Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 1201–1400
Vishwadeepak Bharti alias Govind applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 315 of 2024) involving alleged cheating, fraud, criminal breach of trust and intimidation under Sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that he and co‑accused duped the informant of about Rs 4.42 …
Dev Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15891 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
The petitioner, Neeraj Pathak, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16007 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. On behalf of the petitioner, counsel Rajrshi Gupta and Rizwan Ahamad prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Advocate General (A.G.A.) raised no …
Petitioner Nigam Rai filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15064 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, senior counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner may pursue other remedies. The State of U.P. and another respondent …
The accused Vishwadeepak Bharti (Govind) and Vikram Prasad applied for bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 312 of 2024) alleging that they merely received a small credit in their accounts and had no direct involvement in the D.D. Finance scheme run by their cousin Upendra Nath. The FIR alleged duping …
The applicant filed a second anticipatory bail application under the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482) in a murder case, claiming a new ground that a witness, Ajay Kumar Singh, had recorded a statement after the first bail application was rejected. The State opposed, stating the …
The petitioner Avdesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17 June 2026 under Sections 117(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the dispute was trivial and the parties had amicably resolved it through a compromise affidavit. The court examined the compromise …
Petitioner Adarsh Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15901 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the Court. The State's Additional …
Vinod Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petitioner did not appear before the Court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court held that the petition …
The appellant, Aneesh Ojha, was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 506, 120‑B and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly cheating a complainant by taking possession of his vehicle, misusing cheques and threatening him with caste‑related abuse. The appellant contended that the FIR …
Sugriv Yadav, accused of offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for interim bail while the trial was pending. He had been in custody since 4 July 2025 and offered to return Rs.7.5 lakh to the informant as a condition of his release. Both the …
Naveen alias Golu alias Shivraj filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 26908 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The court, on 15 July 2026, granted the applicant a last opportunity to press the bail application and scheduled a further hearing for 6 August 2026. The applicant …
The accused Noor Mohammad applied for bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 845 of 2024) alleging that he received Rs.12 lakh from the informant for a contract to erect an Airtel tower, of which part was repaid and a cheque later dishonoured. He has 14 criminal cases pending, is on bail in nine, and is …
Aryatech Platforms Private Limited supplied commodities to Vardhman Solvent Extraction Industries Limited, but the latter failed to clear the invoices despite demand and legal notices. The parties could not mutually appoint an arbitrator under Clause 9.2 of their agreement, and the respondent did …
Smt. Tabassum filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Crime No. 50 of 2026 under sections 333, 64(1), 89 of the CrPC and section 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner argued that the …
The applicant, Talib Urf Kamil, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court after being acquitted of the charges. The applicant's counsel argued that the bail application had become infructuous because the acquittal rendered it moot. The court examined whether a bail application could …
The appellant Saurabh Teotia appealed against a charge sheet and cognizance order relating to alleged sexual offences committed in 2017 when the complainant was purportedly 17 years old. The complainant alleged that the appellant lured her with a promise of marriage, established a physical …
The appellants Shilpa and Shubham were named in an FIR alleging that they, along with another accused, assaulted the informant Bechan and his daughter Roshni with lathi and danda, used caste‑indicative slurs, and caused multiple injuries during a dispute over plucking peas. The State, invoking …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which …
Gaurav Srivastava filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16513 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was listed and counsel for the petitioner, Akash Kumar Verma, was expected to appear but failed to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 166877 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 270 of 2024, which alleged offences under sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 324(4) BNS. The applicants contended that the FIR contained …
Dheeraj Kumar Sonkar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was the only party present. …
The petitioner, Dharmraj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 16808 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to address the court, while the State and other respondents were represented. The court observed that the petitioner failed to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mujayyan, who was in custody since 1 June 2026 in a criminal case (Crime No. 206 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 351(2), 338 and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
The appellant Aman Singh appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Etawah, which had closed his opportunity to cross‑examine PW‑1 in a case involving offences under Sections 366, 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of the SC/ST Act. The trial court observed that PW‑1’s …
The appellants Mahendra Singh and another appealed under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, challenging a summoning order and charge‑sheet relating to an alleged assault and caste‑based slur on 28‑12‑2025. They argued that the FIR was lodged …
Hari Lal filed a civil contempt application against Dr. Gorakh Nath Patel, the District Basic Education Officer. The applicant's counsel, Ram Sagar Yadav, informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the application still warranted adjudication. …
The appellant, Aneeta, challenged an order of the trial court dated 30.05.2026 which had treated her application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, 2023 as a complaint case under Section 223 and failed to register a First Information Report (FIR). The High Court recalled its earlier decision in …
The appellant, Pooza Chaturvedi, was alleged to have entrapped the complainant, Govind Diwakar, in a honey‑trap scheme to extort money, subsequently threatening and assaulting his family members and making casteist remarks. An FIR was lodged by the complainant under various provisions of the SC/ST …
The appellants challenged a summoning order issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in a case involving alleged offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The FIR listed six accused, but the charge sheet named only three adults, with the remaining …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 5548 of 2019, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had entered into a compromise on 15 May 2026, which was …
The appeal challenges a summoning order issued by a Special Court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC provisions, alleging that the complaint of caste-based harassment and outraging modesty is false and unsupported by evidence. The complainant, whose husband is a convicted …
The accused Sushil Maurya applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 170 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he took money to secure a government job for the informant's son. He has three other criminal cases, …
Petitioner Deo Narayan and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue, Tehsil Naugarh, to decide a pending case (Case No. 1383 of 2025) filed under Section 198(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nirdosh Chaudhary in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 218, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the IPC and Sections 13, 13(i)a, 13(i)b, 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant argued that the transaction was …
Petitioners Kavita and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22129 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the present …
The petitioners, represented by Mayank Shekhar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Tehsil Sadar, Jaunpur to decide two pending restoration applications (case no. 726/2026 under Section 209(J) of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 and case no. 11117/2025 …
The petitioner filed a second writ petition alleging continued illegal mining on his agricultural land at Nali and Chak Marg, claiming damage to crops and seeking a mandamus to stop the mining and compensation for losses. The court noted that the earlier petition had been consigned after the State …
Petitioner Geeta Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tahsildar of Bansgaon to decide a pending mutation proceeding (Case No. 2075 of 2025) under sections 34 and 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The mutation had been allowed by a decree dated 14‑10‑2019 based on a …
The applicant, Ausan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC section 482. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application contained glaring mistakes that could not be corrected by amendment or a supplementary affidavit. The court held that such defects rendered the application …
The applicant, Ravendra, husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide, was arrested under Sections 85, 108 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the death, that the investigation showed no suicide note or material …
The petitioners, Uday Bhan and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Kaptanganj to register their restoration application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC and Section 151 CPC, which sought recall of an order dated 25‑06‑2026 in the …
M/s Rudrabali Traders filed a writ petition alleging that a mining lease granted to respondent No.5 (Vindhya Construction) overlapped its own lease due to altered geo‑coordinates, and sought a certiorari to quash the lease and obtain related records. The State of U.P. countered, submitting that an …
The petition filed by Aadhar Construction Company under Article 227 sought to set aside two lower court orders, contending that Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) should apply to a complaint case and allow the proceedings to be stopped. The petitioner argued that the original …
Smt. Shubhi Yadav filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 591 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Her counsel, Meraj Ahmad Khan, submitted an application to withdraw the appeal. The judges, J.J. Munir and Indrajeet Shukla, accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal …
The accused, Irshad, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 145 of 2026) alleging he was falsely implicated in a delayed FIR for assaulting a woman with bricks, causing multiple injuries including one fatal. He claimed no motive, no prior criminal record, and that the FIR was lodged by his …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 09.01.2025 and the cognizance order dated 27.06.2025 in State v. Prahlad @ Pawan Dixit and others, relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 …
The accused, Sushil Maurya, was arrested in Crime No. 03 of 2025 under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 168, 471 and 406 for allegedly taking money to secure a government job for the informant's son, a job that was never provided and the money was not returned. He has three other criminal cases, one of …
Arun Kumar Agnihotri, accused in a 2020 fraud case (Crime No.12) under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, sought bail claiming he was falsely implicated and that the money was received by co‑accused Yashwant Verma. He alleged that he had no role in the alleged fraud involving Rs 2,72,000 and 1,650 …
The petitioner, Brajesh Kumar Shukla, filed a suit under Section 144 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Up Ziladhikari of Tehsil Machhalishahar on 7 May 2022, which remains pending despite completion of pleadings. He approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ directing the revenue …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Raj Kumar who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the same Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighted a …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Govind under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a rape case (Crime No.295 of 2026). Govind claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting a consensual relationship with the victim and no injury to her, while …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aalim Ali, who was in custody since 8 July 2026 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, with an earlier FIR under Section 409 later dropped. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that no …
Vikash Chandra Gupta filed a writ petition seeking compensation for the death of his three children, who died while playing with a kite. The supply company, Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, had previously paid ex gratia compensation to two other families whose children died from electrocution. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Shahid Raza, who was charged with offences including rape of a minor under the POCSO Act and several sections of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Raj Kumar, who was charged with offences under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87, 115(2) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Sisodia who was charged under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87 of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, citing …
The petitioner, Akhtari Khatoon, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006 on 20 May 2025 seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Belthra Road, Ballia to decide case No. 6071/2025, which had been pending with repeated adjournments. She alleged that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Anikesh, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, highlighting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shahid Khan @ Munna, who was charged in Crime No. 116 of 2026 under Sections 64(1), 137(2), 87 BNS and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, a 17‑year‑8‑month‑old …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Pankaj, who was charged under Sections 69 and 115(2) of the same Act for allegedly establishing a physical relationship with a 21‑year‑old woman on a false promise of marriage. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet Gautam, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M of the same Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing a 17‑year‑old girl. The …
The petitioner, Chhangur Rai, filed a mutation suit (Case No. 12740 of 2026) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been pending before the Tehsildar (Respondent No‑2) since 4 May 2026. He sought a writ of mandamus directing the Tehsildar to decide the case within a stipulated …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking quash of a charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a land dispute. They contended that the FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings were filed to harass them and that the underlying dispute was already pending as …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rakesh Patel, who was charged under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the same Act and Sections 5(J) and 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The …
The petitioner, Raju, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) of Prayagraj to decide the pending case No.148 of 2024 (Urmila Devi vs. Raju) under Section 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901. The petitioner alleged that the case, arising from a …
Mukesh Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in criminal case No. 598 of 2025, which arose from an FIR under Section 406 IPC. The High Court examined the charge‑sheet, the summons, and the applicant’s criminal history, noting …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 2924 of 2025 (State vs. Dharmendra Singh and others). The High Court examined the charge‑sheet, cognizance order, and the applicants’ criminal history, noting that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10814 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second …
Arvindpal Singh, a branch manager, was arrested in connection with a 2024 case (Crime No. 217) involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. He filed a bail application, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the loan in question was sanctioned based on a report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Moni, who was charged under Sections 64(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the same Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Non‑Bailable Section (BNSS) seeking to quash a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) dated 14‑07‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (E.C. Act) in Session Trial No. 541 of 2024, relating to offences under Sections 323, 504, 452, 506, 308, 336 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Kumar, who was charged under Section 69 BNS for allegedly establishing a false marital promise and a consensual relationship with a 25‑year‑old woman. The …
The applicant, Prashant Kumar Kesharwani, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 05.04.2025 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Allahabad, in a Section 125 CrPC case. The parties were referred to the …
Decent Buildwell Private Limited filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a recovery order dated 03.07.2026 issued by the Recovery Officer (Revenue) of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) and a recovery certificate dated 02.02.2026 issued by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑03‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2025, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 227 of 2025 arising from Crime No. 207 of 2024, which involved …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑12‑2024, the cognizance/summoning order dated 14‑07‑2025, and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 10944 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and …
The petitioner, Jagannath Prasad Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to forward his medical reimbursement file, submitted on 18 April 2025 for Rs.107,051, to the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Ghaziabad for decision. The petition alleged that the respondent (the State …
Govind Mishra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑02‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑04‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 6536 of 2026, which alleged offences under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 121(1). The applicant …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Surya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.1925 of 2026) initiated by the State of U.P. under Sections 324(4) and 318(4) of the BNS. The High Court examined the charge‑sheet and cognizance order and noted …
The applicants, Hasib Salmani and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7502 of 2025) arising out of Crime No. 237 of 2024, which involved offences under sections 85, 115(2), …
Petitioner Usha Sonkar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Gola, District Gorakhpur (respondent No.2) to decide a pending mutation suit (Suit No.1120/2026) filed under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The suit, concerning specific land plots in Bishra …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradeep Kumar, who was charged under CrPC Section 65(1), IPC Sections 351(3) and 352, and POCSO Sections 3 and 4(2) for allegedly attempting indecent assault on a minor. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements recorded under Sections …
The accused, Sajan Singh, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 240 of 2026, which arose from an FIR lodged on 1 June 2026 for theft of cash and jewellery. He was later identified through a police disclosure statement after being arrested in an unrelated case. The applicant has a history of …
The accused, Sajjan Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 161 of 2026) involving alleged theft and offences under Sections 331(4), 305(A), 317(2) and 317(4) of the IPC. The FIR was initially lodged against anonymous persons, and the accused was later identified through a …
Surendra Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑11‑2011, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2011, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.341 of 2011) on the ground that he was falsely implicated and that …
The petitioners, eight assistant teachers, challenged two orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, which allegedly removed them from service and affected their salary. They sought a writ restraining interference with their …
The applicant, Mukesh Kumar Chaudhary, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29490 of 2026 seeking enlargement of bail in a case (Crime No. 313 of 2025) involving alleged recovery of fake currency. He contended that he was not named in the FIR, had no fake currency …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (Case No. 3019 of 2023) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Jalesar. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of …
The applicant, Farhat Khan, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No.51254 of 2023) that arose from a monetary dispute with the second opposite party. The applicant alleged that the FIR and subsequent charge‑sheet under IPC sections 406, 504 and 506 …
The applicant, Sanjeet Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging that the respondent, Judicial Officer Shamim Ahmad Ansari, willfully defied the High Court's order dated 20‑08‑2025 directing the Special POCSO Judge to expedite trial of Sessions Trial No. 689/2019 (State v. Sanjeet Yadav) under …
The petitioner, Khatib Ur Rehman, challenged his suspension dated 19 June 2026, alleging that the order violated the proviso to Regulation 4(i) of the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 2020, which requires serious allegations and a disciplinary …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 35(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Tehsil Sadar, Azamgarh to decide an appeal (Case No. 14024/2026) that had been pending since 2 April 2026. The petition alleged undue …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Dinesh under CrPC Section 482 in a case alleging his involvement in the suicide of a deceased person, charged under Sections 191(2), 333, 127(2) of the CrPC and Section 108 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The applicant claimed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raju, who is accused under Sections 103(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code for murder. Raju contended that the FIR narrative is false, the informant’s testimony is doubtful, and that his co‑accused Naresh had already been released on bail, …
The applicant Shahjad applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 83 of 2025) involving Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the prosecution's case is based solely on circumstantial evidence, a confessional statement, and statements of co-accused, with no other …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application seeking quashing of a charge‑sheet and the cognizance order dated 01‑07‑2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Sahaswan, Budaun. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 221, 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS are non‑cognizable and, per the …
The applicant Rahul was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 223 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. He is not named in the FIR but his name appears in the confessional statement of a co‑accused, and he has been in custody since 24‑06‑2026. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration) of Azamgarh Division to decide an appeal filed under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since September 4, 2025. The petitioner argued that the delay …
Shiv Bachan filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Phulpur, Azamgarh to decide a restoration/recall application filed on 6 May 2026, which arose after an ex‑parte order dated 5 July 2025 in a partition suit under Section 116 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue …
The applicants, Hemant Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1424 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted that they had reached an …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Mishra (alias Udit Narayan), who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide that occurred on 18 October 2024. The informant’s initial complaint on the same date made no allegation against the applicant, and …
The petitioners, five Assistant Teachers, challenged two orders dated 29 July 2025 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, which alleged fraud in their appointments and affected their salaries. The Court noted that no counter‑affidavit was filed by the …
The applicant, Ayodhya Prasad Yadav, filed a contempt application alleging willful defiance of a court order dated 19 January 2026 issued in Writ‑A No. 451 of 2026. The court considered the instructions produced, which included a copy of the order dated 10 March 2026 that decided the applicant’s …
The applicants, Rajesh Maddheshiya and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The counsel for the opposite party had no objection to …
Anand Kumar Agarwal filed a writ petition challenging remarks made by a respondent regarding alleged encroachment on a road adjacent to his plot, which he claimed was not his responsibility as the land belonged to the Public Works Department. The Varanasi Development Authority produced an order …
The petitioner Riyasat filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to respondent No. 8 to decide Revision No. 2 of 1991‑92, which had been restored to the file by a previous order of this Court dated 25‑Oct‑2024. The revision had been originally disposed of by the Board of Revenue on …
The petitioner, Indrawati Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Land/Revenue) of Mirzapur to decide a pending case (No. 315 of 2026) under Section 30(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 07.08.2025. The …
M/s Gurudev Auto Mobiles, through its proprietor, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun, to expedite the trial of a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No. 22 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash charge sheet No. 46 of 2022 and the related criminal proceedings arising under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled their dispute outside court, and …
The applicants, Satyam Tiwari and Arun Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 479 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 147, 504, 506, 307, 34 and 148 of the IPC. They contended that they were …
The applicant, Shashi Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 17-06-2019, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09-02-2021, the non-bailable warrant dated 04-04-2024, and the process under Section 82 CrPC dated 10-06-2026, …
The petitioner, Deepak Solanki, filed a restoration application on 24‑12‑2025 seeking to recall an ex parte order dated 18‑12‑2025 that had been passed in Revision No. 1395 of 2023 under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The application remained pending before the Additional …
The petitioner, Deepak Solanki, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administrative) of Agra Division to decide a restoration application filed on 24‑12‑2025 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application sought to recall an …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 01.05.2026 in Criminal Case No. 2235 of 2026 (State vs. Garima et al.). They contended that the charge‑sheet alleged offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal …
The petitioner, Ramnath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (Judicial) Koraon, Prayagraj, to decide a revenue case (RST/1950/2026) pending under Section 38(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 since 27 October 2014. The petitioner argued that the delay …
The applicant, Umakant Bajpai alias Pappu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the quashing of the charge sheet (Report No. 395/2024 dated 25‑12‑2024) and the order dated 12‑06‑2026 in the pending case State vs. Umakant Bajpai (Criminal Writ No. 93995/2025). The High Court …
The applicant, Atul Kumar Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a magistrate’s order dated 13 March 2026 that treated a charge‑sheet under IPC Sections 352 and 351(3) as a State case. Pandey argued that these sections relate to non‑cognizable offences and, …
The petitioner, Rahul Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Bhatparrani Tehsil, Deoria, to decide a pending mutation case (Case No. 2628 of 2025) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending …
Petitioner Rajesh Singh filed a writ petition seeking payment of salary arrears for the period 12 November 2020 to 31 May 2025. The District Inspector of Schools (Prayagraj) had forwarded his claim to the Director of Education (Secondary), Uttar Pradesh, via a letter dated 24 January 2026, but no …
The applicant, Iqrar Ahamad Abrar Ahamad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by Advocate Javed Habib, while the State of U.P. and another party were represented by G.A. The learned counsel for the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking quash of the charge sheet, notice and inquiry order in a criminal case (State vs. Priyankesh Jain and others). They alleged that the prosecution was maliciously fabricated and that no prima …
The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher appointed in 1993 and terminated on 12 May 2015, filed a claim petition before the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal, which remained pending for eleven years. The Tribunal dismissed the petition as not maintainable, invoking Section 4(5) of the U.P. Public …
Smt. Sushila Devi, appointed as an Assistant Teacher in 1993, was terminated on 12 May 2015 and filed a claim petition before the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal. The petition remained pending for eleven years before the Tribunal dismissed it on 17 July 2026 as not maintainable, invoking …
The petitioner, a former Assistant Teacher terminated in 2015, filed a claim petition before the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal, which remained pending for eleven years. The Tribunal dismissed the petition on 17 July 2026 as not maintainable, invoking Section 4(5) of the U.P. Public Service …
Padamdhar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by senior counsel N.C. Gupta, assisted by Arjit Gupta, while the revenue side was represented by Standing Counsel Ankur Agarwal. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the case State of U.P. v. Shiv Kumar (MU‑A‑274/2021). The High Court examined the FIR, charge sheet, and the orders dated 23‑03‑2022, 24‑08‑2022 and 27‑08‑2025 and found no …
The petitioner, Mohd Parvez Alam Warsi, who had been employed as an Instructor of Art/Physical & Health Education in a primary school from 2013 to 2023‑24, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to renew his engagement for the 2024‑25 and 2025‑26 sessions and to pay the …
Petitioner Ramesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Principal of a Government Industrial Training Institute and the Director of Training and Employment to release his Government Provident Fund of approximately Rs. 33.63 lakh. The court noted that the petitioner had …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S. after being added as an accused based on a dying declaration of the deceased, which named him. The State opposed, producing a video of the declaration that implicated the applicant. The Court examined the nature of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the order dated 16‑08‑2024 in criminal case 12491/2024 (State vs. Qyamuddin) where charges under IPC Sections 420, 406 and 506 had been framed. The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision …
The petitioners Bhagirath and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 10‑05‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 22‑07‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 2137 of 2026 arising from FIR …
Mohammad Qasim was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 205 of 2026) alleging violations of Sections 318(4), 105 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 34 of the Indian Medical Council Act. He contended that he is not a doctor and was falsely implicated, noting that the deceased infant’s …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the trial court to decide a pending family court case (Case No. 972 of 2019) filed under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The case had been pending since 2019 and, despite multiple dates fixed for …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 55616 of 2025, where the accused were charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 19‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 30‑07‑2025 in Criminal Case No.101633 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNSS are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 24‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 09‑03‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS. …
Mubashir and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 17‑01‑2026 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑06‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 760 of 2026. The applicants contended that the offence under Section 351(3) BNSS is non‑cognizable and, …
Santosh Kumari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2891 of 2025) filed under Section 468 IPC and to obtain an order for the speedy disposal of her bail application. The State did not oppose the request for an expeditious bail hearing. …
Aman Tayal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 21‑05‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 30‑05‑2025 in Criminal Case No.108 of 2025. The applicant contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) BNS are …
The petitioner, Tej Kumari, a former part‑time instructor at a primary school, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer to renew her appointment and to decide a representation dated 01‑08‑2026. She alleged that her services were not renewed after the …
The applicant, Deepu Nishad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 14‑07‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 23‑09‑2025 in Criminal Case No.11192 of 2025. The High Court examined the FIR, charge‑sheet and the orders and found no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 3152 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rampravesh Pal in Criminal Case No. 423 of 2024, where he was charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging cheques and withdrawing Rs. 67 lakh from his brother's …
Anand Yadav, the accused in State v. Anand Yadav (Case No. 156 of 2023), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO) at Orai to expedite the trial, which involves charges under Section 377 IPC, …
The applicant, Satyendra Kumar Gautam, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑05‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 02‑07‑2026 in Criminal Case No. 913 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 132, 351(3) and 356(3) of …
The applicant, Shiv Shankar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 07.01.2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 11.02.2025, and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2958 of 2025 relating to FIRs under …
The applicant, Ved Ram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court considered …
The applicants, Smt. Nafeesa Khatoon and another, filed a contempt application alleging that the District Magistrate and other officials willfully defied the Allahabad High Court's order dated 26 May 2025 in Writ‑B No.1487/2025, which prohibited creation of any third‑party interest in a disputed …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yaseen in a criminal case (Cr.No. 581 of 2025) involving alleged assault and subsequent death of an informant's sister‑in‑law. Yaseen argued that he was never named in the FIR and that the informant’s later statement implicating him was …
Gulbahar Abdul Ali filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09.04.2026 issued by the respondent under Section 161 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The order was deemed a non‑speaking order, merely reproducing facts and the statutory provision without reasoning, and it …
Petitioners Ram Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 22760 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer …
Dr. Badri Prasad Agrawal, a 79‑year‑old senior citizen, appealed against a bail rejection order of a Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The FIR alleged that he raped a domestic worker on 4‑Nov‑2024 and threatened to release a video, but the FIR was lodged only on …
The applicant, Nischhal Agrahari, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court to decide a pending complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (Complaint No.1368 of 2023) expeditiously. The trial court had …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) of Azamgarh to decide Appeal No. 221 of 2025 (Shivprasad v. Ramkripal) pending under Section 331(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zila Adalat & Land Revenue Act, 1950 since 28 January 2025. The petitioner …
Jony, the husband of a deceased woman, was arrested under Sections 85, 105 and 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that the FIR was lodged five days after the incident, the charge of Section 105 was later dropped, and the evidence, including the post‑mortem report and a …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Additional Collector (Finance and Revenue), Shamli, to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. RST/115/2026) under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had remained undecided for almost a year despite a prior order to decide it …
The petitioners, Rambabu and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation in the matter had …
Bhagwati Prasad challenged his suspension dated 5 January 2026, contending that it violated the proviso to Rule 4(1) of the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Employees (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 2020, which permits suspension only when the allegations are so serious that they would normally …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ikbal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352, 351(3) and 324(4) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was a retaliatory …
The petitioner, Anjora Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (respondents 2 & 3) to conduct a prompt, proper and fair investigation into FIR No. 191 of 2026 under various sections of the B.N.S. and to arrest the accused. The petitioner …
The applicant, Sahbaz @ Mohd Shahbaj, was implicated in a 2018 case under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 308 and 504 IPC and sought anticipatory bail after a non‑bailable warrant was issued without service of summons. He argued that the injuries alleged were not grievous, that the chargesheet had …
Monu Kumar Gupta, an accused in Criminal Case No. 9633 of 2024 (State vs Hardeep Singh & others) filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, decide the case within a stipulated period. The State opposed …
The applicant, Shakeel Ahmad Qureshi, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking relief without first approaching the Sessions Judge. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised a preliminary objection that …
The applicant, Ramesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi, to decide his criminal case (Criminal Case No. 794 of 2018) within a stipulated period, alleging that no prosecution witness had been examined since the …
The petitioners, Meera and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tahsildar of Tehsil Phulpur, District Azamgarh, to decide a pending mutation case (No. 3525/2022) filed on 3 June 2022 under Sections 34 and 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petition argued that …
Ram Ji applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 145 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, claiming he was falsely implicated. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she left her parental home voluntarily and that no sexual intercourse or enticement occurred. …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Murad Ali under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 409 and 120B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted a two‑year delay in filing the FIR, and asserted that the money …
Panna Lal, who stood as surety for accused Seetu (also known as Banti or Viresh) in a criminal case, was ordered to forfeit a bail bond of Rs 1 lakh after the accused absconded. The accused later surrendered and was placed in judicial custody, prompting the surety to seek a reduction of the …
Petitioners Nitesh Pal and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was already concluded and a final report favoring the petitioners had been submitted on 14‑08‑2026. The petitioners, while …
The petitioner, Neena Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking relief from recovery proceedings by Idbi Bank Limited after having paid Rs.13,10,000 towards a loan. The petitioner offered to pay the remaining balance but requested a six‑month period to do so. The court noted the payment already made …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arvind Kumar Kashyap in Criminal Case No. 334 of 2026, which involved alleged sexual assault and outraging the modesty of a minor girl under Sections 65(1), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The …
The petitioner, Shashwat Pandey, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22123 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent counsel and the …
The petitioner, Ajeet Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mathura, to transfer the investigation of FIR dated 14-06-2026 and ensure a fair, impartial inquiry. The petitioner alleged that the police were not conducting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Mishra in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal No. 0031 of 2026) under IPC sections 317(2), 317(5), 318(4) and 111(2). The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, was falsely implicated based on an informer’s tip, and that there was no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached a settlement with the second opposite party. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hari Narayan Alias Munna, accused under Section 304 IPC for the murder of his wife. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s case relied solely on hearsay, with the only witnesses being the deceased’s son and daughter, who were not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bail and Non‑bailable Surrender (BNSS) Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑08‑2026 issued in a criminal complaint (Case No. 1649 of 2024) under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They also requested that the lower courts be …
The petitioners, Krishnachand Pandey and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 31 July 2026. The petitioners' …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Richhariya, who was arrested in a murder case (Crime No. 70 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) and 191(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the statement of a co‑accused and a confessional statement by the …
The petitioner, Shilpi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Handia, District Prayagraj, to decide a pending suit (No. 21440 of 2025) filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the suit, filed on …
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Arya, sought compassionate consideration under Clause 5(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Transfer Policy dated 05.05.2026, claiming his son’s 50% intellectual and mental disability warranted relief. He relied on a recent decision of this Court (Shailendra Vikram v. State of …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation alleging that the Nagar Palika Parishad issued two work orders for the same repair work on the same day with different monetary values, suggesting possible defalcation. The petitioner also submitted a representation on 11.08.2026 raising general …
The petitioner, Virendra Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a transfer order dated 31‑05‑2026 and a relieving order dated 03‑09‑2026 issued by the State respondents. The petitioner relied on the Court’s earlier decision in Shashi Prakash Tripathi v. State of U.P. (Writ A No. 4494 of 2026) …
The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, to conclude a pending criminal case (Case No. 3480 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case has been pending since …
The petitioner, Radha Devi Sahu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings. The State had already concluded its investigation and forwarded a charge sheet against the accused. The petitioner’s counsel …
The accused Hazarilal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 347 of 2025) alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on 23 November 2025. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than 20 hours after the incident and the medical report was also delayed, raising doubts about the …
The accused Prem Chandra alias Chhotu and Gulsan Kumar alias Bulbul applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 89 of 2026) under Sections 109(1), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. They argued that the FIR dated 14 June 2026 was lodged belatedly for an incident that occurred on 13 June 2026 and that …
Petitioner Rajnish Kumar (a minor) filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (i) a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S., (ii) a writ of mandamus directing the police not to arrest the second petitioner, and (iii) a writ of mandamus …
The petitioner, Rakesk Shukla, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22805 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and wanted to withdraw …
The applicant, Sameer Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (crime no. 16/2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
Reena, the sister‑in‑law of a deceased person, was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment to suicide. She filed a bail application, contending that the FIR was lodged belatedly, the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, and there was no suicide note or material linking her to …
The applicant, Krishna Kumar Shukla, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned Additional Government Advocate highlighted that the applicant had two prior criminal cases which were not disclosed in the supporting affidavit, a breach of Rule …
The applicant, Roma Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Gopal Misra, expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application and sought to withdraw it. The court …
The petitioner, Mausam @ Tunda, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State’s Additional …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 25.05.2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 06.07.2026, and the entire proceedings in Case No. 9523 of 2026 arising from FIR under various IPC sections. The High Court …
Shiv Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22811 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State authorities to decide his application for a compassionate appointment after his father, an Assistant Teacher who died in harness, left the family dependent. He had submitted a representation on 17 July 2017 …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 in a case where they were named among eight accused for alleged assault. They claimed false implication, noting that they had not been arrested, had no criminal antecedents, and that cross‑cases existed with injuries on …
The applicant, Suldeep @ Sandip, was implicated in Crime No. 416 of 2026 under Sections 309(4), 238(A), 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482. The State argued that a final report had already been filed on 10‑09‑2026 and the applicant had no …
