DAKSH PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the Special Trial No. 1309 of 2024 arising from Crime No. 499 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 64, 333, 115(2), 351(2) of the BNSS and Section 3(2)5 of the Scheduled Castes …

SHAHNEWAZ AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 21‑06‑2022 that had summoned them under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the underlying personal …

BHIKAM SINGH KARDAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5548 of 2026) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Bhikam Singh Kardam and others for offences under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333 and 125(a) of …

SONU SINGH @ PARAM JEET SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 10472 of 2026, which arose from a complaint under sections 498A, 323 IPC and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached a full and amicable compromise with the …

KASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Kasim, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and sought to withdraw it. The court considered the …

RAJESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court dismissed an intra‑court appeal challenging a suspension order dated 17‑02‑2026 imposed on Rajesh Kumar, a employee of the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation. The appellant argued that the suspension violated Rule 4 of the Corporation’s Discipline and Appeal Regulations, 2020, …

RAJ KUMAR MAJHI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 222 of 2019 and the cognizance order, as well as to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued against them. They contended that they were on …

RAJAT TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rajat Tyagi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 71445/2023) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. They contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s decision …

RAMALAKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramalakh, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court order to remove illegal encroachments on plot no.351 (Naveen Parti) in Village Aura, Jaunpur. The respondents argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, …

RAFI AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Rafi Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking a directive for the payment of one increment, relying on a representation he submitted on 12 September 2026. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the matter should be decided on its merits, while the standing counsel for the respondents …

GAURAV CHAUDHARYversusUNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaurav Chaudhary, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a notice dated 07.04.2026 issued by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow. The petition sought relief against the annexation of evidence and the procedural steps prescribed by the officer. The Court …

SURAJ YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Suraj Yadav in a case involving alleged possession of a pistol, cartridges, a mobile phone and Rs.3,200 under various sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, …

SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No.46/2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 276, 277, 278 and 318(4) of the BNSS Act. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, …

SHADABversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Shadab was arrested for alleged assault with a knife under several IPC sections, including 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2) and 118(1). He claimed that the informant and he belong to the same family and that a compromise had been reached, with the informant expressing no desire to …

RAJNEESH KUMAR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Rajneesh Kumar Singh, a railway employee, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 27‑01‑2026 and 17‑09‑2026 passed by respondent No. 3. The Union of India raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The …

RANJIT SINGH BAGHELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjit Singh Baghel under Section 482 CrPC in a case registered under Section 409 IPC for alleged criminal breach of trust. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a three‑year delay in filing the FIR and his absence from work on …

SMT BHAWAR KALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Bhawar Kali, sought a compensation of Rs.5,00,000 under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna, 2020 for the death of her son, Ram Kumar. The District Magistrate, Baghpat, rejected the claim with a terse order in Hindi that provided no reasons. The court held that any …

SAVITRIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Savitri applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 101 of 2026) under Sections 87, 137(2), 142 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that she was implicated only because photographs from her mobile phone linked her brother Shivanshu to an alleged enticement of a minor. She claimed no …

HANSRAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hansraj Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (respondent No.2) to decide his application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to register a sale/sub‑lease deed for Plot C‑519. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision …

RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Raj Kumar Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to decide his application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to execute a sale/sub‑lease deed for a plot in NRI City. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision in Civil Appeal …

SHIV KARAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution alleging certain relief. The respondents contended that the petitioners had concealed material facts, specifically a related writ (Writ C No.39926 of 2025) and the pendency of S.A. No.220/26 with an order dated 03.09.2026. …

MRS ABHA CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mrs. Abha Chaudhary filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority to decide her application dated 11‑05‑2026 and to register a sale deed for a plot in NRI City. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court decision (Civil Appeal No.11052 of 2025) …

SHAMSHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner was served a notice to remove illegal constructions encroaching a public road in Bareilly, covering 180 square feet. The petitioner filed a reply with the Executive Engineer. The High Court directed that the reply be placed before the Nagar Ayukta, who should consider the matter and …

FARMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Farman in criminal case No. 179 of 2026, alleged under IPC Section 105 and CrPC Section 223(2). The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, there was no prior enmity with the deceased, and the allegations were vague with …

AJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ajay Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, that the vehicle alleged to be involved had been sold, and that …

M/S SUNIL BATTERY SERVICEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/S Sunil Battery Service filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte adjudication order dated 13‑08‑2024 passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 for FY 2019‑20. The petitioner claimed it was unaware of the order and therefore could not file the statutory appeal within the …

SMT. USHAversusSUSHRI RIDHI PANDEY

Smt. Usha filed a contempt application (civil) against Sushri Ridhi Pandey before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Adeel Ahmad Khan, who informed the Court that the order of the writ Court had been complied with. The Court considered whether the compliance negated …

ARYAN SINGH YADAV ALIAS TONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Aryan Singh Yadav was charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and caste‑based abusing the informant at a public feast. He appealed under Section 14A(1) of the SC/ST Act seeking quash of the …

QAMARUDDIN AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, eight assistant teachers, challenged orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, which adversely affected their appointments and salary. They sought a writ restraining interference with their peaceful functioning and direction …

JAVEDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Javed, who is accused of offences under IPC Sections 364, 302 and 201 arising from a 2017 incident. Javed has been in judicial custody since 28 January 2018 and the trial …

DINESH KUMARversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Kumar, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside an order dated 27 February 2024 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate in Basti and a revisional order dated 5 November 2024 passed by the Session Judge. The relief sought was the quashing of both the magistrate's …

SANJAY SWAMI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The High Court had earlier ordered the applicants to deposit Rs.25,000 with its Mediation Centre, which they failed to do. No representative of the applicants appeared before the Court to pursue the …

SAKEEL AHMAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sakeel Ahmad Khan, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and two other respondents. The petition alleged issues related to betterment or improvement charges, but the record showed that no such demand had been raised. The court examined …

MOHD FARUKH AND 9 OTHERSversusGULAM RASOOL AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to set aside a September 2024 order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge in a rent appeal (Rent Appeal No. 20 of 2021) and to enforce a Small Cause Court judgment granting them possession of a property in Saharanpur. The …

HEMANT KUMAR MISHRAversusUNION BANK OF INDIA, BRANCH MUMFORDGANJ BRANCH

The petitioners, nominees of the deceased Ms. Suraksha Rani Bhatia, sought a writ of mandamus directing Union Bank of India to release the amounts lying in four Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) in their favour. The bank contended that the petitioners were not the original FDR holders and raised a …

NITIN @ SONU CHILLARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin @ Sonu Chillar, who was not named in the FIR but was alleged to have been present at the scene of a homicide. The applicant argued that he had no active role in …

SMT. LOKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Lokesh, was allotted Plot No. VL-51 by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA) which was later cancelled on 10 February 2025 on the ground that the land had been re‑allotted to other tenure‑holders. The petitioner challenged the cancellation and the …

AHSAN AND ANOTHERversusABDUL WAHAV (DIED) AND 28 OTHERS

The petitioners Ahsan and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was listed as infructuous and no appearance was made by the petitioners on the scheduled date. The court observed that …

ANIL KUMAR SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused, Anil Kumar Singh Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case involving sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to fraud and forgery, alleging that the FIR lodged by Shashank Bajpai was false and stemmed from a commercial dispute over a sub‑tender. The applicant contended that no sub‑tender …

SURYAKANT AND ANOTHERversusRANVEER SINGH

The writ petition filed by Suryakant and another under Article 227 was listed as infructuous, meaning no parties appeared before the court. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of being infructuous. No substantive facts, legal issues, or arguments were addressed. The …

ABHISHEK PANDEY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, three assistant teachers, challenged two orders dated 29‑07‑2025 that removed them from service and halted their salary. They argued that the orders were based on an alleged fraud finding that conflicted with earlier departmental inquiries and approvals. The court noted that the …

SMT. ANUPRIYA RAIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Anupriya Rai, an Assistant Teacher, challenged two orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, which alleged irregularities in her appointment and sought to withhold her salary. The petition argued that the …

HAZI MEHARBAN AND 11 OTHERSversusSATYA NARAYAN AND 15 OTHERS

The revisionists challenged orders of the Executing Court that allowed the decree‑holder to take possession of agricultural land without clear identification of its boundaries. The dispute arose from a specific‑performance suit where the original agreement mentioned 5,050 square yards, but the …

ROOP KISHOR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 1062 of 2021) that alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 354, 323, 504, 506 and D.P. Act sections 3 and 4. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the …

SUNIL KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Sunil Kumar (deceased), Aman @ Bholu and Rakesh Singh filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash Special Case No.35 of 2023 (Tridev Singh v. Sunil Kumar et al.) pending before the Special Judge, Etawah, alleging that the criminal case was false, stemmed from a land dispute, …

ROHIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, comprising a husband (Rohit) and his relatives, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings in a dowry harassment case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act. They …

STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERSversusINSPECTOR, PREM VEER SINGH RANA AND ANOTHER

The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a tribunal order dated 14 October 2024 that had set aside disciplinary proceedings against Inspector Prem Veer Singh Rana, alleging that the tribunal failed to consider the respondent's defence and issued a non‑speaking, unseasoned order. The incident involved a …

KAMENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Kamendra Yadav, who was implicated in an Arms Act case (Sections 3, 5, 25, 7) based solely on the confessional statement of a co‑accused. The applicant asserted his innocence, argued that …

KAMENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamendra Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3, 5, 25 and 7 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the sole basis of the accusation was the confessional statement of a …

JAKIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jakir, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 400 of 2007) under Section 137 of the Electricity Act and Sections 379 and 411 of the IPC. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC but later sought to withdraw it and instead file a regular bail …

MOHD. IQBAL ALIAS BALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mohd Iqbal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging a sanction order dated 28‑11‑2024 issued by the Chairman of the U.P. Legislative Council under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondents raised preliminary objections, contending that …

JAGVATIversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant Jagwati filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 244 of 2015) and the charge sheet relating to an alleged insurance fraud where a policy was purportedly issued in the name of a deceased person. The …

VIVEK SAGAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 545 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 335 of 2025, which involved offences under sections 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The …

GAURI SHANKAR @ GAURI SHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Gauri Shankar, who was alleged to have induced investors to deposit money with VEALL Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited under a scheme promising to double the amount in six years. The applicant contended that he was merely an agent of the …

RAMASHRAY YADAV AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellants, Ramashray Yadav and others, appealed against a conviction under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act arising from FIR No. 505 of 2025. They contended that the medical examination was delayed, the injuries were minor, and the FIR was …

SUMAN AWASTHIversusUNION OF INDIA

The applicant, Suman Awasthi, sought a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) and renewal of her passport to travel abroad, but the trial court rejected her application on the basis that a criminal case against her was stayed by this High Court. The criminal case involved offences under Sections 323, 498A, …

AJEET KUMAR BIND AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State. During hearing, counsel for the petitioners requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue any appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State's Attorney General raised no objection to this …

ANAND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anand Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that it should be dismissed as not pressed and that the petitioner may file a fresh petition later. The State …

RAJAN YADAV ALIAS ANKIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajan Yadav alias Ankit and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑06‑2026 (Case Crime No. 109 of 2026) under Sections 87 and 61(2) of the BNS, and a writ of mandamus directing the State …

ABHAY KUMAR RAI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Sessions Trial No.286 of 2017 (State vs. Virendra Rai) involving offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Additional Sessions Judge on …

KAMLESH YADAV @ KARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamlesh Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the only basis for his implication …

NEHA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 11728 of 2025) arising from a Section 306 IPC charge of attempted suicide. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and was verified by the trial court on 03.09.2026. The …

RAJESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Rajesh Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 30‑06‑2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been settled by a compromise deed verified by the Civil Judge. The State and other …

WARISversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Waris, who was accused in a homicide case (Crime No. 412 of 2025) involving the death of his sister‑in‑law. Waris argued that he was implicated solely on false allegations, had no involvement in the family dispute, and had been in …

SHIVNEET SINGH ALIAS SUMIT AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 19658 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 420, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable settlement, which was verified by the Judicial Magistrate on 22‑09‑2026, and …

SHRIPAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a conviction dated 30‑08‑2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhibramau, in a case under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants had appealed the conviction before the Sessions Court, …

TEJ NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tej Narayan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. Both parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the Judicial …

BACHCHU SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18‑09‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 354, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was …

AMOD KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amod Kumar Singh, obtained a ten‑year mining lease through an e‑auction by bidding Rs 112 per cubic metre, higher than the reserved price of Rs 110. The Additional District Magistrate later issued an order, based on a 4 February 2026 notification amending the Uttar Pradesh Minor …