Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 5001–5200
The petitioner, Raj Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. The petitioner’s counsel conceded that the relief sought had already been granted by the appropriate authority. The Court examined whether any further judicial …
Petitioner Sameena Yasmeen filed a writ petition seeking (i) a mandamus directing the authorities to release enhanced salary and allowance for 11 months as per a 26 October 2016 order of the U.P. Legal Services Authority, and (ii) direction to consider her candidature for appointment as a Member of …
Santosh filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 09‑07‑2025 of the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Azamgarh, which partially granted a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. and ordered him to pay Rs.4,000 to …
The petitioner, Ekramullah Khan, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court in 2020. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled date, and the case was listed as potentially infructuous due to the passage of time. The court noted a notice requiring parties to indicate if the cause …
Manish Dixit filed a civil revision challenging an order that allowed the plaintiff's substitution application in an original suit. Dixit was not a party to the suit when the substitution was permitted and his earlier attempt to be impleaded had been rejected. He argued that a prior judgment in …
The petitioners filed Writ‑A No. 13843 of 2021 in the Allahabad High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The case was listed under writs likely to have become infructuous, and a notice required counsel to indicate if the cause of action still survived. Neither the petitioners’ counsel …
The case concerns two first appeals against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awards for the deaths of Lalit Kumar and Rakesh in a 2013 truck accident. The appellants argued that the deceased earned substantially higher agricultural incomes and sought enhanced compensation, invoking the Supreme Court's …
This is a first appeal filed by Smt. Sunita Devi and four others against the order No. 1864 of 2016 passed by a lower court. The appellants were represented by counsel Pramod Kumar Sinha and the respondents by G.K. Srivastava and Komal Mehrotra. The matter was heard by Hon’ble Justice Anil Kumar‑X …
The petitioner Abdul Samad challenged an order dated 25 March 2019 issued by the Additional District Magistrate demanding payment for alleged illegal mining and imposing a blacklist. The petitioner claimed that payments had already been made in excess of the demand and sought relief from coercive …
The applicants, Dharmendra Yadav and another, filed a withdrawal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, stating that the underlying dispute stemmed from a matrimonial conflict between the second respondent and her husband. An FIR had been lodged and a charge‑sheet filed in …
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs.24,62,102 as compensation to the widows of a deceased motorcyclist, finding that his death resulted from injuries sustained in a road accident involving a tractor. Reliance General Insurance appealed, contending that the causal link between the …
The petitioners sought quashing of a cognizance order and pending criminal case arising from a commercial dispute, alleging that the parties had entered into a settlement on 19 June 2019, which was verified by the court on 10 December 2024. The respondent and the Attorney General did not contest the …
The appellant Sunil was convicted under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly kidnapping and raping a minor girl. The High Court examined extensive inconsistencies in the victim's statements, the testimony of family witnesses, and the lack of documentary …
Amod Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging false implication in a suicide‑abetment charge. The applicant argued that he was not named in the alleged suicide note and that the FIR and investigation material did not establish the essential ingredients of …
M/S Solanki Construction filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 2112 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and two other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Ravi Kant Verma, while the respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., C.S.C. The Court, …
The petitioner, Dev Prakash, filed Writ A No. 17912 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and five others. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioner’s counsel, Ramesh Kumar Shukla, did not appear on the scheduled date. The case was categorized …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2019 but failed to appear before the court. The court had issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be dismissed as infructuous if the parties did not appear or indicate that the cause of action still survived. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18683 of 2019) was filed by Shri Krishan against the State of U.P. and others. The petition remained pending since 2019 and the petitioner’s counsel, Ravindra Kumar, did not appear for the hearing. The case was listed under "writs likely to have become infructuous" and a …
The petitioner, Shashi Kant, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19943 of 2019) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was listed as likely to become infructuous due to the passage of time. No counsel for the petitioner appeared before the court, nor was the petition marked …
The petitioner, Meetoo Ram, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 19585 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled date, and the petition was not marked to indicate that the cause of action still survived. The court noted that the matter had been …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute, wherein the complainant alleged offences under Sections 498A, 494, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vasudha, the step‑mother of a deceased person, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged nine days after the death, indicating a fatal delay, and that the …
Petitioner Girraj Kishor Gupta filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No further steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The Court observed that there was nothing for it to consider and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order …
The applicant Neeshu Tyagi, driver of a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, was arrested for demanding Rs 1 lac to influence a pending case and was charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has been in custody since 30 March 2026 and has no prior criminal record. The State opposed …
The applicant, Kapil Sirohi, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a maintenance order dated 10 July 2023 passed by the Family Court, Mathura, which directed him to pay interim maintenance to his wife and son. The applicant alleged that the Family Court failed to consider …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 64 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, concerning alleged rape. The applicant argued that the FIR and the victim’s statement under Section 180 of the B.N.S. did not allege …
The applicant, Avshesh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 107 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 223 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 503, 506 and 153A IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which …
The applicant, Rakhi Rai, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. Both parties reached a settlement and the applicant expressed a desire to discontinue the proceedings. The opposite party, represented by Santosh Kumar Jaiswal, raised no objection to the settlement. The court noted …
The applicant, Mukhtar Ahmad, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order issued by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) in Varanasi. The FIR relating to an alleged offence that occurred in 2005‑06 was lodged only in 2017, and …
The petitioners, who were granted Sirdari leases in 1968 and whose mutation orders were recorded, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer and revenue authorities to correct revenue entries in CH Form 11 and Form 23 and to prevent their eviction. The respondents argued that …
The applicants, Yogesh and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheets and the entire criminal trial (Sessions Trial No. 1221 of 2021) relating to offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 506, 352 and 304 IPC. The applicants …
The Committee of Management of Town Inter College filed a writ petition (Writ No. 21179 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petitioners later filed a withdrawal application (No. 4/2026) seeking to retract the …
The petitioner sought re‑installation of demarcation pillars that had been installed under an order passed pursuant to Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code on 06‑06‑2022, but were later removed by private individuals, leading to an FIR and a final report. The petitioner applied to the …
The appellant, Smt. Shashikala Chauhan, alleged that Ajay Yadav repeatedly raped and blackmailed her, threatening to release a video. The trial court acquitted Yadav, finding contradictions in the appellant's statements and no corroborative evidence. On appeal, the appellant argued that the trial …
M/s Shubham Agencies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of …
The petition filed by Mohammed Salim against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2026:AHC:190551-DB. No …
The petition filed by Abdul Rehman Traders was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that the orders be as per the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2026:AHC:190551-DB.
The applicant, Arun Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the order dated 24‑02‑2026 that framed an alternative charge of Section 302 IPC in a case originally involving Sections 498A, 304B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The original FIR …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest, alleging that the dispute underlying the FIR had been amicably settled and the compromise deed was verified by the magistrate. Both parties’ counsel …
M/s Jbg Marketing And Solution filed a writ petition (Tax No. 2912 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petition was presented by counsel Vishwas Pandey, Vivek Mishra and Yashwant Prasad, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. …
The appellants filed an appeal under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking to quash the chargesheet and summoning order in a criminal case arising from alleged offences under Sections 87 and 70(1) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash orders dated 14‑08‑2025 and 12‑05‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 4266 of 2025) relating to non‑compoundable offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 10‑04‑2018 and the cognizance order dated 18‑08‑2018 in Criminal Case No.2505 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 354, 308 and 325 IPC. Both parties had amicably …
The petitioners, Iqbal, filed a civil revision challenging the dismissal of their suit and a subsequent dismissal of their appeal with a Section 5 limitation condonation application. No counsel appeared for the petitioners at the hearing. The respondents argued that the revision was not maintainable …
The applicant, Smt. Parul, filed a transfer application in the Allahabad High Court. Both parties subsequently reached a settlement, and the applicant expressed a desire not to pursue the matter further. The counsel for the applicant informed the court of this development. The court considered that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, claiming that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 26‑11‑2025. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second opposite …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2497 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 110, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC. Both parties admitted that a compromise had been reached and that the settlement was verified …
The applicant, Indresh Kumar Singh, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 63 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 22 of the NDPS Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vineet Singh, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior criminal record. Relying on …
The petitioners, Murali Dhar Tiwari and others, filed a civil revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging a lower court order. The revision was presented by counsel Dheeraj Kumar Pandey and Lakshmi Kant Pandey, while the respondents were represented by Ashutosh Mani Tripathi. The court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dheeraj Gaur in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, that the victim voluntarily left home, married the …
The petition M/s M.A.R. Construction Company filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was heard by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. Counsel for the petitioner were Nisha …
The petition filed by M/s Suraj Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that orders be as per the decision in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2026:AHC:190551‑DB). No substantive findings on facts …
The petition filed by M/s Surya Associates against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The judgment refers the parties to the order passed in the case of M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB) for the …
The petition filed by M/s Ramji Sanitech Private Limited against the Union of India was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The judgment contains no detailed findings of fact or legal reasoning and directs the parties to refer to the order in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises v. State of Uttar …
M/s Ramji Sanitech Private Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to follow the order issued in M/s …
Mahadev @ Kamlesh filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 6714 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Kamal Dev Singh Chanchal, later moved the court seeking to withdraw the application. The court considered the …
M/s Jbg Marketing And Solution filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3054 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The counsel for the petitioner were Vishwas …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash orders dated 11 May 2026 and 9 September 2025 that rejected his objection to the demarcation of a field book and dismissed his appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 without a hearing. The petitioner alleged that the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the Sessions Trial No. 231 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicants had already reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No.232 of 2017) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by …
Idrawati Devi and five others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition sought relief under the writ jurisdiction, the specific grounds of which are not detailed in the order. The Court, after hearing the parties, …
Smt. Mausam filed an application to cancel the bail of the accused (opposite party no.2) in a criminal case alleging that the accused was pressurising her to compromise and thereby threatening the trial. The application relied on sections of the BNS Act, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act, but no …
The petitioner, Gaya Shankar Pandey, sought relief to release money held by a financial institution, arguing that the appropriate mode was to make a representation under Section 7 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019. The petitioner had previously filed an application before the …
M/s Bareilly Chemicals Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was listed before a bench of Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition without …
Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division to dispose of his appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which has been pending since 30 September 2024. The petitioner argued that the …
The petitioner, Deena Nath, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the revenue authority to record his name on a land plot in accordance with a final decree in a suit filed under Section 229‑B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The decree had been passed by …
The petition filed by M/s G4c Management Private Limited was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that any further orders be in accordance with the order dated in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB). No substantive factual or …
Smt Geeta filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Revenue Officer, District Azamgarh, to expedite a pending proceeding (Case No.834 of 2024) under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901. The proceeding had initially been allowed by the Chief Revenue Officer on …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Nizamabad and the District Magistrate, Azamgarh to enforce an order dated 11‑May‑2026 in a land‑holding division suit under Section 176 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The order had …
The petitioners, Pushpa Nishad and her husband, sought a habeas corpus writ to obtain custody of their daughter, Nandima (Nandini) Nishad, alleging that her marriage to her cousin uncle Arjun Nishad was prohibited under Hindu law and that she was being illegally detained. The State complied with the …
The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Bhadohi to decide a pending mutation suit (No. 518479 of 2025) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay since the suit was filed on 29-12-2025. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Collector of Mau to decide a pending restoration/recall application and a revenue case under Section 30(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. The restoration application was subsequently allowed, leaving only the revenue …
The applicants, Saransh Manaut and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 406 and 506 of the IPC. The dispute between the parties had been amicably settled, a fact verified by …
The Committee of Management of Raghukul Junior High School filed a writ petition seeking inclusion of the school in the grant‑in‑aid list for payment of salaries to teachers and staff. The petitioners argued that under the U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High School) (Payment of Salary of …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 598 of 2020, which involved offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC arising from a 2019 crime. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified by the trial court on 28‑07‑2026 and …
Petitioner Lal Bahadur filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Powayan to decide a mutation case (No. 3339 of 2016) pending since 2016 under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay and unnecessary …
Dashrath filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) of Azamgarh to decide a pending land revenue case (No. 1022 of 2026) under Section 28 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901. The petitioner argued that the proceeding, remanded on 16‑12‑2025, was not …
The Committee of Management of Yug Nirman Balika Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya filed a writ petition seeking inclusion of their school in the grant‑in‑aid list for payment of salaries to teachers and staff under the Uttar Pradesh Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High School) (Payment of Salary of …
The petition filed by Paradise Hospitality Services against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was heard by a bench of Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The petition was disposed of by the court. The court directed that for any orders, reference should be made to the order …
The applicant, Ramji Gupta, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite two pending Sessions Trials (Nos. 577/2024 and 576/2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 308 and 304 IPC. The State opposed, and the Court …
The applicant, Amit Kumar Singh, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 63 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vineet Singh, had already been granted bail in a similar case, establishing parity. The …
The petitioner, Yogendra Premani, challenged two orders of the District Magistrate: an order dated 8 June 2023 cancelling a lease under the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021, and a later order dated 7 March 2025 directing adjustment and refund of the balance. The petitioner …
The applicant, Ankur Garg, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 29‑January‑2025 issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in a complaint under Sections 132(1)(b), (c) and (i) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant contended that …
Jyoti Agarwal filed a contempt application alleging that the Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., failed to comply with the High Court's order dated 10 September 2025 directing a decision on her absorption as an Assistant Teacher within two months. The order had permitted consideration of her …
The petitioner, Dr. Rakesh Singh, challenged the appointment and salary disbursement of a Class‑IV employee (respondent No.7) alleging that the appointment order dated 21‑Nov‑2007 was fraudulent and that subsequent orders granting financial approval were passed without giving the petitioner a …
Smt. Abhilasha Tiwari filed a transfer application seeking to move her matrimonial suit (Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act) from the Family Court in Varanasi to the Family Court in Ballia, citing hardship in attending proceedings due to lack of income and distance. The opposite party, Ashish …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order dated 06‑12‑2024 in a case where the accused was charged under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) BNS (equivalent to IPC Sections 420 and 406). The applicant contended, relying on the Supreme …
Azhar Khan, the petitioner, holds a Wood-Based Industry Licence and sought a writ of certiorari to quash proceedings for the proposed transfer, change of name, and change of ownership of his licence, alleging that he never applied for such transfer. He submitted a letter dated 22 May 2026 to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.354 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
Rahul Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 275 of 2024) filed under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were the result of police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail in two …
The applicant, Dimple Tomar, filed a transfer application under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court seeking to move the suit to another court. The High Court examined the application and observed that the applicant's counsel had not complied with the procedural steps required for such an …
Petitioner M/s Anya Polytech and Fertilizers Limited filed Writ Tax No. 3296 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The specific relief sought is not detailed in the excerpt. The Court, after hearing counsel Pranjal Shukla and Priyanshu Kesarwani for the petitioner and C.S.C. for the respondents, …
The writ petition filed by M/s Anya Polytech And Fertilizers Limited against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The court did not elaborate on facts or legal reasoning in this brief order, and instead directed reference to the order dated in the case …
M/s Anya Polytech and Fertilizers Limited filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition was listed before Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing that the …
Petitioner Mohammad Kalim filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Chief Engineer (respondent No.3) to pass an order on his application dated 15 June 2026 and to correct the demand load and erroneous billing of his electricity account. The petition alleged wrong billing and demanded …
Munni Devi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Her earlier anticipatory bail application had been rejected, with a direction to appear before the trial court and seek regular bail, which she failed to do. …
M/s Supreme Steel And Alloys Khasra filed a writ petition against the Union of India and three other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Nishant Mishra and Ojasvi Gupta, while the respondents were represented by A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Dhananjay Awasthi, and Priyanka Midha. The matter was …
M/s Shivam Ent Udhyog filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3332 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petitioners were represented by counsel Aditya Pandey and Himanshu Mishra, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. …
Lal Chand Pandey, a former Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and education authorities to consider his claim for regularization under Section 33‑G of the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Act, 1982, after the arrears of salary for …
The petitioner, Dr. Rk Bhadwaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 28 June 2026. The petitioner did not contest this fact but …
Petitioners Arvind Swaroop and another applied for a domicile certificate, which was rejected on 14 March 2026 because they had not attached a copy of the parivaar register. They had applied to be included in the register and were awaiting the outcome of that appeal. The State argued that a current …
Petitioners Arvind Swaroop and another challenged the rejection of their applications for caste certificates by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The rejection orders, dated 24 October 2024 and 14 March 2026, cited the absence of a latest copy of the "parivaar register" as the reason. Petitioners argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Imran, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.56 of 2026) under sections 318(4), 111(6), 317(2), 338, 340(2) of the B.N.S. and section 66D of the Income Tax Act. Imran alleged that the recovery of a mobile phone, two pass‑books, an …
The petitioner, a mining operator, claimed that the Divisional Forest Officer had illegally obstructed the transport of mined material on a public road in Baghpat, causing the expiry of his mining permit. He sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate/District Mining Officer to …
Surendra Singh Bhati filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 14 May 2026 issued by an oil company. The petitioner submitted a reply on 22 May 2026 contesting the notice. The respondents, including the Union of India and the oil company, were directed to consider the petitioner’s …
M/s Shivam Ent Udhyog filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Hon'ble Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition without a detailed discussion, directing the parties …
Smt. Husna Bano filed a revision petition against Sri Atikur Rehman Khan. The petition was presented before the Allahabad High Court, but the revisionist failed to appear or prosecute the petition. The court noted that no steps were taken to press the revision. Consequently, the revision was …
Vimal Bahadur Singh filed a criminal revision challenging an ex‑parte maintenance order of Rs 10,000 per month awarded to Swati Singh, arguing the amount was excessive. The State argued that the appropriate remedy was an application under Section 126(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code or Section …
The petitioner, Smt. Nargish Parveen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a mutation order dated 8 July 2026 passed by the Naib Tehsildar of Dhampur in favour of private respondent No.6, and to restrain any alteration of the disputed land pending a statutory appeal. The …
The petition filed by M/s Khwaja Int Udhyog was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The Court directed that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2026:AHC:190551-DB. No substantive facts or arguments were elaborated in …
The appellant Mohit was convicted under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC for allegedly abducting and raping a girl who was claimed to be a minor. On appeal, the defence argued that the victim's age was not conclusively proved, relying on a radiological report …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rahul Gupta (alias Nitish Kumar) in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 105 of the IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, noting a delayed FIR, vague allegations, and lack of clarity about …
The applicant Rajan sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.158 of 2026) alleging gang rape under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S., Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. The prosecution alleged that the co‑accused Manish lured the victim to a field where Rajan and Vikas …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramesh Chandra Gupta and Aditya Gupta in a case involving alleged assault and homicide under Sections 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed they were falsely implicated and highlighted the belated filing of …
The petitioner, Akshay Tyagi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Gautam Budh Nagar, to monitor and ensure a fair, impartial, and expeditious investigation of FIR No. 417/2025 involving multiple IPC offences. He alleged that …
The petitioner, Brij Lal Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the Lecturer (PGT) recruitment selection and to direct a re‑evaluation of his answer sheet, alleging that the correct answer to question 32 was (A) but the commission marked (C) as correct, resulting in a loss of four …
The petition filed by M/s Sk Builders against the State of U.P. was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The Court directed that the orders be as per the earlier judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Enterprises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2026:AHC:190551-DB). No substantive facts or issues …
Smt. Priyanka Singh filed a transfer application in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. No counsel appeared for the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the transfer application for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive …
M/s Rishabh Constructions Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. Counsel for the petitioner was Pooja Talwar, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. The matter was heard by Hon'ble Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. …
A writ petition filed by M/s Rishabh Constructions Pvt Ltd against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others was heard before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief, the specifics of which are not detailed in the judgment. The Court observed that the matter had …
The petitioner, a competing dealer, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate not to issue a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to a private respondent selected by Indian Oil Corporation as a dealer. The petition claimed that the selection process was ambiguous and that …
Smt. Shwati filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 501 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking to transfer the suit. No appearance was made by the applicant to press the application. The Court observed that there was no prosecution of the application and consequently dismissed it. The …
M/s Hanzala Brick Field filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The Allahabad High Court disposed of the petition. The court directed that any orders be taken from the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, …
M/s Sunrise Industrial Services filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to refer to the order …
Sr Enterprises filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was presented by counsel Pankaj Kumar Singh and Sudhanshu Yadav, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. The matter was heard by …
The petitioner, Dhirendra Singh Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) Kanpur Nagar to decide a pending proceeding (Case No.1292 of 2025) under Section 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending …
The Allahabad High Court considered the third bail application of Tauqeer, accused in Crime No. 164 of 2023 under IPC sections 452, 302, 120‑B/34. The applicant argued that the sole witness PW‑1 did not support the allegations, that he was falsely implicated, has no prior record and has been in …
Shamshad, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested on 7 June 2026 in connection with Crime No. 280 of 2026 under Section 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code (BNS) and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, asserting that the FIR was filed six hours after the alleged incident and …
The applicant, Gautam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 64, 351(3) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was lodged 21 days after the alleged incident, there was no medical evidence, and the victim appeared to be a major …
The High Court heard a habeas corpus petition filed by Abu Turar's father, Zohair Alam, seeking custody of the four‑year‑old child who was then in the care of his maternal grandmother. The petitioner, a mechanic earning Rs.25,000 per month, had remarried and his second wife pledged to care for the …
M/s Laxmi Electric And Motor Winding Work filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. The petition was heard by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The Court disposed of the petition without …
Virendra Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0014 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 3(5) of the IPC and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co‑accused, Ashish Patwa, had already …
The applicant, Jitendra Patel, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.287 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The court examined the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS, which indicated …
Manish Arya, the step‑father of the victim, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64(2)M, 76, 115(2), 351(3) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was delayed by seventeen days, and that the investigating officer had not …
Yogesh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 409 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Yashwant Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 64(1), 333, 352, 351(3) and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for an alleged offence at Mehdawal. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 16‑year‑old, had given a …
The applicant, a 74‑year‑old litigant, filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal complaint (Case No. 12563 of 2020) from Meerut to Hapur on the ground of inconvenience. The court noted that the Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts in Uttar Pradesh, 2020, provide a digital …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 28764 of 2026 filed by Ankit @ Sachin Saroj, who was arrested in Crime No.135 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant alleged that the alleged victim, aged 16‑18 as …
The applicant, Sapna Pandey, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a court order directing the Family Court to decide the pending Miscellaneous Case No. 597 of 2022 (under Section 125(3) read with Section 128 CrPC) within a fixed time‑frame. The State opposed …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Anas under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under several IPC sections, including 115(2), 352, 351(2), 308(5), 309(4) and 61(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated in a false …
Shahrukh, also known as Sonu, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 69, 87 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code. The victim is a major, approximately 18 years old, and the prosecution has not produced any conclusive evidence that the …
Saleem, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by hanging, was arrested under Section 108 of the B.N.S. for alleged abetment of suicide. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR and investigation did not establish any act of instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, and that he has …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings, alleging that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and a compromise was verified by the trial court on 23 March 2026. The trial court confirmed the settlement, and the State and the second …
Santosh Kumar filed a petition under Article 226 seeking the disposal of his pending passport application. The respondents argued that a show‑cause notice had been issued to the petitioner because of a criminal case (crime no. 286 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of …
Smt. Shivpatti Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Phoolpur Tehsil to decide a pending mutation proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the proceeding, initiated on 20‑01‑2023, was unduly delayed. The Court, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by the accused (referred to as Rahul) in a criminal case (Crime No. 337 of 2025) involving charges under Section 65(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, Sections 9 and 10 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2006, and Section 75 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dinesh Kumar, who was arrested in a POCSO case (Crime No. 492 of 2026) alleging sexual offences under Sections 64(2)(M), 65(1), 87 of the BNS Act and Sections 3/4(2), 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming the alleged …
The applicant, Smt. Rajani Paliwal Shukla, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, to take cognizance of a charge‑sheet dated 12‑04‑2026 and to summon the State and two other parties. The State opposed, arguing …
Sikesh Paswan was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) under Section 65(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual assault. The applicant contended that the alleged victim was a consenting party, there was no medical evidence of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak, accused in Crime No. 210 of 2026 under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including offences relating to outraging modesty and sexual assault. The applicant argued that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and …
Smt. Neha Chaudhary filed a Section 23 application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for interim maintenance in a Ghaziabad court, which remained pending. She approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a direction that the lower court decide the application within a …
Aman Nishad was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, arguing that the victim's statement was unreliable, the FIR was filed a day after the alleged incident, and there was …
The applicant, Dheeraj Chamaar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. The Attorney General objected, stating that the application failed to disclose the applicant’s criminal antecedents as mandated by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Court Rules. Counsel for the …
The applicant, a rape victim whose identity is protected under Section 72 of the BNS Act, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNS seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite the pending Sessions Trial No. 1290 of 2025 (State vs. Neeshu). The High Court examined whether it …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to expedite the disposal of a pending Sessions case (No. 467 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 420, 328, 376, 384 IPC and Sections 66D, 66E of the IT Act. The respondent, the …
The applicant, Tarachandra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 139 of 2026) under Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging a false promise of marriage to a married adult woman. The prosecution alleged that the applicant established a corporeal relationship with the victim …
The petitioners, Sachin Jain and another, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been in force was …
Harsh Shrivas, a 19‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5(1) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, noting a two‑month delay in filing the FIR and the absence of any …
The petition filed by Asaragreen Infratech Private Limited against the State of Uttar Pradesh was filed under writ tax No. 3543 of 2026. The petitioners were represented by counsel Raja Sahani and the respondents by C.S.C. The matter was heard by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 28‑03‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 09‑07‑2026, and the entire proceedings of State v Ataurrahman Khan & others under Sections 352 and 351(3) BNS. They contended that these …
The petitioners M/s Rst Infocom Private Limited filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3481 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and four others. The petition was heard by a division bench of Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of …
M/s Rst Infocom Private Limited filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to refer to the order in M/s Maa Gayatri …
M/s Rahmat Traders filed a writ petition (Tax No. 3501 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by Hon’ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, …
The applicant, Asif Miyan, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash two orders of the Sessions Judge, Rampur, which had denied him the opportunity to cross‑examine PW‑5 (Constable Dheer Singh) and PW‑9 (S.I. Sohan Lal). The applicant …
Dr. Neelam Gaur filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court alleging inaction by a Probation Officer in proceedings under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The petitioner sought relief through the writ but later …
Rohit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.357 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 363, 3366, 376(2)(n) and Section 51/6 of the POCSO Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the alleged victim, who had married him and bore his child, had given a consent …
The applicant, Ikhlak, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 246 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 64(2) and 137(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a consenting party, denied any sexual assault …
The applicant, Rajan Saini, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29809 of 2026, seeking release in case No. 161 of 2026 which involves charges under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(1) of the POCSO Act, 2012. The State Law Officer informed the …
Akash Nagar filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2024 and a summoning order dated 21‑06‑2024 in a criminal case where he was charged under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. The applicant contended that, according to the Supreme Court’s …
M/s S R D Traders filed a writ petition (Writ Tax No. 3554 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court noted that the order to be passed would be the same as that in M/s Maa …
The applicant, Kasif, was charged in Crime No.183 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 65(1) and 87 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the P.O.C.S.O. Act for alleged offences arising from a trip with the victim. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she had …
The petitioners, mother Smt. Shabanam Bano and another, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody of their seven‑year‑old daughter, Km. Rumaisha, alleging illegal detention by the father, Ansar Ahmad. The father produced the child, who testified that she is comfortable living with him, attends …
The petitioners filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that the wife of petitioner No.1, Smt. Sadhana, was being illegally detained by her mother-in-law, Smt. Munni Devi. The petitioners claimed that the wife had left the matrimonial home with their two minor children and was being held against her …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajan @ Pardesi, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a sexual relationship with a major victim under a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged deception, while …
Vipin applied for bail in criminal case No.109 of 2026, which involved offences under Sections 137(2), 143(4), 98, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The applicant was not named by the victim in statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. The court …
Indu Creations filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing that the orders be …
The petition filed by M/S Dr. Ambedkar Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. No substantive facts, issues, or reasoning were set out in the judgment. The court directed that the orders be taken from a related case, M/s Maa Gayatri …
The applicant Rahul sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication and a ten‑day delay in filing the FIR without explanation. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the delay, …
Petitioners Gaya Prasad and two others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to stay their appeal (No. C202602000001082) under Section 207 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 2006 and to maintain status quo over a disputed 1.4950‑hectare property. The appeal, along with an interim relief application, …
The petition filed by M/S Dr. Ambedkar Enterprises was disposed of by the Allahabad High Court. The order refers the parties to the order dated in the case of M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another. No detailed facts, issues, or reasoning are provided in the judgment …
Aakash Rajbhar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 477 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The victim, an 18‑year‑old, gave a statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S. indicating consent and had …
M/s Dr Ambedkar Enterprises filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a tax matter against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was heard by Hon'ble Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court disposed of the petition, directing the parties to refer to …
The petition filed by M/s Dr. Ambedkar Enterprises against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another was heard by the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that the orders in the matter are to be taken from the judgment in M/s Maa Gayatri Inter Prises vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another, …
M/s Kesarwani Traders filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petition was heard by Judges Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi. The court noted that the order for the case would be as per the order dated in M/s …
Ravi Kumar, accused under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012, applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The State Law Officer informed the court that a notice to the informant had been served but the informant did not appear. The victim’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sabalu in a case registered under Sections 74, 331(4), 351(3), 64(1) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The court noted an inordinate delay of more than one day in lodging the FIR and observed that the alleged victim appeared to be a consenting …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravikant Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR …
Petitioner Ravi Yadav filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a character certificate issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner, through counsel Kartikey Mishra, indicated that he would be advised not to prosecute. The State, represented by Additional Chief …
Santosh @ Soti applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 501 of 2026) under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S., 2023. The FIR was lodged about seven days after the alleged incident, and the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 indicated her consent. The court examined the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sanoj Chaudhary, who was charged under Sections 65(1), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4(2) of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, highlighted a fifteen‑hour …
Vivek, a 20‑year‑old accused, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64(1), 77, 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was lodged 15 days after the alleged incident without any explanation, and that no indecent photographs or video of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sufiyan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 87 of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 5(l) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim is a consenting adult who …
The applicant, Vikash Sahini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.281 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that no photographic or video evidence of the victim was recovered and that he has no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jatin, who was arrested on 28‑06‑2026 in connection with a case (Crime No. 660 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 351(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, …
The applicant, Dharmendra, was charged in Crime No.65 of 2026 under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4(2) of the P.O.C.S.O. Act for an alleged offence at Jaswant Nagar police station, Etawah. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. indicated her …
The applicant, Shivam @ Shubham, filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29891 of 2026 concerning Crime No.207 of 2026, which alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Indian Evidence Act and Sections 3/4(3) of the POCSO Act. The State argued against bail, …
