Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

15781 judgments · newest first · showing 1001–1200

GAURAV PANDEYversusGEETIKA PANDEY

Petitioner Gaurav Pandey filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Dehat, to expedite the pending divorce case No. 830 of 2022 filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had …

SONI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Soni and another, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, who are family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted school certificates and an application for …

VAKIL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vakil Ahmad, filed a writ petition seeking quash of a recovery notice issued by D.C.B. Bank, Meerut, which directed them to deposit an amount by 31.07.2026. The petition alleged that the notice was wrongly received by the respondent's counsel and that it stemmed from a request for …

SIMRAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Simran and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They submitted proof of age and a pending …

POONAM DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Poonam Devi, who was in custody for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that the dispute was essentially civil, and that she had no role …

VIRENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Virendra filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to release his earned leave encashment of Rs.7,96,600 with interest and to consider a representation dated 11.03.2026. The respondents argued that the grievance should be addressed by the General Manager (Finance & …

RAJESH YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, was stranded in Saudi Arabia after his Indian passport expired on 18 September 2026 and filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the passport authority to reissue his passport. The High Court held that it could not issue a direct order for reissue under the …

ROSHAN AND 5 OTHERSversusKESHRAJ

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Gautam Buddh Nagar to decide Original Suit No. 142 of 2021 expeditiously and without unnecessary adjournments, alleging irreparable loss. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. …

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,versusMADHU GUPTA AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court examined a writ petition filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. challenging an order of the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 29‑05‑2026. The petitioner argued that the PLA had not complied with the mandatory conciliation procedure prescribed under Section 22 of the …

RUPALI TRIPATHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the respondents to pay House Rent Allowance (HRA) in accordance with a prior Full Bench judgment (Uma Shankar Singh v. State of U.P.) and to decide a representation dated 11‑12‑2025. The petitioners claimed they had approached the …

SHAMSHUL @ SHULLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shamshul @ Shulla applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 102 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has been cooperating …

PATIRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Patiram under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with charges under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and Section 420 of the IPC. The applicant had been arrested on the spot while driving a vehicle carrying 400 …

SMT. SAROJ SRIVASTAVA AND 2 OTHERSversusSMT. VANDANA SRIVASTAVA AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) F.T.C., Prayagraj to decide an impleadment application dated 22‑11‑2014 and an application under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code dated 02‑07‑2015, pending in Suit No. 1173 of 2013, on a …

GOVIND PRASAD GUPTA AND 11 OTHERSversusMR MUKUL ANAND PANDEY

The applicant filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 05/12/2025 in Writ‑A No. 18350 of 2025. The court noted that the order had been served but not complied with, establishing a prima facie case of contempt. However, the court …

SIDDHARTH RAIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove alleged illegal encroachments on Plot Nos. 37 and 39 in Village Hathini, District Mau. The plots had been earmarked for a Harijan Abadi under consolidation proceedings, and houses have been occupied for 30 years by …

RANVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

Ranveer Singh filed a PIL seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to take preventive measures to protect specific agricultural land in Padham village and to evict trespassers. The respondents, through their standing counsel, argued that the petitioner …

ALATMASH MALIK @ KURBANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Alatmash Malik, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 250 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 353(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) and Section 66 of the Information …

SMT. SONIYA KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Soniya Kumari and another filed Writ Petition No. 39578 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners sought relief, but the respondent counsel pointed out that the same dispute had already been registered as case MU‑0‑A‑0‑S 305/2026 …

DR. ZAFAR ALI KHANversusAKBAR ALI KHAN @ JHHUNNE AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Zafar Ali Khan, filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Azamgarh to decide case No.473 of 2011 within a stipulated period. The Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …

RUKSHAR KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners Rukshar Khatoon and another filed writ petition No. 39534 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of UP and others, contested the petition. The learned permanent advocate argued that the matter was already registered as Mu. A.0. San 494/2026 under Section …

RAEES AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, a government employee, was suspended from April 2014 to January 2019 and seeks payment of arrears, full salary after the suspension was lifted, applicable pay‑commission increments and other benefits. He filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to release the …

ARTI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Arti Devi and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, …

SMT. VISHESHA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Vishesha Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was opposed by the respondents, who argued that the matter was already pending in another case, Mu. A. S. No. …

MAHESHCHANDRAversusSMT. SAVITA CHAUDHARY

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Hathras, to decide a pending divorce petition filed under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that the case was pending and required expeditious disposal. The Court noted …

PRADEEP AND ANOTHERversusUMAPATI AND ANOTHER

Petitioners Pradeep and another filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) in Jaunpur to expedite Suit No.24 of 2026 against the respondents. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh …

SURENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, a government assistant teacher, was suspended and jailed on 3 September 2019 after an FIR was lodged under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act following his wife's suicide. He was reinstated on 24 November 2022 on the condition that salary for the suspension …

MANJEET KUMARversusSMT. LALITA

Manjeet Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Etah, to decide his pending divorce petition filed in 2025. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending for an undue period. The Court …

TRIDEV MANI TRIPATHIversusSURENDRA TRIPATHI AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Tridev Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226/227 seeking a direction that the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of the Fast Track Court‑I, Maharajganj, decide Suit No. 395 of 2015 expeditiously. The High Court examined precedent, notably the Supreme Court’s decision in …

NISHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nisha and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and directing police protection. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and alleged …

HANS RAJ SINGH JYANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, father of the deceased Constable Aditya Jayant, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to release post‑death service benefits to him as the recorded nominee and to decide two pending applications dated 29‑06‑2026 and 14‑09‑2026. He alleged that the benefits were …

RIZWANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rizwan applied for bail in a 2009 case (Crime No. 1482) involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, where he is accused of taking a loan on a property already mortgaged. He had previously been granted bail but failed to appear, leading to his re‑arrest on 14‑09‑2025 and …

NISHA GOND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nisha Gond and another, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order to prevent the respondents and family members from interfering in their marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted school certificates and a marriage registration application to demonstrate …

KUMUD KUMARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kumud Kumari, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to regularize her appointment as Principal after serving as an adhoc Principal for over five years. She alleged that the Director of Education (Secondary) had requested details of such employees in July …

RAJESH ANURAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Anuragi, accused under Sections 80(2) & 85 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the suicide of his wife. The applicant argued that no call‑detail records (CDR) linked him or his family to the …

SMT. JEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt. Jeera Devi filed a writ petition after her husband, Sugai Ram, a retired Consolidation Lekhpal, died on 26-11-2019. She had submitted three applications (5-3-2021, 29-4-2022, 13-8-2025) to the Settlement Officer, Gorakhpur, seeking release of his family pension, but no decision was rendered. …

AJAY KUSHWAHA @ AJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ajay Kushwaha (Ajay Kumar Singh), filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking bail in a criminal case (State vs. Ajay Kumar Singh) pending before the Court No. 25, Deoria. The High Court examined the FIR filed under Section 275 of 2023 and Section 3 of the Public …

NEERAJversusSHYAM LAL AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neeraj, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 144 of 2025) that arose from an ex-parte decree against him. The appeal had been filed after an Order IX Rule 13 CPC application was dismissed. The High Court, noting …

VIRENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 323 of 2026) involving sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and 105(1) of the BNS. The applicant later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …

LALBRAT MAURYAversusPREM KUMAR MAURYA AND 2 OTHERS

Lalbrat Maurya filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to decide a pending 6-C application in Suit No.1647 of 2024. The High Court, after noting that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose, disposed of the petition at …

PRAHLADversusGULAB AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Prahlad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Gorakhpur to decide a 7-C application pending in Original Suit No. 890 of 2017. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and disposed …

SANTOSH KUMARversusSMT. MRIDUJALA

Santosh Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court, Gautam Buddha Nagar, to decide his pending divorce case (Case No.1206 of 2025) under Section 13(1)(i‑a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 within a stipulated period. The petitioner argued that the divorce …

RAVIKANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ravikant, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted the prayer and dismissed the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive facts or legal issues were …

VARISversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Varis, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 108, 308(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a …

MOHAMMAD USMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mohammad Usman, who had been in custody since 2 October 2025 for offences under sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the key witness, the alleged victim Rehan, turned hostile during …

SHAKILA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shakila and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court and subsequently prayed that the petition not be pressed, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and ordered that the petition be withdrawn, allowing the petitioners to file a …

SMT. GEETA CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Geeta Chaurasiya filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash a transfer order dated 11‑09‑2026 and a mandamus directing the respondent not to disturb her service and to pay her salary. The petitioner contended that she had already filed a representation on 12‑09‑2026 before the …

KANHAIYA BINDversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kanhaiya Bind applied for bail under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he was falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record. He had been in custody since 29‑08‑2026 while the investigation continued. The State opposed the …

NILENDU SONKARversusKULDEEP SONKAR AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nilendu Sonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of his pending appeal (No. 51/2024) before the Judge of the Small Causes Court, Allahabad. The petition solely requested that the lower court decide the appeal within a stipulated …

ANOOP KUMAR DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anoop Kumar Dwivedi, filed a writ petition challenging a government order dated 14 September 2026 that transferred him from Etah to Aligarh. He argued that, under the transfer policy, a husband and wife both serving in government positions should be accommodated at the same station, …

DALPAT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Dalpat Singh, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the Special Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2018, which involved charges under Section 363 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as to set aside the charge‑sheet and …

BUNTYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Bunty applied for bail in a criminal case involving sections of the IPC and CrPC, alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim. He claimed the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed and that a civil dispute with the victim's father motivated the complaint. The …

SMT. GOHAR KHANAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Smt. Gohar Khanam filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to consider and finally decide her medical reimbursement claim for treatment between 24 September 2025 and 25 January 2026 and to release the recommended amount of Rs.58,533. She also asked the court to direct …

MAYANKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 1232 of 2026) arising from a crime involving sections of the BNSS, the SC/ST Act, and the POCSO Act. During the hearing, the applicant's …

SHYAM SONIversusSMT. RANI SONI

The petitioner, Shyam Soni, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Jhansi, to expedite the trial of his divorce suit (Suit No. 1074 of 2025). The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been pending since 2025. The Court …

RAMAKANT YADAV AND 25 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, 26 teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters/Headmistresses, filed a writ petition seeking direction for the State to pay them the appropriate scale and arrears of salary under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They claimed to have made several representations to the competent …

VARTHANA FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Varthana Finance Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute a Section 14 order of the SARFAESI Act dated 22 July 2025 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court decision in C. …

RIZWAN MIYAversusMANOJ KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS

Rizwan Miya filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Causes Court, Bareilly, to decide a 6-C application pending in Original Suit No. 407 of 2026. The petition argued that the Small Causes Court should be compelled to hear and dispose of the application promptly. The …

RAMSHARANversusRAJENDRA

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (S.D.) of Ghazipur to expedite Original Suit No. 347 of 2013. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which holds that …

JAI SHREE RAM SAURABH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jai Shree Ram Saurabh Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition in order to file an intervention application in a related Special Appeal (No. 398 of 2026). The court …

INTEJAR AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusMOHD. SALEEM @ SALLAN AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No. 827 of 2022. The High Court observed that keeping the matter pending would serve no useful purpose. …

KRISHNA CHANDversusTANVIR AHMAD AND 6 OTHERS

The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and a restoration application (No. 154 of 2022) was filed. The petitioner sought a direction from the High Court under Article 227 to have the lower court decide the restoration application. The High Court found no need for further …

GAYATRI AND ANOTHERversusSHEELA AND ANOTHER

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Mau to decide Suit No. 1030 of 2024 against the respondents on an expedited basis. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) which held that …

ASHWANI KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Ashwani Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking transfer of an arms licence originally issued to his father. The trial court had rejected the transfer on the ground that the petitioner was facing a criminal trial. The petitioner contended that a final report had been filed and accepted, …

SHIVANI KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shivani Kumari and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging that they are adults who voluntarily married on 21‑09‑2026. The respondents pointed out that …

PHOOLCHANRA KUSHWAHA URF DAYASAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Phoolchanra Kushwaha Urf Dayasagar filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and stay the proceedings in a POCSO case (Sections 354‑A IPC, 7/8 POCSO Act, 3(2)va SC/ST Act). The applicant prayed for the entire proceeding to be set aside. On the hearing …

SHYAM SUNDAR YADAVversusSUNIL KUMAR PALIWAL

The petitioner, Shyam Sundar Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a directive that the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Firozabad decide his pending civil suit (No 100/2019) within a stipulated period. The High Court examined whether a constitutional court can impose a time‑bound …

SANT RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sant Ram filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Secretary, Irrigation and Water Resource Department, U.P., to decide his appeal dated 11‑03‑2024 within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that his appeal was pending and required expeditious disposal. The State, through …

SMT SAMREEN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Samreen and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage …

NITESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioner, Nitesh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and another respondent to take a final decision on an inquiry report dated 03-02-2026 and to reinstate him with all service benefits. The petitioner alleged that the disciplinary authority had not acted on …

ARSHAD MALIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

An inquiry was launched under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up‑Pradhan and Members) Inquiry Rules, 1997 against petitioner Arshad Malik for alleged irregularities during his tenure. The preliminary inquiry found him prima facie guilty and recommended a financial penalty, but …

AMIT KUMARversusSURENDRA KUMAR TIWARI

The applicant Amit Kumar filed a contempt application alleging that the opposite party, Surendra Kumar Tiwari, willfully disobeyed a judgment and order dated 09-10-2025 in writ petition No. 14249 of 2025. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but, instead of issuing a notice, …

SUSHMA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sushma Devi, an Assistant Teacher in Pilibhit, filed a writ petition challenging a September 13, 2026 order that rejected her application for maternity leave for the period 18 September 2026 to 16 March 2027. She argued that she is entitled to the leave under established jurisprudence, …

NADEEM AND ANOTHERversusABDUL WAHEED

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut to expedite case No. 930 of 2020 (Abdul Waheed v. Nadeem & another). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s ruling in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh, which cautions constitutional courts …

PYARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members and to direct police to ensure their safety. They alleged threats and harassment, claiming a violation …

SMT. RADHIKA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Radhika and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and …

SEWARAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Sewaram filed a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings of a loan. The parties agreed that the petition could be disposed in line with the coordination bench order in Baijanth v. State of U.P. (RIT‑C No. 10013/2026) dated 22‑07‑2026. The court considered the limit of recovery under the …

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHERversusSH. CHANDRA PRAKASH GOEL

The case involved an exemption application filed by Sh. Chandra Prakash Goel against the assessment of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The Commissioner appealed the exemption, arguing that the relief was not warranted under the Income Tax Act. The High Court heard the appeal together with …

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHERversusSH. CHANDRA PRAKASH GOEL

The revenue appealed against Tribunal orders that had allowed the assessee, Sh. Chandra Prakash Goel, to set aside assessment orders for AY 2010-11 and 2011-12 on the basis of differing valuation reports. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could rely on the Approved Valuer’s report and …

RAMCHARITRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 ORS.

The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to remove an illegal encroachment on Plot No.55, recorded as Banjar land, after a revenue order under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 ordered eviction on 5 February 2025 but was not implemented. The petitioner …

OM SINGHversusSAPNA

Om Singh filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant was represented by counsel Rakesh Kumar Rathore and Sanjeev Kumar. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. Consequently, …

SMT. MAHIMAversusRANA TRANSPORT COMPANY AND 2 OTHER

The applicant, Smt. Mahima, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Anoop Kumar, subsequently sought to withdraw the application. Respondent No.3, represented by Anubhav Sinha, expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The court noted the withdrawal and the …

SAMEER TRIPATHIversusSMT. SAPNA TRIPATHI

The petitioner, Sameer Tripathi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Additional Principal Judge of the 3rd Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide his pending divorce case (Case No. 438 of 2025) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on a day‑to‑day …

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who is alleged to be involved in a dowry‑related case concerning the death of his daughter‑in‑law Seema. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the cause of death was asphyxia due to antemortem hanging and that …

TEETUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Teetu applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 178 of 2024) involving alleged robbery of a woman, with the FIR lodged on 13.07.2024. The prosecution’s case rests solely on a disclosure statement and recovered articles, with no identification parade conducted. The applicant has a substantial …

MUSHTAQUE ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mushtaque Alam, an additional director of Shine City, was arrested in connection with alleged fraud and conspiracy offences (IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B) and has been in custody since October 2021. He filed a bail application during the early stage of trial, contending that he was …

SAHIL ALIAS NIRHUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Sahil alias Nirhu, who is charged under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in connection with the death of his wife. The trial court had already rejected his first bail plea, noting …

NANHI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Nanhi Devi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 25‑11‑2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them under several IPC sections. They argued that the investigation was complete and a …

BALDEVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Baldev applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 649 of 2025) where he was arrested with 1.2 kg of charas. He argued that the arrest lacked an independent witness and that the mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act had not been complied with, while the trial was at a nascent stage with …

NARESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The case is Criminal Appeal No. 1102 of 1983 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The appellant, Naresh, appealed against the State of U.P. The judgment delivered by Justice Anil Kumar‑X held that the appeal is partly allowed. The specific orders were directed to be seen in the order of …

SURESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Suresh and Naresh were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad, for a robbery and dacoity (IPC §§395, 397) that occurred on 31 March 1978 when armed miscreants looted passengers from a factory vehicle at a railway crossing. The trial court relied on prompt FIR filing, …

DEVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The case arose from an alleged kidnapping of a girl (referred to as “X”) on 4 November 1985, for which an FIR was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court convicted Devendra Singh, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for both offences. On appeal, the appellant …

JAGMOHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appeal challenged a conviction under the Uttar Pradesh Foodgrains Dealers (Licensing and Restriction on Hoarding) Order, 1976 for allegedly storing 40 quintals of wheat in a tractor‑trolley. The trial court had interpreted clause 3(2) of the Order to treat storage in a conveyance as "store" and …

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Pandey and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and the Special Land Acquisition Officer to determine, award and pay full compensation for land acquired in 1981 for a dam project, along with interest and solatium. They alleged that …

MOHD ISHA AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, and requested mediation. The matter was referred to a mediation centre, but the applicants failed to deposit the required Rs. 25,000 as per the mediation report dated 11.05.2025. No counsel appeared …

ANUP KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anup Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel identified defects in the petition and expressed a desire not to pursue it further. The State respondents and the contesting respondent’s counsel raised no objection …

VAKEEL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, summons and the entire criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 456 of 2023) relating to offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise which was …

SACHIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Sachin and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers to intervene in their criminal proceedings. The application was listed but no petitioner representative appeared, even after a revised list. The …

SHANKAR DIGVIJAY NISHAD AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioners alleged that respondents No. 7 and 8 sold a portion of land, which did not belong to them, to respondent No. 6 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. They sought a direction to the Collector to adjudicate …

VIJAI PAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE

An FIR was lodged alleging that thirteen accused, armed with lathis and firearms, attacked the complainant's house, injuring three persons with gunshots. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 324, 147 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, granting them probation, while acquitting them of …

M/S UTTAM MODERN RICE AND OIL MILLSversusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE/COMMERCIAL TAX

M/s Uttam Modern Rice and Oil Mills filed a revision petition (Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 62 of 2018) against the Commissioner of Trade/Commercial Tax. The petition was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the revisionist, Krishna Agarawal, informed the court …

SANT LAL VISHWAKARMA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants, Sant Lal Vishwakarma and others, appealed against a conviction under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506 handed down by the Additional Session Judge, Allahabad. Both parties later entered into a compromise settlement, which was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on …

SHADAB KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shadab Khan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 11 November 2025 that framed charges against him in Sessions Trial No. 45 of 2025. The applicant argued that the trial court had not complied with the mandatory procedural provisions of Sections 230, 261, …

ANNPOORANA RAI AND 3 ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 ORS.

The petitioners, including Annpoorana Rai, sought to have a District Basic Education Officer's order quashed and to be considered for appointment as Assistant Teachers in a Junior Basic School, relying on their BTC training certificate as a valid qualification. The respondents, the State of Uttar …

DR TAUSEEF AHMAD KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Dr. Tauseef Ahmad Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (case crime no. 95 of 2025) pending before the Sambhal trial court. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and the trial court verified the compromise on …

MAUJI LALversusRAKESH CHANDRA

The petition under Article 227 was filed in 2017 by Mauji Lal against Rakesh Chandra. No counsel for the petitioner appeared at the hearing and the case was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court noted a notice requiring old cases to be taken up promptly and warned …

SMT. NISHI MASSEYversusPRATYUSH SOLOMAN

The applicant, Smt. Nishi Massey, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 222 of 2023 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant's counsel, Amitesh Kumar Srivastava, Kailash Chandra, and Pradep Kumar, appeared, but the opposite party's counsel, Rajiv Kumar Pandey, was present. …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR UPADHYAYversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prof. Chandra Shekhar Upadhyay, challenged a disciplinary resolution dated 08.03.2019 passed by the Board of Governors of IIT Kanpur, which imposed punishment on him. He argued that the charges were identical to those faced by Prof. Sanjay Mittal, whose disciplinary findings were set …

CONSTABLE MOHAR SINGH @ MOR SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Constable Mohar Singh and another applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC/Section 482 B.N.S.S. in a case involving multiple IPC offences. The State opposed, noting that proceedings under Section 82 CrPC/84 B.N.S.S. had already declared the applicants proclaimed offenders. The Court …

SHAMBHU SARANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shambhu Saran filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to pass an order for payment of the third Assured Career Progression benefit and leave encashment for 300 days. The petitioner claimed entitlement to these benefits …

ATUL NIGAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petition filed by Atul Nigam against the State of U.P. and others was listed as an old pending case for priority hearing. The court issued a notice that any case not marked as surviving or without counsel appearance would be dismissed as infructuous. Neither the petitioner's counsel appeared nor …

PRATEEK JAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Prateek Jain and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑01‑2025 under Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Mark Act, 1999 and Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, and also a mandamus directing the release of seized goods. The …

SMT. JUBAIDA KHATOONversusMOHAMMAD NAQI AND ANOTHER

The plaintiff in an original suit sought a permanent injunction and possession of certain land parcels, while the defendant (revisionist) applied for the appointment of a Survey Commission under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC to ascertain the exact boundaries of the disputed parcels. The trial court dismissed …

PRINCEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prince, who was charged with offences including rape under the IPC and the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing out …

SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Subhash Chandra Sharma, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 01 of 2026) under Section 105 of the B.N.S. and Section 3/27/25 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the accidental discharge of a firearm during celebratory firing. He relied on …

ASHISH SONI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking relief, but failed to comply with the Court's earlier order dated 01.05.2025 requiring a deposit of Rs.35,000 with the Mediation Centre. The Mediation Centre report dated 01.08.2025 confirmed non‑payment and the applicants did …

M/S K.V. INSTITUTE SAGARPALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, K.V. Institute and another, filed a writ petition seeking renewal of their license, which had been pending for several years before the concerned authorities. The court noted that the Regional Director’s instructions indicated the renewal matter was still under consideration. The …

RAM PRAKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ram Prakash Singh, filed Writ No. 21071 of 2023 challenging an order dated 04-02-2023 passed by Respondent No.2. The petition was heard before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The Court observed that the petitioner had not filed any written stand contesting the findings …

TAHJIB HAIDARversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash an order dated 13 January 2026 that rejected a request to conclude the trial of a criminal case together with a cross‑case arising from the same incident. The applicant argued that the …

VIRAT PARADISE PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSTATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

Virat Paradise Private Ltd filed a writ petition alleging that the Public Works Department placed red marks outside its campus, ostensibly to facilitate demolition of its boundary wall. The petitioner claimed no encroachment existed, supported by a PWD report dated 26‑02‑2026, and sought a direction …

VIKASH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC s.482 filed by Vikash Kumar Singh, who was implicated in a rape case (IPC ss.69, 352, 351(3), 316(2)). The applicant claimed the FIR was false, arising from a long‑term consensual relationship that soured, and asserted innocence. …

AJAB SUKH SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE ALLAHABAD AND 4 OTHERS

The appellant filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court but failed to pay the required court fees of Rs. 56,977.50. The court initially granted the appellant a month to deposit the fees on 28 March 2024, and later, on 6 April 2026, gave a final one‑month extension as a last chance. …

SATYADEV SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE ALLAHABAD AND 4 OTHERS

The appellant filed a first appeal (Defective No. 165 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court but had a deficiency of court fees amounting to Rs. 2,67,215. The court initially granted the appellant a month to pay the fees on 28 March 2026 and later, on 6 April 2026, gave a final one‑month extension …

INDRASEN SINGH AND 9 OTHERSversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE ALLAHABAD AND 4 OTHERS

The appellants, Indrasen Singh and nine others, filed an appeal in the Allahabad High Court but failed to pay a court fee deficiency of Rs. 3,98,770. The court initially granted them a one‑month extension on 28 March 2026 to remedy the deficiency, followed by a final one‑month extension on 6 April …

SMT. RUCHI GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Ruchi Goyal, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate and Additional District Magistrate (Nazul) of Agra to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for the sanctioning of a map for a proposed layout plan. The petitioner relied on letters from the …

KRISHNA MALLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a Special Judge's order that rejected a Section 311 CrPC application for further cross‑examination of the child victim (PW‑1). The trial court had relied on Section 33(5) of the POCSO …

VAIBHAV SOODversusSMT. SWATI SOOD

The appellant, Vaibhav Sood, filed a first appeal but later informed the court that he no longer wishes to prosecute the appeal and sought leave to withdraw it. The appellant's counsel, Hitesh Pachori, made the request before the bench of Hon'ble J.J. Munir and Hon'ble Indrajeet Shukla. The court …

SAPANA VARSHNEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sapana Varshney, filed a writ petition seeking appointment as an Assistant Teacher (Maths) in a senior basic school in Aligarh district, based on a Government Order dated 11 July 2013 for 29,334 teacher posts. The High Court noted that the matter had been decided by the Supreme Court …

JAGDISH SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Jagdish Singh Yadav filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019, seeking the High Court's inherent powers. The applicant's counsel did not appear, while counsel for the State and the other respondent were present. The Court observed that the application had been …

FAIZAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Faizan Khan, filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a Sessions trial for offences under Sections 387, 307 and 506 IPC, alleging false and fabricated allegations and lack of evidence. The trial court had earlier rejected his Section 227 …

DINANATH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS.

The petitioner, Dinanath Verma, sought payment of honorarium arrears for his tenure as Shiksha Mitra in a primary school from November 2007 to August 2012, claiming he was appointed by a district magistrate’s order after a prior writ. He argued that despite a stay on his appointment in 2007, he …

JAYJEET MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 ORS.

Jayjeet Maurya filed a writ petition seeking to quash the orders of the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, which denied his appointment as an Assistant Teacher on the ground that his BTC training certificate was not a valid qualification. He requested that the respondents consider him …

SHIVAM @ SUGAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicants Shivam @ Sugam and Ram Kishor filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order dated 30 June 2023 in Complaint Case No. 7512 of 2023 filed by Santosh Verma (opposite party 2) alleging offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 379 IPC. The …

ANUPAM AGRAHARI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10‑03‑2026 (Crime No. 0056 of 2026) under Sections 87 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest or harass them. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, …

RADHESHYAM MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petition (Writ‑A No. 17324 of 2021) was filed by Radheshyam Mishra against the State of U.P. and others. The case had been listed as an old pending matter and a specific notice required parties to appear or mark the cause of action as surviving, failing which the matter would be dismissed as …

JAI PRAKASH SINGH AND 14 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jai Prakash Singh and 14 others, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 10 June 2016 of the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, and to obtain appointment as Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools, contending that their BTC training certificates should …

JAGATVIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Jagatvir, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the proceedings of a trial court. The petition was listed as likely to be infructuous. An office report dated 05‑09‑2026 indicated that the trial court proceedings from which the petition arose had been …

SHIVPYARI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Shivpyari Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Auraiya, to expedite the trial of S.C. No.1371 of 2023 (State of U.P. v. Ramraj & others), a murder case under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC. The …

DEVESH ALIAS ARVESHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devesh (alias Arvesh), who is charged under IPC sections 498‑A, 302, 201 and 34 for the murder of his wife. The body was discovered in his house after being allegedly moved there by a person named Dahla, who could not be traced during …

SUSHIL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 10673 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The Coordinate Bench had earlier ordered the petitioners to deposit Rs 25,000 by 26 May 2025. The petitioners failed to make the deposit and did not appear for the revised call. The …

DEEPAK SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Deepak Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioner failed to appear, even after the list was revised. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the State respondents. Since there was no …

AAS MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The revisionist Aas Mohammad filed Criminal Revision Defective No. 1714 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a prior order. Counsel for the revisionist, Shahid Ali Siddiqui, informed the court that the revisionist no longer wishes to pursue the remedy. The court considered the request …

RAMKRISHNAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ramkrishna, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3135 of 2014) and the non‑bailable warrant issued against him, alleging that he had been mistakenly identified as Ram Kishan Sharma. He contended that he was not …

SHASHI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shashi Devi filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code alleging that three brothers had raped her on 19 July 2023 and used caste‑related abusive language. The police investigation recorded that the complainant later recanted, stating the allegations were false and made …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Nirmala Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash the District Magistrate's order dated 7 September 2024 that rejected her claim for Rs.5 lakh under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna on the ground that the claim was time‑barred. The petitioner argued that the delay was …

PRAHALAD SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits

The High Court considered the bail application of Prahalad Singh, who had been granted interim bail on 30 July 2025. The Court noted that despite a specific direction to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate by 28 August 2025, the applicant failed to surrender and his whereabouts became …

DEVENDRA KUMAR VAJPEIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 11673 of 2025) was filed by Devendra Kumar Vajpei against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioners failed to appear before the court even after the list was revised, while the respondent's counsel was present. The court, noting the absence of the …

RAJUDEEN @ RAJU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. The Court had earlier ordered them to deposit Rs 20,000 with the Mediation Centre, but they failed to comply. Despite this non‑compliance, the petitioners continued to enjoy the benefits of an interim order. …

SMT. MANJU SINGH AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 11542 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The petition was listed and a revised call was made, but none of the petitioners appeared before the court. The learned Additional …

RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners at the revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State respondents. The court noted the absence of petitioners' …

EMMANUAL EBUKAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Emmanual Ebuka, a foreign national, applied for bail in a case under Sections 8, 21, 27, 27A, 29 and 37 of the NDPS Act and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, alleging that the arrest and seizure of 26.67 kg of crystal and MDMA were conducted without an independent witness, violating mandatory …

RAMKUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ramkumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case of alleged poisoning (Crime No.17 of 2026). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the victim's viscera report showed no poisonous substance and …

VED YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ved Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed but the petitioner’s counsel, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, failed to appear even after the list was revised. The respondent State of U.P. and others were represented by counsel …

SHABAB KHAN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shabab Khan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, and the State Law Officer representing the respondents raised no objection. The Court …

RAM SAWARE @ NARESH KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Saware @ Naresh Kumar Pandey and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 12519 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition listed counsel K.K. Rao and Pradeep Kumar Srinette for the petitioners and G.A. for the …

IFEANYI JOHNBOSCOversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by foreign national Ifeanyi Johnbosco, who was arrested in connection with a seizure of 26.67 kg of crystal methamphetamine and MDMA under Sections 8, 21, 27, 27A, 29 and 37 of the NDPS Act and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act. The …

SHAILENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A criminal revision petition (No. 2914 of 2024) was filed by Shailendra Singh against the State of U.P. and another. The petition was presented before Hon'ble Justice Lakshmi Kant Shukla, with counsel Jitendra Pal Singh, Satyendra Narayan Singh and Sushil Kumar Pandey for the petitioner, and G.A., …

SHAKTI SINGH PATHRAURversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 seeking to quash criminal proceedings in complaint case No. 3185 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court verified that the …

SUMAYILA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The investigation in the matter had already concluded, and a final report favoring the petitioners was submitted. The petitioners, through counsel, expressed a desire to …

SHIV NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shiv Narayan filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 04‑09‑2022 and the criminal proceedings (Case No.1486 of 2023) relating to IPC offences 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant claimed that a compromise between the parties had …

NEPAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UPAND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑06‑2023 and a summoning order dated 17‑08‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Ghaziabad, in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and …

MOHD. IQBAL ALIAS IQBAL BALAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd. Iqbal sought a writ of mandamus directing the police not to register any further FIRs against him without first conducting a preliminary inquiry as mandated by Section 173(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The petitioner also asked for video‑conferenced statements …

DEV MOHAN KHANNA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing, even after the list was revised. The learned Additional Government Advocate appeared for the State respondents. Since the petitioners did not prosecute the petition, the …

ABHISHEK SINGH BHADAURIYAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhishek Singh Bhadauriya, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13011 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of UP and two others. The petition was listed and subsequently revised, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the …

SMT MISLA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Smt Misla Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 07.06.2025 and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest her. The petition listed several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the court, …

AMBESH PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Ambesh Pratap Singh and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13355 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. …

RAJNI SHARMA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 13142 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioners appeared before the court even after the list was revised, while the learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State was present. The court held that the …

INDRA MOHAN GAUTAM AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear before the bench. The State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners' counsel and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …

LAXMI TIWARI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Laxmi Tiwari and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The counsel for the applicants sought dismissal of the application on the ground that it was not pressed. The learned Additional Government Advocate …

SMT KHUSHBU AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt Khushbu and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 11‑06‑2025 under sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus directing the police not to arrest them. The petitioners did not appear …

SUSHIL CHAUDHARY @ SURENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sushil Chaudhary, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.3600323 of 2006) pending before the Small Cause Judge/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, arising from offences under Sections …

AMIT KUMAR SHUKLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings (S.C.No.21 of 2025) initiated under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, which were based on a predicate offence (Case Crime No.220 of 2023 under IPC sections 420 and 506) …

M/S HARI NARAYAN RAIversusMS GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

M/S Hari Narayan Rai entered into a contract with GMR Infrastructure Ltd for earthwork under the DFCC project. Work was delayed by monsoon, after which a second purchase order was issued and the work was completed. The respondent later issued a notice of liquidated damages of Rs. 50,000 and …

RINKU GOLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rinku Gola, who was charged in Crime No. 554 of 2025 under sections of the CrPC, the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the S.C/S.T. Act for allegedly enticing a minor and creating obscene material. The applicant argued that an earlier FIR and a prior …

RAMDEEN KEWAT @ RAMAADHEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.85 of 2008) arising from offences under Sections 326, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise dated 16‑07‑2025, which was verified by the magistrate …

SMT VISHESH KUMARIversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The wife filed a criminal revision under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking enhancement of the Rs 25,000 monthly maintenance awarded by the Family Court, alleging the order was illegal and based on an erroneous assessment of the husband’s income. The husband filed a counter‑revision seeking to set aside …

AFZALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that the applicant was part of an organized criminal gang, and a gang‑chart was …

RASHEED KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Rasheed Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 28 of 2025) seeking relief under Section 482 and several provisions of the B.N.S. Act. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a final report had already been filed …

SMT SHALINI TOMARversusASHWANI KUMAR

The appellant, Smt. Shalini Tomar, filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 619 of 2024) against Ashwani Kumar. The appellant later filed a civil miscellaneous withdrawal application (No. 3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal application. …

DALIP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dalip Singh filed a criminal appeal (No. 6111 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging a conviction by the State of U.P. The appellant was represented by Senior Advocate Saurabh Chaturvedi. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant indicated that the appellant no longer wished to …

PUTTU LAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Puttu Lal Gupta filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17‑12‑2025 that arose from a monetary dispute. The Court referred the matter to its Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the parties reached a settlement agreement on 07‑08‑2026, which they both affirmed as fully …

SUSHIL AWANA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sushil Awana and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of an investigation. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report …

SUNIL KUMAR CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant Sunil Kumar Chauhan appealed against a charge‑sheet dated 20‑01‑2026 and a cognizance order dated 25‑03‑2026 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and related statutes. Both parties asserted that …

GAJJI YADAV @ GAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24-04-2026 alleging his involvement in the death of Malu Ram Yadav and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest. The FIR, filed under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the B.N.S.S., alleged that the deceased had entered the petitioner’s …

VASHU DEV MANJHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act filed by Vashu Dev Manjhi seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑04‑2025, the cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the entire proceedings of case no. 97720 of 2025. The applicant alleged false …

VISHWADEEPAK BHARTI ALIAS GOVINDversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishwadeepak Bharti (alias Govind) in a criminal case (Crime No. 313 of 2024) involving alleged financial fraud under Sections 319(2), 318(4) and 316(2) of the BNS. The applicant contended that he was merely a cousin of the alleged mastermind, …

VIKRAM PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vikram Prasad was arrested in a fraud case (Criminal No. 315 of 2024) alleging duping of an informant of Rs 4.42 crore through D.D. Finance, owned by his cousin Upendra Nath. He is charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 406, 504, 506 and 120‑B and has been in custody since 13‑Oct‑2024 while the trial …